Exo1 phosphorylation status controls the hydroxyurea sensitivity of cells lacking the Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerases delta and zeta

DNA Repair

Volumn 24, Issue , 2014, Pages 26-36

  Doerfler, Lillian ^a   Schmidt, Kristina H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Exo1; Exo1 phosphorylation; Gross chromosomal rearrangements; Hydroxyurea hypersensitivity; Pol32

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE DELTA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ZETA; EXONUCLEASE; EXONUCLEASE 1; HELICASE; HYDROXYUREA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; AMINO ACID TRANSPORTER; CAN1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; MSH2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; POL32 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN MSH2; RECQ HELICASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SGS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND; DNA SYNTHESIS; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; GENE DELETION; GENE INTERACTION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MISMATCH REPAIR; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; PHENOTYPE; REPLISOME; STRESS; TELOMERE; YEAST CELL; DNA REPAIR; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, BASIC; DNA DAMAGE; DNA MISMATCH REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; HYDROXYUREA; MUTATION; MUTS HOMOLOG 2 PROTEIN; PHOSPHORYLATION; RECQ HELICASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84919779014     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Tishkoff D.X., Boerger A.L., Bertrand P., Filosi N., Gaida G.M., Kane M.F., Kolodner R.D. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, a gene encoding an exonuclease that interacts with MSH2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94:7487-7492.
2. Tran P.T., Erdeniz N., Dudley S., Liskay R.M. Characterization of nuclease-dependent functions of Exo1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 2002, 1:895-912.
3. Fiorentini P., Huang K.N., Tishkoff D.X., Kolodner R.D., Symington L.S. Exonuclease I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae functions in mitotic recombination in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17:2764-2773.
4. Rudolph C., Fleck O., Kohli J. Schizosaccharomyces pombe exo1 is involved in the same mismatch repair pathway as msh2 and pms1. Curr. Genet. 1998, 34:343-350.
5. Schmutte C., Sadoff M.M., Shim K.S., Acharya S., Fishel R. The interaction of DNA mismatch repair proteins with human exonuclease I. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:33011-33018.
6. Sokolsky T., Alani E. EXO1 and MSH6 are high-copy suppressors of conditional mutations in the MSH2 mismatch repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2000, 155:589-599.
7. Szankasi P., Smith G.R. A role for exonuclease I from S. pombe in mutation avoidance and mismatch correction. Science 1995, 267:1166-1169.
8. Tran P.T., Fey J.P., Erdeniz N., Gellon L., Boiteux S., Liskay R.M. A mutation in EXO1 defines separable roles in DNA mismatch repair and post-replication repair. DNA Repair 2007, 6:1572-1583.
9. Wei K., Clark A.B., Wong E., Kane M.F., Mazur D.J., Parris T., Kolas N.K., Russell R., Hou H., Kneitz B., Yang G., Kunkel T.A., Kolodner R.D., Cohen P.E., Edelmann W. Inactivation of exonuclease 1 in mice results in DNA mismatch repair defects, increased cancer susceptibility, and male and female sterility. Genes Dev. 2003, 17:603-614.
10. Wu Y., Berends M.J., Post J.G., Mensink R.G., Verlind E., Van Der Sluis T., Kempinga C., Sijmons R.H., van der Zee A.G., Hollema H., Kleibeuker J.H., Buys C.H., Hofstra R.M. Germline mutations of EXO1 gene in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and atypical HNPCC forms. Gastroenterology 2001, 120:1580-1587.
11. Alam N.A., Gorman P., Jaeger E.E., Kelsell D., Leigh I.M., Ratnavel R., Murdoch M.E., Houlston R.S., Aaltonen L.A., Roylance R.R., Tomlinson I.P. Germline deletions of EXO1 do not cause colorectal tumors and lesions which are null for EXO1 do not have microsatellite instability. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2003, 147:121-127.
12. Jagmohan-Changur S., Poikonen T., Vilkki S., Launonen V., Wikman F., Orntoft T.F., Moller P., Vasen H., Tops C., Kolodner R.D., Mecklin J.P., Jarvinen H., Bevan S., Houlston R.S., Aaltonen L.A., Fodde R., Wijnen J., Karhu A. EXO1 variants occur commonly in normal population: evidence against a role in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63:154-158.
13. Thompson E., Meldrum C.J., Crooks R., McPhillips M., Thomas L., Spigelman A.D., Scott R.J. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and the role of hPMS2 and hEXO1 mutations. Clin. Genet. 2004, 65:215-225.
14. Sun X., Zheng L., Shen B. Functional alterations of human exonuclease 1 mutants identified in atypical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Cancer Res. 2002, 62:6026-6030.
15. Bardwell P.D., Woo C.J., Wei K., Li Z., Martin A., Sack S.Z., Parris T., Edelmann W., Scharff M.D. Altered somatic hypermutation and reduced class-switch recombination in exonuclease 1-mutant mice. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5:224-229.
16. Krogh B.O., Symington L.S. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004, 38:233-271.
17. Zhu Z., Chung W.H., Shim E.Y., Lee S.E., Ira G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 2008, 134:981-994.
18. Mimitou E.P., Symington L.S. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008, 455:770-774.
19. Lewis L.K., Karthikeyan G., Westmoreland J.W., Resnick M.A. Differential suppression of DNA repair deficiencies of Yeast rad50, mre11 and xrs2 mutants by EXO1 and TLC1 (the RNA component of telomerase). Genetics 2002, 160:49-62.
20. Doerfler L., Harris L., Viebranz E., Schmidt K.H. Differential genetic interactions between Sgs1, DNA-damage checkpoint components and DNA repair factors in the maintenance of chromosome stability. Genome Integr. 2011, 2:8.
21. Gravel S., Chapman J.R., Magill C., Jackson S.P. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:2767-2772.
22. Lydeard J.R., Lipkin-Moore Z., Jain S., Eapen V.V., Haber J.E. Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000973.
23. Marrero V.A., Symington L.S., Extensive D.N.A. end processing by exo1 and sgs1 inhibits break-induced replication. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001007.
24. Karras G.I., Fumasoni M., Sienski G., Vanoli F., Branzei D., Jentsch S. Noncanonical role of the 9-1-1 clamp in the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway. Mol. Cell 2013, 49:536-546.
25. Vanoli F., Fumasoni M., Szakal B., Maloisel L., Branzei D. Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switch. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001205.
26. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:153-159.
27. Karras G.I., Jentsch S. The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 2010, 141:255-267.
28. Johansson E., Garg P., Burgers P.M. The Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerase delta contains separable domains for processive replication and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:1907-1915.
29. Baranovskiy A.G., Lada A.G., Siebler H.M., Zhang Y., Pavlov Y.I., Tahirov T.H. DNA polymerase delta and zeta switch by sharing accessory subunits of DNA polymerase delta. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:17281-17287.
30. Makarova A.V., Stodola J.L., Burgers P.M. A four-subunit DNA polymerase zeta complex containing Pol delta accessory subunits is essential for PCNA-mediated mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:11618-11626.
31. Siebler H.M., Lada A.G., Baranovskiy A.G., Tahirov T.H., Pavlov Y.I. A novel variant of DNA polymerase zeta, Rev3DeltaC, highlights differential regulation of Pol32 as a subunit of polymerase delta versus zeta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 2014.
32. Gibbs P.E., McGregor W.G., Maher V.M., Nisson P., Lawrence C.W. A human homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae REV3 gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase zeta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:6876-6880.
33. Lawrence C.W., Maher V.M. Eukaryotic mutagenesis and translesion replication dependent on DNA polymerase zeta and Rev1 protein. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2001, 29:187-191.
34. Morrison A., Christensen R.B., Alley J., Beck A.K., Bernstine E.G., Lemontt J.F., Lawrence C.W. REV3, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene whose function is required for induced mutagenesis, is predicted to encode a nonessential DNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171:5659-5667.
35. Huang M.E., Cadieu E., Souciet J.L., Galibert F. Disruption of six novel yeast genes reveals three genes essential for vegetative growth and one required for growth at low temperature. Yeast 1997, 13:1181-1194.
36. Chen S.H., Albuquerque C.P., Liang J., Suhandynata R.T., Zhou H. A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:12803-12812.
37. Randell J.C., Fan A., Chan C., Francis L.I., Heller R.C., Galani K., Bell S.P. Mec1 is one of multiple kinases that prime the Mcm2-7 helicase for phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:353-363.
38. Smolka M.B., Albuquerque C.P., Chen S.H., Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:10364-10369.
39. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4325-4336.
40. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:3055-3069.
41. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004, 23:1206-1213.
42. McGlynn P., Lloyd R.G. Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3:859-870.
43. Segurado M., Diffley J.F. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1816-1827.
44. De Piccoli G., Katou Y., Itoh T., Nakato R., Shirahige K., Labib K. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:696-704.
45. Labib K., De Piccoli G. Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 366:3554-3561.
46. Engels K., Giannattasio M., Muzi-Falconi M., Lopes M., Ferrari S. 14-3-3 Proteins regulate exonuclease 1-dependent processing of stalled replication forks. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1001367.
47. Morin I., Ngo H.P., Greenall A., Zubko M.K., Morrice N., Lydall D. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J. 2008, 27:2400-2410.
48. Jia X., Weinert T., Lydall D. Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 2004, 166:753-764.
49. Gietz R.D., Woods R.A. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 2002, 350:87-96.
50. Rockmill B., Lambie E.J., Roeder G.S. Spore enrichment. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 194:146-149.
51. Fang F., Salmon K., Shen M.W.Y., Aeling K.A., Ito E., Irwin B., Tran U.P.C., Hatfield G.W., Da Silva N.A., Sandmeyer S. A vector set for systematic metabolic engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast (Chichester, England) 2011, 28:123-136.
52. Schmidt K.H., Pennaneach V., Putnam C.D., Kolodner R.D. Analysis of gross-chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods in Enzymology 2006, 462-476. Academic Press. L.C. Judith, M. Paul (Eds.).
53. Lea D.E., Coulson C.A. The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 1949, 49:264-285.
54. Nair K. Table of confidence intervals for the median in samples from any continous population. Sankhya 1940, 551-558.
55. Schmidt K.H., Pennaneach V., Putnam C.D., Kolodner R.D. Analysis of gross-chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 409:462-476.
56. Reenan R.A., Kolodner R.D. Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics 1992, 132:975-985.
57. Motegi A., Myung K. Measuring the rate of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a practical approach to study genomic rearrangements observed in cancer. Methods 2007, 41:168-176.
58. Tran P.T., Simon J.A., Liskay R.M. Interactions of Exo1p with components of MutLalpha in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:9760-9765.
59. Flores-Rozas H., Clark D., Kolodner R.D. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Msh2p-Msh6p interact to form an active mispair recognition complex. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26:375-378.
60. Kleczkowska H.E., Marra G., Lettieri T., Jiricny J. hMSH3 and hMSH6 interact with PCNA and colocalize with it to replication foci. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:724-736.
61. Pavlov Y.I., Mian I.M., Kunkel T.A. Evidence for preferential mismatch repair of lagging strand DNA replication errors in yeast. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:744-748.
62. Liberti S.E., Larrea A.A., Kunkel T.A. Exonuclease 1 preferentially repairs mismatches generated by DNA polymerase alpha. DNA Repair 2013, 12:92-96.
63. Kadyrov F.A., Holmes S.F., Arana M.E., Lukianova O.A., O'Donnell M., Kunkel T.A., Modrich P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MutLalpha is a mismatch repair endonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:37181-37190.
64. Amin N.S., Nguyen M.N., Oh S., Kolodner R.D. exo1-Dependent mutator mutations: model system for studying functional interactions in mismatch repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:5142-5155.
65. Blastyak A., Pinter L., Unk I., Prakash L., Prakash S., Haracska L. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol. Cell 2007, 28:167-175.
66. Michel B., Flores M.J., Viguera E., Grompone G., Seigneur M., Bidnenko V. Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:8181-8188.
67. Branzei D., Foiani M. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair 2009, 8:1038-1046.
68. Reha-Krantz L.J., Siddique M.S., Murphy K., Tam A., O'Carroll M., Lou S., Schultz A., Boone C. Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase delta reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 2011, 189:1211-1224.
69. Giannattasio M., Follonier C., Tourriere H., Puddu F., Lazzaro F., Pasero P., Lopes M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M. Exo1 competes with repair synthesis, converts NER intermediates to long ssDNA gaps, and promotes checkpoint activation. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:50-62.
70. Uhart M., Bustos D.M. Protein intrinsic disorder and network connectivity. The case of 14-3-3 proteins. Front Genet. 2014, 5:10.
71. Frank G., Qiu J., Zheng L., Shen B. Stimulation of eukaryotic flap endonuclease-1 activities by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is independent of its in vitro interaction via a consensus PCNA binding region. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:36295-36302.
72. Gomes X.V., Burgers P.M. Two modes of FEN1 binding to PCNA regulated by DNA. EMBO J. 2000, 19:3811-3821.
73. Jonsson Z.O., Hindges R., Hubscher U. Regulation of DNA replication and repair proteins through interaction with the front side of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. EMBO J. 1998, 17:2412-2425.
74. Maringele L., Lydall D. EXO1-dependent single-stranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Delta mutants. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:1919-1933.
75. Zubko M.K., Guillard S., Lydall D., Exo1 Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 2004, 168:103-115.
76. Dewar J.M., Lydall D. Similarities and differences between uncapped telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks. Chromosoma 2012, 121:117-130.
77. Myung K., Datta A., Chen C., Kolodner R.D. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27:113-116.
78. Myung K., Datta A., Kolodner R.D. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2001, 104:397-408.