A call for expanding inclusive student engagement in SoTL

Teaching and Learning Inquiry

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 63-74

  Felten, Peter ^c   Bagg, Julianne ^a   Bumbry, Michael ^b   Hill, Jennifer ^d   Hornsby, Karen ^e   Pratt, Maria ^a   Weller, Saranne ^f  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^c ELON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^e NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Identity; Inclusion; SoTL; Student engagement; Student voice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922785985     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21674787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.63     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baker, G. R. (2012, February). North Carolina A&T State University: A culture of inquiry. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Examples of Good Assessment Practice. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University.
2. Barnes, E., Gold ring, L., Bestwick, A. &Wood, J. (2010). A collaborative evaluation of student-staff partnership in inquiry-based educational development. In S. Little (Ed.),Staff-student partnerships in higher education (pp. 16-30). London: Continuum.
3. Bernstein, D., & Bass, R. (2005). The scholarship of teaching and learning. Academe:Journal ofLeadership andManagement in Higher Education, 9/(4), 37-43.
4. Bovill, C., Bulley, C. J., & Morss, K. (2011b). Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design: Perspectives from the literature. Teaching in Higher Education,2, 197-209. doi 10.1080/13562517.2010.515024
5. Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., &Felten, P. (2011a). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. InternationalJournal forAcademic Development, 16, 133-145. doi 10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
6. Capstick, S., & Fleming, H. (2001). Peer assisted learning in an undergraduate hospitality course: Second year students supporting first year students in group learning. Journalof Hospitality, Leisure, Sport&Tourism Education, 1,69-75.
7. Chick, N. L. (2013). Difference, privilege and power in the scholarship of teaching and learning: The value of the humanities in SoTL. In K. McKinney (Ed.), Thescholarship ofteaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. 15-33). Indiana: Indiana University Press.
8. Cole, D. (2007). Do interracial interactions matter? An examination of student-faculty contact and intellectual self-concept. Journal ofHigher Education, 27(3), 249-281.
9. Cook-Sather, A. (2007). Resisting the impositional potential of student voice work: Lessons for liberatory educational research from poststructuralist feminist critiques of critical pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics ofEducation, 28, 389-403.
10. Cook-Sather, A. (2011). Layered learning: Student consultants deepening classroom and life lessons. EducationalAction Research, 19,41-57.
11. Cook-Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). Students of Color and Faculty Members Working Together Toward Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy. In Groccia, J., & Cruz, L. (Eds.), To Improve the Academy, 32. San Francisco: Jossey. Bass/Anker.
12. Cook-Sather, A. &Alter, Z. (2011). What is and what can be: How a liminal position can change learning and teaching in higher education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42,37-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x
13. Delpish, A., Darby, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., King, C.,& Felten, P. (2010). Equalizing voices: Student-faculty partnership in course design. In C. Werder & M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging student voices in the study ofteaching and learning (pp. 96-114). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
14. Donelan, M., & Kay, P. (1998). Supplemental instruction: Students helping students' learning at University College London (UCL) and University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN). InternationalJournal ofLegalEducation, 32, 287-299.
15. Felten, P. (2011, Winter). Monet moments and the necessity of productive disruption, Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 2. Retrieved from http://teachingandlearningtogether.blogs.brynmawr.edu/archived-issues/spring2011-issue/from-the-advisory-board
16. Fielding, M. (1999). Radical collegiality: Affirming teaching as an inclusive professional practice. Australian Educational Researcher: A Publication of the Australian Association for Research in Education, 26, 1-34.
17. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
18. Glasser, H. M., &Powers, M. A. (2011). Disrupting traditional student/faculty roles, 140 characters at a time. Teaching andLearningTogetherinHigherEducation, February. Retrieved from http://teachingandlearningtogether.blogs.brynmawr.edu/archived-issues/spring2011-issue/disrupting-traditional-roles
19. Gutman, E. M., Sergison, E. M., Martin, C. J., & Bernstein, J. L. (2010). Engaging students as scholars of teaching and learning. In C. Werder &M. M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging studentvoices in the study ofteaching and learning (pp. 130-145). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
20. Harper, S. R. (2009). Institutional seriousness concerning black male student engagement: Necessary conditions and collaborative partnerships. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Studentengagementin higher education: Theoreticalperspectives andpracticalapproaches for diverse populations (pp. 137-156). New York: Routledge.
21. Harper, S. R., & Quaye, J. (2009). Beyond sameness, with engagement and outcomes for all. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.
22. Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal o f Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183-201.
23. Hinton-Smith,T. (Ed) (2012). Widening participation in higher education: Casting the net wide? Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Huber, M.T. (2009). Teaching travels: Reflections on the social life of classroom inquiry and innovation. InternationalJournal for the Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning 3(2).
25. Hutchings, P. (2005). Building pedagogical intelligence. Carnegie Perspectives. Retrieved from: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives/building-pedagogical-intelligence
26. Hutchings, P., Huber, M.T., & Ciccone, T. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. Ingram, J. (2012, September 4). Student-led assessment sheds light on retention. The Reporter: Western Carolina UniversityFaculty&StaffNews. Retrieved from http://thereporter.wcu.edu/2012/09/student-led-assessment-sheds-light-on-retention/
28. Kay, J., Dunne, E., & Hutchinson, J. (2010). Rethinking the values of higher education - students as change agents? Gloucester: QAA. Retrieved from: www.qaa.ac.uk/students/studentengagement/undergradaute.pdf
29. Kerr, D. &Keating, A. (2011). Intercultural, citizenship and human rights education:The challenges of implementation for policy, practice and research. Educational Research, 53(2), 119-122.
30. Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and University.
31. Little, S. (Ed.) (2011). Staff-student partnerships in higher education. London: Continuum.
32. Manor, C., Bloch-Schulman, S., Flannery, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Foundations of student-faculty partnerships in the scholarship of teaching and learning:Theoretical and developmental considerations. In C. Werder & M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging studentvoicesin the study of teaching and learning (pp. 81-95). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
33. McCulloch, A. (2009).The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student-university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171 -183.
34. McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Rudduck, J. (2005). Pupil voice: Comfortable and uncomfortable learning for teachers. Research Papers in Education, 2 0,149-168.
35. McKinney, K. (2012). Increasing the impact of SoTL: Two sometimes neglected opportunities. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). Retrieved from http://dspaceprod.georgiasouthern.edu:8080/jspui/bitstream/10518/4882/1 /IJ-SoTL _v6n1_l E_McKinney.pdf
36. McLeod, J. (2011). Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 5 2,179-189.
37. Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Bailie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
38. Mihans, R., Long, D., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. InternationalJournal for the Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning, 2,1-9.
39. Neary, M., &Winn, J. (2009). Student as producer: Reinventing the undergraduate curriculum. In M. Neary, H. Stevenson, and L. Bell (Eds.) Thefutureofhigher education: Policy, pedagogy and the student experience (pp. 192-210). London: Continuum.
40. Popovic, C., &Green, D. A. (2012) Understanding undergraduates: Challenging our preconceptions ofstudent success. New York, NY: Routledge.
41. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). (2012). UK quality code for higher education. Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency.
42. Robinson, C. (2012). Student engagement: What does this mean in practice in the context of higher education institutions? Journal ofApplied Research in Higher Education, 4, 94-108.
43. Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school: Giving pupils a voice. London: Continuum Press.
44. Sabri, D. (2011). What's wrong with the'student experience'?, Discourse:Studies in the Cultural Politics ofEducation, 32(5), 657-667.
45. Sacks,P. (2007). Tearing down the gates: Confronting the class divide in American education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46. Savi n-Baden, M. (2008). Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
47. Stevenson, J., &Clegg, S. (2012). Who cares? Gender dynamics in the valuing of extra-curricular activities in higher education. Gender and Education, 24,41-55.
48. Thomson, P., & Holdsworth, R. (2003). Theorizing change in the educational 'field': Re-readings of'student participation' projects. InternationalJournal ofLeadership in Education, 6, 371-391.
49. Trask, B.S., Maritz-Baden, R., Settles, B., Gentry, D., & Burke, D. (2009). Enhancing graduate education: Promoting a scholarship of teaching and learning through mentoring. InternationalJournal ofTeaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20,438-446.
50. Turner, Y. (2013) Pathologies of silence? Reflecting on international learner identities amidst the classroom chatter. In J. Ryan (Ed.) Cross-cultural teaching and learning for home and internationalstudents:Internationalisation ofpedagogyandcurriculum in highereducation (pp. 227-240). London: Routledge.
51. Werder, C., & Otis, M., eds. (2010). Engaging studentvoices in the study o f teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
52. Winkelmes, M-A., & Mustari, E. (2013, Spring). Empowering faculty to improve students' learning through collaborative assessment. LiberalEducation, 99:2.
53. Wymer, K., Fulford, C., Baskerville, N., & Washington, M. (2012). Necessity and the unexpected: SoTL student-faculty collaboration in writing program research. International Journalfor theScholarship ofTeaching andLearning, 6(1), Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v6n 1/essay s_about_sot I/PDF s/W ym er%20et%20a I .%20revised.pdf.