Student trust of teacher as a function of socio‐communicative style of teacher and socio‐communicative orientation of student

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 94-100

  Wooten, Andrea G ^a   McCroskey, James C ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937280496     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099609362075     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bern, S.L., 1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42: 155–162.
2. Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., and Mertz, R. J., 1969. Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33: 563–576.
3. Christophel, D. C., 1990. The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323–340.
4. Darling, J. R., 1990. Team building in small business firms. Journal of Small Business Management,: 86–91.
5. Darling, J. R., and Cluff, E.D., 1987. Social styles and the art of managing up. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 12(6): 350–355.
6. Deutsch, M., 1958. Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2: 265–279.
7. Griffin, K., 1967. The contributions of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68: 104–120.
8. Hunter, J., and Schmidt, F., 1990. Methods of meta‐analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. McCroskey, J.C., 1966. Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33: 65–72.
10. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1992. “ Increasing teacher influence through immediacy ”. In Power in the classroom: Communication, Control, and Concern, Edited by: Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1996. Fundamentals of human communication: An interpersonal perspective, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
12. Merrill, D. W., and Reid, R., 1981. Personal styles and effective performance: Make your style work for you, Radnor, PA: Chilton Book.
13. Norton, R., 1983. Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35: 43–55.
15. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1990. Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness‐responsiveness measure. Psychological Reports, 67: 449–450.
16. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., and Plax, T. G., 1987. Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36: 1–12.
17. Rogers, E. M., and Shoemaker, E E. 1971. Communication of innovations: A cross‐cultural approach, New York: Free Press.
18. Snavely, W.B., 1981. The impact of social style upon person perception in primary relationships. Communication Quarterly, 29: 132–143.
19. Thomas, C. E., 1994. “ An analysis of teacher socio‐communicative style as a predictor of classroom communication behaviors, student liking, motivation, and learning ”. West Virginia University. Unpublished Ed. D. dissertation.
20. Thomas, C.E., Richmond, V.P., and McCroskey, J.C., 1994. The association between immediacy and socio‐communicative style. Communication Research Reports, 11(1): 107–115.
21. Wheeless, L.R., 1978. A follow‐up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4: 143–157.
22. Wheeless, L.R., and Grotz, J., 1977. The measurement of trust and its relationship to self‐disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3: 250–257.