Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts

Hearing Research

Volumn 190, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 128-140

  Sussman, Elyse ^a   Kujala, Teija ^b   Halmetoja, Jaana ^b   Lyytinen, Heikki ^c   Alku, Paavo ^d   Näätänen, Risto ^b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^d AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Mismatch negativity; N2b; P3b; Speech processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMATISM; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOUND; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 1642547012     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(04)00016-4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aaltonen O., Eerola O., Lang A.H., Uusipaikka E., Tuomainen J. Automatic discrimination of phonetically relevant and irrelevant vowel parameters as reflected by mismatch negativity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;1489-1493.
2. Ahissar M., Protopapas A., Reid M., Merzenich M.M. Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;6832-6837.
3. Alain C., Woods D.L. Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;534-546.
4. Alho K. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear Hear. 16:1995;38-51.
5. Alho K., Paavilainen P., Reinikainen K., Sams M., Näätä nen R. Separability of different negative components of the event-related potential associated with auditory stimulus processing. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;613-623.
6. Alho K., Tervaniemi M., Huotilainen M., Lavikainen J., Tiitinen H., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Näätänen R. Processing of complex sounds in the human auditory cortex as revealed by magnetic brain responses. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;369-375.
7. Alku P., Tiitinen H., Näätänen R. A method for generating natural-sounding speech stimuli for cognitive brain research. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110:1999;1329-1333.
8. Dalebout S.D., Stack J.W. Mismatch negativity to acoustic differences not differentiated behaviorally. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 10:1999;388-399.
9. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Dupoux E., Gout A. Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: a cross-linguistic study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:2000;635-647.
10. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci. 11:1988;357-374.
11. Giard M.H., Perrin F., Pernier J., Bouchet P. Brain generators implicated in processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology. 27:1990;627-640.
12. Gomes H., Molholm S., Ritter W., Kurtzberg D., Cowan N., Vaughan H.G. Jr. Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task. Psychophysiology. 37:2000;807-816.
13. Jaramillo M., Ilvonen T., Kujala T., Alku P., Tervaniemi M., Alho K. Are different kinds of acoustic features processed differently for speech and non-speech sounds? Cogn. Brain Res. 12:(3):2001;459-466.
14. Kraus N., Cheour M. Speech sound representation in the brain. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 5:2000;140-150.
15. Laing E., Hulme C. Phonological and semantic processes influence beginning readers' ability to learn to read words. J. Exp. Child Pathol. 73:1999;183-207.
16. Lubert N. Auditory perceptual impairments in children with specific language disorders: a review of the literature. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 46:1981;1-9.
17. Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P.H.T., Richardson, U., Guttorm, T., 2003. Brain Functions and Speech Perception in Infants at Risk for Dyslexia. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
18. Lyytinen, H., Aro, M., Holopainen, L., Leiwo, M., Lyytinen, P., Tolvanen, A., 2004. Children's Language Development and Reading Acquisition in a Highly Transparent Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, in press.
19. Maiste A.C., Wiens A.S., Hunt M.J., Scherg M., Picton T.W. Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds. Ear Hear. 16:1995;68-90.
20. McAnally K.I., Stein J.F. Auditory temporal coding in dyslexia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 263:1996;961-965.
21. Mody M., Studdert-Kennedy M., Brady S. Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding? J. Exp. Child Pathol. 64:1997;199-231.
22. Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., Vainio M., Alku P., Ilmoniemi R.J., Luuk A., Allik J., Sinkkonen J., Alho K. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature. 385:1997;432-434.
23. Näätänen R., Michie P.T. Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation. Biol. Psychol. 8:1997;81-136.
24. Näätänen R., Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 125:1999;826-859.
25. Näätänen R., Simpson M., Loveless N.E. Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol. Psychol. 14:1982;53-98.
26. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Tiitinen H., Jiang D., Alho K. Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;436-450.
27. Nenonen S., Shestakova A., Huotilainen M., Näätänen R. Linguistic relevance of duration within the native language determines the accuracy of speech-sound duration processing. Cogn. Brain Res. 16:2003;492-495.
28. Nittrouer S. Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems? J. Speech Hear. Res. 42:1999;925-942.
29. Novak G., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Jr. Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgements. Psychophysiology. 29:1992;398-411.
30. Novak G., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Jr. The chronometry of attention-modulated processing and automatic mismatch detection. Psychophysiology. 29:1992;412-430.
31. Opitz B., Rinne T., Mecklinger A., Von Kramon D.Y., Schröger E. Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results. Neuroimage. 15:2002;167-174.
32. Picton D.W., Alain C., Otten L., Ritter W., Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 5:2000;111-139.
33. Rack J., Hulme C. The role of phonology in young children learning to read words: the direct-mapping hypothesis. J. Exp. Child Pathol. 57:1993;42-71.
34. Reed M.A. Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. J. Exp. Child Pathol. 48:1989;270-292.
35. Renault, B., Leserve, N., 1979. A trial-by-trial study of the visual omission response in reaction time situations. In: Lehman, D., Callaway, E. (Eds.), Human Evoked Potentials. Plenum Press, New York.
36. Rinne T., Alho K., Ilmoniemi R.J., Virtanen R., Näätänen R. Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources. Neuroimage. 12:2000;14-19.
37. Scherg M., Vajsar J., Picton T.W. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1:1989;336-355.
38. Schulte-Korne G., Deimel W., Bartling J., Remschmidt H. The role of phonological awareness, speech perception, and auditory-temporal processing for dyslexics. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 8:1999;28-34.
39. Schulte-Korne G., Deimel W., Bartling J., Remschmidt H. Speech perception deficit in dyslexic adults as measured by mismatch negativity (MMN). Int. J. Psychophysiol. 40:2001;77-87.
40. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.-G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science. 270:1995;303-304.
41. Sharma A., Dorman M.F. Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:2000;2697-2703.
42. Sharma A., Kraus N., McGee T., Carrell T., Nicol T. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88:1993;64-71.
43. Sussman E., Winkler I. Dynamic process of sensory updating in the auditory system. Cogn. Brain Res. 12:2001;431-439.
44. Sussman E., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Jr. Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Res. 789:1998;130-138.
45. Sussman E., Winkler I., Kreuzer J., Saher M., Näätänen R., Ritter W. Temporal integration: Intentional sound discrimination does not modify stimulus-driven processes in auditory event synthesis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113:2002;909-920.
46. Sussman E., Winkler I., Wang W.J. MMN and attention: Competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology. 40:2003;430-435.
47. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science. 150:1965;1187-1188.
48. Szymanski M.D., Yund E.W., Woods D.L. Phonemes, intensity and attention: Differential effects on the mismatch negativity (MMN). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:1999;3492-3505.
49. Tallal P. Language disabilities in children: a perceptual or linguistic deficit? J. Pediatr. Psychol. 5:1980;127-140.
50. Tallal P., Miller S., Fitch R.H. Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the preeminence of temporal processing. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 682:1993;27-47.
51. Tiitinen H., May P., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature. 372:1994;901-902.
52. Treijo L.J., Ryan-Jones D.L., Kramer A.F. Attentional modulation of the mismatch negativity elicited by frequency differences between binaurally presented tone bursts. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;319-328.
53. Uwer R., Albrecht R., von Suchodoletz W. Automatic processing of tones and speech stimuli in children with specific language impairment. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 44:2002;527-532.
54. Winkler I., Kujala T., Tiitinen H., Sivonen P., Alku P., Lehtokoski A., Czigler I., Csepe V., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R. Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology. 36:1999;638-642.
55. Winkler I., Lehtokoski A., Alku P., Vainio M., Czigler I., Csépe V., Aaltonen O., Raimo I., Alho K., Lang A.H., Iivonen A., Näätä nen R. Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. Cogn. Brain Res. 7:1999;357-369.
56. Woldorff M.G., Hackley S.A., Hillyard S.A. The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology. 28:1991;30-42.
57. Woldorff M.G., Hillyard S.A., Gallen C.C., Hampson S.R., Bloom F.E. Magnetoencephalographic recordings demonstrate attentional modulation of mismatch-related neural activity in human auditory cortex. Psychophysiology. 35:1998;283-292.