The Roles of Sex, Empathy, and Credibility in Out-of-Class Communication Between Faculty and Students

Women's Studies in Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 241-261

  Nadler, Marjorie Keeshan ^a   Nadler, Lawrence B ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644470845     PISSN: 07491409     EISSN: 2152999X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07491409.2001.10162436     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Astin, A., 1977. Four critical years:Effects of college on beliefs, attitudes and knowledge, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
2. Basow, A., and Silberg, N. T., 1987. Student evaluations of college professors:Are male and female professors rated differently?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79:308–314.
3. Bennett, S. K., 1982. Student perceptions and expectations for male and female instructors:Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74:170–179.
4. Chickering, A., 1969. Education and identity, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
5. Chickering, A., 1972. Undergraduate academic experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63:134–143.
6. Chickering, A., and McCormick, J., 1973. Personality development and the college experience. Research in Higher Education, 1:43–70.
7. Cooper, P. J., Stewart, L. P., and Gudykunst, W. B., 1982. Relationship with instructor and other variables influencing student evaluations of instruction. Communication Quarterly, 30:308–315.
8. Dilley, J. S., 1967. Student-faculty non-communication. Journal of College Student Personnel, 8:282–285.
9. Feldman, K., 1993. College students' views of male and female college teachers:Part II—Evidence from the students' evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education, 34:151–211.
10. Feldman, K. A., and Newcomb, T. M., 1969. The impact of college on students. Vol. 2, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
11. Fusani, D. S., 1994. “Extra-class” communication:Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22:232–255.
12. Gadzella, B. M., Tomcala, M., Fullwood, H. L., Channon, R. L., and Benton, F.E., 1992. A comparison of students' perceptions of an ideal instructor Paper presented at the Southwestern Psychological Association Convention, Austin, TX
13. Gamson, Z. F., 1967. Performance and personalism. Sociology of Education, 40:287–291.
14. Grigg, C., 1965. “ Recruitment to graduate study:College seniors' plans for postgraduate education and their implementation the year after commencement ”. In SREB Research Monograph No. 10, Atlanta:Southern Regional Education Board.
15. Gurin, P., and Katz, D., 1966. “ Motivation and aspiration in the Negro college(”. In Office of Education, U.S. Dept. of Health Education and Welfare Project Number 5–0787, Ann Arbor, Mich:University of Michigan Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.
16. Hall, R., and Sandler, B., 1982. The classroom climate:A chilly one for women?, Washington, D.C.:Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
17. Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P., and Dill, H., 1988. Sex role stereotyping of college professors:Bias in student ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80:342–344.
18. McCroskey, J., Jensen, T., and Todd, C., 1972. Generalizability of source credibility scales for public figures Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Chicago, IL
19. Mehrley, R., and McCroskey, T., 1970. Opinionated statements and attitude intensity as predictors of attitude change and source credibility. Speech Monographs, 37:47–52.
20. Miller, G., and Steinberg, M., 1975. Between people, Chicago:Science Research Associates.
21. Nadler, L., and Nadler, M., 1990. Perceptions of sex differences in classroom communication. Women's Studies in Communication, 13:46–65.
22. Newcomb, X, Brown, D., Kulik, J., Reimer, D., and Revelle, W., 1970. “ Self-selection and change ”. In The cluster college, Edited by:Gaff, J., San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
23. Nussbaum, J. F., 1992. Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41:167–180.
24. Paludi, M. A., and Strayer, L. A., 1985. What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's names. Sex Roles, 12:353–361.
25. Pascarella, E. T., 1980. Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50 (4):545–595.
26. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T., 1976. Informal interaction with faculty and freshman ratings of the academic and non-academic experience of college. Journal of Educational Research, 70:35–41.
27. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T., 1977. Patterns of student-faculty informal interaction beyond the classroom and voluntary freshman attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 48:540–552.
28. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T., 1978. Student-faculty informal relationships and freshman year educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 71:183–189.
29. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T., 1979a. Interactive influences in Spady's and Tinto's conceptual models of college dropout. Sociology of Education, 52:197–210.
30. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T., 1979b. Student-faculty informal contact and college persistence:A further investigation. Journal of Educational Research, 72:214–218.
31. Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., and Hibel, J., 1978. Student-faculty interactional settings and their relationship to predicted academic performance. Journal of Higher Education, 49 (5):450–463.
32. Phelan, W., 1979. Undergraduate orientations toward scientific and scholarly careers. American Educational Research Journal, 16:411–422.
33. Ryan, M., 1989. Classroom and contexts:The challenge of feminist pedagogy. Feminist Teacher, 4 (2/3):39–42.
34. Sandler, B., 1991. Women faculty at work in the classroom, or, why it still hurts to be a woman in labor. Communication Education, 40:6–15.
35. Spady, W., 1970. Dropouts from higher education:An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Interchange, 1:64–85.
36. Spady, W., 1971. Dropouts from higher education:Toward an empirical model. Interchange, 2:38–62.
37. Stiff, J., Dillard, J., Somera, L., Kim, H., and Sleight, C., 1988. Empathy, communication, and prosocial behavior. Communication Monographs, 55:198–213.
38. Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T., 1977. Voluntary freshman attrition and patterns of social and academic integration in a university:A test of a conceptual model. Research in Higher Education, 6:25–44.
39. Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T., 1979. Student-faculty contacts and freshman year educational outcomes:A replication Paper presented to the 19th annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, San Diego, May 1979
40. Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T., 1980. Toward the validation of Tinto's model of college student attrition:A review of recent studies. Research in Higher Education, 12 (3):271–282.
41. Theophilides, C., and Terenzini, P. T., 1981. The relation between nonclassroom contact with faculty and students' perceptions of instructional quality. Research in Higher Education, 15 (3):255–269.
42. Thielens, W., 1966. The structure of faculty influence, New York:Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Science Research, The College Entrance Examination Board.
43. Tinto, V., 1987. Leaving college:Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
44. Treichler, P. A., and Kramarae, C., 1983. Women's talk in the ivory tower. Communication Quarterly, 31:118–132.
45. Wilson, R., Gaff, J., Dienst, E., Woods, L., and Bavry, J., 1975. College professors and their impact on students, New York:Wiley. 1975
46. Wilson, R. C., Woods, L., and Gaff, J. G., 1974. Social-psychological accessibility and faculty-student interaction beyond the classroom. Sociology of Education, 47:74–92.
47. Woods, L., and Wilson, R., 1972. Teachers with impact. The Research Reporter, 7:1–4.
48. Zigmund, B. B., 1988, Sept. 1. “ The well-being of women is still being sabotaged—by colleagues, by students, and by themselves ”. In Chronicle of Higher Education A44