The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 517-526

  Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

attention; auditory sensory memory; change detection; event related potentials; mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOUDNESS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85047677697     PISSN: 01685597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-5597(96)95576-8     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alho, K., Woods, D.L. and Algazi, A. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 1994, 31: 469-479.
2. Beagley, H.A. and Knight, J.J. Changes in the auditory evoked response with intensity. J. Laryngol., 1967, 81: 881-873.
3. Böttcher-Gandor, C. and Ullsperger, P. Mismatch negativity in event-related potentials to auditory stimuli as a function of varying inter-stimulus interval. Psychophysiology, 1992, 29: 546-550.
4. Cowan, N. Auditory sensory storage in relation to the growth of sensa-tion and acoustic information extraction. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 1987, 13: 204-215.
5. Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Tedern, W, and Nätäänen, R. Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potentials (ERP). J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 1993, 19: 909-921.
6. Czigler, I., Csibra, G. and Csontos, A. Age and inter-stimulus interval effects on event-related potentials to frequent and infrequent auditory stimuli. Biol. Psychol., 1992, 33: 195-206.
7. Davis, H., Mast, T., Yoshie, N. and Zerlin, S. The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1966, 21: 105-113.
8. Donchin, E. and Coles, M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci., 1988, 11: 357-374.
9. Duncan, C.C. and Kaye, W.H. Effects of clonidine on event-related potential measures of information processing. In: R. Johnson, Jr., J.W. Rohrbaugh and R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current Trends in Event-Related Potential Research, EEG Suppl. 40. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 527-531.
10. Eimer, M. and Schroger, E. The location of preceding stimuli affects selective processing in a sustained attention situation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 94: 115-128.
11. Fitzgerald, P.G. and Picton, T.W. Event-related potentials recorded during the discrimination of improbable stimuli. Biol. Psychol., 1983, 17: 241-276.
12. Giard, M.H., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., Pernier, J. and Näätänen, R. Separate representations of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory. J. Cognit. Neurosci., 1995, 7: 133-143.
13. Imada, T., Hari, R., Loveless, N., McEvoy, L. and Sams, M. Determinants of the auditory mismatch response. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 87: 144-153.
14. Lang, A.H., Nyrke, T., Ek, M., Aaltonen, O., Raimo, I. and Näätänen, R. Pitch discrimination performance and auditory event-related potentials. In: C.H.M. Brunia, A.W.K. Gaillard, A. Kok, G. Mulder and M.N. Verbaten (Eds.), Psychophysiological Brain Research, Vol. 1. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, 1990, pp. 294-298.
15. Levänen, S., Hari, R., McEvoy, L. and Sams, M. Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Exp. Brain Res., 1993, 97: 177-183.
16. McCarthy, G. and Wood, Ch.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 62: 203-208.
17. Näätänen, R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav. Brain Sci., 1990, 13: 201-288.
18. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992.
19. Näätänen, R., Simpson, M. and Loveless, N.E. Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol. Psychol., 1982, 14: 53-98.
20. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K. and Sams, M. Inter-stimulus interval and the mismatch negativity. In: C. Barber and T. Blum (Eds.), Evoked Potentials III. Butterworths, London, 1987, pp. 392-397.
21. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Tiitinen, H., Jiang, D. and Alho, K. Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 1993, 30: 436-450.
22. Nordby, H., Roth, W.T. and Pfefferbaum, A. Event-related potentials to time-deviant-and pitch-deviant-tones. Psychophysiology, 1988, 25: 249-261.
23. Novak, G.P., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H.G. and Wiznitzer, M.L. Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1990, 75: 255-275.
24. Novak, G., Ritter, W. and Vaughan, Jr., H.G. Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgments. Psychophysiology, 1992a, 29: 398-411.
25. Novak, G., Ritter, W. and Vaughan, Jr., H.G. The chronometry of attention modulated processing and automatic mismatch detection. Psychophysiology, 1992b, 29: 412-430.
26. Paavilainen, P., Jiang, D., Lavikainen, J. and Näätänen, R. Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: an event-related potential study. Biol. Psychol., 1993a, 35: 139-152.
27. Paavilainen, P., Tiilinen, H., Alho, K. and Näätänen, R. Mismatch negativity to slight pitch changes outside strong attentional focus. Biol. Psychol., 1993b, 37: 32-41.
28. Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Lehnertz, K. and Lütkenhöner, B. Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 72: 225-231.
29. Pekkonen, E., Jousmäki, V., Partanen, J. and Karhu, J. Mismatch negativity area and age-related auditory memory. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 87: 321-325.
30. Ritter, W. and Ruchkin, D.S. A review of event-related potential components discovered in the context of studying P3. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1992, 658: 1-32.
31. Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan, H.G. and Friedman, D. A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science, 1979, 203: 1358-1361.
32. Ritter, W., Paavilainen, P., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Alho, K., Sams, M. and Näätänen, R. Event-related potentials to repetition and change of auditory stimuli. Electrocnceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 83: 306-321.
33. Ritter, W., Deacon, D., Gomes, H., Javitt, D.C. and Vaughan, Jr., H.G. The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: a review. Ear Hear., 1995, 16: 52-67.
34. Sams, M., Hari, R., Rif, J. and Knuutila, J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 sec: neuromagnetic evidence, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 1993, 5: 363-370.
35. Scharf, B. and Houtsma, A.J., Audition II: loudness, pitch, localization, aural distortion, pathology. In: K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Wiley, New York, 1986, pp. 15.1-60.
36. Schröger, E. Automatic detection of frequency change is invariant over a large intensity range. NeuroReport, 1994, 5: 825-828.
37. Schröger, E. Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology, 1995, 32: 55-65.
38. Schröger, E. Interaural time and level differences: integrated or separated processing? Hear. Res., 1996, 96: 191-198.
39. Schröger, E. and Winkler, I. Presentation rate and magnitude of stimulus deviance effects on human pre-attentive change detection. Neurosci. Lett., 1995, 193: 185-188.
40. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K. and Näätänen, R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 1994, 372: 90-92.
41. Trejo, L.J., Ryan-Jones, D.L.. and Kramer, A.F. Attentional modulation of the mismatch negativity elicited by frequency differences between binaurally presented tones. Psychophysiology, 1995, 32: 319-328.
42. Verleger, R. Event-related potentials and cognition: a critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behav. Brain Sci., 1988, 11: 343-427.
43. Winkler, I., Reinikainen, K. and Näätänen, R. Event-related brain poten̈ tials reflect traces of echoic memory in humans. Percept. Psychophys.. 1993, 53: 443-449.
44. Woldorff, M.G. and Hillyard, S.A. Modulation of early auditory proces̈ sing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroen̈ ceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 79: 170-191.
45. Woldorff, M.G., Hackley, S.A. and Hillyard, S.A. The effects of channel selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by devï ant-tones. Psychophysiology, 1991, 28: 30-42.