PLS-SEM: Looking Back and Moving Forward

Long Range Planning

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 132-137

  Sarstedt, Marko ^a   Ringle, Christian M ^b   Hair, Joseph F ^c  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901660910     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.008     Document Type: Editorial

References (71)

1. Binz Astracan C., Patel V.K., Wanzenried G. A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2014, in press, online available.
2. Babin B.J., Hair J.F., Boles J.S. Publishing research in marketing journals using structural equations modeling. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2008, 16(4):279-285.
3. Becker J.-M., Klein K., Wetzels M. Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):359-394.
4. Becker J.-M., Rai A., Ringle C.M., Völckner F. Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly 2013, 37(3):665-694.
5. Bentler P.M., Huang W. On components, latent variables, PLS and simple methods: reactions to Ridgon's rethinking of PLS. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):138-145.
6. Boomsma A., Hoogland J.J. The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future 2001, Scientific Software International, Chicago. R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, D. Sörbom (Eds.).
7. Chin W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 1998, Erlbaum, Mahwah. G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.).
8. Chin W.W. PLS Graph 3.0 2003, Soft Modeling Inc., Houston.
9. Chin W.W. How to write up and report PLS analyses. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II) 2010, Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York. V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.).
10. Chin W.W., Newsted P.R. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research 1999, Sage, Thousand Oaks. R.H. Hoyle (Ed.).
11. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13(3):319-340.
12. Dijkstra T.K. Some comments on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methods. Journal of Econometrics 1983, 22(1/2):67-90.
13. Dijkstra T.K. Latent variables and indices: Herman Wold's basic design and partial least squares. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II) 2010, Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York. V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.).
14. Dijkstra T.K. PLS' Janus face. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):146-153.
15. Dijkstra T.K., Henseler J. Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: best fitting proper indices and other composites. Quality & Quantity 2011, 45(6):1505-1518.
16. Fornell C.G., Bookstein F.L. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research 1982, 19(4):440-452.
17. Fornell C.G., Johnson M.D., Anderson E.W., Cha J., Bryant B.E. The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing 1996, 60(4):7-18.
18. Goodhue D.L., Lewis W., Thompson R. Comparing PLS to regression and LISREL: a response to Marcolides, Chin, and Saunders. MIS Quarterly 2012, accepted, online available.
19. Goodhue D.L., Lewis W., Thompson R. Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data?. MIS Quarterly 2012, 36(3):891-1001.
20. Gudergan S.P., Ringle C.M., Wende S., Will A. Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research 2008, 61(12):1238-1249.
21. Hair J.F., Hult G.T.M., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) 2014, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
22. Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011, 19(2):139-151.
23. Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. The use of partial least squares (PLS) to address marketing management topics: from the special issue guest editors. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011, 19(2):135-138.
24. Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. Partial least squares: the better approach to structural equation modeling?. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):312-319.
25. Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning 2013, 46(1-2):1-12.
26. Hair J.F., Sarstedt M., Pieper T.M., Ringle C.M. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):320-340.
27. Hair J.F., Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Mena J.A. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2012, 40(3):414-433.
28. Henseler J. Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2012, 40(3):402-413.
29. Henseler J., Chin W.W. A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 2010, 17(1):82-109.
30. Henseler J., Dijkstra T.K., Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Diamantopoulos A., Straub D.W., Ketchen D.J., Hair J.F., Hult G.T.M., Calantone R.J. Common Beliefs and Reality about Partial Least Squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013) 2014, Organizational Research Methods, in press.
31. Henseler J., Fassott G. Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II) 2010, Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York. V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.).
32. Henseler J., Fassott G., Dijkstra T.K., Wilson B. Analyzing quadratic effects of formative constructs by means of variance-based structural equation modelling. European Journal of Information Systems 2012, 21(1):99-112.
33. Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sinkovics R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 2009, Emerald, Bingley. R.R. Sinkovics, P.N. Ghauri (Eds.).
34. Höck C., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. Management of multi-purpose stadiums: importance and performance measurement of service interfaces. International Journal of Services Technology and Management 2010, 14(2/3):188-207.
35. Hwang H., Malhotra N.K., Kim Y., Tomiuk M.A., Hong S. A comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research 2010, 47(4):699-712.
36. Jöreskog K.G. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika 1978, 43(4):443-477.
37. Jöreskog K.G. The LISREL approach to causal model-building in the social sciences. Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part I 1982, North-Holland, Amsterdam. H. Wold, K.G. Jöreskog (Eds.).
38. Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D. LISREL IV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationship by the Method of Maximal Likelihood 1972, International Educational Services, Chicago.
39. Jöreskog K.G., Wold H. The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects. Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part I 1982, North-Holland, Amsterdam. H. Wold, K.G. Jöreskog (Eds.).
40. Kuppelwieser V., Sarstedt M. Applying the future time perspective scale to advertising research. International Journal of Advertising 2014, 33(1):113-136.
41. Lee L., Petter S., Fayard D., Robinson S. On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2011, 12(4):305-328.
42. Lohmöller J.-B. LVPLS 1.6 1984, Lohmöller, Cologne.
43. Lohmöller J.-B. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares 1989, Physica, Heidelberg.
44. Marcoulides G.A., Chin W.W., Saunders C. Foreword: a critical look at partial least squares modeling. MIS Quarterly 2009, 33(1):171-175.
45. Marcoulides G.A., Chin W.W., Saunders C. When imprecise statistical statements become problematic: a response to Goodhue, Lewis, and Thompson. MIS Quarterly 2012, 36(3):717-728.
46. Marcoulides G.A., Saunders C. PLS: a silver bullet?. MIS Quarterly 2006, 30(2):III-IIX.
47. McDonald R.P. Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1996, 31(2):239-270.
48. McIntosh C.N., Edwards J.R., Antonakis J. Reflections on partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods 2014, in press, online available.
49. Peng D.X., Lai F. Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. Journal of Operations Management 2012, 30(6):467-480.
50. Reinartz W.J., Haenlein M., Henseler J. An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2009, 26(4):332-344.
51. Rigdon E.E. Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: in praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):341-358.
52. Rigdon E.E. Partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling. A Second Course 2013, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte NC. second ed. G.R. Hancock, R.O. Mueller (Eds.).
53. Rigdon E.E. Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: breaking chains and forging ahead. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):161-167.
54. Rigdon E.E., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares. Review of Marketing Research 2010, Sharpe: Armonk. N.K. Malhotra (Ed.).
55. Rigdon E.E., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., Gudergan S.P. Assessing heterogeneity in customer satisfaction studies: across industry similarities and within industry differences. Advances in International Marketing 2011, 22:169-194.
56. Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., Straub D.W. A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly 2012, 36(1):iii-xiv.
57. Ringle C.M., Wende S., Will A. SmartPLS 2.0 2005, Hamburg. http://www.smartpls.de.
58. Robins J.A. Partial-least squares. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):309-311.
59. Rönkkö M., Evermann J. A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods 2013, 16(3):425-448.
60. Sarstedt M. A review of recent approaches for capturing heterogeneity in partial least squares path modelling. Journal of Modelling in Management 2008, 3(2):140-161.
61. Sarstedt M., Becker J.-M., Ringle C.M., Schwaiger M. Uncovering and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: which model selection criterion provides an appropriate number of segments?. Schmalenbach Business Review 2011, 63(1):34-62.
62. Sarstedt M., Henseler J., Ringle C.M. Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Advances in International Marketing 2011, 22:195-218.
63. Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M. Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modelling: a comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies. Journal of Applied Statistics 2010, 37(8):1299-1318.
64. Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Henseler J., Hair J.F. On the emancipation of PLS-SEM. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):154-160.
65. Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Smith D., Reams R., Hair J.F. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2014, in press, online available.
66. Shah R., Goldstein S.M. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management 2006, 24(2):148-169.
67. Shook C.L., Ketchen D.J., Hult T., Kacmar K.M. An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal 2004, 25(4):397-404.
68. Völckner F., Sattler H., Hennig-Thurau T., Ringle C.M. The role of parent brand quality for service brand extension success. Journal of Service Research 2010, 13(4):359-361.
69. Wetzels M., Odekerken-Schroder G., van Oppen C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly 2009, 33(1):177-195.
70. Wold H. Causal flows with latent variables: partings of ways in the light of NIPALS modelling. European Economic Review 1974, 5(1):67-86.
71. Wold H. Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions. Systems Under Indirect Observations: Part II 1982, North-Holland: Amsterdam. K.G. Jöreskog, H. Wold (Eds.).