The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning

Communication Education

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 82-90

  Christensen, Lauraj ^a,b   Menzel, Kent E ^a,c  

^a DEPAUW UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective; Behavioral learning; Nonverbal and verbal immediacy; Perceived cognitive; State motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032354772     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634529809379112     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Andersen,J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3, (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Andersen,J. F., & Andersen, P. A. (1987). Never smile until Christmas? Casting doubt on an old myth. Journal of Thought, 22(4), 57-61.
3. Andersen,J. F., Andersen, P. A., &Jensen, A. D. (1979). The measurement of nonverbal immediacy. Communication Research, 7, 153-180.
4. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
5. Comstock,J., Rowell, E., & Bowers,J. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44, 251-266.
6. Gorham,J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
7. Gorham,J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39, 46-62.
8. Gorham,J., & Christophel, D. M. (1992). Students' perceptions of teachers behaviors as motivating and de-motivating factors in college classes. Communication Quarterly, 40, 239-252.
9. Gorham,J., & Zakahi, W. R. (1990). A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product Communication Education, 39, 354-368.
10. Kelley, D. H., & Gorham,J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198-207.
11. Nussbaum,J. F., Comadena, M. E., & Holladay, S. J. (1987). Classroom verbal behavior of highly effective teacher s. Journal of Thought, 22(4), 73-80.
12. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.
13. Richmond, V. P., Gorham,J. S., & McCroskey,J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574-590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-353.
15. Scott, M. D., Nussbaum,J. F. (1981). Student perceptions of instructor communication behaviors and their relationship to student evaluation. Communication Education, 30, 44-53.
16. Wheeless, L. R. (1975). Relationship of four elements to immediate recall and student-instructor interaction. Western Speech Communication, 39, 131-140.