Deep mutational scanning: A new style of protein science

Nature Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 801-807

  Fowler, Douglas M ^a   Fields, Stanley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; PROTEIN VARIANT;

CELL SELECTION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENETICS; LIGAND BINDING; MISSENSE MUTATION; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION;

GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; MUTATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84905217368     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3027     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Freeman, A.M., Mole, B.M., Silversmith, R.E. & Bourret, R.B. Action at a distance: amino acid substitutions that affect binding of the phosphorylated CheY response regulator and catalysis of dephosphorylation can be far from the CheZ phosphatase active site. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4709-4718 (2011).
2. Jonson, P.H. & Petersen, S.B. A critical view on conservative mutations. Protein Eng. 14, 397-402 (2001).
3. Gilbert, G.E., Novakovic, V.A., Kaufman, R.J., Miao, H. & Pipe, S.W. Conservative mutations in the C2 domains of factor VIII and factor V alter phospholipid binding and cofactor activity. Blood 120, 1923-1932 (2012).
4. Zhang, W., Dourado, D.F.A.R., Fernandes, P.A., Ramos, M.J. & Mannervik, B. Multidimensional epistasis and ftness landscapes in enzyme evolution. Biochem. J. 445, 39-46 (2012).
5. Natarajan, C. et al. Epistasis among adaptive mutations in deer mouse hemoglobin. Science 340, 1324-1327 (2013).
6. Fowler, D.M., Stephany, J.J. & Fields, S. Measuring the activity of protein variants on a large-scale using deep mutational scanning. Nat. Protoc. doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.153 (in the press).
7. Wang, X., Minasov, G. & Shoichet, B.K. Evolution of an antibiotic resistance enzyme constrained by stability and activity trade-offs. J. Mol. Biol. 320, 85-95 (2002).
8. Bloom, J.D. & Arnold, F.H. In the light of directed evolution: pathways of adaptive protein evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9995-10000 (2009).
9. Bershtein, S., Segal, M., Bekerman, R., Tokuriki, N. & Tawfk, D.S. Robustness-epistasis link shapes the ftness landscape of a randomly drifting protein. Nature 444, 929-932 (2006).
10. Potapov, V., Cohen, M. & Schreiber, G. Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 22, 553-560 (2009).
11. Magliery, T.J., Lavinder, J.J. & Sullivan, B.J. Protein stability by number: high-throughput and statistical approaches to one of protein science's most diffcult problems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 15, 443-451 (2011).
12. Foit, L. et al. Optimizing protein stability in vivo. Mol. Cell 36, 861-871 (2009).
13. Araya, C.L. et al. A fundamental protein property, thermodynamic stability, revealed solely from large-scale measurements of protein function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16858-16863 (2012).
14. Starita, L.M. et al. Activity-enhancing mutations in an E3 ubiquitin ligase identifed by high-throughput mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1263-E1272 (2013).
15. Lander, G.C., Saibil, H.R. & Nogales, E. Go hybrid: EM, crystallography, and beyond. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 22, 627-635 (2012).
16. Adkar, B.V. et al. Protein model discrimination using mutational sensitivity derived from deep sequencing. Structure 20, 371-381 (2012).
17. Melamed, D., Young, D.L., Gamble, C.E., Miller, C.R. & Fields, S. Deep mutational scanning of an RRM domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A)-binding protein. RNA 19, 1537-1551 (2013).
18. Aydin, Z., Singh, A., Bilmes, J. & Noble, W.S. Learning sparse models for a dynamic Bayesian network classifer of protein secondary structure. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 154 (2011).
19. Chen, K. & Kurgan, L. Computational prediction of secondary and supersecondary structures. Methods Mol. Biol. 932, 63-86 (2013).
20. Kim, D.E., DiMaio, F., Yu-Ruei Wang, R., Song, Y. & Baker, D. One contact for every twelve residues allows robust and accurate topology-level protein structure modeling. Proteins 82, 208-218 (2014).
21. Marks, D.S., Hopf, T.A. & Sander, C. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1072-1080 (2012).
22. Creager, A.N.H. Hershey heaven. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 18-19 (2001).
23. Kim, I., Miller, C.R., Young, D.L. & Fields, S. High-throughput analysis of in vivo protein stability. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 3370-3378 (2013).
24. Morell, M., de Groot, N.S., Vendrell, J., Avilés, F.X. & Ventura, S. Linking amyloid protein aggregation and yeast survival. Mol. Biosyst. 7, 1121-1128 (2011).
25. Dean, A.M. & Thornton, J.W. Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 675-688 (2007).
26. Hinkley, T. et al. A systems analysis of mutational effects in HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase. Nat. Genet. 43, 487-489 (2011).
27. Dickinson, B.C., Leconte, A.M., Allen, B., Esvelt, K.M. & Liu, D.R. Experimental interrogation of the path dependence and stochasticity of protein evolution using phage-assisted continuous evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9007-9012 (2013).
28. Koga, N. et al. Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491, 222-227 (2012).
29. Whitehead, T.A. et al. Optimization of affnity, specifcity and function of designed infuenza inhibitors using deep sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 543-548 (2012).
30. Moretti, R. et al. Community-wide evaluation of methods for predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein interactions. Proteins 81, 1980-1987 (2013).
31. Tennessen, J.A. et al. Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes. Science 337, 64-69 (2012).
32. Brocchieri, L. & Karlin, S. Protein length in eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 3390-3400 (2005).
33. Millot, G.A. et al. A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain signifcance. Hum. Mutat. 33, 1526-1537 (2012).
34. Gnad, F., Baucom, A., Mukhyala, K., Manning, G. & Zhang, Z. Assessment of computational methods for predicting the effects of missense mutations in human cancers. BMC Genomics 14, S7 (2013).
35. Gray, V.E., Kukurba, K.R. & Kumar, S. Performance of computational tools in evaluating the functional impact of laboratory-induced amino acid mutations. Bioinformatics 28, 2093-2096 (2012).
36. Fujino, Y. et al. Robust in vitro affnity maturation strategy based on interface-focused high-throughput mutational scanning. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 428, 395-400 (2012).
37. Fowler, D.M. et al. High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships. Nat. Methods 7, 741-746 (2010).
38. Gold, M.G. et al. Molecular basis of AKAP specifcity for PKA regulatory subunits. Mol. Cell 24, 383-395 (2006).
39. Ernst, A. et al. Coevolution of PDZ domain-ligand interactions analyzed by high-throughput phage display and deep sequencing. Mol. Biosyst. 6, 1782-1790 (2010).
40. McLaughlin, R.N., Poelwijk, F.J., Raman, A., Gosal, W.S. & Ranganathan, R. The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation. Nature 491, 138-142 (2012).
41. Schlinkmann, K.M. et al. Critical features for biosynthesis, stability, and functionality of a G protein-coupled receptor uncovered by all-versus-all mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9810-9815 (2012).
42. Procko, E. et al. Computational design of a protein-based enzyme inhibitor. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 3563-3575 (2013).
43. Tinberg, C.E. et al. Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affnity and selectivity. Nature 501, 212-216 (2013).
44. Traxlmayr, M.W. et al. Construction of a stability landscape of the CH3 domain of human IgG1 by combining directed evolution with high throughput sequencing. J. Mol. Biol. 423, 397-412 (2012).
45. Jiang, L., Mishra, P., Hietpas, R.T., Zeldovich, K.B. & Bolon, D.N.A. Latent effects of Hsp90 mutants revealed at reduced expression levels. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003600 (2013).
46. Hietpas, R.T., Jensen, J.D. & Bolon, D.N.A. Experimental illumination of a ftness landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7896-7901 (2011).
47. Roscoe, B.P., Thayer, K.M., Zeldovich, K.B., Fushman, D. & Bolon, D.N.A. Analyses of the effects of all ubiquitin point mutants on yeast growth rate. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 1363-1377 (2013).
48. Wu, N.C. et al. Systematic identifcation of H274Y compensatory mutations in infuenza A virus neuraminidase by high-throughput screening. J. Virol. 87, 1193-1199 (2013).
49. Forsyth, C.M. et al. Deep mutational scanning of an antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor using mammalian cell display and massively parallel pyrosequencing. MAbs 5, 523-532 (2013).
50. Wagenaar, T.R. et al. Resistance to vemurafenib resulting from a novel mutation in the BRAFV600E kinase domain. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 27, 124-133 (2014).
51. Araya, C.L. & Fowler, D.M. Deep mutational scanning: assessing protein function on a massive scale. Trends Biotechnol. 29, 435-442 (2011).
52. Fowler, D.M., Araya, C.L., Gerard, W. & Fields, S. Enrich: software for analysis of protein function by enrichment and depletion of variants. Bioinformatics 27, 3430-3431 (2011).