Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates

Journal of Communication

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 508-529

  Bilandzic, Helena ^a   Busselle, Rick W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; PREDICTION; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL THEORY; THEORETICAL STUDY; TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 51349144178     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00397.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Bilandzic, H. (2006). The perception of distance in the cultivation process: A theoretical consideration of the relationship between television content, processing experience, and perceived distance. Communication Theory, 16, 333-355.
4. Bilandzic, H., & Rössler, P. (2004). Life according to television. Implications of genre-specific cultivation effects: The gratification/cultivation model. Communications. The European Journal of Communication, 29, 295-326.
5. Busselle, R. W., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255-280.
6. Busselle, R. W., Ryabovolova, A., & Wilson, B. (2004). Ruining a good story: Cultivation, perceived realism and narrative. Communications. The European Journal of Communication, 29, 365-378.
7. Busselle, R. W., & Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and exemplar accessibility. Media Psychology, 5, 255-282.
8. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
10. Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 175-191). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 20, 159-165.
12. Eyal, K., & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 77-98.
13. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Foy, S., & Signorielli, N. (1978). Cultural indicators: The violence profile no. 9. Journal of Communication, 28, 176-207.
14. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 43-67). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247-266.
17. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narrative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
18. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315-341). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311-327.
20. Green, M. C., Garst, J., & Brock, T. C. (2004). The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 161-176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hamilton, L. C. (1992). Regression with graphics: A second course in applied statistics. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22. Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1981a). Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291-301.
23. Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1981b). Using television to construct social reality. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 25, 347-364.
24. Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults' wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7, 325-351.
25. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Kim, J., & Rubin, A. M. (1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107-135.
28. Lyden, J. C. (2003). Film as religion. Myths, morals, and rituals. New York: New York University Press.
29. Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In B. Burleson (Ed.) Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 1-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for leisure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. O'Keefe, G. J. (1984). Public views on crime: Television exposure and media credibility. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 514-535). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Oliver, M. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19, 315-342.
33. Oliver, M. B. (2000). The respondent gender gap. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 215-234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Oliver, M. B., Sargent, S., & Weaver, J. (1998). The impact of sex and gender role self-perception on affective reactions to different types of film. Sex Roles, 38, 45-62.
35. Perse, E. M. (1986). Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 175-193.
36. Perse, E. M. (1990). Cultivation and involvement with local television news. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research (pp. 51-69). Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.
37. Pinkleton, B., Austin, A., & Fujioka, Y. (2001). The relationship of perceived beer ad and PSA quality to high school students' alcohol-related beliefs and behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 575-597.
38. Potter, W. J. (1991). The relationship between first- and second-order measures of cultivation. Human Communication Research, 18, 92-113.
39. Potter, J. W., & Chang, I. C. (1990). Television exposure measures and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 313-333.
40. Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2006). Love on television: Reality perceptions between men and women. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 269-276.
41. Raney, A. A. (2002). Moral judgment as a predictor of enjoyment of crime drama. Media Psychology, 4, 305-322.
42. Rouner, D. (1984). Active television viewing and the cultivation hypothesis. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 168-174.
43. Rowe Stitt, C., & Nabi, R. L. (2005, May). The persuasive impact of narratives: A comparison across message types and modalities. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association in New York.
44. Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1988). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246-268.
45. Segrin, C., & Nabi, R. L. (2002). Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage? Journal of Communication, 52, 247-263.
46. Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14, 328-347.
47. Shrum, L. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects-further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22, 482-509.
48. Shrum, L. J. (2002). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2004). A process model of consumer cultivation. The role of television is a function of the type of judgment. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Shrum, L. J., Wyer, R. S., & O'Guinn, T. C. (1998). The effects of television consumption on social perceptions: The use of priming procedures to investigate psychological processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 447-458.
51. Slater, M. (2002). Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 157-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Slater, M., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56, 235-252.
53. Strange, J. J., & Leung, C. C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem's urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 436-449.
54. Valkenburg, P. M., & Patiwael, M. (1998). Does watching Court TV "cultivate" people's perceptions of crime? Gazette, 60, 227-238.
55. Van den Bulck, J. (2003, May). The datasetting effect of learning fact from viewing fiction: Toward an on-line processing model of television effects. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association in San Diego, CA.
56. Williams, D. (2006). Virtual cultivation: Online worlds, offline perceptions. Journal of Communication, 56, 69-87.
57. Wyer, R. S., Adaval, R., & Colcombe, S. J. (2002). Narrative-based representations of social knowledge: Their construction and use in comprehension, memory, and judgment. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 131-197). New York: Academic Press.
58. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.