Rebuilding leviathan: Party competition and state exploitation in post–communist democracies

Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-278

  Grzymaƚa Busse, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924121361     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618819     Document Type: Book

References (211)

1. Ades, Alberto, and Di Telia, Rafael. 1999. “Rents, Competition, and Corruption,” American Economic Review, 89, 4 (September): 982–93.
2. Ades, Alberto, and Di Telia, Rafael 1997. “The New Economics of Corruption: A Survey and Some New Results,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 496–515.
3. Ades, Alberto, and Di Telia, Rafael 1995. “Competition and Corruption.” Applied Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 169. Oxford University.
4. Ágh, Attila, ed. 1994. The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center of Democracy Studies.
5. Ágh, Attila, and Kurtán, Sándor. 1996. “‘Parliaments’ and ‘Organized Interests’ in Civil Society: Local Government Legislation and Elections in Hungary (1990–1995),” in Ágh, Attila, and Ilonszki, Gabriella, eds. Parliaments and Organized Interests: The Second Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies.
6. Ákos, Róna-Tas. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Albats, Yevgenia. 2003. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
8. Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2005. “Informal Politics and Challenges to Democracy: Administrative Resource in Kuchma’s Ukraine.” Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.
10. Amsden, Alice, Kochanowicz, Jacek, and Taylor, Lance. 1994. The Market Meets Its Match. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Ansell, Christopher, and Burris, Arthur. 1997. “Bosses of the City Unite! Labor Politics and Political Machine Consolidation, 1870–1910,” Studies in American Political Development, 11 (Spring): 1–43.
12. Appel, Hilary. 2004. A New Capitalist Order: Privatization and Ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13. Appel, Hilary. 2001. “Corruption and the Collapse of the Czech Transition Miracle,” East European Politics and Societies, 15, 3: 528–53.
14. Arian, Alan, and Barnes, Samuel. 1974. “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic Stability,” Journal of Politics, 36, 1: 592–614.
15. Auers, Daunis. 2002/2003. “Latvia’s 2002 Elections: Dawn of a New Era?” East European Constitutional Review, 11/12, 4/1 (Fall/Winter): 106–10.
16. Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.
17. Baldersheim, Harald, et al. 1996. “New Institutions of Local Government: A Comparison,” in Baldersheim, Harald, Illner, Michal, Offerdal, Audun, Rose, Lawrence, and Swaniewicz, Pawel, eds. Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East–Central Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.
18. Barnes, Andrew. 2003. “Comparative Theft: Context and Choice in the Hungarian Czech, and Russian Transformations 1989–2000,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 3: 533–65.
19. Bartlett, David. 1997. The Political Economy of Dual Transformations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. Bartlett, David. 1996. “Democracy, Institutional Change, and Stabilization Policy in Hungary,” Europe–Asia Studies, 48, 1: 47–83.
21. Bartolini, Stefano. 1999–2000. “Collusion, Competition, and Democracy,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 4: 435–70; 12, 1: 33–65.
22. Bartolini, Stefano. 2002. “Electoral and Party Competition: Analytical Dimensions and Empirical Problems,” in Gunther, Richard, Montero, Jose Ramon, and Linz, Juan, eds. Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–110.
23. Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Barzelay, Michael. 1997. “Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing,” Governance, 10, 3: 235–60.
25. Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: UC Press.
26. Bendor, Jonathan, Glazer, A., Hammond, T. 2001. “Theories of Delegation,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 235–69.
27. Bennett, Colin. 1997. “Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross–National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability,” Governance, 10, 3: 213–33.
28. Benoit, Kenneth. 2004. “Models of Electoral System Change,” Electoral Studies, 23: 363–89.
29. Benoit, Kenneth, and Hayden, Jacqueline. 2004. “Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland’s Electoral System, 1989–2001,” Journal of Politics, 66, 2: 396–427.
30. Bercík, Peter, and Nemec, Juraj. 1999. “The Civil Service System of the Slovak Republic,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 184–210.
31. Bernhard, Michael. 2000. “Institutional Choice After Communism,” East European Politics and Societies, 3: 316–47.
32. Bielasiak, Jack. 1983. “The Party: Permanent Crisis,” in Brumberg, Abraham, ed. Poland: Genesis of a Revolution. New York: Vintage.
33. Birch, Sarah. 2002. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post–Communist Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
34. Birch, Sarah. 2001. “Electoral Systems and Party System Stability in Post–Communist Europe.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 30 August–2 September 2001, San Francisco.
35. Birnir, Jóhanna Kristin. 2005. “Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization,” Comparative Political Studies, 38, 8 (October): 915–38.
36. Bruszt, Laszlo, and Stark, David. 1991. “Remaking the Political Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition,” Journal of International Affairs, 45, 1 (Summer): 201–45.
37. Brym, Robert, and Gimpelson, Vladimir. 2004. “The Size, Composition, and Dynamics of the Russian State Bureaucracy in the 1990s,” Slavic Review, 63, 1: 90–112.
38. Buchanan, James, and Tullock, Gordon. 1963. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39. Bugaric, Bojan. 2005. “The Europeanization of National Administrations in Central and Eastern Europe: Creating Formal Structures Without Substance?” Paper prepared for the Apres Enlargement Workshop, EUI, Florence, 29–30 April.
40. Bukowska, Xymena, and Czesnik, Mikolaj. 2002. “Analiza Treści Programów Wyborczych,” in Markowski, Radoslaw, ed. System Partyjny I Zachowania Wyborcze. Warsaw: ISP PAN.
41. Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and Economic Reform,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4.
42. Bunce, Valerie. 1999. “The Political Economy of Postsocialism,” Slavic Review 58, 4: 756–93.
43. Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market,” American Journal of Political Science, 48 (4 October): 742–57.
44. Carey, John. 2000. “Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 735–61.
45. Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46. CBOS. 2000. “Finansowanie partii politycznych.” Komunikat z badań (Fall).
47. Cekota, Jaromir, Gönenç, Rauf, and Kwang-Yeol Yoo. 2002. “Strengthening the Management of Public Spending in Hungary,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 336 (30 July).
48. Center for Study of Democracy. 2004. Brief. Bulgaria Sofia (July). Available at http://www.csd.bg, accessed 19 November 2004.
49. Čigane, Lolita. 2002. “A Reflection of the Shortcomings in Legislation on Party Financing in the 2001 Finance Declarations.” Soros Foundation Latvia and Transparency International “delna,” Riga Latvia (April). Available at http://www.politika.lv.
50. Cirtautas, Arista. 1995. “The Post–Leninist State: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination,” Communist and Post–Communist Studies, 28, 4: 379–92.
51. Colazingari, Silvia, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1998. “Corruption in a Paternalistic Democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America,” Political Science Quarterly, 113, 3: 447–70.
52. Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Research Note: Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49, 3: 430–51.
53. Colomer, Josep. 1995. “Strategies and Outcomes in Eastern Europe,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 2: 74–85.
54. Comisso, Ellen. 1986. “State Structures, Political Processes, and Collective Choice in CMEA States,” in Comisso, Ellen, and Tyson, Laura D’Andrea, eds. Power, Purpose, and Collective Choice: Economic Strategy in Socialist States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
55. Coppedge, Michael. 2001. “Political Darwinism in Latin America’s Lost Decade,” in Larry, Diamond, and Richard, Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 173–205.
56. Coppedge, Michael. 1993. “Parties and Society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why Competition Matters,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 1 (April): 253–74.
57. Cotta, Maurizio. 1996. “Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilising Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 69–99.
58. Crenson, Matthew, and Ginsberg, Benjamin. 2004. Downsizing Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
59. Crombrugghe, Alain de. 1997. “Wage and Pension Pressure on the Polish Budget.” Report for World Bank Project RPO 678–96, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1793.
60. Czabański, Krzysztof. 2003. “Rywin TV.” Wprost, 26 October.
61. Dallek, Robert. 1998. Flawed Giant: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1960–1973. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. De Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1974. “Need for Achievement and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Party Success in Elections and Coalitions,” American Political Science Review, 68, 3: 1207–20.
63. Della Porta, Donatella. 2000. “Political Parties and Corruption: 17 Hypotheses on the Interactions Between Parties and Corruption.” EUI Working Papers RSC 2000/60, European University Institute, Fiesole, San Domenico, Italy.
64. Della Porta, Donatella, and Meny, Yves, eds. 1997. Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Pinter.
65. Della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, Alberto Vannucci. 1997. “The ‘Perverse Effects’ of Political Corruption,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 516–38.
66. Demsetz, Harold. 1982. Economic, Legal, and Political Dimensions of Competition. Amsterdam: North–Holland.
67. Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. “Establishing Party Dominance,” in Pempel, T. J., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One–Party Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
68. Diermeier, Daniel, and Merlo, Antonio. 2000. “Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies,” Journal ofEconomic Theory, 94: 46–79.
69. Dnitrova, Zoya. 2002. Financing Election Campaigns. Unpublished Manuscript. Ljabljana: Peace Institute.
70. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
71. Duverger, Maurice. 1965. Political Parties. New York: Wiley and Sons, p. 308.
72. Dyson, Kenneth. 1977. “Party, State, and Bureaucracy in Western Germany.” Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, No. 01–063. Beverly Hills: Sage.
73. East European Constitutional Review. 2001. (Winter). Available at http://www.balticsworldwide.com/wkcrier/030U032T99.htm, accessed February 9, 2006. RFE/RL OMRI Daily Digest Report, 29 July 1996.
74. Ekiert, Grzegorz. 2001. The State After State Socialism: Poland in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard University.
75. Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Zielonka, Jan. 2003. “Introduction: Academic Boundaries and Path Dependencies Facing the EU’s Eastward Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1 (Winter): 7–23.
76. Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Enyedi, Zsolt. 2006. “Party Politics in Post–Communist Transition,” in Katz, Richard, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.
78. Enyedi, Zsolt. 2003. “Cleavage Formation in Hungary: The Role of Agency.” Paper presented at the 2003 Joint Sessions of the ECPR Edinburgh.
79. Enyedi, Zsolt. 1996. “Organizing a Sub–Cultural Party in Eastern Europe,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 377–96.
80. Epstein, David, and O’Halloryn, Sharyn. 1994. “Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion,” American Journal of Political Science, 38/3: 697–722.
81. European Union Commission. 2000. Regular Report on the Czech Republic’s Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: EU.
82. Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Eyal, Gil, Szelényi, Ivan, and Townsley, Eleanor. 1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists. London: Verso.
84. Fainsod, Merle. 1963. Bureaucracy and Modernization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
85. Fainsod, Merle. 1958. Smolensk Under Soviet Rule. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
86. Fainsod, Merle. 1953. How Russia Is Ruled. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
87. Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–53.
89. Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control,” Public Choice, 30: 5–25.
90. Fidrmuc, Jan, Fidrmuc, Jarko, and Horvath, Julius. 2002. “Visegrad Economies: Growth Experience and Prospects.” GDN Global Research Project: Determinants of Economic Growth.
91. Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1995. “The Politics of Property Rights,” American Political Science Review, 89, 4: 867–81.
92. Fish, M. Steven. 1998. “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Postcommunist World,” East European Politics and Societies, 12: 31–78.
93. Freedom House. 2002. Nations in Transit, 2001. Washington: Freedom House.
94. Frič, Pavol, et al. 1999. Korupce na český způsob. Prague: G Plus G.
95. Friedrich, Carl, and Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1956. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
96. Frydman, Roman, Murphy, Kenneth, and Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 1998. Capitalism with a Comrade’s Face. Budapest: Central European University Press.
97. Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization,” World Politics, 54 (April), pp. 308–37.
98. Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post–Communist Presidencies,” Comparative Political Studies, 30: 523–52.
99. Ganev, Venelin. 2005. Preying on the State: State Formation in Post–Communist Bulgaria (1989–1997). Unpublished Manuscript.
100. Ganev, Venelin. 2000. “Post–Communism as a Historical Episode of State Building, or Explaining the Weakness of the Post–Communist State.” Paper presented at the twelfth International Conference of Europeanists Chicago, March.
101. Gazsó, Ferenc. 1992. “Cadre Bureaucracy and the Intelligentsia,” Journal of Communist Studies (September): 76–90.
102. Geddes, Barbara. 1994. The Politician’s Dilemma. Berkeley: University of California Press.
103. Geddes, Barbara, and Neto, Artur Ribeiro. 1992. “Institutional Sources of Corruption in Brazil,” Third World Quarterly, 4: 641–2.
104. Gimpelson, Vladimir, and Treisman, Daniel. 2002. “Fiscal Games and Public Employment,” World Politics, 54: 145–83.
105. Goetz, Klaus H. 2001. “Making Sense ofPost–Communist Central Administration: Modernization Europeanization or Latinization?” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1032–51.
106. Goetz, Klaus, and Margetts, Helen. 1999. “The Solitary Center: The Core Executive in Central and Eastern Europe,” Governance, 12, 4 (October): 425–53.
107. Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy,” World Politics, 53: 588–622.
108. Goldsmith, Arthur. 1999. “Africa’s Overgrown State Reconsidered,” World Politics, 4: 520–46.
109. Government of the Czech Republic. 1998. “Programové prohlašení Vlády České Republiky” [Programmatic declaration of the Government of the Czech Republic] (27 January). Available at http://www.vlada.cz/ASC/urad/historie/vlada98/dokumenty/progrprohl.il2.htm.
110. Government of the Republic of Slovakia. 2001. “Správa o boji proti korupcii na Slovensku.” [Report of the Slovak government]. October. Available at http://www. government.gov.sk, accessed 23 November 2002.
111. Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion, and Diversity,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1013–31.
112. Greene, Kenneth. 2004. Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
113. Gros, Daniel, and Suhcrke, Marc. 2000. “Ten Years After: What Is Special About Transition Countries?” EBRD Working Paper No. 56, August.
114. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2004. “Informal Institutions and the Post–Communist State.” Paper prepared for the Conference on the Role of Ideas in PostCommunist Politics: A Re–Evaluation Havighurst Center, Luxembourg, 5–9 July.
115. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State,” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 10 (December): 1123–47.
116. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117. Grzymala-Busse, Anna, and Innes, Abby. 2003. “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1: 64–73.
118. Grzymala-Busse, Anna, and Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the Post–Communist State,” Politics and Society, 30, 4 (December): 529–54.
119. György, Istvan. 1999. “The Civil Service System of Hungary,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 131–58.
120. Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon.
121. Hadenius, Stig. 1985. Swedish Politics During the 20th Century. Boras: Swedish Institute.
122. Hegedüs, József. 1999. “Hungarian Local Government,” in Kirchner Emil, ed., Decentralization and Transition in the Visegrad. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
123. Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Johnston, Michael, and Levine, Victor, eds. 1989. Political Corruption. New Brunswick: Transaction.
124. Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform,” World Politics, 50, 2 (January): 203–34.
125. Hellman, Joel, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2001. “Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economics,” Finance and Development, 38, 3 (September).
126. Hellman, Joel, Jones, Geraint, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2000. “Seize the State, Seize the Day.” World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2444.
127. Hendley, Katherine. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
128. Herrera, Yoshiko. 2001. “Russian Economic Reform 1991–1998,” in Barany, Zoltan, and Moser, Robert, eds. Challenges to Democratic Transition In Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
129. Hesse, Joachim Jens. 1993. “From Transformation to Modernization: Administrative Change in Central and Eastern Europe,” in idem. ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
130. Heywood, Paul. 1997. “Political Corruption: Problems and Perspectives,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 417–35.
131. Hirszowicz, Maria. 1980. The Bureaucratic Leviathan. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
132. Hojnacki, William. 1996. “Politicization as a Civil Service Dilemma,” in Bekke, Hans, Perry, James, and Toonen, Theo, eds. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 137–64.
133. Holmes, Stephen. 1996. “Cultural Legacies or State Collapse: Probing the PostCommunist Dilemma,” in Mandelbaum, Michael, ed. Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
134. Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective,” in Essays in Economic and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Stockholm: Swedish School of Economics.
135. Horowitz, Shale, and Petréš, Martin. 2003. “Pride and Prejudice in Prague: Understanding Early Policy Error and Belsteol Reform in Czech Economic Transition,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 2: 231–65.
136. Horráth, Tamás, ed. 2000. Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
137. Hough, Jerry. 1969. The Soviet Prefects. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
138. Hough, Jerry, and Fainsod, Merle. 1979. How the Soviet Union Is Governed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
139. Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post–Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
140. Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
141. Humphrey, Caroline. 2002. The Unmaking of Soviet Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
142. Hutchcroft, Paul. 1998. Booty Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
143. Ichino, Nahomi. 2006. Thugs and Voters: Political Tournaments in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis Department of Political Science, Stanford University.
144. Ikstens, Jānis, Smilov, Daniel, and Walecki, Marcin. 2002. “Campaign Finance in Central and Eastern Europe,” IFES Reports (April). Washington: IFES.
145. Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2002. “A Functional Clarification of Parliamentary Committees in Hungary, 1990–1998,” in Olson, David, and Crowther, William, eds. Committees in Post–Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 21–43.
146. Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2000. “The Second Generation Political Elite in Hungary: Partial Consolidation,” in Frentzel–Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe. Warsaw: PAN ISP.
147. Ilonszki, Gabriella. 1998. “Representation Deficit in a New Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Hungarian Case,” Communist and Post–Communist Studies, 14: 157–70.
148. INEKO for the Slovak Government. 2000. “Zaverečná správa o výsledkoch a odporučaniach audity súladu činnosti a financovania úsredných orgánov śtátnej správy,” August.
149. Innes, Abby. 2002. “Party Competition in Post–Communist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery,” Comparative Politics, 35, 1: 85–105.
150. International Monetary Fund. 1999. Report on Observance of Standards and Codes, August 1999/March 2000.
151. Ishiyama, John. 1997. “Transitional Electoral Systems in Post–Communist Eastern Europe,” Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1: 95–115.
152. Issacharoff Samuel, and Pildes, Richard. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process,” Stanford Law Review (February): 642–717.
153. Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint,” World Politics, 50, 4: 507–46.
154. Jabƚoŕiski, A. 1998. “Europeanization of Public Administration in Central Europe: Poland in Comparative Perspective.” NATO Individual Democratic Institution Research Fellowships, Final Report 1995–7.
155. Jackman, Robert. 1993. Power Without Force. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
156. Jacoby, Wade. 2004. The Enlargement of the EU and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
157. Jarosz, Maria. 2001. Manowce Polskiej Prywatyzacji. Warszawa: PWN SA.
158. Jednotka boji proti korupci, Ministry of Interior. 2001. Zpráva o korupci v ČR a o plnění harmonogramu opatření vládního programu boje proti korupci v ČR.
159. Johns, Michael. 2003. “Do as I Say and Not as I Do: The European Union, Eastern Europe, and Minority Rights,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 4 (November): 682–99.
160. Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in PostSoviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
161. Jones Luong, Pauline, and Weinthal, Erika. 2004. “Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks and Negotiated Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, 98, 1: 139–52.
162. Jungerstam-Mulders, Susanne, ed. 2006. Post–Communist EUMemberStates: Parties and Party Systems. London: Ashgate.
163. Kalniņš, Valts, and Čigāne, Lolita. 2003. “On the Road Toward a More Honest Society.” Policy Report, January. Available at http://www.politika.lv.
164. Kaminski, Antoni. 1992. An Institutional Theory of Communist Regimes: Design, Function, and Breakdown. San Francisco: ICS Press.
165. Kang, David. 2002. Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
166. Kaplan, Karel. 1993. Aparát ÚV KSC v letech 1948–1968. Sesity Ústavu pro Soudobé Dějiny AV ČR Sv. 10.
167. Kaplan, Karel. 1987. The Short March: The Communist Takeover of Power in Czechoslovakia, 1945–1948. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
168. Karasimeonov, Georgii. 1996. “Bulgaria’s New Party System,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilizing Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge.
169. Karklins, Rasma. 2002. Typology of Post–Communist Corruption, Problems of PostCommunism, 49 (July/August): 22–32.
170. Karl-Heinz, Nassmacher. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe,” in Alexander, Herbert, ed. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–67.
171. Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy,” Party Politics, 1: 5–28.
172. Kaufman, Daniel. 2003. “Rethinking Governance: Empirical Lessons Challenge Orthodoxy.” World Bank Working Paper.
173. Kaufman, Daniel, Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. 2005. Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators 1996–2004. Washington: World Bank.
174. Keri, Laszlo. 1994. Balance: The Hungarian Government 1990–1994. Budapest: Korridor.
175. Kettle, Steve. 1995. “Straining at the Seams.” Transition (April). Available at http://www.tol.cz.
176. King, Roswitha. 2003. “Conversations with Civil Servants: Interview Results from Estonia, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Poland.” Manuscript, University of Latvia Riga.
177. Kiss, Csilla. 2003. “From Liberalism to Conservatism: The Federation of Young Democrats in Post–Communist Hungary,” East European Politics and Societies, 16, 3, 739–63.
178. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. “Divergent Paths of Post–Communist Democracies,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 299–323.
179. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 845–79.
180. Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldová, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Taka, Gábor. 1999. Post–Communist Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
181. Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. Forthcoming. “Citizen–Politician Linkages: An Introduction,” in Kitschelt and Wilkinson, eds. Patrons, Clients, and Linkages. Manuscript, Duke University.
182. KNAB. 2003. “Progress and Results in the Field of Corruption Prevention and Combat,” Periodic Update 24 (November). Available at http://www.knab.gov.lv/ru/actual/article.php?id=18863, accessed 12 February 2004.
183. Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
184. Kochanowicz, Jacek. 1994. “Reforming Weak States and Deficient Bureaucracies,” in Nelson, JoanM., Kochanowicz, Jacek, Mizsei, Kalman, andMunoz, Oscar, eds. Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Washington: Overseas Development Council, pp. 194–206.
185. Koole, Ruud. 1996. “Cadre, Catch–all or Cartel? A Comment,” Party Politics, 4: 507–23.
186. Kopecký, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post–Communist Europe: The Nature of the Symbiosis,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 251–73.
187. Kopstein, Jeff, and Reilly, David. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, 53, 1: 1–37.
188. Körösényi, Andras. 1999. Government and Politics in Hungary. Budapest: CEUPress.
189. Krasner, Stephen. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, 16, 2 (January): 223–46.
190. Krašovec, Alenka. 2001. “Party and State in Democratic Slovenia,” in Lewis, Paul G., ed. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post–Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 93–106.
191. Krause, Kevin Deegan. 2006. Elected Affinities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
192. Krueger, Anne. 1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent–Seeking Society,” American Economic Review, 64, 3: 291–303.
193. Krupavičius, Algis. 1998. “The Post–Communist Transition and Institutionalization of Lithuania’s Parties,” Political Studies, 46, 3: 465–91.
194. Kunicová, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption,” British Journal of Political Science, 35: 573–606.
195. Kurczewski, Jacek. 1999. “The Rule of Law in Poland,” in Přibán, Jiří, and Young, James, eds. The Rule ofLaw in Central Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
196. Lancaster, Thomas D., and Montinolla, Gabriella. 2001. “Comparative Political Corruption: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 3 (Fall): 3–27.
197. La Palombara, Joseph. 1994. “Structural and Institutional Aspects of Corruption,” Social Research, 61, 2 (Summer): 325–50.
198. Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1999. “Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–96.
199. Lawson, Stephanie. 1993. “Conceptual Issues in the Comparative Study of Regime Change and Democratization,” Comparative Politics, 25, 2 (January): 183–205.
200. Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
201. Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
202. Levite, Ariel, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1983. “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems,” Comparative Politics, 15, 3 (April): 295–327.
203. Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor–Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
204. Lewanski, Rudolf. 1997. “Italian Civil Service: A Pre–Modern Bureaucracy in Transition?” Paper prepared for the Conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Indiana University, 5–8 April.
205. Lewis, Paul, and Gortat, Radzislawa. 1995. “Models of Party Development and Questions of State Dependence in Poland,” Party Politics, 4: 599–608.
206. Lewis, Paul G. 2000. Political Parties in Post–Communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.
207. Lieven, Anatol. 1994. The Baltic Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
208. Lijphart, Arendt. 1999. Patterns ofDemocracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
209. Lijphart, Arendt., ed. 1992. Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
210. Lindberg, Staffan. 2004. The Power of Elections: Democratic Participation, Competition, and Legitimacy in Africa. Lund: Lund University.
211. Linek, Lukáš. 2002. “Czech Republic,” European Journal of Political Research, 41: 931–40.