Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: A cross-linguistic study

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 635-647

  Dehaene Lambertz, G ^a   Dupoux, E ^a   Gout, A ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FRANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JAPAN; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TOPOGRAPHY; VOWEL;

EID: 0033866277     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892900562390     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beckman, M. E. (1982). Segmental duration and the "mora" in Japanese. Phonetica, 39, 113-135.
2. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of the perceptual reorganization for speechcontrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 345-360.
3. Church, K. W. (1987). Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval. Cognition, 25, 53-69.
4. Connolly, J. F., & Phillips, N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 256-266.
5. Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Teder, W., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 19, 909-921.
6. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport, 8, 919-924.
7. Dupoux, E. (1993). Prelexical processing: The syllabic hypothesis revisited. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: the second sperlonga meeting (pp. 81-114). Hove East Sussex, UK: Lea & Febiger.
8. Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1568-1578.
9. Dutoit, T., Pagel, V., Pierret, N., Bataille, F., & Vreken, O. V. D. (1996). The MBROIA project: Towards a set of high-quality speech synthesizers free of use for non-commercial purposes. Paper presented at the ICSLP'96, Philadelphia.
10. Eimas, P. D., & Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99-109.
11. Frazier, L. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition. Cognition, 25, 157-187.
12. Fujimira, O. (1976). Syllables as concatenated demisyllables and affixes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, S55.
13. Giard, M. H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., & Bouchet, P. (1990). Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 27, 627-640.
14. Halle, P., Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Meunier, C. (1998). Processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 592-608.
15. Itô, J., & Mester, A. (1995). Japanese phonology. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 817-838). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16. Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V., & Jusczyk, A. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound pattern of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402-420.
17. Jusczyk, P. W., & Luce, P. A. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native-language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630-645.
18. Keating, P., & Hoffman, M. (1984). Vowel variation in Japanese. Phonetica, 41, 191-207.
19. Klatt, D. H. (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 279-312.
20. Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experiences alter phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606-608.
21. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words phonemes and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675.
22. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Phonological constrainst in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 338-348.
23. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 558-614.
24. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
25. Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., & Segui, J. (1990). Constraining models of lexical access: The onset of word recognition. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 236-262). Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201-288.
27. Näätänen, R., Lehtokovski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iovonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., & Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
28. Pallier, C. (1994). Role de la syllabe dans la perception de la parole: études attentionnelles. These de doctorat de l'Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales [available from the author], Paris.
29. Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastian, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in spech perception. Cognition, 64, B9-B17.
30. Pallier, C., & Dupoux, E. (1997). EXPE: An expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 322-327.
31. Pallier, C., Sebastian-Gallés, N., Felguera, T., Christophe, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). Attentional allocation within the syllabic structure of spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 373-389.
32. Perez-Abalo, M. C., Rodriguez, R., Bobes, M. A., Gutteriez, J., & Valdes-Sosa, M. (1994). Brain potentials and the availability of semantic and phonological codes over time. NeuroReport, 5, 2173-2177.
33. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, D., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density-mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187.
34. Pitt, M. (1998). Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 941-951.
35. Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 421-435.
36. Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Neuropsychological manifestations of phonological processing: Latency variation of a negative ERP component timelocked to phonological mismatch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 204-219.
37. Tucker, D. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic electrode net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 154-163.
38. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganisation during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49-63.
39. Wicklegren, W. A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding associative memory and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review, 76, 1-15.