The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student-university relationship

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 171-183

  McCulloch, Alistair ^a  

^a EDGE HILL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249196708     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070802562857     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alford, J. 1998. A public management road less travelled: Clients as co-producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration 57, no. 4: 128-37.
2. Bailey, J. 2000. Students as clients in a professional/client relationship. Journal of Management Education 24, no. 3: 353-65.
3. Bovaird, T. 2007. Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review 67, no. 5: 846-60.
4. Bramming, P. 2007. An argument for strong learning in higher education, Quality in Higher Education 13, no. 1: 45-56.
5. Cleveland-Innes, M., and C. Emes. 2005. Social and academic interaction in higher education contexts and the effect on deep learning. NASPA Journal: Journal of Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education 42, no. 4: 242-62.
6. Crozier, M., S.P. Huntington, and J. Watanuki. 1975. The crisis of democracy. New York: New York University Press
7. Etzioni, A. 1994. The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. New York: Simon & Schuster.
8. Halbesleben, J., J. Becker, and M. Buckley. 2003. Considering the labor contributions of students: An alternative to the student-as-customer metaphor. Journal of Education for Business 78: 255-7.
9. Halbesleben, J., and A. Wheeler. 2008. Student identification with business education models. Journal of Management Education. DOI: 10.1177/1052562908320658.
10. Harvey, L. 2006 Enhancing the student experience - research evidence from a first year experience literature review. Innovations in Supporting the First Year Experience Conference, May 11, in Edinburgh.
11. Harvey, L., and S. Mason. 1996. A quality graduate. In The management of independent learning, ed. J. Tait, and P. Knight, 13-28. London: Kogan Page.
12. Hirsch, F. 1977. The social limits to growth. London: Routledge.
13. Jenkins, A., R. Breen, and R. Lindsay. 2003. Reshaping research in higher education: Linking teaching with research. London: Routledge.
14. Kaye, T., R. Bickel, and T. Birtwistle. 2006 Criticising the image of the student as consumer: Explaining legal trends and administrative responses in the US and UK. Education and the Law 18, nos. 2-3: 85-129.
15. Kuhn, T. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Orig. pub. 1962.)
16. Levine, C. 1984. Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review 44. Special Issue: Citizenship and Public Administration, 178-89.
17. Lomas, L. 2007 Are students customers? Perceptions of academic staff. Quality in Higher Education 13, no. 1: 31-44.
18. Marschall, M. 2004. Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly 57, no. 2: 231-44.
19. Marton, F., and R. Sälj̈. 1976 Qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, no. 1: 4-11.
20. McMillan, J., and G. Cheney. 1996. The student as consumer: The implications and limitations of a metaphor. Communication Education 45, no. 1: 1-15.
21. Morgan, G. 2006. Images of organization. Updated ed. London: Sage.
22. Ostrom, E. 1996. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development, World Development 24, no. 6: 1073-87.
23. Palfreyman, D., and D. Warner. 1998. Higher education and the law: A guide for managers. Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Panitz, T. 1999. Benefits of cooperative learning in relation to student motivation. In Motivation from within: Approaches for encouraging faculty and students to excel. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 78, ed. M. Theall. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. http://home.capecod.net/?tpanitz/tedsarticles/motivation.htm
25. Percy, S. 1983. Citizen coproduction: Prospects for improving service delivery. Journal of Urban Affairs 5, no. 3: 203-10.
26. Peters, C., D. Bradbard, and M. Martin. 2005. Consumer decision support systems: Resources for student decision making. Journal of Educators Online 2, no. 2. http://www.thejeo.com/Cara%20Peters%20Final.pdf
27. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) 2004. Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/codeOfPractice/default.asp
28. Schmookler, A. 1993. The illusion of choice: How the market economy shapes our destiny. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
29. Whitaker, G. 1980. Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review 40, no. 3: 240-46.