Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement

Communication Theory

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 255-280

  Busselle, Rick ^a   Bilandzic, Helena ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; MODEL; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 42549167499     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abbott, H. P. (2002). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Albrecht, J., & O'Brien, E. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061-1070.
3. Bahk, C. M. (2001). Drench effects of media portrayal of fatal virus disease and health locus of control beliefs. Health Communication, 13, 187-205.
4. Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
5. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2006, June). Experiential engagement in filmic narratives and enjoyment: The role of transportation, identification, and perceived realism. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
6. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2007, May). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, San Francisco.
7. Böcking, S., & Wirth, W. (2005, May). Towards conceptualizing suspension of disbelief for communication research. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, New York.
8. Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
9. Bradley, S., & Shapiro, M. A. (2005). Parsing reality: The interactive effects of complex syntax and time pressure on cognitive processing of television scenarios. Media Psychology, 6, 307-333.
10. Brewer, W. F. (1987). Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modelling cognition (pp. 187-197). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Busselle, R. W. (2001). Television exposure, perceived realism, and exemplar accessibility in the social judgment process. Media Psychology, 3, 43-67.
13. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2007, May). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing films: A mental models approach to (un)realness in narratives. Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, San Francisco.
14. Busselle, R. W., & Greenberg, B. S. (2000). The nature of television realism judgments: A reevaluation of their conceptualization and measurement. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 249-268.
15. Busselle, R. W., Ryabovolova, A., & Wilson, B. (2004). Ruining a good story: Cultivation, perceived realism, and narrative. Communications. The European Journal of Communication, 29, 365-378.
16. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245-264.
17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic.
19. Currie, G. (1997). The paradox of caring. Fiction and the philosophy of mind. In M. Hjort & S. Laver (Eds.), Emotion and the arts (pp. 63-77). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20. Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 175-191). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. New York: Grosset/ Putnam.
22. Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A. & Hewitt, L. E. (Eds.). (1995). Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Galbraith, M. (1995). Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective (pp. 19-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Gendler, T. S., & Kovakovich, K. (2005). Genuine rational fictional emotions. In M. Kieran (Ed.), Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art (pp. 241-253). Boston: Blackwell Publishing.
26. Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (1991). The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2, 336-340.
28. Gerrig, R. J., & Rapp, D. N. (2004). Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25, 266-281.
29. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
30. Gilbert, D. T., & Gill, M. J. (2000). The momentary realist. Psychological Science, 11, 394-398.
31. Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Malone, P. S. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable. Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59, 601-613.
32. Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 221-233.
33. Graesser, A. C., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229-262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247-266.
35. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
36. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind's eye. Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311-327.
38. Hall, A. E. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences' evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of Communication, 53, 624-641.
39. Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of imagination. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
41. Iser, W. (1993). The fictive and the imaginary: Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Kaup, B., & Foss, D. (2005). Detecting and processing inconsistencies in narrative comprehension. In D. Rosen (Ed.), Trends in experimental psychology research (pp. 67-90). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
44. Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25, 171-203.
45. Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D. S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A. (2004). Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes, 38, 267-286.
46. Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax. Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Lacey, N. (2000). Narrative and genre: Key concepts in media studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
48. Lamarque, P. (1981). How can we fear and pity fictions? British Journal of Aesthetics, 21, 291-304.
49. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46-70.
50. Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1990). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of "Dallas". New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Magliano, J. P., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldmann (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 219-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Moran, R. (1994). The expression of feeling in imagination. Philosophical Review, 103, 75-106.
54. Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book. The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.
55. Oatley, K. (1994). A taxonomy of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23, 53-74.
56. Oatley, K. (1999). Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics, 26, 439-454.
57. Oatley, K. (2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Ohler, P. (1994). Kognitive Filmpsychologie. Verarbeitung und mentale Repräsentation narrativer Filme [Cognitive film psychology. Processing and mental representation of narrative films]. Münster: MAkS Publikationen Münster.
59. Perse, E. M. (1986). Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 175-193.
60. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
61. Pinkelton, B., Austin, E., & Fujioka, Y. (2001). The relationship of perceived beer ads and PSA quality to high school students' alcohol-related beliefs and behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 575-597.
62. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Potter, J. W. (1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 159-174.
64. Potter, J. W. (1988). Perceived reality in television effects research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32, 23-41.
65. Prentice, D. A., & Gerrig, R. J. (1999). Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process-theories in social psychology (pp. 529-546). New York: Guilford Press.
66. Prentice, D. A., Gerrig, R. J., & Bailis, D. S. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 416-420.
67. Quintero-Johnson, J., & Busselle, R. (2004, August). Thinking while viewing: The influence of thoughts about a program on transportation and perceived realism. Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division at the Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Toronto.
68. Rapaport, W. J., & Shapiro, S. C. (1995). Cognition and fiction. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective (pp. 107-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Readers'reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 30, 779-788.
70. Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers'trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 737-750.
71. Riffaterre, M. (1990). Fictional truth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
72. Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Davies, J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implications of the mental models approach for cultivation theory. European Journal of Communication Research, 29, 345-363.
73. Segal, E. M. (1995a). A cognitive-phenomenological theory of fictional narrative. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 61-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Segal, E. M. (1995b). Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Shapiro, M. A., Barriga, C., & Beren, J. (2004, May). Tell me something I didn't know about why you did that: Attribution and perceived reality. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
76. Shapiro, M. A., & Chock, T. M. (2003). Psychological processes in perceiving reality. Media Psychology, 5, 163-198.
77. Shapiro, M. A., & Fox, F. R. (2002). The role of typical and atypical events in story memory. Human Communication Research, 28, 109-135.
78. Shapiro, M. A., Pena-Herborn, J., & Hancock, J. (2006). Realism, imagination, and narrative video games. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, & consequences (pp. 275-289). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14, 328-347.
80. Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2004). A process model of consumer cultivation. The role of television is a function of the type of judgment. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173-191.
82. Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56, 235-252.
83. Strange, J. (2002). How fictional tales wag real-world beliefs. Models and mechanisms of narrative influence. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (pp. 263-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
84. Taylor, L. D. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal sexual television content and perceived realism on attitudes and beliefs. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 130-138.
85. Todorov, T. (1977). The poetics of prose. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
86. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
87. Wilson, B., & Busselle, R. (2004, May). Transportation into the narrative and perceptions of media realism. Presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
88. Worth, S. (2004). Fictional spaces. Philosophical Forum, 35, 439-455.
89. Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment. The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Yanal, R. J. (1999). Paradoxes of emotion and fiction. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
91. Zhang, L., Hmielowski, J., & Busselle, R. (2007, May). The role of distraction in altering transportation, perceived internal realism, and counter-arguing in experiencing television narrative. Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division of the International Communication Association Annual Convention, San Francisco.
92. Zillmann, D. (1994). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23, 33-51.
93. Zubin, D. A., & Hewitt, L. E. (1995). The deictic center: A theory of deixis in narrative. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective (pp. 129-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
94. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
95. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.