Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 82-95

  Simons, Kim T ^a   Ruczinski, Ingo ^b   Kooperberg, Charles ^c   Fox, Brian A ^a   Bystroff, Chris ^a   Baker, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Knowledge based scoring functions; Protein folding; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 0032929780     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<82::AID-PROT7>3.0.CO;2-A     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
2. Dandekar T, Argos P. Identifying the tertiary fold of small proteins with different topologies from sequence and secondary structure using the genetic algorithm and extended criteria specific for strand regions. J Mol Biol 1996;256:645-660.
3. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Tsai J, Levitt M. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1996;257:716-725.
4. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins 1994;18:338-352.
5. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256: 623-644.
6. Monge A, Lathrop EJ, Gunn JR, Shenkin PS, Friesner RA. Computer modeling of protein folding: conformational and energetic analysis of reduced and detailed protein models. J Mol Biol 1995;247:995-1012.
7. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
8. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213: 859-883.
9. Srinivasan R, Rose GD. LINUS: a hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein. Proteins 1995;22:81-99.
10. Kocher JA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1598-1613.
11. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate x-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996; 258:367-392.
12. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
13. Swayne DF, Cook D, Buja A. XGobi: Interactive dynamic graphics in the X Window system with a link to S. Proceedings of the 1991 American Statistical Association Meetings. Alexandria, VA: ASA; 1992.
14. Harris NL, Presnell SR, Cohen FE. Four helix bundle diversity in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;236:1356-1368.
15. Walther D, Eisenhaber F, Argos P. Principles of helix-helix packing in proteins: the helical lattice superposition model. J Mol Biol 1996;255:536-553.
16. Efimov AV. A novel super-secondary structure of proteins and the relation between structure and the amino acid sequence. FEES 1984;166:33-38.
17. Richardson JS. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Adv Protein Chem 1981;34:167-339.
18. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Coordination geometry of nonbonded residues in globular proteins. Folding Design 1996;28:357-370.
19. Mitchell JBO, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Non-randomness in side-chain packing: the distribution of interplanar angles. Proteins 1996;29:370-380.
20. Bystroff C, Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 1998;281:565-577.
21. Genest C, Zidek J. Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. Stat Sci 1986;1:114-148.
22. Reddy BVB, Blundell TL. Packing of secondary structural elements in proteins. J Mol Biol 1993;233:464-479.
23. Holm L, Sander C. Database algorithm for generating protein backbone and side-chain co-ordinates from a Cα trace. J Mol Biol 1991;218:183-194.
24. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJ, et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
25. Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994;3:522-524.
26. Bowie JU. Helix packing angle preferences. Nature Struct Biol 1997;4:915-917.
27. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
28. Reid LS, Thornton JM. Rebuilding flavodoxin from C alpha coordinates: a test study. Proteins 1989;5:170-182.