Effects of new mutations on fitness: Insights from models and data

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1320, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 76-92

  Bataillon, Thomas ^a   Bailey, Susan F ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Distribution of fitness effects; Experimental evolution; Mutation; Mutational landscape models; Population genomics

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; DNA POLYMORPHISM; EMPIRICISM; EVOLUTION; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; POPULATION; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; WILD TYPE;

DISTRIBUTION OF FITNESS EFFECTS; EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION; MUTATION; MUTATIONAL LANDSCAPE MODELS; POPULATION GENOMICS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84904381004     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12460     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Chevin, L.-M., G. Martin & T. Lenormand . 2010. Fisher's model and the genomics of adaptation: restricted pleiotropy, heterogeneous mutation, and parallel evolution. Evolution 64: 3213-3231.
2. Chevin, L.-M., R. Lande & G. M. Mace . 2010. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000357.
3. Hoffmann, A.A. & C.M. Sgrò . 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470: 479-485.
4. Otto, S.P. & T. Lenormand . 2002. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 252-261.
5. Hill, W.G. 2010. Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365: 73-85.
6. Bataillon, T. 2000. Estimation of spontaneous genome-wide mutation rate parameters: whither beneficial mutations?. Heredity 84: 497-501.
7. Orr, H.A. 2010. The population genetics of beneficial mutations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365: 1195-1201.
8. Walsh, B. & M.W. Blows . 2009. Abundant genetic variation + strong selection = multivariate genetic constraints: a geometric view of adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 41-59.
9. Lande, R. 1998. Risk of population extinction from fixation of deleterious and reverse mutations. Genetica 102: 21-27.
10. Beisel, C.J., D.R. Rokyta, H.A. Wichman & P. Joyce . 2007. Testing the extreme value domain of attraction for distributions of beneficial fitness effects. Genetics 176: 2441-2449.
11. Joyce, P., D.R. Rokyta, C.J. Beisel & H.A. Orr . 2008. A general extreme value theory model for the adaptation of DNA sequences under strong selection and weak mutation. Genetics 180: 1627-1643.
12. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon: Oxford.
13. Kimura, M. 1984. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
14. Martin, G. & T. Lenormand . 2006. A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60: 893-907.
15. Gros, P.-A., H. Le Nagard & O. Tenaillon . 2009. The evolution of epistasis and its links with genetic robustness, complexity and drift in a phenotypic model of adaptation. Genetics 182: 277-293.
16. Lourenço, J., N. Galtier & S. Glémin . 2011. Complexity, pleiotropy, and the fitness effect of mutations. Evolution 65: 1559-1571.
17. Tenaillon, O., O.K. Silander, J.-P. Uzan & L. Chao . 2007. Quantifying organismal complexity using a population genetic approach. PLoS One 2: e217.
18. Martin, G., S.F. Elena & T. Lenormand . 2007. Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat. Genet. 39: 555-560.
19. Orr, H.A. 2009. Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 531-539.
20. Charlesworth, B., H. Borthwick, C. Bartolomé & P. Pignatelli . 2004. Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167: 815-826.
21. Azevedo, R.B., P.D. Keightley, C. Laurén-Määttä, et al. 2002. Spontaneous mutational variation for body size in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 162: 755-765.
22. MacLean, R., G.G. Perron & A. Gardner . 2010. Diminishing returns from beneficial mutations and pervasive epistasis shape the fitness landscape for rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genetics 186: 1345-1354.
23. Elena, S.F., L. Ekunwe, N. Hajela, et al. 1998. Distribution of fitness effects caused by random insertion mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetica 102/103: 349-358.
24. Bell, G. 2010. Experimental genomics of fitness in yeast. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 277: 1459-1467.
25. Chevin, L.-M. 2011. On measuring selection in experimental evolution. Biol. Lett. 7: 210-213.
26. Luria, S.E. & M. Delbrück . 1943. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28: 491.
27. Kassen, R. & T. Bataillon . 2006. Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria. Nat. Genet. 38: 484-488.
28. Rosche, W.A. & P.L. Foster . 2000. Determining mutation rates in bacterial populations. Methods 20: 4-17.
29. MacLean, R.C. & A. Buckling . 2009. The distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000406.
30. Bataillon, T., T. Zhang & R. Kassen . 2011. Cost of adaptation and fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Genetics 189: 939-949.
31. McDonald, M.J., T.F. Cooper, H.J. Beaumont & P.B. Rainey . 2011. The distribution of fitness effects of new beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biol. Lett. 7: 98-100.
32. Drake, J.W., B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth & J.F. Crow . 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148: 1667-1686.
33. Martin, G. & T. Lenormand . 2008. The distribution of beneficial and fixed mutation fitness effects close to an optimum. Genetics 179: 907-916.
34. Rokyta, D.R., C.J. Beisel, P. Joyce, et al. 2008. Beneficial fitness effects are not exponential for two viruses. J. Mol. Evol. 67: 368-376.
35. Sanjuán, R., A. Moya & S.F. Elena . 2004. The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101: 8396-8401.
36. Lind, P.A., O.G. Berg & D.I. Andersson . 2010. Mutational robustness of ribosomal protein genes. Science 330: 825-827.
37. Hietpas, R.T., J.D. Jensen & D.N. Bolon . 2011. Experimental illumination of a fitness landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108: 7896-7901.
38. Carrasco, P., F. de la Iglesia & S.F. Elena . 2007. Distribution of fitness and virulence effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in tobacco etch virus. J. Virol. 81: 12979-12984.
39. Jacquier, H., A. Birgy, H. Le Nagard, et al. 2013. Capturing the mutational landscape of the beta-lactamase TEM-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110: 13067-13072.
40. Muller, H. 1928. The measurement of gene mutation rate in Drosophila, its high variability, and its dependence upon temperature. Genetics 13: 279.
41. Mukai, T. 1964. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50: 1.
42. Halligan, D.L. & P.D. Keightley . 2009. Spontaneous mutation accumulation studies in evolutionary genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 151-172.
43. Estes, S., P.C. Phillips, D.R. Denver, et al. 2004. Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 166: 1269-1279.
44. Rozen, D.E., J. De Visser & P.J. Gerrish . 2002. Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations. Curr. Biol. 12: 1040-1045.
45. Sousa, A., S. Magalhães & I. Gordo . 2012. Cost of antibiotic resistance and the geometry of adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 1417-1428.
46. Hegreness, M., N. Shoresh, D. Hartl & R. Kishony . 2006. An equivalence principle for the incorporation of favorable mutations in asexual populations. Science 311: 1615-1617.
47. Perfeito, L., A. Sousa, T. Bataillon & I. Gordo . 2014. Rates of fitness decline and rebound suggest pervasive epistasis. Evolution 68: 150-162.
48. de Sousa, J.A.M., P.R. Campos & I. Gordo . 2013. An ABC method for estimating the rate and distribution of effects of beneficial mutations. Genome Biol. Evol. 5: 794-806.
49. Sella, G., D.A. Petrov, M. Przeworski & P. Andolfatto . 2009. Pervasive natural selection in the Drosophila genome?. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000495.
50. Stephan, W. 2010. Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365: 1245-1253.
51. Olson-Manning, C.F., M.R. Wagner & T. Mitchell-Olds . 2012. Adaptive evolution: evaluating empirical support for theoretical predictions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13: 867-877.
52. Leffler, E.M., K. Bullaughey, D.R. Matute, et al. 2012. Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species? PLoS Biol. 10: e1001388.
53. Gayral, P., J. Melo-Ferreira, S. Glémin, et al. 2013. Reference-free population genomics from next-generation transcriptome data and the vertebrate-invertebrate gap. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003457.
54. Charlesworth, B. 2009. Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 195-205.
55. Lawrie, D.S., P.W. Messer, R. Hershberg & D.A. Petrov . 2013. Strong purifying selection at synonymous sites in D. melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003527.
56. Eyre-Walker, A. & P.D. Keightley . 2009. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26: 2097-2108.
57. Boyko, A.R., S.H. Williamson, A.R. Indap, et al. 2008. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000083.
58. Wilson, D.J., R.D. Hernandez, P. Andolfatto & M. Przeworski . 2011. A population genetics-phylogenetics approach to inferring natural selection in coding sequences. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002395.
59. Kousathanas, A. & P.D. Keightley . 2013. A comparison of models to infer the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Genetics 193: 1197-1208.
60. Messer, P.W. 2009. Measuring the rates of spontaneous mutation from deep and large-scale polymorphism data. Genetics 182: 1219-1232.
61. Eyre-Walker, A., M. Woolfit & T. Phelps . 2006. The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans. Genetics 173: 891-900.
62. Li, J., H. Li, M. Jakobsson, et al. 2012. Joint analysis of demography and selection in population genetics: where do we stand and where could we go? Mol. Ecol. 21: 28-44.
63. Elyashiv, E., K. Bullaughey, S. Sattath, et al. 2010. Shifts in the intensity of purifying selection: an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism data from two closely related yeast species. Genome Res. 20: 1558-1573.
64. Perfeito, Li., L. Fernandes, C. Mota & I. Gordo . 2007. Adaptive mutations in bacteria: high rate and small effects. Science 317: 813-815.
65. Schoustra, S.E., T. Bataillon, D.R. Gifford & R. Kassen . 2009. The properties of adaptive walks in evolving populations of fungus. PLoS Biol. 7: e1000250.
66. Gifford, D.R., S.E. Schoustra & R. Kassen . 2011. The length of adaptive walks is insensitive to starting fitness in Aspergillus nidulans. Evolution 65: 3070-3078.
67. Orr, H.A. 2006. The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations in Fisher's geometric model of adaptation. J. Theor. Biol. 238: 279-285.
68. Schneider, A., B. Charlesworth, A. Eyre-Walker & P.D. Keightley . 2011. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations. Genetics 189: 1427-1437.
69. Poon, A. & S.P. Otto . 2000. Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations. Evolution 54: 1467-1479.
70. Martin, G., R. Aguilée, J. Ramsayer, et al. 2013. The probability of evolutionary rescue: towards a quantitative comparison between theory and evolution experiments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 368: 20120088.
71. Huerta-Sanchez, E., R. Durrett & C. D. Bustamante . 2008. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence under fluctuating selection. Genetics 178: 325-337.
72. Domingo-Calap, P., J.M. Cuevas & R. Sanjuán . 2009. The fitness effects of random mutations in single-stranded DNA and RNA bacteriophages. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000742.
73. Peris, J.B., P. Davis, J.M. Cuevas, et al. 2010. Distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in bacteriophage f1. Genetics 185: 603-609.
74. Imhof, M. & C. Schlötterer . 2001. Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 1113-1117.
75. Barrett, R.D., R.C. MacLean & G. Bell . 2006. Mutations of intermediate effect are responsible for adaptation in evolving Pseudomonas fluorescens populations. Biol. Lett. 2: 236-238.
76. Hvilsom, C., Y. Qian, T. Bataillon, et al. 2012. Extensive X-linked adaptive evolution in central chimpanzees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109: 2054-2059.
77. Gossmann, T.I., B.-H. Song, A.J. Windsor, et al. 2010. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 1822-1832.
78. Loewe, L., B. Charlesworth, C. Bartolomé & V. Nöel . 2006. Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations. Genetics 172: 1079-1092.