Error-Free DNA Damage Tolerance and Sister Chromatid Proximity during DNA Replication Rely on the Polα/Primase/Ctf4 Complex

Molecular Cell

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 812-823

  Fumasoni, Marco ^a   Zwicky, Katharina ^b   Vanoli, Fabio ^a,c   Lopes, Massimo ^b   Branzei, Dana ^a  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CTF4 PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ALPHA; DNA PRIMASE; PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CTF4 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE BETA; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE TOLERANCE; DNA METABOLISM; DNA REPLICATION; GENOME; MUTAGENESIS; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; REPLISOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMATID; DNA REPAIR; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTOR; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CHROMATIDS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA POLYMERASE I; DNA PRIMASE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; MUTATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84923902089     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.038     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anand R.P., Lovett S.T., Haber J.E. Break-induced DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a010397.
2. Atkinson J., McGlynn P. Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:3475-3492.
3. Aze A., Zhou J.C., Costa A., Costanzo V. DNA replication and homologous recombination factors: acting together to maintain genome stability. Chromosoma 2013, 122:401-413.
4. Becker J.R., Nguyen H.D., Wang X., Bielinsky A.K. Mcm10 deficiency causes defective-replisome-induced mutagenesis and a dependency on error-free postreplicative repair. Cell Cycle 2014, 13:1737-1748.
5. Bermejo R., Capra T., Jossen R., Colosio A., Frattini C., Carotenuto W., Cocito A., Doksani Y., Klein H., Gómez-González B., et al. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 2011, 146:233-246.
6. Branzei D. Ubiquitin family modifications and template switching. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585:2810-2817.
7. Branzei D., Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:208-219.
8. Branzei D., Vanoli F., Foiani M. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 2008, 456:915-920.
9. Cejka P., Vondrejs V., Storchová Z. Dissection of the functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 postreplicative repair group in mutagenesis and UV sensitivity. Genetics 2001, 159:953-963.
10. Costantino L., Sotiriou S.K., Rantala J.K., Magin S., Mladenov E., Helleday T., Haber J.E., Iliakis G., Kallioniemi O.P., Halazonetis T.D. Break-induced replication repair of damaged forks induces genomic duplications in human cells. Science 2014, 343:88-91.
11. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:153-159.
12. Covo S., Westmoreland J.W., Gordenin D.A., Resnick M.A. Cohesin Is limiting for the suppression of DNA damage-induced recombination between homologous chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001006.
13. Doksani Y., Bermejo R., Fiorani S., Haber J.E., Foiani M. Replicon dynamics, dormant origin firing, and terminal fork integrity after double-strand break formation. Cell 2009, 137:247-258.
14. Gambus A., van Deursen F., Polychronopoulos D., Foltman M., Jones R.C., Edmondson R.D., Calzada A., Labib K. A key role for Ctf4 in coupling the MCM2-7 helicase to DNA polymerase alpha within the eukaryotic replisome. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2992-3004.
15. Gerbi S.A., Bielinsky A.K. DNA replication and chromatin. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2002, 12:243-248.
16. Giannattasio M., Zwicky K., Follonier C., Foiani M., Lopes M., Branzei D. Visualization of recombination-mediated damage bypass by template switching. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21:884-892.
17. Gonzalez-Huici V., Szakal B., Urulangodi M., Psakhye I., Castellucci F., Menolfi D., Rajakumara E., Fumasoni M., Bermejo R., Jentsch S., Branzei D. DNA bending facilitates the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway and upholds genome integrity. EMBO J. 2014, 33:327-340.
18. Halazonetis T.D., Gorgoulis V.G., Bartek J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 2008, 319:1352-1355.
19. Hanna J.S., Kroll E.S., Lundblad V., Spencer F.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:3144-3158.
20. Heller R.C., Marians K.J. Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:932-943.
21. Hoege C., Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Pyrowolakis G., Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 2002, 419:135-141.
22. Jackson S.P., Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009, 461:1071-1078.
23. Karras G.I., Fumasoni M., Sienski G., Vanoli F., Branzei D., Jentsch S. Noncanonical role of the 9-1-1 clamp in the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway. Mol. Cell 2013, 49:536-546.
24. Kerzendorfer C., Colnaghi R., Abramowicz I., Carpenter G., O'Driscoll M. Meier-Gorlin syndrome and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: two developmental disorders highlighting the importance of efficient DNA replication for normal development and neurogenesis. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2013, 12:637-644.
25. Kouprina N., Kroll E., Bannikov V., Bliskovsky V., Gizatullin R., Kirillov A., Shestopalov B., Zakharyev V., Hieter P., Spencer F., et al. CTF4 (CHL15) mutants exhibit defective DNA metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12:5736-5747.
26. Krogh B.O., Symington L.S. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004, 38:233-271.
27. Lehmann A.R., Fuchs R.P. Gaps and forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2006, 5:1495-1498.
28. Liberi G., Maffioletti G., Lucca C., Chiolo I., Baryshnikova A., Cotta-Ramusino C., Lopes M., Pellicioli A., Haber J.E., Foiani M. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:339-350.
29. Liu X., Wang X., Reyes-Lamothe R., Sherratt D. Replication-directed sister chromosome alignment in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 75:1090-1097.
30. Longhese M.P., Jovine L., Plevani P., Lucchini G. Conditional mutations in the yeast DNA primase genes affect different aspects of DNA metabolism and interactions in the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex. Genetics 1993, 133:183-191.
31. Lopes M., Foiani M., Sogo J.M. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:15-27.
32. Lucchini G., Mazza C., Scacheri E., Plevani P. Genetic mapping of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase I gene and characterization of a pol1 temperature-sensitive mutant altered in DNA primase-polymerase complex stability. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1988, 212:459-465.
33. Lydeard J.R., Lipkin-Moore Z., Sheu Y.J., Stillman B., Burgers P.M., Haber J.E. Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for pre-RC assembly. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:1133-1144.
34. Marini F., Pellicioli A., Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Stern D.F., Foiani M. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J. 1997, 16:639-650.
35. McLellan J.L., O'Neil N.J., Barrett I., Ferree E., van Pel D.M., Ushey K., Sipahimalani P., Bryan J., Rose A.M., Hieter P. Synthetic lethality of cohesins with PARPs and replication fork mediators. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002574.
36. Michaelis C., Ciosk R., Nasmyth K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 1997, 91:35-45.
37. Neelsen K., Lopes M. Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 10.1038/nrm3935.
38. Neelsen K.J., Zanini I.M., Herrador R., Lopes M. Oncogenes induce genotoxic stress by mitotic processing of unusual replication intermediates. J.Cell Biol. 2013, 200:699-708.
39. Neelsen K.J., Chaudhuri A.R., Follonier C., Herrador R., Lopes M. Visualization and interpretation of eukaryotic DNA replication intermediates invivo by electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1094:177-208.
40. O'Driscoll M., Jeggo P.A. The role of the DNA damage response pathways in brain development and microcephaly: insight from human disorders. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2008, 7:1039-1050.
41. Ogiwara H., Ui A., Lai M.S., Enomoto T., Seki M. Chl1 and Ctf4 are required for damage-induced recombinations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 354:222-226.
42. Onoda F., Seki M., Miyajima A., Enomoto T. Elevation of sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sgs1 disruptants and the relevance of the disruptants as a system to evaluate mutations in Bloom's syndrome gene. Mutat. Res. 2000, 459:203-209.
43. Papouli E., Chen S., Davies A.A., Huttner D., Krejci L., Sung P., Ulrich H.D. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:123-133.
44. Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Sacher M., Hoege C., Jentsch S. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 2005, 436:428-433.
45. Putnam C.D., Hayes T.K., Kolodner R.D. Post-replication repair suppresses duplication-mediated genome instability. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000933.
46. Ray Chaudhuri A., Hashimoto Y., Herrador R., Neelsen K.J., Fachinetti D., Bermejo R., Cocito A., Costanzo V., Lopes M. Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:417-423.
47. Sale J.E. Competition, collaboration and coordination-determining how cells bypass DNA damage. J.Cell Sci. 2012, 125:1633-1643.
48. Simon A.C., Zhou J.C., Perera R.L., van Deursen F., Evrin C., Ivanova M.E., Kilkenny M.L., Renault L., Kjaer S., Matak-Vinković D., et al. A Ctf4 trimer couples the CMG helicase to DNA polymerase α in the eukaryotic replisome. Nature 2014, 510:293-297.
49. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002, 297:599-602.
50. Song W., Dominska M., Greenwell P.W., Petes T.D. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111:E2210-E2218.
51. Straight A.F., Belmont A.S., Robinett C.C., Murray A.W. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6:1599-1608.
52. Suzuki M., Niimi A., Limsirichaikul S., Tomida S., Miao Huang Q., Izuta S., Usukura J., Itoh Y., Hishida T., Akashi T., et al. PCNA mono-ubiquitination and activation of translesion DNA polymerases by DNA polymerase alpha. J.Biochem. 2009, 146:13-21.
53. Szakal B., Branzei D. Premature Cdk1/Cdc5/Mus81 pathway activation induces aberrant replication and deleterious crossover. EMBO J. 2013, 32:1155-1167.
54. Tanaka H., Katou Y., Yagura M., Saitoh K., Itoh T., Araki H., Bando M., Shirahige K. Ctf4 coordinates the progression of helicase and DNA polymerase alpha. Genes Cells 2009, 14:807-820.
55. Tittel-Elmer M., Lengronne A., Davidson M.B., Bacal J., François P., Hohl M., Petrini J.H., Pasero P., Cobb J.A. Cohesin association to replication sites depends on rad50 and promotes fork restart. Mol. Cell 2012, 48:98-108.
56. Uhlmann F., Lottspeich F., Nasmyth K. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 1999, 400:37-42.
57. van der Lelij P., Oostra A.B., Rooimans M.A., Joenje H., de Winter J.P. Diagnostic Overlap between Fanconi Anemia and the Cohesinopathies: Roberts Syndrome and Warsaw Breakage Syndrome. Anemia 2010, 2010:565268.
58. Vanoli F., Fumasoni M., Szakal B., Maloisel L., Branzei D. Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switch. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001205.
59. Warren C.D., Eckley D.M., Lee M.S., Hanna J.S., Hughes A., Peyser B., Jie C., Irizarry R., Spencer F.A. S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:1724-1735.
60. Waters L.S., Walker G.C. The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:8971-8976.
61. Xu H., Boone C., Brown G.W. Genetic dissection of parallel sister-chromatid cohesion pathways. Genetics 2007, 176:1417-1429.
62. Yoshizawa-Sugata N., Masai H. Roles of human AND-1 in chromosome transactions in S phase. J.Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:20718-20728.