Assessment of professional behaviour in undergraduate medical education: Peer assessment enhances performance

Medical Education

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 836-842

  Schönrock Adema, Johanna ^a,c   Heijne Penninga, Marjolein ^a   Van Duijn, Marijtje A J ^b   Geertsma, Jelle ^a   Cohen Schotanus, Janke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

*education, medical, undergraduate; Clinical competence standards; Female; Humans; Male; Peer group; Professional practice *standards; Randomised controlled trial publication type

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEONTOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONALISM; SCORING SYSTEM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PEER GROUP; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;

EID: 34548183242     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02817.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. CanMEDS (Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists). CanMEDS 2000: extract from the CanMEDS 2000 Project Societal Needs Working Group Report. Med Teach 2002 22 : 549 54.
2. Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Med Educ 2002 36 : 800 4.
3. Van Luijk SJ, Smeets JGE, Smits J, Wolfhagen I, Perquin MLF. Assessing professional behaviour and the role of academic advice at the Maastricht Medical School. Med Teach 2000 22 : 168 72.
4. Van Luijk SJ, ed. Professional Behaviour: Teaching, Assessing and Coaching Students. Final Report of the Project Team Consilium Abeundi, appointed by the Netherlands Council of Medical Deans of the Dutch Federation of University Medical Centres. Maastricht : University Press Maastricht 2005.
5. Cohen-Schotanus J. Student assessment and examination rules. Med Teach 1999 21 : 318 21.
6. Eraut M. A wider perspective on assessment. Med Educ 2004 34 : 803 4.
7. Frederiksen N. The real test bias: influences of testing on teaching and learning. Am Psychol 1984 39 : 193 202.
8. Dominick P, Reilly R, McGourty J. The effects of peer feedback on team member behaviour. Group Organization Manage 1997 22 : 508 20.
9. Sluijsmans DMA, Brand-Gruwel S, Van Merriënboer JJG. Peer assessment training in teacher education: effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment Eval Higher Educ 2002 27 : 443 54.
10. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev Educational Res 1998 68 : 249 76.
11. Somervell H. Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment Eval Higher Educ 1993 18 : 221.
12. Bruch M, Pearl L, Giordano S. Differences in the cognitive processes of academically successful and unsuccessful test-anxious students. J Counsel Psychol 1986 33 : 217 9.
13. Svensson L. On qualitative differences in learning. III. Study skill and learning. Br J Educ Psychol 1977 47 : 233 43.
14. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: an Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. London : Sage 1999.
15. Dolmans DHJM, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IHAP, van der Vleuten CPM. Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Med Educ 2005 39 : 732 41.
16. Decker P, Cornelius E. The effect on leniency of justifying performance ratings to a supervisor. J Psychol 1981 108 : 211 8.
17. Harris M, Smith D, Champagne D. A field study of performance appraisal purpose: research- versus administrative-based ratings. Personnel Psychol 1995 48 : 151 60.
18. Harris MM, Schaubroeck J. A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychol 1988 41 : 43 62.
19. London M, Smither JW. Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations and performance-related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Personnel Psychol 1995 48 : 803 39.
20. Duckworth AL, Seligman MEP. Self-discipline gives girls the edge: gender in self-discipline, grades and achievement test scores. J Educational Psychol 2006 98 : 198 208.
21. Grabill KM, Lasane TP, Povitsky WT et al. Gender and study behaviour: how social perception, social norm adherence, and structured academic behaviour are predicted by gender. North Am J Psychol 2005 7 : 7 24.
22. Rubinstein G. The big five among male and female students of different faculties. Pers Indiv Diff 2005 38 : 1495 503.
23. Busato VV, Prins FJ, Elshout JJ, Hamaker C. Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Pers Indiv Diff 2000 29 : 1057 68.
24. Furnham A, Moutafi J, Chamorro-Premuzic T. Personality and intelligence: gender, the big five, self-estimated and psychometric intelligence. Int J Select Assessment 2005 13 : 11 24.