Differences in the donor behavior characteristics of young affluent males and females: Empirical evidence from Britain

Voluntas

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 181-203

  Kottasz, Rita ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Britain; Conjoint analysis; Donor products; Gender; Planned giving

Indexed keywords

FINANCIAL PROVISION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 3042737722     PISSN: 09578765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:VOLU.0000033180.43496.09     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. American Association of Fundraising Council. (1994). Giving USA, American Association of Fundraising Council, New York.
2. Bashford, S. (2002, May 9). RNLI to review brand in hunt for young donors. Marketing (London), p.12.
3. Batson, D. C. (1991). The Altruism Question, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Bendapudi, N., Singh, S. N., and Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing helping behaviour: An integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing 60, 33-49.
5. Bennett, R. (2003). Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8(1), 12-29.
6. Bennett, R., and Gabriel, H. (2000). Image building for charitable organisations. Social Marketing Quarterly 6(3), 77-81.
7. Bennett, R., and Gabriel, H. (2003). Image and reputational characteristics of UK charitable organisations: An empirical study. Corporate Reputation Review 6(3), 276-289.
8. Braus, P. (1994). Will baby boomers give generously? American Demographics 16(7), 48-52.
9. Brunel, F. F., and Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to "help-self" and "help-others" charity advertising appeals: The mediating role of world-views. Journal of Advertising 29(3), 15-29.
10. Charity Commission (2003). Visit: www.charity-commission.gov.uk/registeredcharities/factfigures.asp
11. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., and Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(6), 1015-1026.
12. Clark, P. W., Martin, C. A., and Bush, A. J. (2001). The effect of role model influence on adolescents' materialism and marketplace knowledge. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 9(4), 27-36.
13. Clary, E. G., and Snyder, M. (1991). A Functional Analysis of Altruism and Pro-Social Behaviour: The Case of Volunteerism in Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Sage, London.
14. Clotfelter, C. T. (2001). Who are the alumni donors? Giving by two generations of alumni from selective colleges. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12(2), 119-138.
15. Collard, D. (1978). Altruism and Economy, Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Crooks, E. (2002, June 12). Number earning £100,000 rises 50%. Financial Times (London), p. 1.
17. Datamonitor (2002, June 25). Rich suffer as shares plunge. Metro (London ), p. 7.
18. Davis, M. H. (1994). Helping and empathy: Taking the multi-dimensional view. In: C. Whan Park and D. C. Smith (eds.), Marketing Theory and Applications, American Marketing Association, Chicago.
19. Demetriou, D. (2002, June 17). Suburb has wealthiest households in country. Evening Standard (London), p. 25.
20. Falco, N., Fopma, W., Maxwell, S., Stoller, M., and Turrell, N. (1998). Is philanthropy a learned behaviour? Fundraising Management 29(7), 36-37.
21. Flack, J. (2001, June 28). Give generously. Marketing Week (London), June 28, pp. 61-63.
22. Goodden, H. (1994). An enormous inter-generational transfer of wealth is imminent: How can charities benefit? Front and Centre, Canadian Centre for Philanthropy 1(3), 17-18.
23. Gorov, L. (1999, November 28). Spreading the wealth: Rich, young entrepreneurs are turning to social activism instead of the typical charities with their time and money. Boston Globe (Boston), p. 1.
24. Grace, K. S. (2000). High Impact Philanthropy, Wiley, London.
25. Greer, J. (2000). Women supporting women supporting women: A full circle of empowerment. Fund Raising Management 31(1), 36-37.
26. Guy, B. S., and Patton, W. E. (1989). The marketing of altruistic causes: Understanding why people help. Journal of Consumer Marketing 6(1), 19-31.
27. Harvey, J. (1990). Benefit segmentation for fundraisers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18(1), 77-86.
28. Herbig, P., Koehler, W., and Day, K. (1993). Marketing to the baby bust generation. Journal of Consumer Marketing 10(1), 4-9.
29. Hill, N. (2000, November 9). Charities fail to take advantage of new tax rules. Guardian (London).
30. Jones, A., and Posnett, J. (1991). Charitable donations by UK households: Evidence from the family expenditure survey. Applied Economics 23(2), 343-351.
31. Kennedy, S. (1998). The power of positioning: A case history from the children's society. Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 3(3), 224-230.
32. Kleinman, M. (2000, July 20). Marie Curie to increase donor list via DRTV ads. Marketing (London), p. 14.
33. Krebs, D. L. (1970). Altruism: An examination of the concept and a review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin 74(4), 258-302.
34. Lindeman, E. C. (1988). Wealth and Culture: A Study of One Hundred Foundations and Community Trusts and Their Operations During the Decade 1921-1930, Society and Philanthropy, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey.
35. Martin, M. W. (1994). Virtuous Giving: Philanthropy, Voluntary Services and Caring, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
36. McGee, R. W. (2002). Ending welfare as we know it: A modest proposal. Economic Affairs 22(1), 12-17.
37. McGrath, S. (1997). Giving donors good reason to give again. Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 2(2), 125-135.
38. NCVO [National Council for Voluntary Organisations] (1999). Research Quarterly, 6, July, NCVO, London.
39. Newman, R. H. (1998). Transforming donors into strategic funders. Fund Raising Management 29(1), 31-42.
40. Nichols, J. (1994). Changing Demographics: Fund Raising in the 1990s, Bonus Books, Chicago.
41. Ostrower, F. (1997). Why the Wealthy Give: The Culture of Elite Philanthropy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
42. Penrod, S. (1983). Social Psychology, Prentice-Hall, New York.
43. Pharoah, C. (1996). Individual Giving: Seesaw Evidence, Static Trends, Dimensions of the Volunteer Sector, Charities Aid Foundation, London.
44. Pharoah, C., and Tanner, S. (1997). Trends in charitable giving. Fiscal Studies 18(4), 427-443.
45. Pidgeon, S., and Saxton, J. (1992). How fundraising will change in the 90s. Direct Response 11(9), 37-43.
46. Piliavin, J. F., Dovidio, B., Gaeitner, S. L., and Clark, R. D. (1981). Emergency Intervention, Academic Press, New York.
47. Price, C. (2000). The Internet Entrepreneurs, Pearson Education, London.
48. Radley, A., and Kennedy, M. (1995). Charitable giving by individuals: A study of attitudes and practice. Human Relations 48(6), 685-709.
49. Reed, D. (1998, February 9). Giving is receiving. Precision Marketing (London), pp. 17-18.
50. Richin, M. L. (1987). Media, materialism and human happiness. In: M. Wallendorf and P. Anderson (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 352-356.
51. Romney-Alexander, D. (2002). Payroll giving in the UK: Donor incentives and influences on giving behaviour. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 7(1), 84-92.
52. Sargeant, A. (1999a). Donor retention: Just why do donors stop giving. Paper presented at the Institute of Charity Fundraising Managers (ICFM) Conference, July 12-14, Birmingham, UK.
53. Sargeant, A. (1999b). Charitable giving: Towards a model of donor behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management 15(4), 215-238.
54. Sargeant, A., Ford, J., and West, D. C. (2000). Widening the appeal of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 5(4), 318-332.
55. Schervish, P. G., and Havens, J. J. (2001). Wealth and the commonwealth: New findings on wherewithal and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(1), 5-25.
56. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Love, A., and Diamantopoulos, A. (1997). Responses to different charity appeals: The impact of donor characteristics on the amount of donations. European Journal of Marketing 31(8), 548-561.
57. Schlegelmilch, B., and Tynan, A. (1987). Market segment orientated fundraising strategies: An empirical analysis. MIP 7(11/12), 16-24.
58. Shelton, M. L., and Rogers, R. W. (1981). Fear arousing and empathy arousing appeals to help: The pathos of persuasion. Journal of Applied Psychology 11(4), 366-378.
59. Silver, M. (1980). Affluence, Altruism and Atrophy, New York University Press, New York.
60. Simpson, J. C. (1986, September 11). Baby boomers have 60s heritage - but charities say they are cheap. Wall Street Journal (New York), p. 33.
61. Smy, L. (2000, February 17). Private sponsorship - tax breaks ensure that giving is easy. Financial Times, Business and the Arts [Section II] (London), p. 2.
62. Speirn, S. (2002, December 23). In the many faces of philanthropy. Business Week 3813, p. 7.
63. Steinberg, K. (2003). Philanthropic Giving Index, December, The Centre on Philanthropy at Indiana University, Indiana.
64. Storey, J. (2001). Charities are facing a crisis of their own. Marketing Week, April 26, p. 22.
65. Taylor, M., and Lansley, J. (1992). Ideology and welfare in the UK: The implications for the voluntary sector, Voluntas 3(2), 153-174.
66. Too many cooks (2000, November 8). Guardian (London), http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/0,7843,393984,00.html
67. Van Riel, C. B. M. (1995). Principles of Corporate Communications, Prentice Hall Europe, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
68. Walker, C. (2002). Philanthropy, social capital or strategic alliance? The involvement of senior UK business executives with the voluntary sector and implications for corporate fundraising. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 7(3), 219-228.
69. Warwick-Ching, L. (2002, October 17). Understanding charitable giving - an ethical way to spend and save, Financial Times Supplement, pp. 12-13.
70. Weiser, J. (2002, December 23), In the many faces of philanthropy. Business Week 3813, p. 7.
71. Williamson, G., and Clark, M. (1989). Providing help and desired relationship type as determinants of changes in self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(3), 722-734.
72. Wolpert, J. (2002). What Charity Can and Cannot Do: Policy in Perspective, Available from the Century Foundation Web site, www.tcf.org
73. Wray, R. (2002). Women struggle to join £100k club. Guardian, June 13, p. 28.
74. Wymer, W. (1997). Segmenting volunteers using values, self-esteem, empathy and facilitation as determinant variables. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing 5(2), 3-28.
75. Yankelovich, D. (1985). The Charitable Behaviour of Americans: Management Survey, Independent Sector, Washington, DC.