Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds within multistream auditory environments

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 93-110

  Sussman, E S ^a   Bregman, A S ^b   Wang, W J ^a,c   Khan, F J ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; SENSORY STIMULATION; SOUND TRANSMISSION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION RESPONSE; REACTION TIME; SOUND; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SOUND; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 21244443493     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.5.1.93     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. BEY, C., & McADAMS, S. (2003). Postrecognition of interleaved melodies as an indirect measure of auditory stream formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 267-279.
2. BOTTE, M.-C., DRAKE, C., BROCHARD, R., & McADAMS, S. (1997). Perceptual attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 419-425.
3. BREGMAN, A. S. (1978). Auditory streaming is cumulative. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 380-387.
4. BREGMAN, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. BROADBENT, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.
6. BROCHARD, R., DRAKE, C., BOTTE, M.-C., & McADAMS, S. (1999). Perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences: Effect of number of simultaneous subsequences and frequency separation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1742-1759.
7. BUSHNELL, M. C. GOLDBERG, M. E., & ROBINSON, D. L. (1981). Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex: 1. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 755-772.
8. CARLYON, R. P., CUSACK, R., FOXTON, J. M., & ROBERTSON, I. H. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 115-127.
9. CUSACK, R., DEEKS, J., AIKMAN, G., & CARLYON, R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 643-656.
10. DESIMONE, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 353, 1245-1255.
11. DESIMONE, R., & DUNCAN, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
12. DEUTSCH, J. A., & DEUTSCH, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
13. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
14. DUNCAN, J., MARTENS, S., & WARD. R. (1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature, 387, 808-810.
15. FRIEDMAN, D., CYCOWICZ, Y. M., & GAETA, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373.
16. FRITZ, J., SHAMMA, S., ELHILALI, M., & KLEIN, D. (2003). Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1216-1223.
17. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
18. HILLYARD, S. A., VOGEL, E. K., & LUCK, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1257-1270.
19. KISLEY, M. A., DAVALOS, D. B., LAYTON, H. S., PRATT, D., ELLIS, J. K., & SEGER, C. A. (2004). Small changes in temporal deviance modulate mismatch negativity amplitude in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 358, 197-200.
20. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. MORAN, J., & DESIMONE, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782-784.
22. NÄÄTÄNEN, R., PAAVILAINEN, P., TIITINEN, H., JIANG, D., & ALHO, K. (1993). Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 30, 436-450.
23. NÄÄTÄNEN, R., TERVANIEMI, M., SUSSMAN, E., PAAVILAINEN, P., & WINKLER, I. (2001). "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 283-288.
24. NEISSER, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
25. NORMAN, D. A. (1967). Temporal con fusion and limited capacity processors. Acta Psychologica, 27, 293-297.
26. PICTON, D. W., ALAIN, C., OTTEN, L., RITTER, W., & ACHIM, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 111-139.
27. RITTER, W., SUSSMAN, E., DEACON, D., COWAN, N., & VAUGHAN, H. G., JR. (1999). Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events. Psychophysiology, 36, 835-839.
28. RITTER, W., SUSSMAN, E., & MOLHOLM, S. (2000). Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects. NeuroReport, 11, 61-63.
29. RUGG, M. D., & COLES, G. H. (1995). Electrophysiology of mind. Event-related brain potentials and cognition (Oxford Psychology Series No. 25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. STEKELENBURG, J. J., VROOMEN, J., & DE GELDER, B. (2004). Illusory sound shifts induced by the ventriloquist illusion evoke the mismatch negativity. Neuroscience Letters, 357, 163-166.
31. SUSSMAN, E. (2004). Auditory scene analysis: Examining the role of nonlinguistic auditory processing in speech perception. In P. Divenyi (Ed.), Speech separation by humans and machines (pp. 5-12). New York: Kluwer.
32. SUSSMAN, E. (2005). Integration and segregation in auditory scene analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 1285-1298.
33. SUSSMAN E., ČEPONIENÈ, R., SHESTAKOVA, A., NÄÄTÄNEN, R., & WINKLER, I. (2001). Auditory stream segregation processes operate similarly in school-aged children as adults. Hearing Research, 153, 108-114.
34. SUSSMAN, E., KUJALA, T., HALMETOJA, J., LYYTINEN, H., ALKU, P., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (2004). Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts. Hearing Research, 190, 128-140.
35. SUSSMAN, E., RITTER, W., & VAUGHAN, H. G., JR. (1998). Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Research, 789, 130-138.
36. SUSSMAN, E., RITTER, W., & VAUGHAN, H. G., JR. (1999). An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 36, 22-34.
37. SUSSMAN, E., WINKLER, I., HUOUTILAINEN, M., RITTER, W., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (2002). Top-down effects on the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 393-405.
38. SUSSMAN, E., WINKLER, I., KREUZER, J., SAHER, M., NÄÄTÄ NEN, R., & RITTER, W. (2002). Temporal integration: Intentional sound discrimination does not modify stimulus-driven processes in auditory event synthesis. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 909-920.
39. SUSSMAN, E., WINKLER, I., & WANG, W. J. (2003). MMN and attention: Competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology, 40, 430-435.
40. TIITINEN, H., MAY, P., REINIKAINEN, K., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90-92.
41. TREISMAN, A. (1969). Strategies and models in selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 242-299.
42. VAN NOORDEN, L. P. A. S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.
43. WINKLER, I., SUSSMAN, E., TERVANIEMI, M., RITTER, W., HORVATH, J., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (2003). Pre-attentive auditory context effects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 57-77.
44. WOLDORFF, M. G., HACKLEY, S. A., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1991). The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology, 28, 30-42.
45. WOLDORFF, M. G., HILLYARD, S. A., GALLEN, C. C., HAMPSON, S. R., & BLOOM, F. E. (1998). Magnetoencephalographic recordings demonstrate attentional modulation of mismatch-related neural activity in human auditory cortex. Psychophysiology, 35, 283-292.
46. YABE, H., WINKLER, I., CZIGLER, I., KOYAMA, S., KAKIGI, R., SUTOH, T., HIRUMA, T., & KANEKO, S. (2001). Organizing sound sequences in the human brain: The interplay of auditory streaming and temporal integration. Brain Research. 897, 222-227.