Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 21, 2014, Pages

  Song, Wei ^a   Dominska, Margaret ^a   Greenwell, Patricia W ^a   Petes, Thomas D ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Break induced replication; Loss of heterozygosity; Mitotic cross overs

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ALPHA; DNA HELICASE; GUANINE QUADRUPLEX; PROTEIN RRM3P; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOME DUPLICATION; CHROMOSOME FRAGILITY; CHROMOSOME MAP; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENE CONVERSION; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HOMOZYGOTE; MITOTIC RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPOSON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TELOMERE;

BREAK-INDUCED REPLICATION; LOSS OF HETEROZYGOSITY; MITOTIC CROSS-OVERS;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOMICS; LOSS OF HETEROZYGOSITY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84901659561     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406847111     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Durkin SG, Glover TW (2007) Chromosome fragile sites. Annu Rev Genet 41: 169-192.
2. Debatisse M, Le Tallec B, Letessier A, Dutrillaux B, Brison O (2012) Common fragile sites: Mechanisms of instability revisited. Trends Genet 28(1):22-32.
3. Casper AM, Rosen DM, Rajula KD (2012) Sites of genetic instability in mitosis and cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1267:24-30.
4. Freudenreich CH (2007) Chromosome fragility: Molecular mechanisms and cellular consequences. Front Biosci 12:4911-4924.
5. Aguilera A, Garcia-Muse T (2013) Causes of genetic instability. Annu Rev Genet 47: 1-32.
6. Casper AM, Nghiem P, Arlt MF, Glover TW (2002) ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111(6):779-789. (Pubitemid 36106400)
7. Cha RS, Kleckner N (2002) ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297(5581):602-606. (Pubitemid 34815344)
8. Ying S, et al. (2013) MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression. Nat Cell Biol 15(8):1001-1007.
9. Kim JC, Mirkin SM (2013) The balancing act of DNA repeat expansions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 23(3):280-288.
10. Lobachev KS, Rattray A, Narayanan V (2007) Hairpin-and cruciform-mediated chromosome breakage: Causes and consequences in eukaryotic cells. Front Biosci 12: 4208-4220.
11. Lemoine FJ, Degtyareva NP, Lobachev K, Petes TD (2005) Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120(5):587-598. (Pubitemid 40343072)
12. Azvolinsky A, Giresi PG, Lieb JD, Zakian VA (2009) Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 34(6):722-734.
13. Fachinetti D, et al. (2010) Replication termination at eukaryotic chromosomes is mediated by Top2 and occurs at genomic loci containing pausing elements. Mol Cell 39(4):595-605.
14. Greenfeder SA, Newlon CS (1992) Replication forks pause at yeast centromeres. Mol Cell Biol 12(9):4056-4066.
15. Deshpande AM, Newlon CS (1996) DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 272(5264):1030-1033. (Pubitemid 26259324)
16. Feng W, Di Rienzi SC, Raghuraman MK, Brewer BJ (2011) Replication stress-induced chromosome breakage is correlated with replication fork progression and is preceded by single-stranded DNA formation. G3 (Bethesda) 1(5):327-335.
17. Kunkel TA, Burgers PM (2008) Dividing the workload at a eukaryotic replication fork. Trends Cell Biol 18(11):521-527.
18. Rosen DM, Younkin EM, Miller SD, Casper AM (2013) Fragile site instability in Sac-charomyces cerevisiae causes loss of heterozygosity by mitotic crossovers and break-induced replication. PLoS Genet 9(9):e1003817.
19. Casper AM, Mieczkowski PA, Gawel M, Petes TD (2008) Low levels of DNA polymerase alpha induce mitotic and meiotic instability in the ribosomal DNA gene cluster of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 4(6):e1000105.
20. St Charles J, et al. (2012) High-resolution genome-wide analysis of irradiated (UV and γ-rays) diploid yeast cells reveals a high frequency of genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events. Genetics 190(4):1267-1284.
21. Gresham D, et al. (2010) Optimized detection of sequence variation in heterozygous genomes using DNA microarrays with isothermal-melting probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(4):1482-1487.
22. St Charles J, Petes TD (2013) High-resolution mapping of spontaneous mitotic recombination hotspots on the 1.1 Mb arm of yeast chromosome IV. PLoS Genet 9(4): e1003434.
23. Yin Y, Petes TD (2013) Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of UV-induced mitotic recombination events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 9(10):e1003894.
24. Pâques F, Haber JE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by doublestrand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63(2):349-404. (Pubitemid 29264976)
25. Andersen SL, Petes TD (2012) Reciprocal uniparental disomy in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(25):9947-9952.
26. Barbera MA, Petes TD (2006) Selection and analysis of spontaneous reciprocal mitotic cross-overs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(34):12819-12824. (Pubitemid 44298645)
27. Lee PS, et al. (2009) A fine-structure map of spontaneous mitotic crossovers in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 5(3):e1000410.
28. Freudenreich CH, Kantrow SM, Zakian VA (1998) Expansion and length-dependent fragility of CTG repeats in yeast. Science 279(5352):853-856. (Pubitemid 28106277)
29. Kim HM, et al. (2008) Chromosome fragility at GAA tracts in yeast depends on repeat orientation and requires mismatch repair. EMBO J 27(21):2896-2906.
30. Voineagu I, Surka CF, Shishkin AA, Krasilnikova MM, Mirkin SM (2009) Replisome stalling and stabilization at CGG repeats, which are responsible for chromosomal fragility. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16(2):226-228.
31. Lobachev KS, et al. (1998) Factors affecting inverted repeat stimulation of recombination and deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 148(4):1507-1524. (Pubitemid 28180680)
32. Raveendranathan M, et al. (2006) Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J 25(15):3627-3639. (Pubitemid 44264873)
33. Arlt MF, Glover TW (2010) Inhibition of topoisomerase I prevents chromosome breakage at common fragile sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 9(6):678-689.
34. Quevedo O, García-Luis J, Matos-Perdomo E, Aragón L, Machín F (2012) Nondisjunction of a single chromosome leads to breakage and activation of DNA damage checkpoint in G2. PLoS Genet 8(2):e1002509.
35. Ribeyre C, et al. (2009) The yeast Pif1 helicase prevents genomic instability caused by G-quadruplex-forming CEB1 sequences in vivo. PLoS Genet 5(5):e1000475.
36. Paeschke K, Capra JA, Zakian VA (2011) DNA replication through G-quadruplex motifs is promoted by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA helicase. Cell 145(5):678-691.
37. Capra JA, Paeschke K, Singh M, Zakian VA (2010) G-quadruplex DNA sequences are evolutionary conserved and associated with distinct genomic features in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLOS Comput Biol 6(7):e1000861.
38. McCulley JL, Petes TD (2010) Chromosome rearrangements and aneuploidy in yeast strains lacking both Tel1p and Mec1p reflect deficiencies in two different mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(25):11465-11470.
39. Morrow DM, Connelly C, Hieter P (1997) "Break copy" duplication: A model for chromosome fragment formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147(2):371-382. (Pubitemid 27418552)
40. Chua P, Jinks-Robertson S (1991) Segregation of recombinant chromatids following mitotic crossing over in yeast. Genetics 129(2):359-369.
41. Kadyk LC, Hartwell LH (1992) Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132(2): 387-402.
42. Bzymek M, Lovett ST (2001) Instability of repetitive DNA sequences: The role of replication in multiple mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(15):8319-8325. (Pubitemid 32678030)
43. Chandramouly G, et al. (2013) BRCA1 and CtIP suppress long-tract gene conversion between sister chromatids. Nat Commun 4:2404.
44. LaFave MC, et al. (2014) Sources and structures of mitotic crossovers that arise when BLM helicase is absent in Drosophila. Genetics 196(1):107-118.
45. Heyer WD, Ehmsen KT, Liu J (2010) Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 44:113-139.
46. Mitchel K, Zhang H, Welz-Voegele C, Jinks-Robertson S (2010) Molecular structures of crossover and noncrossover intermediates during gap repair in yeast: Implications for recombination. Mol Cell 38(2):211-222.
47. Lee PS, Petes TD (2010) From the cover: Mitotic gene conversion events induced in G1-synchronized yeast cells by gamma rays are similar to spontaneous conversion events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(16):7383-7388.
48. Tang W, et al. (2011) Friedreich's ataxia (GAA)n-(TTC)n repeats strongly stimulate mitotic crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisae. PLoS Genet7(1):e1001270.
49. Zhang Y, et al. (2012) Genome-wide screen identifies pathways that govern GAA/TTC repeat fragility and expansions in dividing and nondividing yeast cells. Mol Cell 48(2): 254-265.
50. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(15):8276-8282. (Pubitemid 32678024)
51. Guthrie C, Fink GR (1991) Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology (Academic, San Diego).
52. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y (1990) More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med 9(7):811-818. (Pubitemid 20343989)
53. Altman DG (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research (CRC, New York).