Protein intrinsic disorder and network connectivity. The case of 14-3-3 proteins

Frontiers in Genetics

Volumn 5, Issue FEB, 2014, Pages

  Uhart, Marina ^a   Bustos, Diego M ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES BIOTECNOLÓGICAS   (Argentina)

Author keywords

14 3 3 protein family; Post translational modifications; Protein interaction networks; Protein intrinsic disorder; Protein phosphorylation

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; INSULIN; ISOPROTEIN; PHOSPHATASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PROTEIN 14 3 3; PROTEIN VARIANT; PROTEINASE; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; METABOLISM; PARALOGY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84897711870     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16648021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00010     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Aitken, A. (2002). Functional specificity in 14-3-3 isoform interactions through dimer formation and phosphorylation. Chromosome location of mammalian isoforms and variants. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 993-1010. doi: 10.1023/A:1021261931561.
2. Aitken, A. (2006). 14-3-3 proteins: a historic overview. Semin. Cancer Biol. 16, 162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.03.005.
3. Beltrao, P., and Serrano, L. (2005). Comparative genomics and disorder prediction identify biologically relevant SH3 protein interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1:e26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010026.
4. Bier, D., Rose, R., Bravo-Rodriguez, K., Bartel, M., Ramirez-Anguita, J., Dutt, S., et al. (2013). Molecular tweezers modulate 14-3-3 protein-protein interactions. Nat. Chem. 5, 234-239. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1570.
5. Buljan, M., Chalancon, G., Dunker, A., Bateman, A., Balaji, S., Fuxreiter, M., and Babu, M. (2013). Alternative splicing of intrinsically disordered regions and rewiring of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.03.006.
6. Buljan, M., Chalancon, G., Eustermann, S., Wagner, G., Fuxreiter, M., Bateman, A., et al. (2012). Tissue-specific splicing of disordered segments that embed binding motifs rewires protein interaction networks. Mol. Cell. 46, 871-883. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039.
7. Burnett, G., and Kennedy, E. (1954). The enzymatic phosphorylation of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 211, 969-980.
8. Bustos, D., and Iglesias, A. (2006). Intrinsic disorder is a key characteristic in partners that bind 14-3-3 proteins. Proteins 42, 35-42. doi: 10.1002/prot.20888.
9. Bustos, D. M. (2012). The role of protein disorder in the 14-3-3 interaction network. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 178-184. doi: 10.1039/c1mb05216k.
10. Davey, N. E., Van Roey, K., Weatheritt, R. J., Toedt, G., Uyar, B., Altenberg, B., et al. (2011). Attributes of short linear motifs. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 268-281. doi: 10.1039/c1mb05231d.
11. De Las Rivas, J., and Fontanillo, C. (2010). Protein-protein interactions essentials: key concepts to building and analyzing interactome networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6:e1000807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000807.
12. Diella, F., Haslam, N., Chica, C., Budd, A., Michael, S., Brown, N. P., et al. (2008). Understanding eukaryotic linear motifs and their role in cell signaling and regulation. Front. Biosci. 13:6580-6603. doi: 10.2741/3175.
13. Dunker, A., Cortese, M., Romero, P., Iakoucheva, L., and Uversky, V. (2005). Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. FEBS J. 272, 5129-5148. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04948.x.
14. Dunker, A., Garner, E., Guilliot, S., Romero, P., Albrecht, K., Hart, J., et al. (1998). Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 3, 473-484.
15. Dunker, A., Oldfield, C., Meng, J., Romero, P., Yang, J. Y., Chen, J. W., et al. (2008). The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins. BMC Genomics 9(Suppl. 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-S2-S1.
16. Fernández, A., and Lynch, M. (2011). Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity. Nature 474, 502-505. doi: 10.1038/nature09992.
17. Fernández, A., Tzeng, Y.-H., and Hsu, S.-B. (2012). Subfunctionalization reduces the fitness cost of gene duplication in humans by buffering dosage imbalances. BMC Genomics 12:604. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-604.
18. Fuxreiter, M., Tompa, P., and Simon, I. (2007). Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 23, 950-958. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm035.
19. Gardino, A. K., Smerdon, S. J., and Yaffe, M. B. (2006). Structural determinants of 14-3-3 binding specificities and regulation of subcellular localization of 14-3-3-ligand complexes: a comparison of the X-ray crystal structures of all human 14-3-3 isoforms. Semin. Cancer Biol. 16, 173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.03.007.
20. Ge, F., Li, W. L., Bi, L. J., Tao, S. C., Zhang, Z. P., and Zhang, X. E. (2010). Identification of novel 14-3-3π{variant} interacting proteins by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK). J. Proteome Res. 9, 5848-5858. doi: 10.1021/pr100616g.
21. Gong, Y., Kakihara, Y., Krogan, N., Greenblatt, J., Emili, A., Zhang, Z., et al. (2009). An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications to protein folding pathways in the cell. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 275. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.26.
22. Gough, N. R., and Foley, J. F. (2010). Focus issue: systems analysis of protein phosphorylation. Sci. Signal. 3:eg6. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.3137eg6.
23. Gsponer, J., Futschik, M., Teichmann, S., and Babu, M. (2008). Tight regulation of unstructured proteins: from transcript synthesis to protein degradation. Science 322, 1365-1368. doi: 10.1126/science.1163581.
24. He, X., and Zhang, J. (2005). Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169, 1157-1164. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.037051.
25. Iakoucheva, L. M., Radivojac, P., Brown, C. J., O'Connor, T. R., Sikes, J. G., Obradovic, Z., et al. (2004). The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1037-1049. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh253.
26. Johnson, C., Crowther, S., Stafford, M. J., Campbell, D., Toth, R., and Mackintosh, C. (2010). Bioinformatic and experimental survey of 14-3-3-binding sites. Biochem. J. 427, 69-78. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091834.
27. Kim, P. M., Sboner, A., Xia, Y., and Gerstein, M. (2008). The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4:179. doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.16.
28. Kjarland, E., Keen, T. J., and Kleppe, R. (2006). Does isoform diversity explain functional differences in the 14-3-3 protein family? Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 7, 217-223. doi: 10.2174/138920106777549777.
29. Liu, J., Faeder, J. R., and Camacho, C. J. (2009). Toward a quantitative theory of intrinsically disordered proteins and their function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 19819-19823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907710106.
30. Messaritou, G., Grammenoudi, S., and Skoulakis, E. M. (2010). Dimerization is essential for 14-3-3zeta stability and function in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 1692-1700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.045989.
31. Moore, B., and Perez, V. (1967). "Physiological and biochemical aspects of nervous integration," in A Symposium, ed. F. Carlson (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall), 343-359.
32. Moreira, J., Shen, T., Ohlsson, G., Gromov, P., Gromova, I., and Celis, J. (2008). A combined proteome and ultrastructural localization analysis of 14-3-3 proteins in transformed human amnion (AMA) cells: definition of a framework to study isoform-specific differences. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1225-1240. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700439-MCP200.
33. Morrison, D. (2009). The 14-3-3 proteins: integrators of diverse signaling cues that impact cell fate and cancer development. Trends Cell. Biol. 19, 16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.10.003.
34. Mosca, R., Pache, R. A., and Aloy, P. (2012). The role of structural disorder in the rewiring of protein interactions through evolution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 1-8. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.014969.
35. Muslin, A., Tanner, J., Allen, P., and Shaw, A. (1996). Interaction of 14-3-3 with signaling proteins is mediated by the recognition of phosphoserine. Cell 84, 889-897. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81067-3.
36. Nguyen Ba, A. N., Yeh, B. J., Van Dyk, D., Davidson, A. R., Andrews, B. J., Weiss, E. L., et al. (2012). Proteome-wide discovery of evolutionary conserved sequences in disordered regions. Sci. Signal. 5, rs1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002515.
37. Oldfield, C. J., Meng, J., Yang, J. Y., Yang, M. Q., Uversky, V. N., and Dunker, A. K. (2008). Flexible nets: disorder and induced fit in the associations of p53 and 14-3-3 with their partners. BMC Genomics 9:S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-S1-S1.
38. Panni, S., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Kiemer, L., Cabibbo, A., Paoluzi, S., Santonico, E., et al. (2011). Combining peptide recognition specificity and context information for the prediction of the 14-3-3-mediated interactome in S. cereviceae and H. sapiens. Proteomics 11, 128-143. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000030.
39. Paul, A.-L., Denison, F. C., Schultz, E. R., Zupanska, A. K., and Ferl, R. J. (2012). 14-3-3 Phosphoprotein interaction networks - does isoform diversity present functional interaction specification? Front. Plant Sci. 3:190. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00190.
40. Pozuelo Rubio, M., Geraghty, K. M., Wong, B. H., Wood, N. T., Campbell, D. G., Morrice, N., et al. (2004). 14-3-3-affinity purification of over 200 human phosphoproteins reveals new links to regulation of cellular metabolism, proliferation and trafficking. Biochem. J. 379, 395-408. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031797.
41. Rajamani, D., Thiel, S., Vajda, S., and Camacho, C. J. (2004). Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 11287-11292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401942101.
42. Sluchanko, N., Artemova, N., Sudnitsyna, M., Safenkova, I., Antson, A., Levitsky, D., et al. (2012). Monomeric 14-3-3π{variant} has a chaperone-like activity and is stabilized by phosphorylated HspB6. Biochemistry 51, 6127-6138. doi: 10.1021/bi300674e.
43. Sluchanko, N., and Gusev, N. (2012). Oligomeric structure of 14-3-3 protein: what do we know about monomers? FEBS Lett. 586, 4249-4256. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.10.048.
44. Sun, I., Wong, E., Li, M., Lee, W., and Cheng, C. (2009). 14-3-3 and its binding partners are regulators of protein-protein interactions during spermatogenesis. J. Endocrinol. 202, 327-336. doi: 10.1677/JOE-09-0041.
45. Tinti, M., Johnson, C., Toth, R., Ferrier, D. E. K., and MacKintosh, C. (2012). Evolution of signal multiplexing by 14-3-3-binding 2R-ohnologue protein families in the vertebrates. Open Biol. 2, 120103. doi: 10.1098/rsob.120103.
46. Tompa, P. (2011). Unstructural biology coming of age. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 419-425. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.012.
47. Uhart, M., and Bustos, D. M. (2013). Human 14-3-3 paralogs differences uncovered by cross-talk of phosphorylation and lysine acetylation. PLoS ONE 8:e55703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055703.
48. Uhart, M., Iglesias, A., and Bustos, D. (2011). Structurally constrained residues outside the binding motif are essential in the interaction of 14-3-3 and phosphorylated partner. J. Mol. Biol. 406, 552-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.12.043.
49. Uversky, V. N., and Dunker, A. K. (2010). Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 1231-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.01.017.
50. Ward, J., Sodhi, J., Mcguffin, L., Buxton, B., and Jones, D. (2004). Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 635-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002.
51. Watts, D., and Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393, 440-442. doi: 10.1038/30918.
52. Wenfu, W., and Shakes, D. C. (1996). Molecular evolution of the 14-3-3 protein family. J. Mol. Evol. 43, 384-398. doi: 10.1007/BF02339012.
53. Wilker, E., and Yaffe, M. B. (2004). 14-3-3 Proteins - a focus on cancer and human disease. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 37, 633-642. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.04.015.
54. Woodcock, J., Ma, Y., Coolen, C., Pham, D., Jones, C., Lopez, A., et al. (2010). Sphingosine and FTY720 directly bind pro-survival 14-3-3 proteins to regulate their function. Cell. Signal. 22, 1291-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.04.004.
55. Wright, P., and Dyson, H. (2009). Linking folding and binding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.12.003.
56. Wu, J., Vallenius, T., Ovaska, K., Westermarck, J., Mäkelä, T. P., and Hautaniemi, S. (2009). Integrated network analysis platform for protein-protein interactions. Nat. Methods 6, 75-77. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1282.
57. Yaffe, M. B. (2002). How do 14-3-3 proteins work? Gatekeeper phosphorylation and the molecular anvil hypothesis. FEBS Lett. 513, 53-57. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03288-4.
58. Yang, X., Lee, W. H., Sobott, F., Papagrigoriou, E., Robinson, C. V., Grossmann, J. G., et al. (2006). Structural basis for protein-protein interactions in the 14-3-3 protein family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 17237-17242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605779103.