Writing profiles: The effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 829-853

  Van Waes, Luuk ^a   Schellens, Peter Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Pause analysis; Revision; Word processor; Writing process; Writing profiles

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037410552     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00121-2     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aldenderfer MarkS. Blashfield Roger K. Cluster Analysis 1984 Sage Publications London
2. Arms ValerieM. The computer and the process of composition Pipeline 8 1983 16-18
3. Balkena S.J.B. The composing activities of computer literate writers Dissertation Abstracts International 45 1984 12A
4. Bridwell LindaS. Duin AnnH. Looking in-depth at writers: computers as writing medium and research tool Collins J.L. Sommers E.A. (Eds.), Writing On-Line 1985 115-121 Boynton/Cook Upper Montclair, NJ
5. Bridwell LindaS. Sirc Geoffrey Brooke Robert Revising and computing: case studies of student writers Freedman S. (Ed.), The Acquisition of the Written Word 1985 172-194 Ablex Publications Norwood, NJ
6. Bridwell LindaS. Sirc Geoffrey Brooke Robert Computers and composing: case studies of experienced writers Matsuhashi A. (Ed.), Writing in Real Time 1987 81-107 Ablex Publications Norwood, NJ
7. Case D. Processing professional words: personal computers and writing habits College Composition and Communication 36 1985 317-322
8. Collier RichardM. The word processor and revision strategies College Composition and Communication 34 1983 149-155
9. Collier Richard Werier Clifford When computer writers compose by hand Computers and Composition 12 1995 47-59
10. Daiute ColletteA. Writing and Computers 1985 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
11. Daiute ColletteA. Physical and cognitive factors in revising: insight from studies with computers Research in the Teaching of English 20 1986 141-159
12. Deming MaryP. The effects of word processing on basic college writers' revision strategies Dissertation Abstracts International 48 1987 09A
13. Duin AnnH. Hansen CraigJ. (Eds.), Nonacademic Writing: Social Theory and Technology 1996 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
14. Duling, R.A., 1985. Word Processors and Student Writing. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
15. Dyson MaryC. Haselgrove Mark The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen Journal of Research in Reading 23 2000 210-223
16. Fitch, Joyce E., 1985. The Effect of Word Processing on Revision and Attitude Towards Writing. Eric Document ED272 898.
17. Flower LindaS. Problem-solving Strategies for Writing 1981 Harcourt Brace Jovanovich New York
18. Flower Linda Hayes JohnR. A cognitive process theory of writing College Composition and Communication 32 1981 365-387
19. Gould JohnD. Composing letters with computer-based text-editors Human Factors 23 1981 593-606
20. Haas Christina 'Seeing it on the screen isn't really seeing it': computer writers' reading problems Hawisher G.E. Selfe C.L. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers 1989 16-29 Teachers College Press New York
21. Haas Christina How the writing medium shapes the writing process: effects of word processing on planning Research in the Teaching of English 23 1989 181-207
22. Haas Christina Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy 1996 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
23. Harris Jeanette Student writers and word processing: a preliminary evaluation College Composition and Communication 36 1985 323-330
24. Harris Muriel Wachs Mary Simultaneous and successive cognitive processes and writing skills Written Communication 3 1986 449-470
25. Hawisher GailE. The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshmen Research in the Teaching of English 21 1987 145-159
26. Hawisher GailE. Research and recommendations for computers and composition Hawisher G.E. Selfe C.L. (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Computers and Composition Instruction 1989 44-69 Teachers College Press New York
27. Hayes JohnR. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing Levy C.M. Ransdell S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 1996 1-28 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
28. Hayes JohnR. Flower Linda Identifying the organization of writing processes Gregg L. Steinberg E.R. (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing 1980 3-30 Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
29. Janssen Daniël Van Waes Luuk Van den Bergh Huub Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes Levy C.M. Ransdell S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 1996 233-250 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
30. Jensen G.H. Di Tiberio J.K. Personality and individual writing processes College Composition and Communication 35 1984 258-300
31. Joram Elana Woodruff Earl Lindsay Peter Bryson Mary Students' editing skills and attitudes toward word processing Computers and Composition 7 1990 55-72
32. Kellogg RonaldT. A model of working memory in writing Levy C.M. Ransdell S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 1996 233-250 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
33. Kollberg, Py, 1997. S-notation-a computer based method for studying and representing text composition. Licentiate Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, IPLab, Stockholm.
34. Kurth, Ruth J., 1986. Using Word Processing to Enhance Revision Strategies. Eric Document 277 049.
35. Levy MichaelC. Ransdell Sarah Writing signatures Levy C.M. Ransdell S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 1996 149-162 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
36. Lutz J.A. A study of professional and experienced writers revising and editing at the computer and with pen and paper Research in the Teaching of English 21 1987 398-412
37. Matsuhashi Ann (Ed.), Writing in Real Time. Modelling Production Processes 1987 Ablex Publications Norwood, NJ
38. Nystrand Martin Wiemelt Jeffrey Greene Stuart Where did composition studies come from? Written Communication 10 1993 267-333
39. Perrin, Daniel, 1998. Journalistische Schreibstrategien optimieren (Optimizing Strategies in Journalistic Writing). PhD Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Berne.
40. Pogner Karl-Heinz Text and dynamics: observations on text production at a technical workplace Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 14 1997 119-146
41. Rijlaarsdam Gert Van den Bergh Huub The dynamics of composing: an agenda for research into an interactive compensatory model of writing Levy C.M. Ransdell S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 1996 107-126 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
42. Schriner DeloresK. Risk taking, revising and word processing Computers and Composition 5 1988 43-53
43. Schwartz Mimi Revision profiles: patterns and implications College English 45 1983 549-558
44. Schwartz Mimi Two journeys through the writing process College Composition and Communication 34 1983 188-201
45. Severinson Eklundh Kerstin Linear and nonlinear strategies in computer-based writing Computers and Composition 11 1994 203-216
46. Severinson Eklundh Kerstin Kollberg Py A computer tool and framework for analysing on-line revisions Levy C.M. Ransdell S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications 1996 163-188 Lawrence Erbaum Mahwah, NJ
47. Van Waes, Luuk, 1991a. De computer en het schrijfproces. De invloed van de tekstverwerker op het pauze-en revisiegedrag van schrijvers (The Computer and the Writing Process. The Influence of the Word Processor on the Pausing and Revision Behavior Of Writers). PhD Dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.
48. Van Waes Luuk De invloed van de schermgrootte op het revisiegedrag [The influence of screen size on revision behavior] Bax M.M.H. Vuyck W. (Eds.), Thema's in de taalbeheersing (Themes in Applied Linguistics) 1991 240 252 ICG Publication Dordrecht
49. Van Waes Luuk How do writers adapt their writing processes to word processing? Pander Maat H. Steehouder M. (Eds.), Studies of Functional Text Quality 1992 173-186 Rodopi Amsterdam
50. Van Waes Luuk Van Herreweghe Liesbet Computerprotokolle in der Schreibprozessforschung. Der Gebrauch von Keytrap als Observations instrument (Computer protocols in writing process research. The use of Keytrap as an observation instrument) Jacobs E.-M. Knorr D. Molitor-Lübbert S. (Eds.), Wissenschaftliche Textproduktion: Mit und ohne Computer (Scientific Text Production: With and Without the Computer) 1994 35-52 Peter Lang Frankfurt
51. Williamson MichaelM. Pence Penny Word processing and student writers Britton B.K. Glynn S.M. (Eds.), Computer Writing Environments: Theory, Research, and Design 1989 173-186 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
52. Witte StephenP. Cherry RogerD. Writing processes and written products in composition research Cooper C.R. Greenbaum S. (Eds.), Studying Writing 1986 112-153 Sage Publications London
53. Womble GailG. Revising and computing Collins J. Sommers E. (Eds.), Writing On-line 1985 75-82 Boynton/Cook Upper Montclair, NJ
54. Wyllie, Allison, 1993. On the Road to Discovery: A Study of the Composing Strategies of Academic Writers on the Word Processor. MA Dissertation, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK.