Probability dependence and functional separation of the object-related and mismatch negativity event-related potential components

NeuroImage

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 285-290

  Bendixen, Alexandra ^a,b   Jones, Simon J ^c   Klump, Georg ^c   Winkler, István ^a,d  

^a INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Auditory object formation; Auditory scene analysis; Auditory streaming; Event related potential (ERP); Mismatch negativity (MMN); Mistuned partial; Object related negativity (ORN); P3a; Scalp current density (SCD); Sequential regularity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; SCALP; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75249099272     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.037     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alain C., and Izenberg A. Effects of attentional load on auditory scene analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 1063-1073
2. Alain C., and McDonald K.L. Age-related differences in neuromagnetic brain activity underlying concurrent sound perception. J. Neurosci. 27 (2007) 1308-1314
3. Alain C., Arnott S.R., and Picton T.W. Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (2001) 1072-1089
4. Alain C., Schuler B.M., and McDonald K.L. Neural activity associated with distinguishing concurrent auditory objects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 (2002) 990-995
5. Alain C., Theunissen E.L., Chevalier H., Batty M., and Taylor M.J. Developmental changes in distinguishing concurrent auditory objects. Cogn. Brain Res. 16 (2003) 210-218
6. Alain C., Reinke K., He Y., Wang C.H., and Lobaugh N. Hearing two things at once: neurophysiological indices of speech segregation and identification. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17 (2005) 811-818
7. Bregman A.S. Auditory scene analysis. The perceptual organization of sound (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
8. Carlyon R.P. How the brain separates sounds. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 465-471
9. Chatrian G.E., Lettich E., and Nelson P.L. Ten percent electrode system for topographic studies of spontaneous and evoked EEG activities. Am. J. EEG Technol. 25 (1985) 83-92
10. Ciocca V., and Darwin C.J. The integration of nonsimultaneous frequency components into a single virtual pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105 (1999) 2421-2430
11. Darwin C.J., Hukin R.W., and Alkhatib B.Y. Grouping in pitch perception: evidence for sequential constraints. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 880-885
12. Deike S., Gaschler-Markefski B., Brechmann A., and Scheich H. Auditory stream segregation relying on timbre involves left auditory cortex. NeuroReport 15 (2004) 1511-1514
13. Delorme A., and Makeig S. EEGlab: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134 (2004) 9-21
14. Dyson B.J., and Alain C. Is a change as good with a rest? Task-dependent effects of inter-trial contingency on concurrent sound segregation. Brain Res. 1189 (2008) 135-144
15. Dyson B.J., and Alain C. It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 8 (2008) 329-343
16. Dyson B.J., Alain C., and He Y. I've heard it all before: perceptual invariance represented by early cortical auditory-evoked responses. Cogn. Brain Res. 23 (2005) 457-460
17. Escera C., Alho K., Schröger E., and Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 5 (2000) 151-166
18. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., and Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 (2001) 355-373
19. Hautus M.J., and Johnson B.W. Object-related brain potentials associated with the perceptual segregation of a dichotically embedded pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 (2005) 275-280
20. Haykin S., and Chen Z. The cocktail party problem. Neural Comput. 17 (2005) 1875-1902
21. Hiraumi H., Nagamine T., Morita T., Naito Y., Fukuyama H., and Ito J. Right hemispheric predominance in the segregation of mistuned partials. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22 (2005) 1821-1824
22. Hyde K.L., Peretz I., and Zatorre R.J. Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution. Neuropsychologia 46 (2008) 632-639
23. Jasper H.H. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10 (1958) 371-375
24. Johnson B.W., Hautus M., and Clapp W.C. Neural activity associated with binaural processes for the perceptual segregation of pitch. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114 (2003) 2245-2250
25. Lee A.K.C., and Shinn-Cunningham B.G. Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123 (2008) 4340-4351
26. Linden D.E.J. The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us?. Neuroscientist 11 (2005) 563-576
27. McDonald K.L., and Alain C. Contribution of harmonicity and location to auditory object formation in free field: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 (2005) 1593-1604
28. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W.K., and Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol. 42 (1978) 313-329
29. Nousak J.M.K., Deacon D., Ritter W., and Vaughan Jr. H.G. Storage of information in transient auditory memory. Cogn. Brain Res. 4 (1996) 305-317
30. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., and Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72 (1989) 184-187
31. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., and Echallier J.F. Corrigendum. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 76 (1990) 565
32. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 (2007) 2128-2148
33. Sams M., Alho K., and Näätänen R. Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 21 (1984) 434-441
34. Schröger E. The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 91 (2005) 490-501
35. Snyder J.S., and Alain C. Age-related changes in neural activity associated with concurrent vowel segregation. Cogn. Brain Res. 24 (2005) 492-499
36. Snyder J.S., and Alain C. Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychol. Bull. 133 (2007) 780-799
37. Srinivasan R. High-resolution EEG: theory and practice. In: Handy T.C. (Ed). Event-related potentials: a methods handbook (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge 167-188
38. Steiger H., and Bregman A.S. Competition among auditory streaming, dichotic fusion, and diotic fusion. Percept. Psychophys. 32 (1982) 153-162
39. Tervaniemi M., Schröger E., and Näätänen R. Pre-attentive processing of spectrally complex sound with asynchronous onsets: an event-related potential study with human subjects. Neurosci. Lett. 227 (1997) 197-200
40. Tervaniemi M., Ilvonen T., Sinkkonen J., Kujala A., Alho K., Huotilainen M., and Näätänen R. Harmonic partials facilitate pitch discrimination in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Neurosci. Lett. 279 (2000) 29-32
41. Tervaniemi M., Schröger E., Saher M., and Näätänen R. Effects of spectral complexity and sound duration on automatic complex-sound pitch processing in humans - a mismatch negativity study. Neurosci. Lett. 290 (2000) 66-70
42. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J. Psychophysiol. 21 (2007) 147-163
43. Zatorre R.J., Belin P., and Penhune V.B. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 37-46