Visualization of recombination-mediated damage bypass by template switching

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 884-892

  Giannattasio, Michele ^a,b   Zwicky, Katharina ^c   Follonier, Cindy ^c,d   Foiani, Marco ^a,b   Lopes, Massimo ^c   Branzei, Dana ^a  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; CRUCIFORM DNA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; FUNGAL DNA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHROMATID; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRUCTURE; DNA SYNTHESIS; DNA TEMPLATE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE LOCUS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GENOTOXICITY; HOLLIDAY JUNCTION; MEIOSIS; MINICHROMOSOME; MITOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TEMPLATE SWITCHING; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; BIOSYNTHESIS; DNA REPLICATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; UBIQUITINATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CHROMATIDS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, CRUCIFORM; DNA, FUNGAL; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TEMPLATES, GENETIC; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84922335476     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2888     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Branzei, D., Foiani, M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 208-219 (2010).
2. Weinert, T., Kaochar, S., Jones, H., Paek, A., Clark, A.J. The replication fork's five degrees of freedom, their failure and genome rearrangements. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 778-784 (2009).
3. Sale, J.E. Competition, collaboration and coordination: determining how cells bypass DNA damage. J. Cell Sci. 125, 1633-1643 (2012).
4. Zhang, H., Lawrence, C.W. The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15954-15959 (2005).
5. Prakash, L. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 184, 471-478 (1981).
6. Lehmann, A.R. Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 66, 319-337 (1972).
7. Branzei, D., Vanoli, F., Foiani, M. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456, 915-920 (2008).
8. Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.L., Pyrowolakis, G., Jentsch, S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419, 135-141 (2002).
9. Stelter, P., Ulrich, H.D. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425, 188-191 (2003).
10. Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.L., Sacher, M., Hoege, C., Jentsch, S. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436, 428-433 (2005).
11. Papouli, E. et al. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19, 123-133 (2005).
12. Minca, E.C., Kowalski, D. Multiple Rad5 activities mediate sister chromatid recombination to bypass DNA damage at stalled replication forks. Mol. Cell 38, 649-661 (2010).
13. Haracska, L., Torres-Ramos, C.A., Johnson, R.E., Prakash, S., Prakash, L. Opposing effects of ubiquitin conjugation and SUMO modification of PCNA on replicational bypass of DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 4267-4274 (2004).
14. Lopes, M., Foiani, M., Sogo, J.M. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 21, 15-27 (2006).
15. Heller, R.C., Marians, K.J. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand. Nature 439, 557-562 (2006).
16. Torres-Ramos, C.A., Prakash, S., Prakash, L. Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2419-2426 (2002).
17. Vanoli, F., Fumasoni, M., Szakal, B., Maloisel, L., Branzei, D. Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switch. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001205 (2010).
18. Torres-Ramos, C.A., Prakash, S., Prakash, L. Requirement of yeast DNA polymerase ? in post-replicational repair of UV-damaged DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25445-25448 (1997).
19. Karras, G.I., Jentsch, S. The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 141, 255-267 (2010).
20. Liberi, G. et al. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 19, 339-350 (2005).
21. Ashton, T.M., Mankouri, H.W., Heidenblut, A., McHugh, P.J., Hickson, I.D. Pathways for Holliday junction processing during homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 1921-1933 (2011).
22. Szakal, B., Branzei, D. Premature Cdk1/Cdc5/Mus81 pathway activation induces aberrant replication and deleterious crossover. EMBO J. 32, 1155-1167 (2013).
23. Mankouri, H.W., Ashton, T.M., Hickson, I.D. Holliday junction-containing DNA structures persist in cells lacking Sgs1 or Top3 following exposure to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4944-4949 (2011).
24. Osman, F., Whitby, M.C. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6, 1004-1017 (2007).
25. Sung, P., Klein, H. Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 739-750 (2006).
26. Branzei, D. Ubiquitin family modifications and template switching. FEBS Lett. 585, 2810-2817 (2011).
27. Ciccia, A. et al. Polyubiquitinated PCNA recruits the ZRANB3 translocase to maintain genomic integrity after replication stress. Mol. Cell 47, 396-409 (2012).
28. Blastyák, A. et al. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol. Cell 28, 167-175 (2007).
29. Burkovics, P., Sebesta, M., Balogh, D., Haracska, L., Krejci, L. Strand invasion by HLTF as a mechanism for template switch in fork rescue. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 1711-1720 (2014).
30. Glineburg, M.R., Chavez, A., Agrawal, V., Brill, S.J., Johnson, F.B. Resolution by unassisted Top3 points to template switch recombination intermediates during DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 33193-33204 (2013).
31. Lehmann, A.R., Fuchs, R.P. Gaps and forks in DNA replication: rediscovering old models. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5, 1495-1498 (2006).
32. Alexandrov, L.B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415-421 (2013).
33. Tateishi, S., Sakuraba, Y., Masuyama, S., Inoue, H., Yamaizumi, M. Dysfunction of human Rad18 results in defective postreplication repair and hypersensitivity to multiple mutagens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7927-7932 (2000).
34. Hishida, T., Kubota, Y., Carr, A.M., Iwasaki, H. RAD6-RAD18-RAD5-pathway-dependent tolerance to chronic low-dose ultraviolet light. Nature 457, 612-615 (2009).
35. Daigaku, Y., Davies, A.A., Ulrich, H.D. Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature 465, 951-955 (2010).
36. Alvaro, D., Lisby, M., Rothstein, R. Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet. 3, e228 (2007).
37. Mozlin, A.M., Fung, C.W., Symington, L.S. Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 paralogs in sister chromatid recombination. Genetics 178, 113-126 (2008).
38. Fabre, F., Chan, A., Heyer, W.D., Gangloff, S. Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16887-16892 (2002).
39. Runge, K.W., Zakian, V.A. Introduction of extra telomeric DNA sequences into Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in telomere elongation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1488-1497 (1989).
40. Bzymek, M., Thayer, N.H., Oh, S.D., Kleckner, N., Hunter, N. Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair. Nature 464, 937-941 (2010).
41. Neelsen, K.J., Chaudhuri, A.R., Follonier, C., Herrador, R., Lopes, M. Visualization and interpretation of eukaryotic DNA replication intermediates in vivo by electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 1094, 177-208 (2014).
42. Cromie, G.A. et al. Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination. Cell 127, 1167-1178 (2006).
43. Liberi, G. et al. Methods to study replication fork collapse in budding yeast. Methods Enzymol. 409, 442-462 (2006).
44. Lopes, M., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Liberi, G., Foiani, M. Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell 12, 1499-1510 (2003).
45. Allers, T., Lichten, M. A method for preparing genomic DNA that restrains branch migration of Holliday junctions. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, e6 (2000).
46. Joo, C., McKinney, S.A., Lilley, D.M., Ha, T. Exploring rare conformational species and ionic effects in DNA Holliday junctions using single-molecule spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 341, 739-751 (2004).
47. Cejka, P., Plank, J.L., Bachrati, C.Z., Hickson, I.D., Kowalczykowski, S.C. Rmi1 stimulates decatenation of double Holliday junctions during dissolution by Sgs1-Top3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1377-1382 (2010).
48. Gonzalez-Huici, V. et al. DNA bending facilitates the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway and upholds genome integrity. EMBO J. 33, 327-340 (2014).
49. Follonier, C., Oehler, J., Herrador, R., Lopes, M. Friedreich's ataxia-associated GAA repeats induce replication-fork reversal and unusual molecular junctions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 486-494 (2013).
50. Sogo, J.M., Lopes, M., Foiani, M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297, 599-602 (2002).
51. Szostak, J.W., Orr-Weaver, T.L., Rothstein, R.J., Stahl, F.W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 33, 25-35 (1983).
52. Karras, G.I. et al. Noncanonical role of the 9-1-1 clamp in the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway. Mol. Cell 49, 536-546 (2013).
53. Wu, L., Hickson, I.D. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426, 870-874 (2003).
54. Ira, G., Malkova, A., Liberi, G., Foiani, M., Haber, J.E. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115, 401-411 (2003).
55. Bugreev, D.V., Yu, X., Egelman, E.H., Mazin, A.V. Novel pro-and anti-recombination activities of the Bloom's syndrome helicase. Genes Dev. 21, 3085-3094 (2007).
56. Hu, Y. et al. RECQL5/Recql5 helicase regulates homologous recombination and suppresses tumor formation via disruption of Rad51 presynaptic filaments. Genes Dev. 21, 3073-3084 (2007).
57. Robert, T., Dervins, D., Fabre, F., Gangloff, S. Mrc1 and Srs2 are major actors in the regulation of spontaneous crossover. EMBO J. 25, 2837-2846 (2006).
58. Gangloff, S., McDonald, J.P., Bendixen, C., Arthur, L., Rothstein, R. The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8391-8398 (1994).
59. Branzei, D. et al. Ubc9-and Mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127, 509-522 (2006).
60. Sollier, J. et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 1671-1682 (2009).