Eye and Pen: A new device for studying reading during writing

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 287-299

  Alamargot, Denis ^a   Chesnet, David ^a   Dansac, Christophe ^b   Ros, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; WRITING;

EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; WRITING;

EID: 33748989527     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192780     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. AHLSÉN, E., & STRÖMQVIST, S. (1999). ScriptLog: A tool for logging the writing process and its possible diagnostic use. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice (pp. 144-149). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University.
2. ALAMARGOT, D., & CHANQUOY, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. ALAMARGOT, D., & CHANQUOY, L. (2002). Les modèles de rédaction de textes. In M. Fayol (Ed.), Production du langage: Traité des sciences cognitives (pp. 45-65). Paris: Hermes.
4. ALAMARGOT, D., DANSAC, C., & CHESNET, D. (in press). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In M. Torrance, D. Galbraith, & L. van Waes (Eds.), Recent developments in writing-process research (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. ALAMARGOT, D., DANSAC, C., ROS, C., & CHUY, M. (2005). Rédiger un texte procédural à partir de sources: Relations entre l'empan de mémoire de travail et l'activité oculaire du scripteur. In D. Alamargot, P. Terrier, & J. M. Cellier (Eds.), Production, compréhension et usages des écrits techniques au travail (pp. 51-68). Toulouse: Octarès.
6. ANDERSON, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science, 26, 85-112.
7. BACCINO, T., & PYNTE, J. (1998). Spatial encoding and referential processing during reading. European Psychologist, 3, 51-61.
8. BERNINGER, V. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99-112.
9. BOURDIN, B., & FAYOL, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 219-227.
10. BREETVELT, I., VAN DEN BERGH, H., & RIJLAARSDAM, G. (1996). Rereading and generating and their relation to text quality: An application of multilevel analysis on writing process data. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 10-20). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
11. BURTIS, P. J., BEREITER, C., SCARDAMALIA, M., & TETROE, J. (1983). The development of planning in writing. In B. M. Kroll & G. Wells (Eds.), Explorations in the development of writing (pp. 153-174). New York: Wiley.
12. BUTTERFIELD, E. C., HACKER, D. J., & ALBERTSON, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 239-297.
13. CACCAMISE, D. J. (1987). Idea generation in writing. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 224-253). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. CAPOROSSI, G., ALAMARGOT, D., & CHESNET, D. (2004). Using the computer to study the dynamics of handwriting processes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3245, 242-254.
15. CHANQUOY, L., & ALAMARGOT, D. (2002). Mémoire de travail et rédaction de textes: Evolution des modèles et bilan des premiers travaux. L'Année Psychologique, 102, 363-398.
16. CHANQUOY, L., FOULIN, J.-N., & FAYOL, M. (1990). Temporal management of short text writing by children and adults. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 10, 513-540.
17. CHESNET, D., & ALAMARGOT, D. (2005). Analyses en temps réel des activités oculaires et graphomotrices du scripteur: Intérêt du dispositif "Eye and Pen." L'Année Psychologique, 105, 477-520.
18. CHESNET, D., GUILLABERT, F., & ESPÉRET, E. (1994). G-Studio: Un logiciel pour l'étude en temps réel des paramètres temporels de la production écrite. L'Année Psychologique, 94, 115-125.
19. COLLEWIJN, H., STEINMAN, R. M., ERKELENS, C. J., PIZLO, Z., & VAN DER STEEN, J. (1992). Effect of freeing the head on eye movement characteristics during three-dimensional shifts of gaze tracking. In A. Berthoz, W. Graf, & P.-P. Vidal (Eds.), Head-neck sensory-motor system (pp. 412-418). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. COSTERMANS, J., & FAYOL, M. (EDS.) (1997). Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. DANEMAN, M., & GREEN, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 1-18.
22. DANSAC, C., & ALAMARGOT, D. (1999). Accessing referential information during text composition: When and why? In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 79-97). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
23. DANSAC, C., & PASSERAULT, J. M. (1996, October). Effect of re-reading suppression on the temporal parameters of text production. Paper presented at the European Writing Conference, Barcelona.
24. DUIN, A. H., & GRAVES, M. F. (1987). Intensive vocabulary instruction as a prewriting technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 311-330.
25. EHRLICHMAN, H., & WEINBERGER, A. (1978). Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1080-1101.
26. FAYOL, M., HUPET, M., & LARGY, P. (1999). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices' to experts' errors. Reading & Writing, 11, 153-174.
27. FAYOL, M., LARGY, P., & LEMAIRE, P. (1994). When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 437-464.
28. FLOWER, L., & HAYES, J. R. (1980). The dynamic of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31 -50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. FOULIN, J.-N. (1995). Pauses et débits: Les indicateurs temporels de la production écrite. L'Année Psychologique, 95, 483-504.
30. GLENBERG, A. M., SCHROEDER, J. L., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 651-658.
31. GRAHAM, S., & WEINTRAUB, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 7-87.
32. GRIFFIN, Z. M., & BOCK, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274-279.
33. GUFONI, V., FAYOL, M., & GOMBERT, J. E. (1994). Aided subsequent reports as a technique of studying written production: The effects of viewing and the length of text In G. Eigler & T. Jechle (Eds.), Writing: Current trends in European research (pp. 45-53). Freiburg, Germany: Hochschul.
34. HACKER, D. J. (1994). Comprehension monitoring as a writing process. In E. C. Butterfield & J. S. Carlson (Eds.). Children 's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 6, pp. 143-172). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
35. HAYES, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. HAYES, J. R., & FLOWER, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. HAYES, J. R., & FLOWER, L. S. (1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction of protocol analysis. In P. Mosenthal, S. Walmsley, & L. Tamor (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 206-219). New York: Longman.
38. HAYES, J. R., FLOWER, L. [S.], SCHRIVER, K. A., STRATMAN, J. F., & CAREY, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Reading, writing and language learning (Vol. 2, pp. 176-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. HAYES, J. R., & NASH, J. G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 29-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. HERST, A. N., EPELBOIM, J., & STEINMAN, R. M. (2001). Temporal coordination of the human head and eye during a natural sequential tapping task. Vision Research, 41, 3307-3319.
41. HULL, G. A., & SMITH, W. L. (1983). Interrupting visual feedback in writing. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 57, 963-978.
42. INHOFF, A. W., & GORDON, A. M. (1998). Eye movements and eye-hand coordination during typing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 153-157.
43. JANSSEN, D., VAN WAES, L., & VAN DEN BERGH, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 233-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. KAUFER, D. S., HAYES, J. R., & FLOWER, L. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 121-140.
45. KELLOGG, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15, 256-266.
46. KELLOGG, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 355-365.
47. KELLOGG, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57-72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. KENNEDY, A., RADACH, R., HELLER, D., & PYNTE, J. (EDS.) (2000). Reading as a perceptual process. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
49. KENNEDY, M. L. (1985). The composing process of students writing from sources. Written Communication, 2, 434-456.
50. KOWLER, E., PlZLO, Z., GUO-LIANG, Z., ERKELENS, C. J., STEINMAN, R. M., & COLLEWIJN, H. (1992). Coordination of head and eyes during the performance of natural (and unnatural) visual tasks. In A. Berthoz, W. Graf, & P.-P. Vidal (Eds.), Head-neck sensory-motor system (pp. 419-426). New York: Oxford University Press.
51. LARGY, P., & DEDEYAN, A. (2002). Automatisme en détection d'erreurs d'accord sujet-verbe: Étude chez l'enfant et l'adulte. L'Année Psychologique, 102, 201-234.
52. LEE, C. (1999). Eye and head coordination in reading: Roles of head movement and cognitive control. Vision Research, 39, 3761-3768.
53. LEVY, C. M., & RANSDELL, S. (1994). Computer-aided protocol analysis of writing processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 219-223.
54. MCCUTCHEN, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299-325.
55. MCCUTCHEN, D., FRANCIS, M., & KERR, S. (1997). Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 667-676.
56. MCGINLEY, W. (1992). The role of reading and writing while composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 226-247.
57. MEYER, A. S., SLEIDERINK, A. M., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
58. MIALL, R. C., & TCHALENKO, J. (2001). The painter's eye movements. Leonardo, 34, 35-40.
59. NASH, J. G., SCHUMACHER, G. M., & CARLSON, B. W. (1993). Writing from sources: A structure mapping model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 159-170.
60. O'HARA, K., TAYLOR, A., NEWMAN, W., & SELLEN, A. J. (2002). Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 56, 269-305.
61. OLIVE, T., & KELLOGG, R.T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high-and low-level production processes in written production. Memory & Cognition, 30, 594-600.
62. OLIVE, T., & PIOLAT, A. (2002). Suppressing visual feedback in written composition: Effects on processing demands and coordination of the writing processes. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 209-218.
63. PIOLAT, A., & OLIVE, T. (2000). Comment étudier le coût et le déroulement de la rédaction de textes? La méthode de triple tâche: Un bilan méthodologique. L'Année Psychologique, 465, 465-502.
64. PIOLAT, A., & PÉLISSIER, A. (1998). Étude de la rédaction de textes: Contraintes théoriques et méthodes de recherche. In A. Piolat & A. Pélissier (Eds.), La rédaction de textes: Approche cognitive (pp. 225-269). Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
65. RANSDELL, S. E. (1990). Using a real-time replay of students' word processing to understand and promote better writing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 142-144.
66. RANSDELL, S. [E.], ARECCO, M. R., & LEVY, C. M. (2001). Bilingual long-term working memory: The effects of working memory loads on writing quality and fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 113-128.
67. RANSDELL, S. [E.], & LEVY, C. M. (1996). Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 93-105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. RAYNER, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
69. REICHLE, E. D., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (2003). The performance of natural (and unnatural) visual tasks. The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavior & Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
70. RICHARDSON, D. C., & SPIVEY, M. J. (2004a). Eye-tracking: Characteristics and methods. In G. Wnek & G. Bowlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering (pp. 568-572). New York: Dekker. Abstract available at dekker.com/sdek/96019590-9133495/abstract~db=enc~content= a713554053?words=%7cspivey&hash =2398117647.
71. RICHARDSON, D. C., & SPIVEY, M. J. (2004b). Eye-tracking: Research areas and applications. In G. Wnek & G. Bowlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering (pp. 573-582). New York: Dekker. Abstract available at dekker.com/sdek/209608953-62770257/abstract~db=enc~content
72. SALVUCCI, D. D., & ANDERSON, J. R. (2001). Automated eye-movement protocol analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 39-86.
73. SCARDAMALIA, M., & BEREITER, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic and remedial capabilities in children's composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67-95). New York: Wiley.
74. SCHILPEROORD, J. (1996). It's about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
75. SCHUMACHER, G. M., KLARE, G. R., CRONIN, F. C., & MOSES, J. D. (1984). Cognitive activities of beginning and advanced college writers: A pausal analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 169-187.
76. SEVERINSON, E. K., & KOLLBERG, P. (1994, October). Computer tools for tracing the writing process: From keystroke records to S-notation. Paper presented at the EARLI/ECWC SIG Conference, Utrecht.
77. SIRC, G., & BRIDWELL-BOWLES, L. (1988). A computer tool for analysing the composing process. Collegiate Microcomputer, 6, 155-160.
78. SMYTH, M. M., & SILVERS, G. (1987). Functions of vision in the control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 65, 47-64.
79. TCHALENKO, J. (2001). Eye-hand coordination in portrait drawing: A case study. London: Camberwell College of Arts.
80. TORRANCE, M., THOMAS, G. V., & ROBINSON, E. J. (1996). Finding something to write about: Strategic and automatic processes in idea generation. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theory, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 199-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. VAN DEN BERGH, H., & RIJLAARSDAM, G. (1999). The dynamics of idea generation during writing: An on-line study. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 99-120). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
82. VAN GELDEREN, A., & OOSTDAM, R. H. (2002). Improving linguistic fluency for writing: Effects of explicitness and focus of instruction. L1-Educational Studies in Language & Literature, 2, 239-270.
83. VOSS, J. F., VESONDER, G. T., & SPILICH, G. J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 651-667.