Combined eyetracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 337-351

  Wengelin, Åsa ^a   Torrance, Mark ^b   Holmqvist, Kenneth ^a   Simpson, Sol ^c   Galbraith, David ^d   Johansson, Victoria ^a   Johansson, Roger ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c SR Research Ltd   (Canada)

^d STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; WRITING;

COGNITION; HUMANS; SOFTWARE; WRITING;

EID: 66149120287     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.337     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Studies in writing 9: Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and pen: A new device for studying reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 38, 287-299.
3. Allal, L., Chanquoy, L., & Largy, P. (eds.) (2004). Studies in writing 13: Revision. Cognitive and instructional processes. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Allum, P. H., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2007). Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 791-810.
5. Andersson, B., Dahl, J., Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., et al. (2006). Combining keystroke logging with eye tracking. In L. Van Waes, M. Leiten, & C. M. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and digital media (pp. 166-172). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Berman, R., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language & Literacy, 5, 1-43.
7. Bisaillon, J. (2007). Professional editing strategies used by six editors. Written Communication, 24, 295-322.
8. Breetvelt, I., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Rereading and generating and their relation to text quality: An application of multilevel analysis on writing process data. In G. Rijlaars-dam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 10-20). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
9. Britton, J. (1982). Shaping at the point of utterance. In G. M. Pradl (Ed.), Prospect and retrospect: Selected essays of James Britton (pp. 139-145). London: Boynton/Cook.
10. Butsch, R. (1932). Eye movements and the eye-hand-span in typewriting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 104-121.
11. Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J.-N., & Fayol, M. (1990). Temporal management of short text writing by children and adults. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 10, 513-540.
12. Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J.-N., & Fayol, M. (1996). Writing in adults: A real-time approach. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzin (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 36-44). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
13. Chesnet, D., & Alamargot, D. (2006). Eye and Pen (Version 1.0.). Poitiers: Octares.
14. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
15. Crain-Thoreson, C., Lippman, M. Z., & McClendon-Magnuson, D. (1997). Windows on comprehension: Reading processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 579-591.
16. Degenhardt, M. (2006). CAMTASIA and CATMOVIE: Two digital tools for observing, documenting and analysing writing processes of university students. In L. van Waes, M. Leijten, & C. M. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and digital media (pp. 180-188). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17. Eklund, R. (2004). Disfluency in Swedish human-human and humanmachine travel booking dialogues. Linköping Studies in Science & Technology (Dissertation No. 882). University of Linköping, Tekniska Högskolan.
18. Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). The pregnant pause: An enquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 229-243.
19. Foulin, J.-N. (1998). To what extent does pause location predict pause duration in adults' and children's writing? Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 17, 601-620.
20. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.
21. Hacker, D. J., Plumb, C., Butterfield, E. C., Quathamer, D., & Heineken, E. (1994). Text revision: Detection and correction of errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 65-78.
22. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Johansson, V., & Strömqvist, S. (2004). Perceiving and producing the frog story. In D. Ravid & H. B.-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 293-306). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
25. Holsanova, J. (2001). Picture viewing and picture description (Lund University Cognitive Studies No. 83). Lund: Lund University, Department of Philosophy.
26. Inhoff, A., & Gordon, A. (1998). Eye movements and eye-hand coordination during typing. Psychological Science, 6, 153-157.
27. Jansen, D., Van Waes, L., & van den Bergh, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 233-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Johansson, R., Wengelin, Å., Johansson, V., & Holmqvist, K. (in press). Looking at the keyboard or the monitor: Relationship with text production processes. Reading & Writing.
29. Just, P. A., & Carpenter, A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
30. Just, P. A., & Carpenter, A. (2002). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. In T. A. Polk & C. M. Seifert (Eds.), Cognitive modeling (pp. 131-180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Perspective-driven text comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 319-334.
32. Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15, 256-266.
33. Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209-226). Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
35. Kollmorgen, S., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Automatically detecting reading in eye tracking data. (Lund University Cognitive Studies, No. 144). Lund: Lund University, Department of Philosophy.
36. Leijten, M. (2007). Writing and speech recognition: Observing error correction strategies of professional writers. Utrecht: LOT.
37. Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2006). Inputlog: New perspectives on the logging of on-line writing. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (pp. 73-94). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Levy, B. A. (1983). Proofreading familiar text: Constraints on visual processing. Memory & Cognition, 11, 1-12.
40. Levy, C. M. (1994). FauxWord and FastFauxWord: Windows-based tools for capturing and analyzing the process of written composition. In H. Van den Bergh, T. van der Geest, D. Janssen, G. Rijlaarsdam, & S. Sengers (Eds.), EARLI/ECWC Writing Conference abstracts. Utrecht: Utrecht University Press.
41. Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. E. (1994). Computer-aided protocol analysis of writing processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 219-223.
42. Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. (2003). Stimulated recall as a trigger for increasing noticing and language awareness in the L2 writing classroom: A case study of two young female writers. Language Awareness, 12, 172-186.
43. Liversedge, S. P., & Findlay, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 6-14.
44. Lorch, R., van den Broek, P., & Pressley, M. (1997). Understanding reading comprehension: Current and future contributions of cognitive science. Commentary. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 213-259.
45. Matsuhashi, A. (1987a). Revising the plan and altering the text. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 224-253). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46. Matsuhashi, A. (ed.) (1987b). Writing in real time: Modelling production processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47. Myhill, D., & Jones, S. (2007). More than just error correction: Students' perspectives on their revision processes during writing. Written Communication, 24, 323-343.
48. Olive, T., & Levy, C. M. (eds) (2003). Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
49. Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2002). Suppressing visual feedback in written composition: Effects on processing demands and coordination of the writing processes. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 209-218.
50. Pianko, S. (1979). The description of the composing processes of college freshmen writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5-22.
51. Pilotti, M., Maxwell, K., & Chodorow, M. (2006). Does the effect of familiarity on proofreading change with encoding task and time? Journal of General Psychology, 133, 287-299.
52. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-131.
53. Power, M. J. (1986). A technique for measuring processing load during speech production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 371-382.
54. Rabiner, L. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE, 77, 257-286.
55. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
56. Raupach, M. (1980). Temporal variables in first and second language speech production. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp. 263-270). The Hague: Mouton.
57. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
58. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476.
59. Schilperoord, J. (1996). It's about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production Amsterdam: Rodopi.
60. Schilperoord, J. (2003). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 61-88). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
61. Schilperoord, J., & Sanders, T. (1999). How hierarchical text structure affects retrieval processes: Implications of pause and text analysis. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 13-30). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
62. Simpson, S., & Torrance, M. (2007). EyeWrite (Version 5.1). Osgoode, ON: SR Research, and Nottingham, U.K.: Nottingham Trent University.
63. Spelman Miller, K. (2000). Academic writers on-line: Investigating pausing in the production of text. Language Teaching Research, 4, 123-148.
64. Starr, M. S., & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 156-163.
65. Strömqvist, S., & Karlsson, H. (2002). ScriptLog for Windows: User's manual (Tech. rep.). Lund: Lund University, and University College of Stavanger, Centre for Reading Research, Department of Linguistics.
66. Strömqvist, S., & Malmsten, L. (1998). ScriptLog Pro 1.04: User's manual (Tech. rep.). Göteborg: University of Göteborg, Department of Linguistics.
67. Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (eds.) (2006). Studies in writing 18: Computer key-stroke logging and writing. Methods and applications. Oxford: Elsevier.
68. Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & García, J. N. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth grade writers. Learning & Instruction, 17, 265-285.
69. van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). The dynamics of composing: Modeling writing process data. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 207-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). The dynamics of idea generation during writing: An online study. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 99-120). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
71. van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2007). The dynamics of idea generation during writing: An online study. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition (pp. 125-150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
72. Van Wijk, C., & Sanders, T. (1999). Identifying writing strategies through text analysis. Written Communication, 16, 51-75.
73. Wengelin, Å. (2002). Text production in adults with reading and writing difficulties (Gothenburg Monographs of Linguistics 20). Göteborg: Göteborg University, Department of Linguistics.
74. Wengelin, Å. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theory, methods and empirical data. In K. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer key-stroke logging and writing (pp. 107-130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.