Integration of consonant and pitch processing as revealed by the absence of additivity in mismatch negativity

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Gao, Shan ^a   Hu, Jiehui ^a   Gong, Diankun ^a   Chen, Sifan ^a   Kendrick, Keith M ^a   Yao, Dezhong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONSONANT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; RELIABILITY; RESPONSE TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOWEL; ACOUSTICS; AUDITORY CORTEX; BEHAVIOR; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; BEHAVIOR; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861709849     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038289     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Maess B, Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Friederici AD, (2001) Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study. Nat Neurosci 4: 540-545.
2. Patel AD, (2003) Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nat Neurosci 6: 674-681.
3. Koelsch S, Kasper E, Sammler D, Schulze K, Gunter TC, et al. (2004) Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing. Nat Neurosci 7: 302-307.
4. Steinbeis N, Koelsch S, (2008) Comparing the Processing of Music and Language Meaning Using EEG and fMRI Provides Evidence for Similar and Distinct Neural Representations. PLoS ONE 3: e2226.
5. Patel AD, Daniele JR, (2003) An empirical comparison of rhythm in language and music. Cognition 87: B35-B45.
6. Bigand E, Tillmann B, Poulin B, D'Adamo DA, Madurell F, (2001) The effect of harmonic context on phoneme monitoring in vocal music. Cognition 81: B11-B20.
7. Kolinsky R, Lidji P, Peretz I, Besson M, Morais J, (2009) Processing interactions between phonology and melody: Vowels sing but consonants speak. Cognition 112: 1-20.
8. Garner WR, (1974) The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD Erlbaum.
9. Lidji P, Jolicœur P, Kolinsky R, Moreau P, Connolly JF, et al. (2010) Early integration of vowel and pitch processing: A mismatch negativity study. Clinical Neurophysiology 121: 533-541.
10. Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K, (2007) The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology 118: 2544-2590.
11. Schröger E, (1997) On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology 34: 245-257.
12. Alho K, (1995) Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and hearing 16: 38-51.
13. Näätänen R, Alho K, (1995) Generators of electrical and magnetic mismatch responses in humans. Brain Topography 7: 315-320.
14. Alain C, Woods DL, (1997) Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 34: 534-546.
15. Levänen S, Hari R, McEvoy L, Sams M, (1993) Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Experimental Brain Research 97: 177-183.
16. Takegata R, Paavilainen P, Näätänen R, Winkler I, (1999) Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions in humans as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroscience Letters 266: 109-112.
17. Wolff C, Schröger E, (2001) Human pre-attentive auditory change-detection with single, double, and triple deviations as revealed by mismatch negativity additivity. Neuroscience Letters 311: 37-40.
18. Ylinen S, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R, (2005) Phoneme quality and quantity are processed independently in the human brain. NeuroReport 16: 1857-1860.
19. Paavilainen P, Valppu S, Näätänen R, (2001) The additivity of the auditory feature analysis in the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity: 1+1≈2 but 1+1+1<3. Neuroscience Letters 301: 179-182.
20. Studdert-Kennedy M, Shankweiler D, Pisoni D, (1972) Auditory and phonetic processes in speech perception: Evidence from a dichotic study. Cognitive Psychology 3: 455-466.
21. Wood CC, (1975) Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: Neurophysiological and information-processing analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1: 3-20.
22. Wood CC, (1974) Parallel processing of auditory and phonetic information in speech discrimination. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 15: 501-508.
23. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PSF, Springer JA, et al. (2000) Human Temporal Lobe Activation by Speech and Nonspeech Sounds. Cerebral Cortex 10: 512-528.
24. Zatorre RJ, Belin P, Penhune VB, (2002) Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends in cognitive sciences 6: 37-46.
25. Scotto di Carlo N, (2007) Effect of multifactorial constraints on operasinging intelligibility (I). Journal of Singing 63: 1-13.
26. Scotto di Carlo N, (2007) Effect of multifactorial constraints on operasinging intelligibility (II). Journal of Singing 63: 559-567.
27. Yao D, (2001) A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity. Physiological measurement 22: 693-711.
28. Qin Y, Xu P, Yao D, (2010) A comparative study of different references for EEG default mode network: The use of the infinity reference. Clinical Neurophysiology 121: 1981-1991.
29. Yao D, (2000) Electric potential produced by a dipole in a homogeneous conducting sphere. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 47: 964-966.
30. Yao D, Wang L, Oostenveld R, Nielsen KD, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. (2005) A comparative study of different references for EEG spectral mapping: the issue of the neutral reference and the use of the infinity reference. Physiological measurement 26: 173.
31. Sharma M, Purdy SC, Newall P, Wheldall K, Beaman R, et al. (2004) Effects of identification technique, extraction method, and stimulus type on mismatch negativity in adults and children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 15: 616-632.
32. Giard MH, Lavikahen J, Reinikainen K, Perrin F, Bertrand O, et al. (1995) Separate Representation of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Duration in Auditory Sensory Memory: An Event-Related Potential and Dipole-Model Analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 133-143.
33. Knösche TR, Lattner S, Maess B, Schauer M, Friederici AD, (2002) Early Parallel Processing of Auditory Word and Voice Information. NeuroImage 17: 1493-1503.
34. Czigler I, Winkler I, (1996) Preattentive auditory change detection relies on unitary sensory memory representations. NeuroReport 7: 2413-2417.
35. Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, Nicol T, (1993) Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 88: 64-71.
36. May P, Tiitinen H, Ilmoniemi RJ, Nyman G, Taylor JG, et al. (1999) Frequency Change Detection in Human Auditory Cortex. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 6: 99-120.
37. Lei X, Xu P, Luo C, Zhao J, Zhou D, et al. (2011) fMRI functional networks for EEG source imaging. Human Brain Mapping 32: 1141-1160.
38. Xu P, Tian Y, Chen H, Yao D, (2007) Lp norm iterative sparse solution for EEG source Localization. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 54: 400-409.
39. Jancke L, Wustenberg T, Scheich H, Heinze HJ, (2002) Phonetic perception and the temporal cortex. NeuroImage 15: 733-746.
40. Guitton MJ, (2010) Cross-modal compensation between name and visual aspect in socially active avatars. Computers in Human Behavior 26: 1772-1776.
41. Liberman AM, Mattingly IG, (1989) A specialization for speech perception. Science 243: 489-494.
42. Vouloumanos A, Kiehl KA, Werker JF, Liddle PF, (2001) Detection of Sounds in the Auditory Stream: Event-Related fMRI Evidence for Differential Activation to Speech and Nonspeech. J Cognitive Neuroscience 13: 994-1005.
43. Peretz I, (2006) The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition 100: 1-32.
44. Shtyrov Y, Pihko E, Pulvermuller F, (2005) Determinants of dominance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech? NeuroImage 27: 37-47.
45. Fry DB, (1956) Perception and recognition in speech. In: Halle M, Lunt HG, Schoonevelt CHv, editors. For Roman Jakobson The Hague Mouton.
46. Studdert-Kennedy M, (1974) The perception of speech. In: Sebeok TA, editors. Current trends in linguistics The Hague, Netherlands Mouton pp. 2349-2385.
47. Hickok G, Poeppel D, (2000) Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in cognitive sciences 4: 131-138.