How to improve the peer review method: Free-selection vs assigned-pair protocol evaluated in a computer networking course

Computers and Education

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 182-195

  Papadopoulos, Pantelis M ^a   Lagkas, Thomas D ^b   Demetriadis, Stavros N ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN MACEDONIA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Interactive learning environments; Multimedia hypermedia systems; Pedagogical issues; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER NETWORKS; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; TEACHING;

ASSIGNMENT PROTOCOLS; COMPUTER NETWORKING; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; MULTIMEDIA/HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; PEER-REVIEW ACTIVITIES; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY; WEB-BASED ENVIRONMENT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84857460544     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. L.W. Anderson.; D.R. Krathwohl A taxonomy for learning, teaching.; assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives 2001 Longman NY
2. N. Anderson.; B. Shneiderman Use of peer ratings in evaluating computer program quality Proceedings of the 15th annual SIGCPR conference 1977 ACM Arlington, Virginia, USA. New York, NY 218 226
3. K. Anewalt Using peer review as a vehicle for communication skill development and active learning Journal of Computing in Small Colleges 21 2 2005 148 155
4. R. Ballantyne, K. Hughes.; A. Mylonas Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 5 2002 427 441
5. Carlson, P. A.; Berry, F. C. (2005). Calibrated peer review: a tool for assessing the process as well as the product in learning outcomes. In Proceedings of 2005 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition.
6. Crespo, R. M.; Pardo, A.; Kloos, C. D. (2004). An adaptive strategy for peer review. Paper presented at ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Savannah, GA.
7. K. Cho.; C. MacArthur Student revision with peer and expert reviewing Learning and Instruction 20 2010 328 338
8. K. Cho.; C.D. Schunn Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: a web-based reciprocal peer review system Computers and Education 48 3 2007 409 426
9. K. Cho, C.D. Schunn.; D. Charney Commenting on writing: typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts Written Communication 23 2006 260 294
10. R. Davies.; T. Berrow An evaluation of the use of computer peer review for developing higher-level skills Computers and Education 30 1/2 1998 111 115
11. S. Demetriadis, T. Egerter, F. Hanisch.; F. Fischer Peer review-based scripted collaboration to support domain-specific and domain-general knowledge acquisition in computer science Computer Science Education 21 1 2011 29 56
12. A. DiPardo.; S.W. Freedman Peer response groups in the writing classroom: theoretic foundations and new directions Review of Educational Research 58 1988 119 149
13. M.M. Dossin Among friends: effective peer critiquing The Clearing House 76 4 2003 206 207
14. N. Falchikov Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education 2001 Routledge Falmer London
15. N. Falchikov.; J. Goldfinch Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks Review of Educational Research 70 3 2000 287 322
16. J. Fitzgerald Research on revision in writing Review of Educational Research 57 1987 481 506
17. E. Gehringer, L. Ehresman, S. Conger.; P. Wagle Reusable learning objects through peer review: the Expertiza approach Innovate 3 5 2007 Retrieved September 10, 2009 from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view= article&id=365
18. Gendron, M.; Jarmoszko, A. T. (2003). Teaching data communications and networking to school of business undergraduates: a pedagogical framework for juxtaposing theory and practice. In Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education (InSITE) conference (pp. 1145-1153).
19. S. Gielen, E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena.; K. Struyven Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning Learning and Instruction 20 2010 304 315
20. I.M. Goldin.; K.D. Ashley Peering inside peer review with Bayesian models G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, A. Mitrovic, AIED 2011, LNAI Vol. 6738 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin 90 97
21. J. Hansen.; J. Liu Guiding principles for effective peer response ELT Journal 59 2005 31 38
22. R.H. Haswell NCTE/CCCC's recent war on scholarship Written Communication 22 2005 198 223
23. J.R. Hayes, L. Flower, K.A. Schriver, J. Stratman.; L. Carey Cognitive processes in revision S. Rosenberg, Reading, writing.; language processing. Advances in applied psycholinguistics Vol. 2 1987 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 176 240
24. C. Hundhausen, A. Agrawal, D. Fairbrother.; M. Trevisan Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course: an empirical study Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on computer science education 2009 ACM Chattanooga, TN, USA 291 295
25. L. Li, X. Liu.; A.L. Steckelberg Assessor or assessee: how student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback British Journal of Educational Technology 41 3 2010 525 536
26. N. Linge.; D. Parsons Problem-based learning as an effective tool for teaching computer network design Education, IEEE Transactions on 49 1 2006 5 10
27. H.C. Liou.; Z.Y. Peng Training effects on computer-mediated peer review System 37 2009 514 525
28. J. Liu.; J.G. Hansen Peer response in second language writing classrooms D. Belcher, J. Liu, Michigan series on teaching multilingual writers 2002 U of Michigan P Ann Arbor, MI
29. C.C. Liu.; C.M. Tsai Peer assessment through web-based knowledge acquisition: tools to support conceptual awareness Innovations in Education and Teaching International 42 2005 43 59
30. Loddington, S. P.; Wilkinson, N.; Bates, M. R. N.; Crawford, A R.; Willmot, P. (2008). Discover WebPA: An online self and peer assessment system, EE2008: International conference on innovation, good practice and research in engineering education, 14-16 July 2008, Loughborough, UK. Available at http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/scholarart/ee2008/w005-loddington.pdf Accessed 31.07.09.
31. K. Lundstrom.; W. Baker To give is better than to receive: the benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing Journal of Second Language Writing 18 2009 30 43
32. A. Luxton-Reilly A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment Computer Science Education 19 4 2009 209 232
33. C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham.; S. Schwartz Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among students with learning disabilities Learning Disability Quarterly 14 1991 61 73
34. J. McConnell Active and cooperative learning. Analysis of algorithms: An active learning approach 2001 Jones & Bartlett Pub
35. D. McCutchen, G.A. Hull.; W.L. Smith Editing strategies and error correction in basic writing Written Communication 4 1987 139 154
36. K. Mangelsdorf Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: what do the students think? ELT Journal 46 1992 274 284
37. A. Martinez-Mones, E. Gomez-Sanchez, Y.A. Dimitriadis, I.M. Jorrin-Abellan, B. Rubia-Avi.; G. Vega-Gorgojo Multiple case studies to enhance project-based learning in a computer architecture course Education, IEEE Transactions on 48 3 2005 482 489
38. Noor, R. (2003). Implementing a problem based learning for undergraduate course: a first experience. Presented at The Learning Conf. 2003: What Learning Means, Jul. 15-18, 2003, Institute of Education, Univ. of London.
39. M. Norris.; S. Pretty Designing the total area network 2000 Wiley New York
40. D. O'Neill Peer reviews. Encyclopedia of software engineering 2001 John Wiley & Sons NY
41. Reily, K.; Finnerty, P. L.; Terveen, L. (2009). Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is Surprisingly Accurate. In Proceedings of GROUP'09, May 10-13, 2009, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.
42. M. Scardamalia.; C. Bereiter Computer support for knowledge-building communities The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 3 1994 265 283
43. E. Silva.; D. Moreira WebCoM: a tool to use peer review to improve student interaction Journal on Educational Resources in Computing 3 1 2003 1 14
44. D.M.A. Sluijsmans, S. Brand-Gruwel.; J.J.G. Van Merriënboer Peer assessment training in teacher education: effects on performance and perceptions Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 2002 443 454
45. N.I. Sommers Revision strategies of student writers and experienced writers College Composition and Communication 31 1980 378 387
46. R.J. Spiro, P.J. Feltovich, M.J. Jacobson.; R.L. Coulson Cognitive flexibility, constructivism.; hypertext: random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains T. Duffy, D. Jonassen, Constructivism and the technology of instruction 1992 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 57 75
47. K. Topping Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities Review of Educational Research 68 1998 249 276
48. C.-C. Tsai.; J.-C. Liang The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views Instructional Science 37 2009 293 310
49. S. Tseng.; C.-C. Tsai On-line peer assessment and the role of peer feedback: a study of high school computer course Computers and Education 49 2007 1161 1174
50. Turner, S.; Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. (2009). Exploring peer review in the computer science classroom. In Computing Research Repository. Retrieved November, 30, 2009 from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907. 3456.pdf.
51. Turner, S.; Pérez-Quiñones, M. A.; Edwards, S.; Chase, J. (2010). Peer review in CS2: conceptual learning. In Proceedings of SIGCSE'10, March 10-13, 2010, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
52. I. Van den Berg, W. Admiraal.; A. Pilot Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 31 2006 19 36
53. E. Van Steendam, G. Rijlaarsdam, L. Sercu.; H. Van den Bergh The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL Learning and Instruction 20 4 2010 316 327
54. J. Whittington The process of effective critiques Computers & Graphics 28 3 2004 401 407 Elsevier
55. W.J. Wolfe Online student peer reviews Proceedings of the 5th conference on information technology education 2004 ACM Press New York 33 37
56. E.Z.F. Ziu, S. Lin, C.H. Chiu.; S.M. Yuan Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer IEEE Transactions on Education 44 2001 246 251