Protein-Protein Docking with Dynamic Residue Protonation States

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Kilambi, Krishna Praneeth ^a   Reddy, Kavan ^a   Gray, Jeffrey J ^a,b  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; PH SENSORS; PROTEINS; PROTONATION;

DOCKING SIMULATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; LOCAL PH; PH CONDITION; PH SENSITIVE; PROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; PROTONATION STATE; SIDE-CHAINS;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HYDROGEN BOND; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHDOCK ALGORITHM; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTON TRANSPORT; ROSETTADOCK ALGORITHM; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM;

PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTON;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HYDROGEN BONDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; PROTONS;

EID: 84919607747     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004018     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Schönichen A, Webb BA, Jacobson MP, Barber DL, (2013) Considering Protonation as a Posttranslational Modification Regulating Protein Structure and Function. Annu Rev Biophys 42: 289–314 doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102349
2. Garcia-Moreno B, (2009) Adaptations of proteins to cellular and subcellular pH. J Biol 8: 1–4 doi:10.1186/jbiol199
3. Sheinerman FB, Norel R, Honig B, (2000) Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10: 153–159 doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00065-8
4. Warshel A, Dryga A, (2011) Simulating electrostatic energies in proteins: Perspectives and some recent studies of pKas, redox, and other crucial functional properties. Proteins 79: 3469–3484 doi:10.1002/prot.23125
5. Mitra RC, Zhang Z, Alexov E, (2011) In silico modeling of pH-optimum of protein–protein binding. Proteins 79: 925–936.
6. Onufriev AV, Alexov E, (2013) Protonation and pK changes in protein–ligand binding. Q Rev Biophys 46: 181–209 doi:10.1017/S0033583513000024
7. Wass MN, Fuentes G, Pons C, Pazos F, Valencia A, (2011) Towards the prediction of protein interaction partners using physical docking. Mol Syst Biol 7: 469 doi:10.1038/msb.2011.3
8. Lopes A, Sacquin-Mora S, Dimitrova V, Laine E, Ponty Y, et al. (2013) Protein-Protein Interactions in a Crowded Environment: An Analysis via Cross-Docking Simulations and Evolutionary Information. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003369 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003369
9. Szilagyi A, Zhang Y, (2014) Template-based structure modeling of protein–protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 24: 10–23 doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.005
10. Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli A-M, Clarke B, LaLonde J, et al. (2006) A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions. J Med Chem 49: 5912–5931 doi:10.1021/jm050362n
11. Polgár T, Magyar C, Simon I, Keserü GM, (2007) Impact of Ligand Protonation on Virtual Screening against β-Secretase (BACE1). J Chem Inf Model 47: 2366–2373 doi:10.1021/ci700223p
12. Bas DC, Rogers DM, Jensen JH, (2008) Very fast prediction and rationalization of pKa values for protein–ligand complexes. Proteins 73: 765–783.
13. Kalliokoski T, Salo HS, Lahtela-Kakkonen M, Poso A, (2009) The Effect of Ligand-Based Tautomer and Protomer Prediction on Structure-Based Virtual Screening. J Chem Inf Model 49: 2742–2748 doi:10.1021/ci900364w
14. Ten Brink T, Exner TE, (2009) Influence of Protonation, Tautomeric, and Stereoisomeric States on Protein−Ligand Docking Results. J Chem Inf Model 49: 1535–1546 doi:10.1021/ci800420z
15. Park M-S, Gao C, Stern HA, (2011) Estimating binding affinities by docking/scoring methods using variable protonation states. Proteins 79: 304–314 doi:10.1002/prot.22883
16. Spassov VZ, Yan L, (2013) pH-selective mutagenesis of protein–protein interfaces: In silico design of therapeutic antibodies with prolonged half-life. Proteins 81: 704–714 doi:10.1002/prot.24230
17. De Vries SJ, van Dijk M, Bonvin AMJJ, (2010) The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protocols 5: 883–897 doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.32
18. Vriend G, (1990) WHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graph 8: 52–56 doi:10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-V
19. Georgescu RE, Alexov EG, Gunner MR, (2002) Combining Conformational Flexibility and Continuum Electrostatics for Calculating pKas in Proteins. Biophys J 83: 1731–1748.
20. Nielsen JE, Gunner MR, García-Moreno E B, (2011) The pKa Cooperative: A collaborative effort to advance structure-based calculations of pKa values and electrostatic effects in proteins. Proteins 79: 3249–3259 doi:10.1002/prot.23194
21. Dong F, Olsen B, Baker NA, (2008) Computational Methods for Biomolecular Electrostatics. Methods Cell Biol 84: 843–870 doi:10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84026-X
22. Castañeda CA, Fitch CA, Majumdar A, Khangulov V, Schlessman JL, et al. (2009) Molecular determinants of the pKa values of Asp and Glu residues in staphylococcal nuclease. Proteins 77: 570–588.
23. Karp DA, Stahley MR, García-Moreno E B, (2010) Conformational Consequences of Ionization of Lys, Asp, and Glu Buried at Position 66 in Staphylococcal Nuclease. Biochemistry 49: 4138–4146 doi:10.1021/bi902114m
24. Isom DG, Castañeda CA, Cannon BR, García-Moreno E B, (2011) Large shifts in pKa values of lysine residues buried inside a protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 5260–5265 doi:10.1073/pnas.1010750108
25. Kilambi KP, Gray JJ, (2012) Rapid calculation of protein pKa values using Rosetta. Biophys J 103: 587–595 doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.044
26. Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis S, Lange O, Thompson J, et al. (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Meth Enz 487: 545–574.
27. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, et al. (2003) Protein-Protein Docking with Simultaneous Optimization of Rigid-body Displacement and Side-chain Conformations. J Mol Biol 331: 281–299 doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00670-3
28. Chaudhury S, Berrondo M, Weitzner BD, Muthu P, Bergman H, et al. (2011) Benchmarking and Analysis of Protein Docking Performance in Rosetta v3.2. PLoS ONE 6: e22477 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022477
29. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z, (2010) Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 78: 3111–3114 doi:10.1002/prot.22830
30. Martin WL, West Jr AP, Gan L, Bjorkman PJ, (2001) Crystal Structure at 2.8 Å of an FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex: Mechanism of pH-Dependent Binding. Molecular Cell 7: 867–877 doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00230-1
31. Dunbrack RL, Cohen FE, (1997) Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Science 6: 1661–1681.
32. Pollet A, Sansen S, Raedschelders G, Gebruers K, Rabijns A, et al. (2009) Identification of structural determinants for inhibition strength and specificity of wheat xylanase inhibitors TAXI-IA and TAXI-IIA. FEBS J 276: 3916–3927 doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07105.x
33. Méndez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ, (2005) Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 60: 150–169 doi:10.1002/prot.20551
34. Conway P, Tyka MD, DiMaio F, Konerding DE, Baker D, (2014) Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling. Protein Science 23: 47–55 doi:10.1002/pro.2389
35. Fierens K, Gils A, Sansen S, Brijs K, Courtin CM, et al. (2005) His374 of wheat endoxylanase inhibitor TAXI-I stabilizes complex formation with glycoside hydrolase family 11 endoxylanases. FEBS J 272: 5872–5882 doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04987.x
36. Efron B, (1979) Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Ann Statist 7: 1–26 doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552
37. Xu D, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R, (1997) Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. Protein Eng 10: 999–1012 doi:10.1093/protein/10.9.999
38. Janin J, Chothia C, (1990) The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Biol Chem 265: 16027–16030.
39. Sundquist WI, Schubert HL, Kelly BN, Hill GC, Holton JM, et al. (2004) Ubiquitin Recognition by the Human TSG101 Protein. Molecular Cell 13: 783–789 doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00129-7
40. Xu HE, Lambert MH, Montana VG, Plunket KD, Moore LB, et al. (2001) Structural determinants of ligand binding selectivity between the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 13919–13924 doi:10.1073/pnas.241410198
41. Bourne Y, Watson MH, Hickey MJ, Holmes W, Rocque W, et al. (1996) Crystal Structure and Mutational Analysis of the Human CDK2 Kinase Complex with Cell Cycle–Regulatory Protein CksHs1. Cell 84: 863–874 doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81065-X
42. Bonvin AM, (2006) Flexible protein–protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16: 194–200 doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.002
43. Chaudhury S, Gray JJ, (2008) Conformer Selection and Induced Fit in Flexible Backbone Protein-Protein Docking Using Computational and NMR Ensembles. J Mol Biol 381: 1068–1087 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.042
44. Bradley P, Misura KMS, Baker D, (2005) Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins. Science 309: 1868–1871.
45. Misura KMS, Baker D, (2005) Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models. Proteins 59: 15–29 doi:10.1002/prot.20376
46. Frigerio F, Coda A, Pugliese L, Lionetti C, Menegatti E, et al. (1992) Crystal and molecular structure of the bovine α-chymotrypsin-eglin c complex at 2.0 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 225: 107–123 doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)91029-O
47. Braden BC, Souchon H, Eiselé J-L, Bentley GA, Bhat TN, et al. (1994) Three-dimensional structures of the free and the antigen-complexed Fab from monoclonal anti-lysozyme antibody D44.1. J Mol Biol 243: 767–781 doi:10.1016/0022-2836(94)90046-9
48. Kastritis PL, Bonvin AMJJ, (2010) Are Scoring Functions in Protein−Protein Docking Ready To Predict Interactomes? Clues from a Novel Binding Affinity Benchmark. J Proteome Res 9: 2216–2225 doi:10.1021/pr9009854
49. Moal IH, Agius R, Bates PA, (2011) Protein–protein binding affinity prediction on a diverse set of structures. Bioinformatics 27: 3002–3009 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr513
50. Kilambi KP, Pacella MS, Xu J, Labonte JW, Porter JR, et al. (2013) Extending RosettaDock with water, sugar, and pH for prediction of complex structures and affinities for CAPRI rounds 20–27. Proteins 81: 2201–2209 doi:10.1002/prot.24425
51. Ghetie V, Ward ES, (2000) Multiple Roles for the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I– Related Receptor FcRn. Annu Rev Immunol 18: 739–766 doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.739
52. Raghavan M, Bonagura VR, Morrison SL, Bjorkman PJ, (1995) Analysis of the pH Dependence of the Neonatal Fc Receptor/Immunoglobulin G Interaction Using Antibody and Receptor Variants. Biochemistry 34: 14649–14657 doi:10.1021/bi00045a005
53. Zhang Z, Lange OF, (2013) Replica Exchange Improves Sampling in Low-Resolution Docking Stage of RosettaDock. PLoS ONE 8: e72096 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072096
54. Kaufmann KW, Lemmon GH, DeLuca SL, Sheehan JH, Meiler J, (2010) Practically Useful: What the Rosetta Protein Modeling Suite Can Do for You. Biochemistry 49: 2987–2998 doi:10.1021/bi902153g
55. Strauch E-M, Fleishman SJ, Baker D (2013) Computational design of a pH-sensitive IgG binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA: 201313605. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313605111.
56. Janin J, (2013) The targets of CAPRI rounds 20–27. Proteins 81: 2075–2081 doi:10.1002/prot.24375
57. Anderson DE, Becktel WJ, Dahlquist FW, (1990) pH-Induced denaturation of proteins: a single salt bridge contributes 3–5 kcal/mol to the free energy of folding of T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry 29: 2403–2408 doi:10.1021/bi00461a025
58. Mosca R, Céol A, Aloy P, (2013) Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks. Nat Meth 10: 47–53 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2289
59. Vakser IA, (2013) Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23: 198–205 doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2012.12.003
60. Zhang QC, Petrey D, Deng L, Qiang L, Shi Y, et al. (2012) Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature 490: 556–560 doi:10.1038/nature11503
61. Casey JR, Grinstein S, Orlowski J, (2010) Sensors and regulators of intracellular pH. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 50–61 doi:10.1038/nrm2820
62. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235–242 doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235
63. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, et al. (2005) Protein–protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update. Proteins 60: 214–216 doi:10.1002/prot.20560
64. Moutevelis E, Warwicker J, (2004) Prediction of pKa and redox properties in the thioredoxin superfamily. Protein Science 13: 2744–2752 doi:10.1110/ps.04804504
65. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, et al. (1983) CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4: 187–217 doi:10.1002/jcc.540040211
66. Lazaridis T, Karplus M, (1999) Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35: 133–152.
67. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D, (2003) An Orientation-dependent Hydrogen Bonding Potential Improves Prediction of Specificity and Structure for Proteins and Protein-Protein Complexes. J Mol Biol 326: 1239–1259 doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00021-4
68. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, et al. (1999) Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 34: 82–95.
69. Chaudhury S, Lyskov S, Gray JJ, (2010) PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta. Bioinformatics 26: 689–691 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007