Exploring students’ behavioural patterns during online peer assessment from the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive perspectives: a progressive sequential analysis

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 171-188

  Cheng, Kun Hung ^a,b   Hou, Huei Tse ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

behavioural patterns; content analysis; online peer assessment; peer feedback; sequential analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923337855     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2013.822416     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bakeman, R. & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barak, M. & Rafaeli, S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 61, 84–103.
3. Chen, Y. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 105–117.
4. Cheng, K. H., Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (in press). Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study. Interactive Learning Environments.
5. Cheng, K. H. & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Students’ interpersonal perspectives, conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 599–618.
6. Cho, K. & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48, 409–426.
7. Cho, Y. & Cho, K. (2010). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39, 629–643.
8. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23, 260–294.
9. Davis, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37, 346–355.
10. De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2011). Assessing collaboration in a wiki: The reliability of university students’ peer assessment. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 201–206.
11. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. London: Routledge-Falmer.
12. Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 289–299.
13. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304–315.
14. Guan, Y. H., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, F. K. (2006). Content analysis of online discussion on a senior-high school discussion forum of a virtual physics laboratory. Instructional Science, 34, 279–311.
15. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
16. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 115–136). New York: Springer.
17. Hou, H. T. (2010). Exploring the behavioural patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: Quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 52–60.
18. Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2007). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 237–251.
19. Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2008). Analysis of problem-solving based online asynchronous discussion pattern. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 17–28.
20. Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2009). Using blogs as a professional development tool for teachers: Analysis of interaction behavioral patterns. Interactive Learning Environments, 17, 325–340.
21. Kollar, I. & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20, 344–348.
22. Liang, J. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 242–247.
23. Liu, C. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50, 627–639.
24. Liu, E. Z. F. & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 1122–1125.
25. Lu, J. & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40, 257–275.
26. Lynch, R., McNamara, P. M., & Seery, N. (2012). Promoting deep learning in a teacher education programme through self- and peer-assessment and feedback. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 179–197.
27. McGourty, J. (2000). Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 120–124.
28. Riley, N. R. (2006). Methods for evaluating critical learning using online discussion forums. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15, 63–78.
29. Sadler, P. M. & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 1–31.
30. Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 275–288.
31. Schönrock-Adema, J., Heijne-Penninga, M., van Duijn, M. A., Geertsma, J., & Cohen-Schotanus, J. (2007). Assessment of professional behaviour in undergraduate medical education: Peer assessment enhances performance. Medical Education, 41, 836–842.
32. Sitthiworachart, J. & Joy, M. (2008). Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 217–231.
33. Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 71–81.
34. Strachan, I. B. & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self assessment of group work: Developing an effective response to increased enrollment in a third year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20, 343–353.
35. Strijbos, J. W. & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 265–269.
36. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.
37. Tsai, C. C. & Liang, J. C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37, 293–310.
38. Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241–252.
39. Tseng, S. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49, 1161–1174.
40. Welsh, M. (2012). Student perceptions of using the PebblePad e-portfolio system to support self- and peer-based formative assessment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21, 57–83.