Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 275-288

  Sargeant, Joan ^a   Mann, Karen ^a   Sinclair, Douglas ^a   Van Der Vleuten, Cees ^b   Metsemakers, Job ^b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Continuing professional development; Culture; Emotions; Facilitating feedback; Multi source feedback; Performance assessment; Professionalism; Reflection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; EDUCATION; EMOTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EMOTIONS; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; NOVA SCOTIA; PHYSICIANS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 50849093579     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ashford S.J., Blatt R., VandeWalle D (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback- seeking behaviour in organizations Journal of Management 29(6): 773-799
2. Atwater L.E. Waldman D.A., Brett J.F. (2002). Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback Human Resources Management Review 41(2): 193-208
3. Bandura A. (1995). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control Freeman and Company, New York
4. Bennett H., Gatrell J., Packham R. (2004). Medical appraisal: collecting evidence of performance through 360 feedback Clinician in Management 12: 165-171
5. Boud D., Keough R., Walker D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning Kogan Page, London
6. Boud, D. (2002). The unexamined life is not the life of learning: rethinking assessment for lifelong learning. Professional lecture presented at Trent Park, Middlesex University, London UK
7. Bracken D.W., Timmreck C.W., Church A.H. (2001). The Handbook for Multisource Feedback Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
8. Brett J.F., Atwater L. (2001). 360 Feedback: accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness Journal of Applied Psychology 86(5): 930-942
9. DeNisi A., Kluger A.N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executives 14(1): 129-139
10. Evans R., Elwyn G., Edwards A. (2004). Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians British Medical Journal 328(7450): 1240-1245
11. Fidler H., Lockyer J.M., Toews J., Violato C. (1999). Changing physician' practices: the effect of individual feedback Academic Medicine 74(6): 702-714
12. Freidson E. (1994). Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy University of Chicago Press, Chicago
13. Gielen S., Dochy F., Diericks S. (2003). Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes true assessment effects In: Sigers M., Dochy F., Cascallar E. (eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: in Search of Qualities and Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 37-54
14. Goodstone M., Diamante T. (1998). Organizational use of therapeutic change: strengthening multisource feedback systems through interdisciplinary coaching Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 50(3): 152-163
15. Hall, W., Violato, C., Lewkonia, R., Lockyer, J., Fidler, H., Toews, J., et al. (1999). Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: The physician achievement review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 61:52-57
16. Johns C. (2002). Guided Reflection: Advancing Practice Blackwell publishing, Oxford, UK
17. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory Psychological Bulletin 119: 254-284
18. Lipner R.S., Blank L.L., Leas B.F., Fortna G.S. (2002). The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification Acad Med 77(10): S64-S66
19. Lockyer J., Violato C., Fidler H. (2003). Likelihood of change: a study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data Teaching & Learning In Medicine 15(3): 168-174
20. Moon J. (1999). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice Stylus Publishing, Herdon, VA
21. Mory E.H. (2004). Feedback research revisited In: Jonassen D (ed) Handbook for Education Communications and Technology. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 745-783
22. Nova Scotia Physician Achievement Review (NSPAR) Program. (2005). . Accessed 04/04/06. College of Physician and Surgeons of Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS
23. Ramsey P.G., Wenrich M.D., Carline J.D., Inui T.S., Larson E.B., LoGerfo J.P. (1993) Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance JAMA 269: 1655-60
24. Rice P.L., Ezzy D. (2000). Qualitative Research Methods Oxford University Press, Victoria, Australia
25. Sargeant J., Mann K., Ferrier S. (2005). Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness Medical Education 39(5): 497-504
26. Sargeant J.M., Mann K.V., Ferrier S.N., Langille D., Muirhead P.D., Hayes V.M. (2003). Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study Academic Medicine 10(Suppl): S42-S44
27. Smither J.W., London M., Reilly R.R. (2005). Does performance improve following multi source feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings Personnel Psychology 58: 33-66
28. Violato C., Marini A., Toews J., Lockyer J., Fidler H. (1997) Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians Acad Med 72(10): S82-S84