Towards neurophysiological assessment of phonemic discrimination: Context effects of the mismatch negativity

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1078-1086

  Davids, Nina ^a,b   Brink, Daniëlle van den ^b,c   Turennout, Miranda van ^a,b   Mitterer, Holger ^d   Verhoeven, Ludo ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Event related potential (ERP); Mismatch negativity (MMN); Phonemic discrimination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349278448     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alonso-Búa B., Díaz F., and Ferraces J. The contribution of AERPs (MMN and LDN) to studying temporal vs. linguistic processing deficits in children with reading difficulties. Int J Psychophysiol 59 (2006) 159-167
2. Bishop D.V. Using mismatch negativity to study central auditory processing in developmental language and literacy impairments: where are we, and where should we be going?. Psychol Bull 133 (2007) 651-672
3. Clifford J.O., and Williston J.S. The effects of attention and context on the spatial and magnitude components of the early responses of the event-related potential elicited by a rare stimulus. Int J Psychophysiol 14 (1993) 209-226
4. Corbera S., Escera C., and Artigas J. Impaired duration mismatch negativity in developmental dyslexia. Neuroreport 17 (2006) 1051-1055
5. Deacon D., Nousak J.M., Pilotti M., Ritter W., and Yang C.M. Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts?. Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 413-419
6. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. Neuroreport 8 (1997) 919-924
7. Goswami U. Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia 6 (2000) 133-151
8. Gratton G., Coles M.G., and Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55 (1983) 468-484
9. Greenhouse S.W., and Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24 (1959) 95-112
10. Grimm S., and Schröger E. The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: evidence for the predictive nature of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) system. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25 (2007) 241-249
11. Grimm S., Schröger E., Bendixen A., Bass P., Roye A., and Deouell L.Y. Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach. Clin Neurophysiol 119 (2008) 934-947
12. Kaernbach C., and Schlemmer K. The decay of pitch memory during rehearsal. J Acoust Soc Am 123 (2008) 1846-1849
13. Lachmann T., Berti S., Kujala T., and Schröger E. Diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia have different deficits in neural processing of tones and phonemes. Int J Psychophysiol 56 (2005) 105-120
14. Manis F.R., McBride-Chang C., Seidenberg M.S., Keating P., Doi L.M., et al. Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia?. J Exp Child Psychol 66 (1997) 211-235
15. Maurer U., Bucher K., Brem S., and Brandeis D. Development of the automatic mismatch response: from frontal positivity in kindergarten children to the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 114 (2003) 808-817
16. Meng X., Sai X., Wang C., Wang J., Sha S., and Zhou X. Auditory and speech processing and reading development in Chinese school children: behavioural and ERP evidence. Dyslexia 11 (2005) 292-310
17. Molholm S., Gomes H., Lobosco J., Deacon D., and Ritter W. Feature versus gestalt representation of stimuli in the mismatch negativity system of 7- to 9-year-old children. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 385-393
18. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
19. Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 16 (1995) 6-18
20. Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity: clinical research and possible applications. Int J Psychophysiol 48 (2003) 179-188
21. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W., and Mantysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 42 (1978) 313-329
22. Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., et al. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 385 (1997) 432-434
23. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., and Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 118 (2007) 2544-2590
24. Näätänen R., Pakarinen S., Rinne T., and Takegata R. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 115 (2004) 140-144
25. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
26. Pettigrew C.M., Murdoch B.E., Ponton C.W., Finnigan S., Alku P., Kei J., et al. Automatic auditory processing of English words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm. Ear Hear 25 (2004) 284-301
27. Ramus F. Dyslexia. Talk of two theories. Nature 412 (2001) 393-395
28. Rappaport M., Clifford J.O., and Winterfield K.M. P300 response under active and passive attentional states and uni- and bimodality stimulus presentation conditions. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2 (1990) 399-407
29. Sams M., Paavilainen P., Alho K., and Näätänen R. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62 (1985) 437-448
30. Schröger E. Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 30 (1998) 131-145
31. Schulte-Körne G., Deimel W., Bartling J., and Remschmidt H. Auditory processing and dyslexia: evidence for a specific speech processing deficit. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 337-340
32. Sharma M., Purdy S.C., Newall P., Wheldall K., Beaman R., and Dillon H. Electrophysiology and behavioural evidence of auditory processing deficits in children with reading disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 117 (2006) 1130-1144
33. Tallal P. Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nat Rev Neurosci 5 (2004) 721-728
34. Tallal P., and Piercy M. Developmental aphasia: Impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality. Neuropsychologica 11 (1973) 389-398
35. Uwer R., Albrecht R., and von-Suchodoletz W. Automatic processing of tones and speech stimuli in children with specific language impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 44 (2002) 527-532
36. Ziegler J.C., and Goswami U. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull 131 (2005) 3-29