Logging tools to study digital writing processes

Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 507-533

  van Waes, Luuk ^a   Leijten, Mariëlle ^a   Wengelin, Åsa ^b   Lindgren, Eva ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919551346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (Eds.). (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and Pen: A new device for studying reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 38(2), 287-299.
3. Alves, R. A., Castro, S. L., de Sousa, L., & Strömqvist, S. (2007). Influence of typing skill on pause-execution cycles in written composition. In M. Torrance, D. Galbraith & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Recent developpements in writing-process research (Vol. 20, pp. 55-65). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Andersson, B., Dahl, J., Holmquist, K., Holsanova, J., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., ... Wengelin, Å. (2006). Combining keystroke logging with eye-tracking. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten & C. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and digital media (Vol. 17, pp. 166-172). Oxford: Elsevier.
5. Beers, S., Quinlan, T., & Harbaugh, A. (2010). Adolescent students' reading during writing behaviors and relationships with text quality: an eyetracking study. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 743-775.
6. Bowles, M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York: Routledge.
7. Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (2002). Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 405-415.
8. Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 1-36.
9. Bridwell, L. S., & Duin, A. H. (1985). Looking in-depth at writers: Computers as writing medium and research tool. In J. L. Collins & E. A. Sommers (Eds.), Writing on-line (pp. 115-121). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
10. Brotherton, P. (1979). Speaking and not speaking: Processes for translating ideas into speech. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Of speech and time: Temporal speech patterns in interpersonal contexts (pp. 179-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J. N., & Fayol, M. (1996). Writing in adults: A real-time approach. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 36-43). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
12. Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80-98.
13. Coover, J. E. (1923). A method of teaching typewriting based upon a psychological analysis of expert typing. National Education Association, 61, 561-567.
14. Eklund, R., & Shriberg, E. (1998). Crosslinguistic disfluency modelling: A comparative analysis of Swedish and American English human-human and human-machine dialogues. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney.
15. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
16. Fortune, A., & Thorp, D. (2001). Knotted and entangled: new light on the identification, classification and value of language related episodes in collaborative output tasks. Language Awareness, 10(2-3), 143-160.
17. Galbraith, D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing. Learning and Instruction, 32(2), 93-233.
18. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1961). The distribution of pause durations in speech. Language and Speech, 4, 232-237.
19. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press.
20. Grabowski, J. (2008). The internal structure of university students' keyboard skills. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 27-52.
21. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3-12.
22. Greene, S., & Higgins, L. (1994). "Once upon a time": The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing (pp. 115-140). London: Sage.
23. Hansen, G. (2006). Retrospection methods in translator training and translation research. Journal of Specialised Translation, 5(1), 2-41.
24. Hayes, J. R. (2004). What triggers revision? In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (Vol. 13, pp. 9-20). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. (2006). Is working memory Involved in the transcribing and editing of Texts? Written Communication, 23(2), 135-141.
26. Hayes, J. R., & Nash, J. G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 29-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Strömqvist, S., & Wengelin, A. (2002). Studying reading and writing online. In S. Strömqvist (Ed.), The diversity of languages and language learning (pp. 103-123). Lund: Lund University, Centre for Languages and Literature.
28. Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1997). Eye movements and eye-hand coordination during typing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(6), 153-157.
29. Jakobsen, A. L. (2006). Research methods in translation-Translog. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging: Methods and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 95-105). Oxford: Elsevier.
30. Janssen, D., Van Waes, L., & Van den Bergh, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 233-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Johansson, V. (2009). Developmental aspects of text production in writing and speech. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lund, Lund.
32. Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Kellogg, R. T. (2004). Working memory components in written sentence generation. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 341-361.
34. Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26.
35. Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production. Acta Psychologica, 124, 382-397.
36. Kollberg, P. (1998). S-notation-a computer-based method for studying and representing text composition. Unpublished Lic thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
37. Latif, M. M. A. (2009). A state-of-the-art review of the real-time computer-aided study of the writing process. International Journal of English Studies, 8(1), 29-50.
38. Leijten, M. (2007). Writing and speech recognition: Observing error correction strategies of professional writers (Vol. 160). Utrecht: LOT.
39. Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2006). Inputlog: New perspectives on the logging of on-line writing. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer key-stroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 73-94). Oxford: Elsevier.
40. Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., & Janssen, D. (2010). Error correction strategies of professional speech recognition users: Three profiles. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 964-975.
41. Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., & Ransdell, S. (2010). Correcting text production errors: Isolating the effects of writing mode from error span, input mode, and lexicality. Written Communication, 27(2), 189-227.
42. Lindgren, E. (2004). The uptake of peer-based intervention in the writing classroom. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching of writing (Vol. 14, pp. 259-274). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
43. Lindgren, E. (2005). Writing and revising: Didactic and methodological implications of keystroke logging (Skrifter från moderna språk, No. 18). Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Modern Languages.
44. Lindgren, E., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (in press). Adapting to the reader during writing. Written Language & Literacy.
45. Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2002). The LS graph: A methodology for visualising writing revision. Language Learning, 52(3), 565-595.
46. Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2003). Stimulated recall as a trigger for increasing noticing and language awareness in the L2 writing classroom: A case study of two young female writers. Language Awareness, 12, 172-186.
47. Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Analysing on-line revision. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging: Methods and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 157-188). Oxford: Elsevier.
48. Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. H., Deutschmann, M., & Steinvall, A. (2009). Supporting learner reflection in the language translation class. In M. Chang & C.-W. Kuo (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer enhanced language and culture learning (pp. 21-40). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
49. Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. H., Lindgren, U., & Spelman Miller, K. (2007). GIS for writing: Applying geographic information system techniques to data-mine writing's cognitive processes. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Methods and applications (Vol. 20, pp. 83-96). Oxford: Elsevier.
50. Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. H., & Spelman Miller, K. (2008). Development of fluency and revision in L1 and L2 writing in Swedish high school years 8 and 9. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 133-151.
51. Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. H., & Stevenson, M. (2008). Supporting the reflective language learner with computer keystroke logging. In B. Barber & F. Zhang (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-enhanced language acquisition and learning (pp. 189-204). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
52. Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(2), 113-134.
53. Matsuhashi, A. (1987). Revising the plan and altering the text. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 197-223). New York: Academic Press.
54. McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13-23.
55. Nottbusch, G. (2010). Grammatical planning, execution, and control in written sentence production. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 777-801.
56. Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., Weingarten, R., & Will, U. (2005). Syllabic structures in typing: Evidence from hearing-impaired writers. Reading and Writing, 18, 497-526.
57. Nottbusch, G., Weingarten, R., & Sahel, S. (2007). From written word to written sentence production. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (Vol. 20, pp. 31-54). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
58. Nottbusch, G., Weingarten, R., & Will, U. (1998). Schreiben mit der hand und schreiben mit dem computer. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie, 56, 11-27.
59. Perin, D. (2003). Progression analysis: Investigating writing strategies at the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(6), 907-921.
60. Piolat, A., Kellogg, R. T., & Farioli, F. (2001). The triple task technique for studying writing processes: On which task is attention focused? Current Psychology Letters. Brain, Behavior and Cognition, 4, 67-83.
61. Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Raedts, M., Van Steendam, E., ... Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Observation of peers in learning to write: Practice and research. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 53-83.
62. Rijlaarsdam, G., & Couzijn, M. (2000). Stimulating awareness of writing in the writing curriculum. In A. Camps & M. Milian (Eds.), Metalinguistic activity in learning to write (pp. 167-202). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
63. Schilperoord, J. (1996). The distribution of pause time in written text production. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 21-35). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
64. Schilperoord, J. (2002). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (Vol. 10, pp. 61-88). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
65. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
66. Severinson Eklundh, K. S. (1994). Linear and non-linear strategies in computer-based writing. Computers and Composition, 11, 203-216.
67. Severinson Eklundh, K. S., & Kollberg, P. (1992). Translating keystroke records into a general notation for the writing process (IPLab-59). Stockholm: Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
68. Severinson Eklundh, K. S., & Kollberg, P. (1996). Computer tools for tracing the writing process: From keystroke records to S-notation. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Models and methodology in writing research (pp. 526-541). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
69. Severinson Eklundh, K. S., & Kollberg, P. (2003). Emerging discourse structure: Computerassisted episode analysis as a window to global revision in university students' writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 869-891.
70. Simpson, S., & Torrance, M. (2007). EyeWrite (Version 5.1). Unpublished report.
71. Sleurs, K., Jacobs, G., & Van Waes, L. (2003). Constructing press releases, constructing quotations: A case study. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(2), 192-212.
72. Smagorinsky, P. (1989). The reliability and validity of protocol analysis. Written Communication, 6, 463-479.
73. Spelman Miller, K. (2000). Writing on-line: Temporal features of first and second language written text production. Unpublished PhD thesis, the University of Reading.
74. Spelman Miller, K. (2002). Units of production in writing: Towards a discourse perspective. In S. Burgess (Ed.), Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses (Vol. 44, pp. 115-139). Tenerife: University La Laguna.
75. Spelman Miller, K. (2006). The pausological study of written language production. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging: Methods and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 11-30). Oxford: Elsevier.
76. Spelman Miller, K., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 433-454.
77. Spelman Miller, K., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Keystroke logging-an introduction. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 1-10). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
78. Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multidimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 201-233.
79. Strömqvist, S., & Malmsten, L. (1997). Scriptlog Pro 1.04-user's manual. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
80. Strömqvist, S., Nordqvist, Å., & Wengelin, Å. (2004). Writing the frog story-developmental and cross-modal perspectives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative-typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 359-394). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (2002). Self-assessment in autonomous computer-aided L2 writing. ELT Journal, 56(3), 258-266.
82. Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (2006). Computer key-stroke logging and writing. Oxford: Elsevier.
83. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251.
84. Swerts, M. (1998). Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 485-496.
85. Thorson, H. (2000). Using the computer to compare foreign and native language writing processes: A statistical and case study approach. Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 155-170.
86. Van den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D. T., & Schellens, P. J. (2004). Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: A methodological comparison. Interacting with Computers, 16, 1153-1170.
87. Van den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D. T., & Schellens, P. J. (2006). Hardopdenkprotocollen en gebruikersonderzoek: Volledigheid en reactiviteit van de synchrone hardopdenkmethode. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(3), 185-197.
88. Van Hout, T. (2009). Writing form sources: Ethnographic insights into business news production. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Ghent, Ghent.
89. Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Quinlan, T. (2010). Reading during sentence composing and error correction: A multilevel analysis of the influences of task complexity. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 803-834.
90. Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Van Weijen, D. (2009). Keystroke logging in writing research: Observing writing processes with Inputlog. GFL-German as a Foreign Language, 2(3), 41-64.
91. Van Waes, L., & Schellens, P. J. (2003). Writing profiles: The effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(6), 829-853.
92. Van Weijen, D. (2009). Writing processes, text quality, and task effects: Empirical studies in first and second language writing (Vol. 201). Utrecht: LOT.
93. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U. (2004). Morphemes, syllables and graphemes in written word production. In T. Pechmann & C. Habel (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to speech production (pp. 529-572). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
95. Wengelin, Å. (2001). From the "dyslexia classroom" to the "classroom for reading and writing difficulties"-How do spelling difficulties influence the text production? In W. Vagle & K. Wikberg (Eds.), New directions in Nordic text linguistics and discourse analysis: Methodological issues (pp. 160-175). Oslo: Novus.
96. Wengelin, Å. (2002). Text production in adults with reading and writing difficulties (PhD thesis). Gothenburgh Monographs in Linguistics 20. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.
97. Wengelin, Å. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theories, methods and empirical data. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer key-stroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 107-130). Oxford: Elsevier.
98. Wengelin, Å. (2007). The word level focus in text production by adults with reading and writing difficulties. In D. Galbraith, M. Torrance, & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Writing and cognition (pp. 68-82). Oxford: Elsevier.
99. Wengelin, Å., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2010). Studying reading during writing: New perspectives in research. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 735-742.
100. Wengelin, Å., & Strömqvist, S. (2000). Discourse level writing in dyslexics-methods, results and implications for diagnosis. Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Vocology, 25(1), 22-28.
101. Wengelin, Å., Torrance, M., Holmqvist, K., Simpson, S., Galbraith, D., Johansson, V., & Johansson, R. (2009). Combined eye-tracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 337-351.