Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue , 2014, Pages 13614-13620

  Dahlstrom, Michael F ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Persuasion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASS MEDIUM; METHODOLOGY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SCIENCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ETHICS; PERSUASION;

HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASS MEDIA; NARRATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SCIENCE;

EID: 84907246302     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320645111     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Katz Y (2013) Against storytelling of scientific results. Nat Methods 10(11): 1045.
2. Polsby NW (1993) Where do you get your ideas? PS: Political Science and Politics 26(1): 83-87.
3. Bruner J (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA), p 222.
4. Green MC (2006) Narratives and cancer communication. J Commun 56(Suppl 1): S163-S183.
5. National Science Board (2012) Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012 (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA).
6. Norris SP, Guilbert SM, Smith ML, Hakimelahi S, Phillips LM (2005) A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Sci Educ 89(4): 535-563.
7. Avraamidou L, Osborne J (2009) The role of narrative in communicating science. Int J Sci Educ 31(12): 1683-1707.
8. Kreuter MW, et al. (2007) Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med 33(3): 221-235.
9. Fisher WR (1985) The narrative paradigm: In the beginning. J Commun 35(4): 74-89.
10. Strange JJ, Leung CC (1999) How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem's urgency, causes, and cures. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25(4): 436-449.
11. Trabasso T, Sperry LL (1985) Causal relatedness and importance of story events. J Mem Lang 24(5): 595-611.
12. Dahlstrom MF (2010) The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from science communication. Communic Res 37(6): 857-875.
13. Dahlstrom MF (2012) The persuasive influence of narrative causality: Psychological mechanism, strength in overcoming resistance, and persistence over time. Media Psychol 15(3): 303-326.
14. Kreiswirth M (1992) Trusting the tale: The narrativist turn in the human sciences. New Lit Hist 23(3): 629-657.
15. Monteagudo-Gonzalez J (2011) Jerome Bruner and the challenges of the narrative turn. Then and now. Narrative Inq 21(2): 295-302.
16. Fisher WR (1984) Narration as a human-communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Commun Monogr 51(1): 1-22.
17. Zabrucky KM, Moore D (1999) Influence of text genre on adults' monitoring of understanding and recall. Educ Gerontol 25(8): 691-710.
18. Schank RC, Abelson R (1995) Knowledge and memory: The real story. Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story, ed Wyer RS (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilldale, NJ), pp 1-86.
19. Graesser AC, Olde B, Klettke B (2002) How does the mind construct and represent stories? Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, eds Green MC, Strange JJ, Brock TC (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp 229-262.
20. Graesser AC, Ottati V (1995) Why Stories? Some evidence, questions, and challenges. Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story, ed Wyer RS (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HIllsdale, NJ).
21. Bruner J (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Crit Inq 18(1): 1-21.
22. Glaser M, Garsoffky B, Schwan S (2009) Narrative-based learning: Possible benefits and problems. Communications-European Journal of Communication Research 34(4): 429-447.
23. Oatley K (1999) Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Rev Gen Psychol 3(2): 101-117.
24. Read SJ, Miller LC (1995) Stories are fundamental to meaning and memory: For social creatures, could it be otherwise? Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story, ed Wyer RS (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp 139-152.
25. Klassen S (2010) The relation of story structure to a model of conceptual change in science learning. Sci Educ 19(3): 305-317.
26. Reiss MJ, Millar R, Osborne J (1999) Beyond 2000: Science/biology education for the future. J Biol Educ 33(2): 68-70.
27. Fisch SM (2000) A capacity model of children's comprehension of educational content on television. Media Psychol 2(1): 63-91.
28. Mazor KM, et al. (2007) Patient education about anticoagulant medication: Is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective? Patient Educ Couns 69(1-3): 145-157.
29. Wise M, Han JY, Shaw B, McTavish F, Gustafson DH (2008) Effects of using online narrative and didactic information on healthcare participation for breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 70(3): 348-356.
30. Betsch C, Ulshöfer C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T (2011) The influence of narrative v. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Med Decis Making 31(5): 742-753.
31. Hopfer S (2012) Effects of a narrative HPV vaccination intervention aimed at reaching college women: A randomized controlled trial. Prev Sci 13(2): 173-182.
32. Nan X, Dahlstrom MF, Richards AS, Rangarajan S (2014) Influence of evidence type and narrative type on HPV risk perception and intention to obtain the HPV vaccine. Health Commun, in press.
33. Hinyard LJ, Kreuter MW (2007) Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Educ Behav 34(5): 777-792.
34. Winterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner M, Mooney A (2008) Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 67(12): 2079-2088.
35. Shaffer VA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2013) All stories are not alike: A purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids. Med Decis Making 33(1): 4-13.
36. Cunningham RM, Boom JA (2013) Telling stories of vaccine-preventable diseases: Whyit works. SD Med (Spec no): 21-26.
37. McQuail D (2010) McQuail's Mass Communication Theory (Sage Publications, London), 6th Ed.
38. Elliott R (2012) The medialization of regenerative medicine: Frames and metaphors in UK news stories. The Sciences' Media Connection-Public Communication and Its Repercussions, eds Rödder S, Franzen M, Weingart P (Springer, London), pp 87-106.
39. Shoemaker PJ, Eichholz M, Kim E, Wrigley B (2001) Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism Mass Commun Q 78(2): 233-246.
40. Reese SD, Ballinger J (2001) The roots of a sociology of news: Remembering Mr. Gates and social control in the newsroom. Journalism Mass Commun Q 78(4): 641-658.
41. Galtung J, Ruge MH (1965) The structure of foreign-news-The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in 4 Norwegian newspapers. J Peace Res 2(1): 64-91.
42. Badenschier F, Wormer H (2012) Issue selection in science journalism: Towards a special theory of news values for science news? The Sciences' Media Connection-Public Communication and Its Repercussions, eds Rödder S, Franzen M, Weingart P (Springer, London), pp 59-86.
43. Zillmann D (1999) Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychol 1(1): 69-94.
44. Gerbner G (1998) Telling stories, or how do we know what we know? The story of cultural indicators and the cultural environment movement. Wide Angle; A Quarterly Journal of Film History Theory Criticism & Practice 20(2): 116-131.
45. Shanahan J, Morgan M (1999) Televison and its Viewers; Cultivation Theory and Research (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
46. Gerbner G, Gross L (1976) Living with television: The violence profile. J Commun 26(2): 173-199.
47. McComas K, Shanahan J, Butler JS (2001) Environmental content in prime-time network TV's non-news entertainment and fictional programs. Soc Nat Resour 14(6): 533-542.
48. Dahlstrom MF, Scheufele DA (2010) Diversity of television exposure and its association with the cultivation of concern for environmental risks. Environ Commun 4(1): 54-65.
49. Besley JC, Shanahan J (2005) Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology. Sci Commun 26(4): 347-367.
50. Dudo A, et al. (2011) Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communic Res 38(6): 754-777.
51. Kirby DA (2013) Forensic fictions: Science, television production, and modern storytelling. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 44(1): 92-102.
52. Curtis R (1994) Narrative form and normative force-Baconian storytelling in popular science. Soc Stud Sci 24(3): 419-461.
53. Green MC, Brock TC (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(5): 701-721.
54. Slater MD, Rouner D (2002) Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Commun Theory 12(2): 173-191.
55. Gibson R, Zillmann D (1994) Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports-Perceptions of issues and personal consequences. Communic Res 21(5): 603-624.
56. Moyer-Guse E, Nabi RL (2010) Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Hum Commun Res 36(1): 26-52.
57. Gerrig RJ (1993) Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
58. Dahlstrom MF, Ho SS (2012) Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science. Sci Commun 34(5): 592-617.
59. Appel M, Richter T (2007) Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychol 10(1): 113-134.
60. Marsh EJ, Meade ML, Roediger HL (2003) Learning facts from fiction. J Mem Lang 49(4): 519-536.
61. Bilandzic H, Busselle RW (2008) Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. J Commun 58(3): 508-529.
62. Brodie M, et al. (2001) Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Aff (Millwood) 20(1): 192-199.
63. Vaughan PW, Rogers EM, Singhal A, Swalehe RM (2000) Entertainment-education and HIV/AIDS prevention: A field experiment in Tanzania. J Health Commun 5(Suppl): 81-100.
64. National Academy of Sciences (2013) The Science and Entertainment Exchange. Available at www.scienceandentertainmentexchange.org. Accessed April 17, 2014.
65. Barriga CA, Shapiro MA, Fernandez ML (2010) Science information in fictional movies: Effects of context and gender. Sci Commun 32(1): 3-24.
66. McComas K, Shanahan J (1999) Telling stories about global climate change-Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communic Res 26(1): 30-57.
67. Miller JD, Kimmel L (2001) Biomedical Communications: Purposes, Audiences, and Strategies (John Wiley, New York).
68. Miller JD, Pardo R, Niwa F (1997) Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada (Chicago Academy of Sciences, Chicago).
69. Dickson D (2001) Weaving a social web. Nature 414(6864): 587-587.
70. Walker G, Simmons P, Irwin A, Wynne B (1999) Risk communication, public participation and the Seveso II directive. J Hazard Mater 65(1-2): 179-190.
71. Busselle RW, Bilandzic H (2008) Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Commun Theory 18(2): 255-280.
72. Kreiswirth M (2000) Merely telling stories? Narrative and knowledge in the human sciences. Poetics Today 21(2): 293-318.
73. Wynne B (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science-Hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genet 9(3): 211-220.
74. Goodwin J, Dahlstrom MF (2014) Communication strategies for earning trust in climate change debates. WIREs Climate Change 5(1): 151-160.
75. Priest SH (2001) Misplaced faith-Communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Sci Commun 23(2): 97-110.
76. Priest SH, Bonfadelli H, Rusanen M (2003) The "trust gap" hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Anal 23(4): 751-766.
77. Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G (2009) The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal 29(5): 633-647.
78. Pornpitakpan C (2004) The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. J Appl Soc Psychol 34(2): 243-281.
79. Einsiedel E (2008) Public engagement and dialogue: A research review. Handbook of Public Communication on Science and Technology, eds Bucchi M, Smart B (Routledge, London), pp 173-184.
80. Pielke RA (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
81. Rabinovich A, Morton TA, Birney ME (2012) Communicating climate science: The role of perceived communicator's motives. J Environ Psychol 32(1): 11-18.
82. Randall R (2009) Loss and climate change: The cost of parallel narratives. Ecopsychology 1(3): 118-129.
83. Kahan DM (2012) Why we are poles apart on climate change. Nature 488(7411): 255.
84. Brossard D (2013) New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(Suppl 3): 14096-14101.
85. Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2013) Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet's potential for closing them. Public Underst Sci.
86. Anderson AA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA, Ladwig P (2013) The "nasty effect: " Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(3): 373-387.
87. Berger J, Milkman KL (2012) What makes online content viral? J Mark Res 49(2): 192-205.
88. Dahlstrom MF, Ritland R (2012) The problem of communicating beyond human scale. Between Scientists and Citizens, ed Goodwin J (Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation, Ames, IA), pp 121-130.
89. Kaschak MP, Maner JK (2009) Embodiment, evolution, and social cognition: An integrative framework. Eur J Soc Psychol 39(7): 1236-1244.
90. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M (2011) Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks. Patient Educ Couns 84(2): 245-250.
91. McCarthy RJ, Skowronski JJ (2011) You're getting warmer: Level of construal affects the impact of central traits on impression formation. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(6): 1304-1307.
92. Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. J Consum Psychol 17(2): 83-95.
93. Baake K (2003) Metaphor and Knowledge: The Challenges of Writing Science (State Univ of New York Press, New York, NY).
94. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2014) Nanotechnology 101. Available at www.nano.gov/nanotech-101. Accessed April 17, 2014.
95. Weigmann K (2004) The code, the text and the language of God. When explaining science and its implications to the lay public, metaphors come in handy. But their indiscriminant use could also easily backfire. EMBO Rep 5(2): 116-118.