Differential genetic interactions between Sgs1, DNA-damage checkpoint components and DNA repair factors in the maintenance of chromosome stability

Genome Integrity

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Doerfler, Lillian ^a   Harris, Lorena ^a   Viebranz, Emilie ^a   Schmidt, Kristina H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA damage checkpoint; Genome instability; Mitotic recombination; Sgs1; Translocations

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; BLOOM SYNDROME HELICASE; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CHECKPOINT KINASE TEL1; DUN1 KINASE; EXONUCLEASE; HELICASE; HYDROXYUREA; MEC1 KINASE; MEC3 KINASE; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; PROTEIN EXO1; SGS1 HELICASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALP1 GENE; ARTICLE; CAN1 GENE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHK1 GENE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DUN1 GENE; EXO1 GENE; GENE; GENE DELETION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MUTATION; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENETIC RESISTANCE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; LYP 1 GENE; MEC1 GENE; MEC3 GENE; MISMATCH REPAIR; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RAD59 GENE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TEL1 GENE;

EID: 84861801208     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20419414     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-9414-2-8     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Myung K, Chen C, Kolodner RD. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2001, 411:1073-1076. 10.1038/35082608, 11429610.
2. Myung K, Datta A, Chen C, Kolodner RD. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat Genet 2001, 27:113-116. 10.1038/83673, 11138010.
3. Myung K, Datta A, Kolodner RD. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2001, 104:397-408. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00227-6, 11239397.
4. Myung K, Kolodner RD. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:4500-4507. 10.1073/pnas.062702199, 123677, 11917116.
5. Myung K, Pennaneach V, Kats ES, Kolodner RD. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin-assembly factors that act during DNA replication function in the maintenance of genome stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:6640-6645. 10.1073/pnas.1232239100, 164500, 12750463.
6. Putnam CD, Hayes TK, Kolodner RD. Specific pathways prevent duplication-mediated genome rearrangements. Nature 2009, 460:984-989. 10.1038/nature08217, 2785216, 19641493.
7. Putnam CD, Jaehnig EJ, Kolodner RD. Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8:974-982.
8. Putnam CD, Pennaneach V, Kolodner RD. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to define the chromosomal instability phenotype. Mol Cell Biol 2005, 25:7226-7238. 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7226-7238.2005, 1190249, 16055731.
9. Schmidt KH, Kolodner RD. Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:18196-18201. 10.1073/pnas.0608566103, 1838729, 17114288.
10. Schmidt KH, Wu J, Kolodner RD. Control of Translocations between Highly Diverged Genes by Sgs1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homolog of the Bloom's Syndrome Protein. Mol Cell Biol 2006, 26:5406-5420. 10.1128/MCB.00161-06, 1592713, 16809776.
11. Antoccia A, Kobayashi J, Tauchi H, Matsuura S, Komatsu K. Nijmegen breakage syndrome and functions of the responsible protein, NBS1. Genome Dyn 2006, 1:191-205.
12. Carney JP, Maser RS, Olivares H, Davis EM, Le Beau M, Yates JR, Hays L, Morgan WF, Petrini JH. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 1998, 93:477-486. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81175-7, 9590181.
13. Varon R, Vissinga C, Platzer M, Cerosaletti KM, Chrzanowska KH, Saar K, Beckmann G, Seemanova E, Cooper PR, Nowak NJ, et al. Nibrin, a novel DNA double-strand break repair protein, is mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Cell 1998, 93:467-476. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81174-5, 9590180.
14. Ellis NA, Groden J, Ye TZ, Straughen J, Lennon DJ, Ciocci S, Proytcheva M, German J. The Bloom's syndrome gene product is homologous to RecQ helicases. Cell 1995, 83:655-666. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90105-1, 7585968.
15. Yu CE, Oshima J, Fu YH, Wijsman EM, Hisama F, Alisch R, Matthews S, Nakura J, Miki T, Ouais S, et al. Positional cloning of the Werner's syndrome gene. Science 1996, 272:258-262. 10.1126/science.272.5259.258, 8602509.
16. Savitsky K, Bar-Shira A, Gilad S, Rotman G, Ziv Y, Vanagaite L, Tagle DA, Smith S, Uziel T, Sfez S, et al. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 1995, 268:1749-1753. 10.1126/science.7792600, 7792600.
17. Morrow DM, Tagle DA, Shiloh Y, Collins FS, Hieter P. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 1995, 82:831-840. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90480-8, 7545545.
18. Lydeard JR, Lipkin-Moore Z, Jain S, Eapen VV, Haber JE. Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000973. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000973, 2877739, 20523895.
19. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008, 455:770-774. 10.1038/nature07312, 18806779.
20. Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 2008, 134:981-994. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037, 2662516, 18805091.
21. Marrero VA, Symington LS. Extensive DNA end processing by exo1 and sgs1 inhibits break-induced replication. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1001007. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001007, 2900301, 20628570.
22. Cobb JA, Bjergbaek L, Gasser SM. RecQ helicases: at the heart of genetic stability. FEBS Lett 2002, 529:43-48. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03269-6, 12354611.
23. Frei C, Gasser SM. The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci. Genes Dev 2000, 14:81-96. 316339, 10640278.
24. Ira G, Malkova A, Liberi G, Foiani M, Haber JE. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 2003, 115:401-411. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00886-9, 14622595.
25. Lee SK, Johnson RE, Yu SL, Prakash L, Prakash S. Requirement of yeast SGS1 and SRS2 genes for replication and transcription. Science 1999, 286:2339-2342. 10.1126/science.286.5448.2339, 10600744.
26. Versini G, Comet I, Wu M, Hoopes L, Schwob E, Pasero P. The yeast Sgs1 helicase is differentially required for genomic and ribosomal DNA replication. Embo J 2003, 22:1939-1949. 10.1093/emboj/cdg180, 154472, 12682026.
27. Bentley NJ, Holtzman DA, Flaggs G, Keegan KS, DeMaggio A, Ford JC, Hoekstra M, Carr AM. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. Embo J 1996, 15:6641-6651. 452488, 8978690.
28. Carr AM. Control of cell cycle arrest by the Mec1sc/Rad3sp DNA structure checkpoint pathway. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1997, 7:93-98. 10.1016/S0959-437X(97)80115-3, 9024628.
29. Cimprich KA, Shin TB, Keith CT, Schreiber SL. cDNA cloning and gene mapping of a candidate human cell cycle checkpoint protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:2850-2855. 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2850, 39722, 8610130.
30. Weinert TA, Kiser GL, Hartwell LH. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev 1994, 8:652-665. 10.1101/gad.8.6.652, 7926756.
31. Tercero JA, Diffley JF. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 2001, 412:553-557. 10.1038/35087607, 11484057.
32. Merrill BJ, Holm C. A requirement for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is caused by DNA replication defects of mec1 mutants. Genetics 1999, 153:595-605. 1460794, 10511542.
33. Grushcow JM, Holzen TM, Park KJ, Weinert T, Lichten M, Bishop DK. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics 1999, 153:607-620. 1460798, 10511543.
34. Kato R, Ogawa H. An essential gene, ESR1, is required for mitotic cell growth, DNA repair and meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:3104-3112. 10.1093/nar/22.15.3104, 310282, 8065923.
35. Lydall D, Nikolsky Y, Bishop DK, Weinert T. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 1996, 383:840-843. 10.1038/383840a0, 8893012.
36. Greenwell PW, Kronmal SL, Porter SE, Gassenhuber J, Obermaier B, Petes TD. TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 1995, 82:823-829. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90479-4, 7671310.
37. Ritchie KB, Mallory JC, Petes TD. Interactions of TLC1 (which encodes the RNA subunit of telomerase), TEL1, and MEC1 in regulating telomere length in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:6065-6075. 84515, 10454554.
38. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996, 271:357-360. 10.1126/science.271.5247.357, 8553072.
39. Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev 2001, 15:2809-2821. 312815, 11691833.
40. Kondo T, Wakayama T, Naiki T, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 2001, 294:867-870. 10.1126/science.1063827, 11679674.
41. Makovets S, Blackburn EH. DNA damage signalling prevents deleterious telomere addition at DNA breaks. Nat Cell Biol 2009, 11:1383-1386. 10.1038/ncb1985, 2806817, 19838171.
42. Zhang W, Durocher D. De novo telomere formation is suppressed by the Mec1-dependent inhibition of Cdc13 accumulation at DNA breaks. Genes Dev 24:502-515.
43. Bashkirov VI, King JS, Bashkirova EV, Schmuckli-Maurer J, Heyer WD. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol Cell Biol 2000, 20:4393-4404. 10.1128/MCB.20.12.4393-4404.2000, 85806, 10825202.
44. Flott S, Alabert C, Toh GW, Toth R, Sugawara N, Campbell DG, Haber JE, Pasero P, Rouse J. Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 regulates the single-strand annealing mode of DNA repair in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2007, 27:6433-6445. 10.1128/MCB.00135-07, 2099619, 17636031.
45. Ehmsen KT, Heyer WD. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mus81-Mms4 is a catalytic, DNA structure-selective endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:2182-2195. 10.1093/nar/gkm1152, 2367710, 18281703.
46. Mordes DA, Nam EA, Cortez D. Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:18730-18734. 10.1073/pnas.0806621105, 2596233, 19028869.
47. Herzberg K, Bashkirov VI, Rolfsmeier M, Haghnazari E, McDonald WH, Anderson S, Bashkirova EV, Yates JR, Heyer WD. Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 2006, 26:8396-8409. 10.1128/MCB.01317-06, 1636779, 16966380.
48. Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell 1993, 75:1119-1127. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-G, 8261511.
49. Huang M, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell 1998, 94:595-605. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81601-3, 9741624.
50. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, Elledge SJ. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999, 286:1166-1171. 10.1126/science.286.5442.1166, 10550056.
51. Gardner R, Putnam CW, Weinert T. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. Embo J 1999, 18:3173-3185. 10.1093/emboj/18.11.3173, 1171398, 10357828.
52. Chan JE, Kolodner RD. A genetic and structural study of genome rearrangements mediated by high copy repeat Ty1 elements. PLoS Genet 7:e1002089.
53. Chen Q, Ijpma A, Greider CW. Two survivor pathways that allow growth in the absence of telomerase are generated by distinct telomere recombination events. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21:1819-1827. 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1819-1827.2001, 86745, 11238918.
54. Teng SC, Chang J, McCowan B, Zakian VA. Telomerase-independent lengthening of yeast telomeres occurs by an abrupt Rad50p-dependent, Rif-inhibited recombinational process. Mol Cell 2000, 6:947-952. 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00094-8, 11090632.
55. Teng SC, Zakian VA. Telomere-telomere recombination is an efficient bypass pathway for telomere maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:8083-8093. 84893, 10567534.
56. Malkova A, Ivanov EL, Haber JE. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:7131-7136. 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7131, 38948, 8692957.
57. Signon L, Malkova A, Naylor ML, Klein H, Haber JE. Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21:2048-2056. 10.1128/MCB.21.6.2048-2056.2001, 86809, 11238940.
58. Symington LS. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002, 66:630-670. table of contents, 10.1128/MMBR.66.4.630-670.2002, 134659, 12456786.
59. Sugawara N, Ira G, Haber JE. DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 2000, 20:5300-5309. 10.1128/MCB.20.14.5300-5309.2000, 85979, 10866686.
60. Schmidt KH, Viebranz E, Doerfler L, Lester C, Rubenstein A. Formation of complex and unstable chromosomal translocations in yeast. PLoS One 2010, 5:e12007. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012007, 2918500, 20711256.
61. Pannunzio NR, Manthey GM, Bailis AM. RAD59 is required for efficient repair of simultaneous double-strand breaks resulting in translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008, 7:788-800.
62. Onoda F, Seki M, Miyajima A, Enomoto T. Elevation of sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sgs1 disruptants and the relevance of the disruptants as a system to evaluate mutations in Bloom's syndrome gene. Mutat Res 2000, 459:203-209.
63. Ooi SL, Shoemaker DD, Boeke JD. DNA helicase gene interaction network defined using synthetic lethality analyzed by microarray. Nat Genet 2003, 35:277-286. 10.1038/ng1258, 14566339.
64. Watt PM, Hickson ID, Borts RH, Louis EJ. SGS1, a homologue of the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1996, 144:935-945. 1207633, 8913739.
65. Louis EJ, Haber JE. The structure and evolution of subtelomeric Y' repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992, 131:559-574. 1205030, 1628806.
66. Lydeard JR, Jain S, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 2007, 448:820-823. 10.1038/nature06047, 17671506.
67. Fishman-Lobell J, Haber JE. Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1. Science 1992, 258:480-484. 10.1126/science.1411547, 1411547.
68. Ivanov EL, Haber JE. RAD1 and RAD10, but not other excision repair genes, are required for double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15:2245-2251. 230452, 7891718.
69. Hwang JY, Smith S, Myung K. The Rad1-Rad10 complex promotes the production of gross chromosomal rearrangements from spontaneous DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2005, 169:1927-1937. 10.1534/genetics.104.039768, 1449617, 15687264.
70. Bartsch S, Kang LE, Symington LS. RAD51 is required for the repair of plasmid double-stranded DNA gaps from either plasmid or chromosomal templates. Mol Cell Biol 2000, 20:1194-1205. 10.1128/MCB.20.4.1194-1205.2000, 85244, 10648605.
71. Malagon F, Aguilera A. Yeast spt6-140 mutation, affecting chromatin and transcription, preferentially increases recombination in which Rad51p-mediated strand exchange is dispensable. Genetics 2001, 158:597-611. 1461695, 11404325.
72. Tran PT, Erdeniz N, Symington LS, Liskay RM. EXO1-A multi-tasking eukaryotic nuclease. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3:1549-1559.
73. Schmutte C, Sadoff MM, Shim KS, Acharya S, Fishel R. The interaction of DNA mismatch repair proteins with human exonuclease I. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:33011-33018. 10.1074/jbc.M102670200, 11427529.
74. Tishkoff DX, Boerger AL, Bertrand P, Filosi N, Gaida GM, Kane MF, Kolodner RD. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, a gene encoding an exonuclease that interacts with MSH2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:7487-7492. 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7487, 23848, 9207118.
75. Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko MK, Morrice N, Lydall D. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. Embo J 2008, 27:2400-2410. 10.1038/emboj.2008.171, 2532783, 18756267.
76. Chen C, Umezu K, Kolodner RD. Chromosomal rearrangements occur in S. cerevisiae rfa1 mutator mutants due to mutagenic lesions processed by double-strand-break repair. Mol Cell 1998, 2:9-22. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80109-4, 9702187.
77. Schmidt KH, Pennaneach V, Putnam CD, Kolodner RD. Analysis of gross-chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol 2006, 409:462-476.
78. Gietz RD, Woods RA. Yeast transformation by the LiAc/SS Carrier DNA/PEG method. Methods Mol Biol 2006, 313:107-120.
79. Lea DE, Coulson CA. The distribution of the number of mutants in bacterial populations. J Genet 1949, 49:264-285.
80. Nair KR. Table of confidence intervals for the median in samples from any continuous population. Sankhya 1940, 4:551-558.
81. Mirzaei H, Syed S, Kennedy J, Schmidt KH. Sgs1 truncations inducegenome rearrangements but suppress detrimental effects of BLM overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol 2011, 405:877-891. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.035, 21111748.
82. Schmidt KH, Viebranz EB, Harris LB, Mirzaei-Souderjani H, Syed S, Medicus R. Defects in DNA lesion bypass lead to spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements and increased cell death. Eukaryot Cell 2010, 9:315-324. 10.1128/EC.00260-09, 2823012, 20008080.