Language context and phonetic change detection

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 833-844

  Winkler, István ^a,b   Kujala, Teija ^b   Alku, Paavo ^c   Näätänen, Risto ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cognition; Context; Deviance detection; ERP; Language; Mismatch negativity (MMN); N2b; Neural basis of behavior; P3a; Speech processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUNGARY; LANGUAGE; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; STANDARD; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 1642309743     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00205-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aaltonen O., Eerola O., Hellström Å., Uusipaikka E., Lang A.H. Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;1090-1106.
2. Aaltonen O., Niemi P., Nyrke T., Tuhkanen M. Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum. Biol. Psychol. 24:1987;197-207.
3. Alho K., Paavilainen P., Reinikainen K., Sams M., Näätä nen R. Separability of different negative components of the event-related potential associated with auditory stimulus processing. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;613-623.
4. Alku P., Tiitinen H., Näätänen R. A method for generating natural-sounding speech stimuli for cognitive brain research. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110:1999;1329-1333.
5. Brattico E., Näätänen R., Tervaniemi M. Context effects on pitch perception in musicians and non-musicians: evidence from ERP recordings. Music Percept. 19:2002;1-24.
6. Cutler A., Otake T. Mora or phoneme - further evidence for language-specific listening. J. Mem. Lang. 33:1994;824-844.
7. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport. 8:1997;919-924.
8. Diesch E., Biermann S., Luce T. The magnetic field elicited by word and phonological non-words. NeuroReport. 9:1998;455-460.
9. Diesch E., Luce T. Magnetic mismatch fields elicited by vowels and consonants. Exp. Brain Res. 116:1997;139-152.
10. Edgington E.S. Randomization Tests. 1980;Dekker, New York.
11. Escera C., Alho K., Schröger E., Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 5:2000;151-166.
12. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25:2001;355-373.
13. Hahne A., Schröger E., Friederici A.D. Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in auditory sentence comprehension. NeuroReport. 13:2002;305-309.
14. T. Jacobsen, J. Horváth, E. Schröger, S. Lattner, A. Widmann, I. Winkler, Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality, Brain Lang., in press.
15. Kaipio M.-L., Novitski N., Tervaniemi M., Alho K., Öhman J., Salonen O., Näätänen R. Fast vigilance decrement in closed head injury patients as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). NeuroReport. 12:2001;1517-1521.
16. Kuhl P.K. Human adults and infants show a 'perceptual magnet effect' for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Percept. Psychophys. 50:1991;93-107.
17. Lang A.H., Eerola O., Korpilahti P., Holopainen I., Salo S., Aaltonen O. Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear. 16:1995;118-130.
18. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav. Brain Sci. 13:1990;201-288.
19. Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour-Luhtanen M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., Vainio M., Alku P., Ilmoniemi R.J., Luuk A., Allik J., Sinkkonen J., Alho K. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature. 385:1997;432-434.
20. Näätänen R., Terveniemi M., Sussman E., Paavilainen P., Winkler I. 'Primitive intelligence' in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci. 24:2001;282-288.
21. Näätänen R., Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 125:1999;826-859.
22. Novak G., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Jr. The chronometry of attention-modulated processing and automatic mismatch detection. Psychophysiology. 29:1992;412-430.
23. Phillips C., Pellathy T., Marantz A., Yellin E., Wexler K., Poeppel D., McGinnis M., Roberts T. Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: an MEG mismatch study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:2000;1038-1055.
24. Picton T.W., Alain C., Otten L., Ritter W., Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 5:2000;111-139.
25. Pulvermüller F. Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5:2001;517-524.
26. Pulvermüller F., Kujala T., Shtyrov Y., Simola J., Tiitinen H., Alku P., Alho K., Martinkauppi S., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R. Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. NeuroImage. 14:2001;607-616.
27. Sandridge S., Boothroyd A. Using naturally produced speech to elicit mismatch negativity. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 7:1996;105-112.
28. Schröger E., Rauh R., Schubö W. Probability distribution of Minkowski distance between discrete random variables. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 53:1993;379-398.
29. Sharma A., Dorman M.F. Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:2000;2697-2703.
30. Shtyrov Y., Pulvermüller F. Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain. NeuroReport. 13:2002;521-525.
31. Shtyrov Y., Pulvermüller F. Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15:2002;1085-1091.
32. Sussman E., Winkler I., Huotilainen M., Ritter W., Näätä nen R. Top-down effects can modify the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization. Cogn. Brain Res. 13:2002;393-405.
33. Sussman E., Winkler I., Wang W.J. MMN and attention: competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology. 40:2003;430-435.
34. Szymanski M., Yund E.W., Woods D.L. Phonemes, intensity and attention: differential effects on the mismatch negativity (MMN). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:1999;3492-3505.
35. Widmann A., Schröger E. Bootstrapping the Distribution of the City-Block Distance Between Two Repeated Measures. 1999;. On-line: http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~biopsych/widmann/minkowski.html.
36. Winkler I., Karmos G., Näätänen R. Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res. 742:1996;239-252.
37. Winkler I., Kujala T., Tiitinen H., Sivonen P., Alku P., Lehtokoski A., Czigler I., Csépe V., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R. Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology. 36:1999;638-642.
38. Winkler I., Lehtokoski A., Alku P., Vainio M., Czigler I., Csépe V., Aaltonen O., Raimo I., Alho K., Lang H., Iivonen A., Näätä nen R. Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. Cogn. Brain Res. 7:1999;357-369.
39. Winkler I., Sussman E., Tervaniemi M., Ritter W., Horváth J., Näätänen R. Pre-attentive auditory context effects. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3:2003;57-77.
40. Wunderlich J.L., Cone-Wesson B.K. Effects of stimulus frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory-evoked potential. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2001;1526-1537.