Input to verbal working memory: Preattentive construction of the central speech representation

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 231-239

  Jacobsen, Thomas ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mismatch negativity; Speech perception; Vowel categorization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 10444243431     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.231     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aulanko, R., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V, Näätänen, R., & Sams, M. (1993). Phonetic invariance in the human auditory cortex. Neuroreport, 4(12), 1356-1358.
2. Butler, R. A., Spreng, M., & Keidel, W. D. (1969). Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory potential in man. Psychophysiology, 5, 665-672.
3. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport, 8, 919-924.
5. Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, posthoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [computer program]. Bonn, FRG: Bonn University, Dep. of Psychology.
6. Gomes, H., Ritter, W., & Vaughan Jr., H. G. (1995). The nature of pre-attentive storage in the auditory system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 81-94.
7. Hackley, S. A. (1993). An evaluation of the automaticity of sensory processing using event-related potentials and brain-stem reflexes. Psychophysiology, 30, 415-428.
8. Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Lavikainen, J., Tiitinen, H., Alho, K., Sinkkonen, J., Knuutila, J., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Interaction between representations of different features of auditory sensory memory. NeuroReport, 4, 1279-1281.
9. Jacobsen, T., Horenkamp, T., & Schröger, E. (2003). Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 8(6), 338-346.
10. Jacobsen, T., Horvath, J., Schröger, E., Lattner, S., Widmann, A., & Winkler, I. (2004). Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality. Brain and Language, 88, 54-67.
11. Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2001). Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? Psychophysiology, 38(4), 723-727.
12. Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2003). Measuring duration mismatch negativity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(6), 1133-1143.
13. Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Alter, K. (2004). Pre-attentive phoneme perception from dynamic speech stimuli. Psychophysiology, 41(4), 654-659.
14. Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., Horenkamp, T., & Winkler, I. (2003). Mismatch negativity to pitch change: Varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 344(2), 79-82.
15. Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Sussman, E. (2004). Pre-attentive categorization of vowel formant structure in complex tones. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(3), 473-479.
16. Kraus, N., McGee, T. J., Carrell, T. D., & Sharma, A. (1995) Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear and Hearing, 16, 19-37.
17. Kuhl, P. K. (2000). Language, mind and brain: Experience alters perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.). The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 99-115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Näätänen, R. (2001). The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology, 38(1), 1-21.
20. Näätänen, R., & Alho, K. (1997). Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 44-45.
21. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective attention reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
22. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour-Luhtanen, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., & Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
23. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
24. Näätänen, R., Sams, M., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., & Sokolov, E. N. (1988). Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 69, 523-531.
25. Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., & Winkler, I. (2001). "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 282-288.
26. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826-859.
27. Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A., Yellin, E., Wexler, K., Poeppel, D., McGinnis, M., & Roberts, T. (2000). Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: An MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1038-1055.
28. Picton T. W., Woods D. L., & Proulx, G. B. (1978). Human auditory sustained potentials: 11. stimulus relationships. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 198-210.
29. Rinne, T., Alho, K., Alku, P., Holi, M., Sinkkonen, J., Virtanen, J., Bertrand, O., & Näätänen, R. (1999). Analysis of speech sounds is left-hemisphere predominant at 100-150 ms after sound onset. NeuroReport, 10, 1113-1137.
30. Ritter, W, Vaughan, H. G., & Costa, L. D. (1968). Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: A study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 25, 550-556.
31. Schröger, E. (1997). Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection: a response to Näätänen and Alho. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 45-46.
32. Schröger, E. (1998). Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 131-145.
33. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1996). Mismatch response to changes in sound location. NeuroReport, 7, 3005-3008.
34. Shestakova, A., Brattico, E., Huotilainen, M., Galunov, V., Soloviev, A., Sams, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (2002). Abstract phoneme representations in the left temporal cortex: Magnetic mismatch negativity study. Neuroreport, 13, 1813-1816.
35. Tuller, B., Case, P., Ding, M., & Kelso, J. A. S (1994). The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 3-16.
36. Uchanski, R. M., & Braida, L. D. (1998). Effects of token variability on our ability to distinguish between vowels. Perception & Psychophysics., 60(4), 533-543.
37. Walker, L. J., Carpenter, M., Downs, C. R., Cranford, J. L., Stuart, A., & Pravica, D. (2001). Possible neuronal refractory or recovery artefacts associated with recording the mismatch negativity response. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 348-356.
38. Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (1999). Bootstrapping the distribution of the city-block distance between two repeated measures [on-line]. Available at http://www.unileipzig.de/~biopsych/widmann/minkowski.html.
39. Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Lehtokoski, A., Czigler, I., Csépe, V. Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (1999a). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36, 638-642.
40. Winkler, I., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M., & Näätänen, R. (1990). The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. Psychophysiology, 27, 228-235.