Classroom interaction and educational outcomes

Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances Through Meta-Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 129-147

  Kerssen Griep, Jeff ^a   Gayle, Barbara Mae ^b   Preiss, Raymond W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND   (United States)

^b SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907797255     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203933145     Document Type: Chapter

References (114)

1. Aiken, E.G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W.A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 439-444.
2. Ames, C. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91, 409-421.
3. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
4. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-270.
5. Anderson, L. E., & Carta-Falsa, J. (2002). Factors that make faculty and student relationships effective. College Teaching, 50(4), 134-138.
6. Aylor, B., & Oppliger, P. (2003). Out-of-class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style. Communication Education, 52, 122-134.
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
8. Beatty, M. J., & Payne, S.K. (1984). Effects of social facilitation on listening comprehension. Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 37-40.
9. Bell, R. A., & Daly, J.A. (1984). The affinity-seeking function of communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 91-115.
10. Berger, C. R. (1994). Power, dominance, and social interaction. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 450-507). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Bostrom, R. N., & Bryant, C. L. (1980). Factors in the retention of information presented orally: The role of short-term listening. TheWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 137-145.
12. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Burroughs, N., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education, 38, 214-229.
14. Butland, M. J., & Beebe, S. A. (1992, October). Teacher immediacy and power in the classroom:The application of implicit communication theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Miami, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 421).
15. Butler, D. L. (2002). Qualitative approaches to investigating self-regulated learning:Contributions and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 59-63.
16. Canfield, G. R. (1961, December). How used are lessons on listening? The Elementary School Journal, 64, 146-151.
17. Cheng, Y.C. (1994). Classroom environment and student affective performance:An effective profile. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 221-240.
18. Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82-90.
19. Christophel, D.M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
20. Christophel, D.M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292-306.
21. Clark, R. K., Keith, S., & Walker, M. (2001, November). Experimentally assessing the student impacts of out-of-class communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
22. Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical, and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263-297.
23. Coakley, C.G., & Wolvin, A.D. (1989). Experiential listening. NewOrleans, LA: Spectra.
24. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J.W. (1995). Food for thought:Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44, 251-266.
25. Cooper, P. M., Stewart, L. P., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1982). Relationship with instructor and other variables influencing student evaluations of instruction. Communication Quarterly, 30, 308-315.
26. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.
27. Cupach, W. R., & Imahori, T. T. (1993). Identity management theory: Communication competence in intercultural episodes and relationships. In R. L.Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 112-131). NewburyPark, CA: Sage.
28. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R.M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 165-183.
29. Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1973). Listening and note taking: II. Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 278-287.
30. Dolin, D. J. (1995). An alternative form of teacher affinity-seeking measure. Communication Research Reports, 12, 220-226.
31. Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264-291.
32. French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1968). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics:Research and theory (3rd ed., pp. 259-269). NewYork:Harper & Row.
33. Frymier, A. B. (1993). The relationship among communication apprehension, immediacy, and motivation to study. Communication Reports, 6, 8-17.
34. Frymier, A. B. (1994a). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-143.
35. Frymier, A. B. (1994b). The use of affinity-seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 87-105.
36. Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G.M. (1995). "What's in it for me?" Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation. Communication Education, 44, 40-50.
37. Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G.M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learnerempowered measure. Communication Education, 45, 181-199.
38. Frymier, A. B., & Thomas, C. A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
39. Fusani, D. S. (1994). "Extra-class" communication: Frequency, immediacy, self disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 232-255.
40. Garko, M. G., Kough, C., Pignata, G., Kimmel, E. B., & Eison, J. (1994). Myths about student faculty relationships: What do students really want? Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5(2), 51-65.
41. Gayle, B.M. (2002, December). How can we teach students to critically evaluate their own stance and seriously consider divergent views? National Teaching and Learning Forum, 12(1), 6-8.
42. Giles, H., & Wiemann, J.W. (1987). Language, social comparison, and power. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 350-384). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Glenn, E. C., Emmert, P., & Emmert, V. (1995). A scale for measuring listenability: The factors that determine listening ease and difficulty. International Journal of Listening, 9, 44-61.
44. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York:Pantheon.
45. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
46. Gorham, J., & Christophel, D.M. (1992). Students' perception of teacher behaviors as motivating and demotivating factors in college classes. Communication Quarterly, 40, 239-252.
47. Gorham, J., Kelley, D. H., & McCroskey, J. C. (1989). The affinity-seeking of classroom teachers: A second perspective. Communication Quarterly, 37, 16-26.
48. Gorham, J., & Millette, D. M. (1997). A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 46, 245-261.
49. Hess, J. A., Smythe, M. J., & Communication 451. (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 52, 197-219.
50. Hogelucht, K. S. B., & Geist, P. (1997). Discipline in the classroom: Communicative strategies for negotiating order. Western Journal of Communication, 97(1), 1-35.
51. Ilatov, Z. Z., Shamai, S., Hertz-Lazarovitz, R., & Mayer-Young, S. (1998). Teacher-student classroom interactions: The influence of gender, academic dominance and teacher communication style. Adolescence, 33(1), 269-277.
52. Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41-47.
53. Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (2002). Out-of-class communication between female and male students and faculty: The relationship to student perceptions of instructor immediacy. Women's Studies in Communication, 25, 119-137.
54. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. A. (2000). Constructive controversy: The educative power of intellectual conflict. Change, 32, 28-32.
55. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in the classroom IV: Teacher communication techniques as alternatives to discipline. In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 724-746). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1985). Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34, 19-28.
57. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Smith, V., & Sorenson, G. (1988). Effects of teacher immediacy and strategy type on college student resistance to on-task demands. Communication Education, 37, 54-67.
58. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Sorenson, G., & Smith, V. (1988). Experienced and prospective teachers' selections of compliance-gaining messages for "common" student misbehaviors. Communication Education, 37, 150-164.
59. Kerssen-Griep, J. (2001). Teacher communication activities relevant to student motivation:Classroom facework and instructional communication competence. Communication Education, 50, 256-273.
60. Kerssen-Griep, J., Hess, J. A., & Trees, A. R. (2003). Sustaining the desire to learn: Dimensions of perceived instructional facework related to student involvement and motivation to learn. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 357-381.
61. Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
62. Kovalainen, M., Kumpulainen, K., & Vasama, S. (2001). Orchestrating classroom interaction in a community of inquiry: Modes of teacher participation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 17-28.
63. Kuh, G.D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123-155.
64. Lamport, M. A. (1993). Student-faculty informal interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 28, 971-990.
65. Lim, T., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415-450.
66. Manke, M.H. P. (1990). Constructing the power relationship:Astudy of two elementary school classrooms (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 5, 3635.
67. McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1986). The affinity-seeking of classroom teachers. Communication Research Reports, 3, 158-167.
68. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom I: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175-184.
69. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, G. T., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.
70. McKenzie, N. J., & Clark, A. J. (1995). The all in one concept:How much must listening research include? International Journal of Listening, 9, 29-43.
71. McNeil, L. M. (1988). Contradictions of control. New York: Routledge.
72. Mehrabian, A. (1966). Immediacy: An indicator of attitudes in linguistic communication. Journal of Personality, 34, 26-34.
73. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 17-25.
74. Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). Amodified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 387-400.
75. Myers, S. A. (1995). Student perceptions of teacher-affinity-seeking and classroom climate. Communication Research Reports, 12, 192-199.
76. Myers, S. A. (2002). Perceived aggressive instructor communication and student state motivation, learning and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 15, 114-121.
77. Nadler, M.K., & Nadler, L. B. (2000). Out-of-class communication between faculty and students: A faculty perspective. Communication Studies, 51, 176-188.
78. Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (2001). The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in outof- class communication. Women's Studies in Communication, 24, 241-261.
79. Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
80. Oppenheimer, R. J. (2001). Increasing student motivation and facilitating learning. College Teaching, 49(3), 96-98.
81. Pascarella, E.T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50, 545-595.
82. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83. Patrick, B. C., Hisley, J., & Kempler, T. (2000). "What's everybody so excited about?":The effect of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 217-236.
84. Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37, 5-15.
85. Petrie, C.R., & Carrel, S.D. (1976). The relationship of motivation, listening capability, initial information and verbal organizational ability to lecture comprehension and retention. Communication Monographs, 43, 187-194.
86. Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
87. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.
88. Richardson, L.W., Cook, J. A., & Macke, A. S. (1980, August). Classroom authority management of male and female university professors. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, NewYork. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 199 122).
89. Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
90. Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J.C. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125-136.
91. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1-12.
92. Rodríguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293-305.
93. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of community of learners. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1, 209-229.
94. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsicmotivation, social development, andwell-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
95. Seibold, D. R., Cantrill, J. G., & Meyers, R. A. (1994). Communication and interpersonal influence. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 542-588). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
96. Shamai, S., Ilatov, Z., Hertz-Lazarovitz, R., & Bentsvi-Mayer, S. (1995). Developing a model of classroom interactions between teacher and students. Curriculum and Teaching, 10(2), 45-55.
97. Shiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323.
98. Simonds, C. J., Jones, R., & Bedore, J. (1994, November). What happened if: Challenge behavior in the college classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 877).
99. Slavin, R. (1985). Team-assisted individualization: Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction in mathematics. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. H. Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 177-209). New York: Plenum.
100. Smeltzer, L. R., & Watson, K.W. (1984). Listening: An empirical comparison of discussion length and level of incentive. Central States Speech Journal, 35, 166-170.
101. Sprague, J. (1990, February). Problematizing power in the classroom: Applying the critical perspective to a significant issue in instructional communication. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Sacramento, CA.
102. Sprague, J. (1994). Ontology, politics, and instructional communication research: Why we can't just "agree to disagree" about power. Communication Education, 43, 273-290.
103. Sprague, J. (2002). Communication Education: The spiral continues. Communication Education, 51, 337-354.
104. Taylor, E. N. (1988). Power relationships in the classroom and how they are maintained (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 2105.
105. Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1991). Students' out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 149-162.
106. Tinto, V. (1987). Learning in college. Chicago: University of Chicago.
107. Wanzer, M. B. (1998). An exploratory investigation of student and teacher perceptions of student-generated affinity-seeking behaviors. Communication Education, 47, 373-382.
108. Watson, K. W., Barker, L. L., & Weaver, J. B. (1995). The listening styles profile (LSP-16): Development and validation of an instrument to assess four listening styles. Journal of International Listening, 9, 7-13.
109. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication:A study of interaction patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
110. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
111. Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2001). An experimental study of teachers' verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students' affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 327-342.
112. Wooten, A. G., & McCroskey, J. C. (1996). Student trust of teacher as a function of socio-communicative style of teacher and socio-communication orientation of student. Communication Research Reports, 13, 94-100.
113. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. (1991). Interpersonal teacher behavior in the classroom. In B. J. Fraser & H. J.Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments:Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences (pp. 141-160). New York: Pergamon.
114. Wubbels, T., Creton, H., Levy, J., & Hooymayers, H. (1993). The model for interpersonal teacher behavior. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 13-28). London: Falmer Press.