The five myths of MMN: Redefining how to Use MMN in basic and clinical research

Brain Topography

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 553-564

  Sussman, E S ^a   Chen, S ^a   Sussman Fort, J ^a   Dinces, E ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Auditory scene analysis; Context effects; Event related potentials (ERPs); Mismatch negativity (MMN)

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY SCENE ANALYSIS; AUDITORY SCREENING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DICHOTIC LISTENING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NEUROMODULATION; PASSIVE LISTENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS;

EID: 84904756705     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: 15736792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-013-0326-6     Document Type: Review

References (123)

1. Aaltonen O, Niemi P, Nyrke T, Tuhkanen M (1987) Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum. Biol Psychol 24(3):197-207 (Pubitemid 17151237)
2. Aaltonen O, Tuomainen J, Laine M, Niemi P (1993) Cortical differences in tonal versus vowel processing as revealed by an ERP component called mismatch negativity (MMN). Brain Lang 44(2):139-152 (Pubitemid 23092530)
3. Alho K, Huotilainen M, Tiitinen H, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Näätänen R (1993) Memory-related processing of complex sound patterns in human auditory cortex: a MEG study. NeuroReport 4(4):391-394 (Pubitemid 23116730)
4. Atienza M, Cantero JL, Grau C, Gomez C, Dominguez-Marin E, Escera C (2003) Effects of temporal encoding on auditory object formation: a mismatch negativity study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16(3):359-371 (Pubitemid 36423332)
5. Bendixen A, Jones SJ, Klump G, Winkler I (2010) Probability dependence and functional separation of the object-related and mismatch negativity event-related potential components. Neuroimage 50(1):285-290
6. Bishop DV, Hardiman MJ (2010) Measurement of mismatch negativity in individuals: a study using single-trial analysis. 47(4):697-705
7. Bonte ML, Mitterer H, Zellagui N, Poelmans H, Blomert L (2005) Auditory cortical tuning to statistical regularities in phonology. Clin Neurophysiol 116(12):2765-2774 (Pubitemid 41714026)
8. Broadbent DE (1958) Perception and communication. Pergamon Press Ltd, London
9. Brunellière A, Dufour S, Nguyen N (2011) Regional differences in the listener's phonemic inventory affect semantic processing: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study. Brain Lang 117(1):45-51
10. Chen S, Sussman ES (2013) Context effects on auditory distraction. Biol Psychol 94(2):297-309
11. Colin C, Radeau M, Soquet A, Demolin D, Colin F, Deltenre P (2002) Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory. Clin Neurophysiol 113(4):495-506 (Pubitemid 34327382)
12. Cornell SA, Lahiri A, Eulitz C (2011) "What you encode is not necessarily what you store": evidence for sparse feature representations from mismatch negativity. Brain Res 1394:79-89
13. Czigler I (2014) Visual mismatch negativity and categorization. Brain Topography, in press
14. Dalebout SD, Stack JW (1999) Mismatch negativity to acoustic differences not differentiated behaviorally. J Am Acad Audiol 10(7):388-399
15. Davids N, van den Brink D, van Turennout M, Mitterer H, Verhoeven L (2009) Towards neurophysiological assessment of phonemic discrimination: context effects of the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 120(6):1078-1086
16. Deguchi C, Chobert J, Brunellière A, Nguyen N, Colombo L, Besson M (2010) Pre-attentive and attentive processing of French vowels. Brain Res 1366:149-161
17. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Dupoux E, Gout A (2000) Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: a cross-linguistic study. J Cogn Neurosci 12(4):635-647 (Pubitemid 30609389)
18. DeSanctis P, Ritter W, Molholm S, Kelly SP, Foxe JJ (2008) Auditory scene analysis: the interaction of stimulation rate and frequency separation on pre-attentive grouping. Eur J Neurosci 27(5):127-1276
19. Deutsch JA, Deutsch D (1963) Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychol Rev 70:80-90
20. Díaz B, Baus C, Escera C, Costa A, Sebastián-Gallés N (2008) Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(42):16083-16088
21. Dyson BJ, Alain C, He Y (2005) Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 5(3):319-338 (Pubitemid 44228202)
22. Froyen D, Van Atteveldt N, Bonte M, Blomert L (2008) Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds. Neurosci Lett 430(1):23-28
23. Gao S, Hu J, Gong D, Chen S, Kendrick KM, Yao D (2012) Integration of consonant and pitch processing as revealed by the absence of additivity in mismatch negativity. PLoS ONE 7(5):e38289
24. Gomes H, Berstein R, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr, Miller J (1997) Storage of feature conjunctions in transient auditory memory. Psychophysiology 34(6):712-716 (Pubitemid 27514924)
25. Gomes H, Molholm S, Ritter W, Kurtzberg D, Cowan N, Vaughan HG Jr (2000) Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task. Psychophysiology 37(6):807-816
26. Grimm S, Widmann A, Schröger E (2004) Differential processing of duration changes within short and long sounds in humans. Neurosci Lett 356(2):83-86 (Pubitemid 38121474)
27. Hasting AS, Winkler I, Kotz SA (2008) Early differential processing of verbs and nouns in the human brain as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Eur J Neurosci 27(6):1561-1565 (Pubitemid 351406260)
28. Hillyard SA, Hink RF, Schwent VL, Picton TW (1973) Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182(4108):177-180
29. Hisagi M, Shafer VL, Strange W, Sussman ES (2010) Perception of a Japanese vowel length contrast by Japanese and American English listeners: behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Brain Res 1360:89-105
30. Hung J, Jones SJ, VazPato M (2001) Scalp potentials to pitch change in rapid tone sequences. A correlate of sequential stream segregation. Exp Brain Res 140(1):56-65 (Pubitemid 32758974)
31. Jacobsen T, Schröger E (2004) Input to verbal working memory: reattentive construction of the central speech representation. Exp Psychol 51(4):231-239 (Pubitemid 39636751)
32. Jakoby H, Goldstein A, Faust M (2011) Electrophysiological correlates of speech perception mechanisms and individual differences in second language attainment. Psychophysiology 48(11):1517-1531
33. Javitt DC, Grochowski S, Shelley AM, Ritter W (1998) Impaired mismatch negativity (MMN) generation in schizophrenia as a function of stimulus deviance, probability, and interstimulus/interdeviant interval. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108(2):143-153
34. Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Wittfoth M, Sammler D (2005) Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: an ERP Study. J Cogn Neurosci 17(10):1565-1577 (Pubitemid 41510960)
35. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell TD, Sharma A (1995) Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear Hear 16(1):19-37
36. Kraus N, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Nicol TG, Koch DB (1996) Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science 273:971-973 (Pubitemid 26275177)
37. Kujala T, Näätänen R (2001) The mismatch negativity in evaluating central auditory dysfunction in dyslexia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:535-543 (Pubitemid 32930014)
38. Kujala T, Halmetoja J, Näätänen R, Alku P, Lyytinen H, Sussman E (2006) Speech- and sound-segmentation in dyslexia: evidence for a multiple-level cortical impairment. Eur J Neurosci 24(8):2420-2427 (Pubitemid 44622362)
39. Lee CY, Yen HL, Yeh PW, Lin WH, Cheng YY, Tzeng YL, Wu HC (2012) Mismatch responses to lexical tone, initial consonant, and vowel in Mandarin-speaking preschoolers. Neuropsychologia 50(14):3228-3239
40. Lepistö T, Kuitunen A, Sussman E, Saalasti S, Jansson-Verkasalo E, Nieminen-von Wendt T, Kujala T (2009) Auditory stream segregation in children with Asperger syndrome. Biol Psychol 82(3):301-307
41. Lipski SC, Escudero P, Benders T (2012) Language experience modulates weighting of acoustic cues for vowel perception: an event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 49(5):638-650
42. List A, Justus T, Robertson LC, Bentin S (2007) A mismatch negativity study of local-global auditory processing. Brain Res 1153:122-133 (Pubitemid 46802524)
43. Maiste AC, Wiens AS, Hunt MJ, Scherg M, Picton TW (1995) Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds. Ear Hear 16(1):68-90
44. May PJ, Tiitinen H (2010) Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47(1):66-122
45. Miglietta S, Grimaldi M, Calabrese A (2013) Conditioned allophony in speech perception: an ERP study. Brain Lang 126(3):285-290
46. Morlet D, Fischer C (2014) MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review. Brain Topography, in press.
47. Müller D, Schröger E (2007) Temporal grouping affects the automatic processing of deviant sounds. Biol Psychol 74(3):358-364
48. Müller D, Widmann A, Schröger E (2005) Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. Psychophysiology 42:668-676
49. Näätänen R (1991) Mismatch negativity outside strong attentional focus: a commentary on Woldorff et al. (1991). Psychophysiology 28(4):478-484
50. Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
51. Näätänen R (2003) Mismatch negativity: clinical research and possible applications. Int J Psychophysiol 48:179-188
52. Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mäntysalo S (1978) Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 42:313-329
53. Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Tiitinen H, Jiang D, Alho K (1993) Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 30(5):436-450 (Pubitemid 23250117)
54. Nager W, Teder-Sälejärvi W, Kunze S, Münte TF (2003) Preattentive evaluation of multiple perceptual streams in human audition. NeuroReport 14(6):871-874 (Pubitemid 36667929)
55. Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
56. Nenonen S, Shestakova A, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R (2005) Speech-sound duration processing in a second language is specific to phonetic categories. Brain Lang 92(1):26-32 (Pubitemid 39586724)
57. Novak GP, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr, Wiznitzer ML (1990) Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75(4):255-275 (Pubitemid 20111464)
58. Novak G, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr (1992) Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgments. Psychophysiology 29(4):398-411
59. Paavilainen P, Tiitinen H, Alho K, Näätänen R (1993) Mismatch negativity to slight pitch changes outside strong attentional focus. Biol Psychol 37(1):23-41 (Pubitemid 23341457)
60. Paavilainen P, Jaramillo M, Näätänen R, Winkler I (1999) Neuronal populations in the human brain extracting invariant relationships from acoustic variance. Neurosci Lett 265(3):179-182 (Pubitemid 29207395)
61. Partanen E, Vainio M, Kujala T, Huotilainen M (2011) Linguistic multifeature MMN paradigm for extensive recording of auditory discrimination profiles. Psychophysiology 48(10):1372-1380
62. Peltola MS, Tamminen H, Toivonen H, Kujala T, Näätänen R (2012) Different kinds of bilinguals: different kinds of brains: the neural organization of two languages in one brain. Brain Lang 121(3):261-266
63. Perez VB, Woods SW, Roach BJ, Ford JM, McGlashan TH, Srihari VH, Mathalon DH (2013). Automatic Auditory Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and Clinical High-Risk Patients: Forecasting Psychosis Risk with Mismatch Negativity. Biol Psychiatry, in press
64. Pulvermüller F, Shtyrov Y (2006) Language outside the focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Prog Neurobiol 79(1):49-71
65. Pulvermüller F, Shtyrov Y, Kujala T, Näätänen R (2004) Word-specific cortical activity as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 41(1):106-112
66. Rahne T, Böckmann-Barthel M (2009) Visual cues release the temporal coherence of auditory objects in auditory scene analysis. Brain Res 1300:125-134
67. Rahne T, Sussman E (2009) Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment. Eur J Neurosci 29(1):205-211
68. Rahne T, Böckmann M, von Specht H, Sussman E (2007) Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis. Brain Res 1144:127-135 (Pubitemid 46440839)
69. Reiche M, Hartwigsen G, Widmann A, Saur D, Schröger E, Bendixen A (2013) Involuntary attentional capture by speech and nonspeech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study. Brain Res 1490:153-160
70. Ritter W, Sussman E, Molholm S (2000) Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects. NeuroReport 11(1):61-63 (Pubitemid 30053390)
71. Saarinen J, Paavilainen P, Schöger E, Tervaniemi M, Näätänen R (1992) Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. NeuroReport 3(12):1149-1451
72. Sams M, Alho K, Näätänen R (1983) Sequential effects on the ERP in discriminating two stimuli. Biol Psychol 17(1):41-58 (Pubitemid 13003664)
73. Sams M, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Näätänen R (1985) Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62(6):437-448 (Pubitemid 16230711)
74. Savela J, Kujala T, Tuomainen J, Ek M, Aaltonen O, Näätä nen R (2003) The mismatch negativity and reaction time as indices of the perceptual distance between the corresponding vowels of two related languages. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16(2):250-256 (Pubitemid 36369323)
75. Schöger E (1995) Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology 32(1):55-65
76. Schöger E (1996) The influence of stimulus intensity and interstimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100(6):517-526
77. Schöger E, Näätänen R, Paavilainen P (1992) Event-related potentials reveal how non-attended complex sound patterns are represented by the human brain. Neurosci Lett 146(2):183-186
78. Schöger E, Paavilainen P, Näätänen R (1994) Mismatch negativity to changes in a continuous tone with regularly varying frequencies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92(2):140-147
79. Shafer VL, Schwartz RG, Kurtzberg D (2004) Language-specific memory traces of consonants in the brain. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 18(3):242-254 (Pubitemid 38114969)
80. Sharma A, Dorman MF (1998) Exploration of the perceptual magnet effect using the mismatch negativity auditory evoked potential. J Acoust Soc Am 104(1):511-517 (Pubitemid 28321738)
81. Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, Nicol T (1993) Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88(1):64-71 (Pubitemid 23171523)
82. Shtyrov Y, Pulvermüller F (2002) Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain. NeuroReport 13(4):521-525 (Pubitemid 34293203)
83. Sokolov EN (1963) Higher nervous functions: the orienting reflex. Annu Rev Phsyiol 25:545-580
84. Sonnadara RR, Alain C, Trainor LJ (2006) Effects of spatial separation and stimulus probability on the event-related potentials elicited by occasional changes in sound location. Brain Res 1071(1):175-185 (Pubitemid 43255488)
85. Sorokin A, Alku P, Kujala T (2010) Change and novelty detection in speech and non-speech sound streams. Brain Res 23(1327):77-90
86. Squires KC, Squires NK, Hillyard SA (1975) Vertex evoked potentials in a rating scale detection task: relation to signal probability. Behav Biol 13:21-34
87. Steinberg J, Truckenbrodt H, Jacobsen T (2010) Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity. J Cogn Neurosci 22(10):2174-2185
88. Stekelenburg JJ, Vroomen J (2012) Electrophysiological evidence for a multisensory speech-specific mode of perception. Neuropsychologia 50(7):1425-1431
89. Sussman E (2005) Integration and segregation in auditory scene analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 117(3):1285-1298
90. Sussman E (2007) A new view on the MMN and attention debate: auditory context effects. J Psychophysiol 21(3-4):164-175
91. Sussman E (2013) Attention matters: pitch vs. pattern processing in adolescence. Front Psychol 4(333):1-9
92. Sussman E, Gumenyuk V (2005) Organization of sequential sounds in auditory memory. NeuroReport 16(13):1519-1523 (Pubitemid 41805674)
93. Sussman E, Steinschneider M (2006) Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex. Brain Res 1075(1):165-174
94. Sussman E, Steinschneider M (2009) Attention effects on auditory scene analysis in children. Neuropsychologia 47(3):771-785
95. Sussman E, Winkler I (2001) Dynamic sensory updating in the auditory system. Cogn Brain Res 12:431-439 (Pubitemid 33022697)
96. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr (1998a) Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Res 789:130-138 (Pubitemid 28206853)
97. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr (1998b) Predictability of stimulus deviance and the mismatch negativity. NeuroReport 9(18):4167-4170 (Pubitemid 29030709)
98. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr (1999) An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 36:22-34 (Pubitemid 29044453)
99. Sussman E, Winkler I, Huotilainen M, Ritter W, Näätänen R (2002) Top-down effects on the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization. Cogn Brain Res 13:393-405 (Pubitemid 34252969)
100. Sussman E, Sheridan K, Kreuzer J, Winkler I (2003a) Representation of the standard: stimulus context effects on the process generating the mismatch negativity component of event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 40(3):465-471 (Pubitemid 36596914)
101. Sussman E, Winkler I, Wang W (2003b) MMN and attention: competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology 40(3):430-435 (Pubitemid 36596911)
102. Sussman E, Kujala T, Halmetoja J, Lyytinen H, Alku P, Näätänen R (2004) Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts. Hear Res 190(1-2):128-140 (Pubitemid 38402287)
103. Sussman E, Bregman AS, Wang WJ, Khan FJ (2005) Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds in multistream auditory environments. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 5(1):93-110 (Pubitemid 41431334)
104. Sussman ES, Horváth J, Winkler I, Orr M (2007) The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Percept Psychophys 69(1):136-152
105. Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER (1965) Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150(3700):1187-1188
106. Szymanski MD, Yund EW, Woods DL (1999) Phonemes, intensity and attention: differential effects on the mismatch negativity (MMN). J Acoust Soc Am 106(6):3492-3505 (Pubitemid 129520713)
107. Tervaniemi M, Kruck S, DeBaene W, Schröger E, Alter K, Friederici AD (2009) Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus. Eur J Neurosci 30(8):1636-1642
108. Tiitinen H, May P, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R (1994) Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 372(6501):90-92 (Pubitemid 24339487)
109. Treisman AM (1969) Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol Rev 76:282-299
110. van Linden S, Stekelenburg JJ, Tuomainen J, Vroomen J (2007) Lexical effects on auditory speech perception: an electrophysiological study. Neurosci Lett 420(1):49-52 (Pubitemid 46777104)
111. van Zuijen TL, Sussman E, Winkler I, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M (2004) Grouping of sequential sounds - an event-related potential study comparing musicians and nonmusicians. J Cogn Neurosci 16(2):331-338 (Pubitemid 38299803)
112. Wang XD, Gu F, He K, Chen LH, Chen L (2012) Preattentive extraction of abstract auditory rules in speech sound stream: a mismatch negativity study using lexical tones. PLoS ONE 7(1):e30027
113. Wei JH, Chan TC, Luo YJ (2002) A modified oddball paradigm "cross-modal delayed response" and the research on mismatch negativity. Brain Res Bull 57(2):221-230
114. Winkler I, Lehtokoski A, Alku P, Vainio M, Czigler I, Csépe V, Aaltonen O, Raimo I, Alho K, Lang H, Iivonen A, Näätänen R (1999) Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 7(3):357-369 (Pubitemid 29029977)
115. Winkler I, Korzyukov O, Gumenyuk V, Cowan N, Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Ilmoniemi RJ, Alho K, Näätänen R (2002) Temporary and longer term retention of acoustic information. 39(4):530-534
116. Winkler I, Kujala T, Alku P, Näätänen R (2003a) Language context and phonetic change detection. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17(3):833-844 (Pubitemid 38373384)
117. Winkler I, Sussman E, Tervaniemi M, Horváth J, Ritter W, Näätänen R (2003b) Preattentive auditory context effects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3(1):57-77 (Pubitemid 37517036)
118. Winkler I, Takegata R, Sussman E (2005) Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25(1):291-299 (Pubitemid 41278506)
119. Woldorff MG, Hackley SA, Hillyard SA (1991) The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology 28(1):30-42
120. Woldorff MG, Hillyard SA, Gallen CC, Hampson SR, Bloom FE (1998) Magnetoencephalographic recordings demonstrate attentional modulation of mismatch-related neural activity in human auditory cortex. Psychophysiology 35(3):283-292 (Pubitemid 28166678)
121. Xi J, Zhang L, Shu H, Zhang Y, Li P (2010) Categorical perception of lexical tones in Chinese revealed by mismatch negativity. Neuroscience 170(1):223-231
122. Yabe H, Winkler I, Czigler I, Koyama S, Kakigi R, Sutoh T, Hiruma T, Kaneko S (2001) Organizing sound sequences in the human brain: the interplay of auditory streaming and temporal integration. Cogn Brain Res 897:222-227 (Pubitemid 32244376)
123. Ylinen S, Uther M, Latvala A, Vepsäläinen S, Iverson P, Akahane-Yamada R, Näätänen R (2010) Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English. J Cogn Neurosci 22(6):1319-1332