The relevance of reputation in the nonprofit sector: The moderating effect of socio-demographic characteristics

International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 110-126

  Schloderer, Matthias P ^a   Sarstedt, Marko ^b,c   Ringle, Christian M ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^d HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904548997     PISSN: 14654520     EISSN: 1479103X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.1491     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Bartikowski B, Walsh G, Beatty SE. 2011. Culture and Age as Moderators in the Corporate Reputation and Loyalty Relationship. Journal of Business Research 64(9): 966-972.
2. Becker J-M, et al. 2013. Discovering Unobserved Heterogeneity in Structural Equation Models to Avert Validity Threats. MIS Quarterly 37(3): 665-694.
3. Bennett R, Gabriel H. 2003. Image and Reputational Characteristics of UK Charitable Organizations: An Empirical Study. Corporate Reputation Reviews 6(3): 276-289.
4. Brown E, Slivinski A. 2006. Nonprofit organizations and the market. In The Non-Profit Sector. A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. Powell W, Steinberg R (eds). Yale University Press: New Haven, London, 140-158.
5. Bussell H, Forbes D. 2002. Understanding the Volunteer Market: The What, Where, Who and Why of Volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 7(3): 244-257.
6. Clark P, Martin C, Bush A. 2001. The Effect of Role Model Influence on Adolescents' Materialism and Marketplace Knowledge. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 9(4): 27-36.
7. Clotfelter C. 2001. Who are the Alumni Donors? Giving by Two Generations of Alumni from Selective Colleges. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12(2), 119-138.
8. Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer H. 2001. Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2): 269-277.
9. Diamantopoulos A, et al. 2012. Guidelines for Choosing Between Multi-item and Single-item Scales for Construct Measurement: A Predictive Validity Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(3): 434-449.
10. Eberl M. 2010. An application of PLS in multi-group analysis: the need for differentiated corporate-level marketing in the mobile communications industry. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, Esposito V, Chin W, Hensler J, Wang H. (eds). Springer: Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York; 487-514.
11. Eikenberry A, Kluver J. 2004. The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk? Public Administration Review 64(2): 132-140.
12. Fornell C, Bookstein FL. 1982. Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research 19(4): 440-452.
13. Goerke, J 2003. Taking the Quantum Leap: Nonprofits are now in Business, An Australian Perspective. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8(4): 317-327.
14. Gudergan SP, et al. 2008. Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in PLS Path Modeling. Journal of Business Research 61(12): 1238-1249.
15. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt, M. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19(2): 139-151.
16. Hair JF, et al. 2012a. The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning 45(5-6): 320-340.
17. Hair JF, et al. 2012b. An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(3): 414-433.
18. Hair JF, et al. 2014a. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage: Thousand Oaks.
19. Hair JF, et al. 2014b. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review 26(2): 106-121.
20. Helm S. 2007. One Reputation or Many? Comparing Stakeholders' Perceptions of Corporate Reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 12(3): 238-254.
21. Helm S. 2011. Corporate reputation: an introduction to a complex construct. In Reputation Management, Helm S, Liehr-Gobbers K, Storck C (eds). Springer: Heidelberg, 3-16.
22. Helm S, Salminen RT. 2010. Basking in Reflected Glory: Using Customer Reference Relationships to Build Reputation in Industrial Markets. Industrial Marketing Management 39(5): 737-743.
23. Henseler J. 2007. A New simple approach to multi-group analysis in partial least squares path modeling. In PLS'07 International Symposium on PLS and Related Methods - Causalities Explored by Indirect Observation, Martens H, Næs T, Martens M (eds). Matforsk: Ås, Norway, 104-107.
24. Henseler J, Sarstedt M. 2013. Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Computational Statistics 28(2): 565-580.
25. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics R. 2009. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20: 277-320.
26. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2012. Using partial least squares path modeling in international advertising research: basic concepts and recent issues. In Handbook of Research in International Advertising. Okazaki S (ed). Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham; 252-276.
27. Henseler J, et al. 2014. Common Beliefs and Reality About Partial Least Squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods forthcoming.
28. Höck C, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2010. Management of Multi-Purpose Stadiums: Importance and Performance Measurement of Service Interfaces. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management 14(2/3): 188-207.
29. Hume C, Hume M. 2008. The Strategic Role of Knowledge Management in Nonprofit Organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 13(2): 129-140.
30. Jöreskog KG. 1978. Structural Analysis of Covariance and Correlation Matrices. Psychometrika 43(4): 443-477.
31. Jöreskog KG. 1982. The LISREL approach to causal model-building in the social sciences. In Systems Under Indirect Observation, Wold H, Jöreskog KG (eds). Part I. North-Holland: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 81-100.
32. Kong E, Prior D. 2008. An Intellectual Capital Perspective of Competitive Advantage in Nonprofit Organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 13(2): 119-128.
33. Kottasz R. 2004a. Differences in the Donor Behaviour Characteristics of Young Affluent Males and Females: Empirical Evidence from Britain. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 15(2): 181-203.
34. Kottasz R. 2004b. How Should Charitable Organizations Motivate Young Professionals to Give Philanthropically? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 9(1): 9-27.
35. Krebs D. 1970. Altruism - An Examination of the Concept and a Review of the Literature. Psychological Bulletin 74(4): 258-302.
36. Kuppelwieser V, Sarstedt M. 2014. Applying the Future Time Perspective Scale to Advertising Research. International Journal of Advertising 33(1): 113-136.
37. Leete L. 2006. Work in the nonprofit sector. In The Non-Profit Sector. A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. Powell W, Steinberg R (eds). Yale University Press: New Haven, London; 159-179.
38. Lohmöller J-B. 1989. Latent Variable Path Modeling With Partial Least Squares. Physica: Heidelberg.
39. Meijer M. 2009. The Effects of Charity Reputation on Charitable Giving. Corporate Reputation Review 12(1): 33-42.
40. Mesch DJ, et al. 2011. Gender Differences in Charitable Giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 16(4): 342-355.
41. Mews M. 2013. To Pay or Not to Pay - the Role of Monetary Incentives in an Optimal Blood Donation Service Bundle. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 18(3): 192-202.
42. Mews M, Boenigk S. 2013. Does Organizational Reputation Influence the Willingness to Donate Blood? International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 10(1): 49-64.
43. Mooi E, Sarstedt M. 2011. A Concise Guide to Market Research. The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Springer: Berlin.
44. Nguyen N, Leblanc G. 2001. Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation in Customers' Retention Decisions in Services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 8(4): 227-236.
45. Padanyi P, Gainer B. 2003. Peer Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector: Its Role in Nonprofit Sector Management. Corporate Reputation Review 6(3): 252-265.
46. Pentecost, R, Andrews, L. 2010. Differences Between Students and Non-Students' Willingness to Donate to Charitable Organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 15(2): 122-136.
47. PodsakoffPM, et al. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879-903.
48. Principi A, Chiatti C, Lamura G. 2012. Motivations of Older Volunteers in Three European Countries. International Journal of Manpower 33(6): 704-722.
49. Raithel S, et al. 2009. Corporate Reputation in Times of Economic Crisis. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the Academy of Marketing's Brand, Identity and Corporate Reputation SIG. Cambridge, UK.
50. Rigdon EE, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2010. Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares. In Review of Marketing Research, Malhotra NK (ed). Sharpe: Armonk; 255-296.
51. Rigdon EE, et al. 2011. Assessing Heterogeneity in Customer Satisfaction Studies: Across Industry Similarities and Within Industry Differences. Advances in International Marketing 22: 169-194.
52. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A. 2005. SmartPLS 2.0 (Beta). http://www.smartpls.de.
53. Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Mooi EA. 2010. Response-Based Segmentation Using Finite Mixture Partial Least Squares: Theoretical Foundations and an Application to American Customer Satisfaction Index Data. Annals of Information Systems 8: 19-49.
54. Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW. 2012. A Critical Look at the Use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly 36(1): iii-xiv.
55. Riordan CM, Gatewood RD, Bill JB. 1997. Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 16(4): 401-412.
56. Sargeant A, Ford J, West D. 2000. Widening the Appeal of Charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 5(4): 318-332.
57. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. 2010. Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity in PLS Path Modelling: A Comparison of FIMIX-PLS With Different Data Analysis Strategies. Journal of Applied Statistics 37(8): 1299-1318.
58. Sarstedt M, Schloderer M. 2010. Developing a Measurement Approach for Reputation of Non-profit Organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 15(3): 276-299.
59. Sarstedt M, Wilczynski P. 2009. More for Less? A Comparison of Single-item and Multi-item Measures. Business Administration Review 69(2): 211-227.
60. Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Ringle CM. 2011. Multi-Group Analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling: Alternative Methods and Empirical Results. Advances in International Marketing 22: 195-218.
61. Sarstedt M, Wilczynski P, Melewar TC. 2013. Measuring Reputation in Global Markets-A Comparison of Reputation Measures' Convergent and Criterion Validities. Journal of World Business 48(3): 329-339.
62. Sarstedt, M, et al. 2014a. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A Useful Tool for Family Business Researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy 5(1): 105-115.
63. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF. 2014b. PLS-SEM: Looking Back and Moving Forward. Long Range Planning forthcoming.
64. Sarstedt M, et al. 2014c. On the Emancipation of PLS-SEM. Long Range Planning forthcoming.
65. Sarstedt, M, et al. 2014d. In Pursuit of Understanding What Drives Fan Satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, forthcoming.
66. Sattler, H, et al. 2010. The Impact of Brand Extension Success Factors on Brand Extension Price Premium. International Journal of Research in Marketing 27(4): 319-328.
67. Schervish P, Havens J. 2001. Wealth and Commonwealth: New Findings on Wherewithal and Philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(1): 5-25.
68. Schlegelmilch B, Love A, Diamantopoulos A 1997. Responses to Different Charity Appeals: The Impact of Donor Characteristics on the Amount of Donations. European Journal of Marketing 31(8): 548-560.
69. Schwaiger M. 2004. Components and Parameters of Corporate Reputation - An Empirical Study. Schmalenbach Business Review 56(1): 46-71.
70. Schwaiger M, Sarstedt M, Taylor C. 2010. Art for the Sake of the Corporation: Audi, BMW Group, DaimlerChrysler, Montblanc, Siemens, and Volkswagen Help Explore the Effect of Sponsorship on Corporate Reputations. Journal of Advertising Research 50(1): 77-90.
71. Shier ML, Handy F. 2012. Understanding Online Donor Behavior: Role of Donor Characteristics, Perceptions of the Internet, Website and Program, and Influence from Social Networks. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 17(3): 219-230.
72. Smith D. 1999. Determinants of Voluntary Association Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23(3): 243-263.
73. Smith BR, Cronley ML, Barr TF. 2012. Funding Implications of Social Enterprise: The Role of Mission Consistency, Entrepreneurial Competence, and Attitude Toward Social Enterprise on Donor Behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 31(1): 142-157.
74. Tschirhart M. 1998. Understanding the Older Stipended Volunteer: Age-related Differences Among Americorps Members. Public Productivity and Management Review 22(1): 35-48.
75. Van Helden B. 2013. Public Governance and Social Sector Incentives in Netherland. International Journal of Governance 3(1): 1-12.
76. Venable B, et al. 2005. The Role of Brand Personality in Charitable Giving: An Assessment and Validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33(3): 295-312.
77. Völckner F, et al. 2010. The Role of Parent Brand Quality for Service Brand Extension Success. Journal of Service Research 13(4): 359-361.
78. Walsh G, Beatty S. 2007. Customer-based Corporate Reputation of as Service Firm: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35(1): 127-143.
79. Walsh G, Beatty S, Shiu E. 2009. The Consumer-based Corporate Reputation Scale: Replication and Short Form. Journal of Business Research 62(10): 924-930.
80. Wedel M, Kamakura WA. 2000. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations, 2nd ed. Kluwer: Boston.
81. Weerawardena J, Mort G. 2008. Nonprofit Competitive Strategy. International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing 13(2): 103-106.
82. Weisbrod B. 1998. The nonprofit mission and its financing: growing links between nonprofits and the rest of the economy. In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, Weisbrod B (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 1-24.
83. Wold H. 1974. Causal Flows With Latent Variables: Partings of the Ways in Light of NIPALS Modelling. European Economic Reviews 5(1): 67-86.
84. Wymer W. 1998. Youth Development Volunteers: Their Motives, How They Differ from Other Volunteers and Correlates of Involvement Intensity. Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 3(4): 321-336.