An ABC method for estimating the rate and distribution of effects of beneficial mutations

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 794-806

  Moura De Sousa, Jorge A ^a   Campos, Paulo R A ^b   Gordo, Isabel ^a  

^a INSTITUTO GULBENKIAN DE CIÊNCIA   (Portugal)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Distribution of fitness effects; Experimental evolution; Mutation rate; Parameter estimation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DISTRIBUTION OF FITNESS EFFECTS; EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DISTRIBUTION OF FITNESS EFFECTS; EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATE; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BAYES THEOREM; GENETIC FITNESS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; PROBABILITY; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84891475093     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt045     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Barrett R D H, MacLean RC, Bell G. 2006. Mutations of intermediate effect are responsible for adaptation in evolving Pseudomonas fluorescens populations. Biol Lett. 2:236-238.
2. Barrick JE, Kauth MR, Strelioff CC, Lenski RE. 2010. Escherichia coli rpoB mutants have increased evolvability in proportion to their fitness defects. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1338-1347.
3. Bataillon T, Zhang T, Kassen R. 2011. Cost of adaptation and fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Genetics 189:939-949.
4. Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ. 2002. Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162:2025-2035.
5. Betancourt AJ, Bollback JP. 2006. Fitness effects of beneficial mutations: the mutational landscape model in experimental evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 16:618-623.
6. Biswas S, Akey JM. 2006. Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends Genet. 22:437-446.
7. Bollback JP, York TL, Nielsen R. 2008. Estimation of 2Nes from temporal allele frequency data. Genetics 179:497-502.
8. Burke MK, et al. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature 467:587-590.
9. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289-1303.
10. Crow JF, Kimura M. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Csilléry K, François O, Blum M G B. 2012. ABC: an R package for approximate Bayesian computation (ABC). Methods Ecol Evol. 3:475-479.
12. Cutter AD, Choi JY. 2010. Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. Genome Res. 20:1103-1111.
13. Denver DR, et al. 2012. Variation in base-substitution mutation in experimental and natural lineages of Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genome Biol Evol. 4:513-522.
14. Desai MM, Fisher DS, Murray AW. 2007. The speed of evolution and maintenance of variation in asexual populations. Curr Biol. 17:385-394.
15. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF. 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148:1667-1686.
16. Dykhuizen DE, Hartl DL. 1983. Selection in chemostats. Microbiol Rev. 47:150-168.
17. Elena SF, Lenski RE. 2003. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet. 4:457-469.
18. Enard D, Depaulis F, Roest Crollius H. 2010. Human and non-human primate genomes share hotspots of positive selection. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000840.
19. Estes S, Phillips PC, Denver DR. 2011. Fitness recovery and compensatory evolution in natural mutant lines of C. elegans. Evolution 65:2335-2344.
20. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 8:610-618.
21. Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
22. Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE. 1998. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 102-103:127-144.
23. Good BH, et al. 2012. Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:4950-4955.
24. Gordo I, Perfeito L, Sousa A. 2011. Fitness effects of mutations in bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 21:20-35.
25. Grossman SR, et al. 2010. A composite of multiple signals distinguishes causal variants in regions of positive selection. Science 327:883-886.
26. Grossman SR, et al. 2013. Identifying recent adaptations in large-scale genomic data. Cell 152:703-713.
27. Hancock AM, Di Rienzo A. 2008. Detecting the genetic signature of natural selection in human populations: models, methods, and data. Annu Rev Anthropol. 37:197-217.
28. Hegreness M, Shoresh N, Hartl D, Kishony R. 2006. An equivalence principle for the incorporation of favorable mutations in asexual populations. Science 311:1615-1617.
29. Hietpas RT, Jensen JD, Bolon D N A. 2011. From the cover: experimental illumination of a fitness landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:7896-7901.
30. Illingworth CJ, Mustonen V. 2011. Distinguishing driver and passenger mutations in an evolutionary history categorized by interference. Genetics 189:989-1000.
31. Illingworth CJ, Mustonen V. 2012. A method to infer positive selection from marker dynamics in an asexual population. Bioinformatics 28:831-837.
32. Imhof M, Schlotterer C. 2001. Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98:1113-1117.
33. Jensen JD, Thornton KR, Andolfatto P. 2008. An approximate Bayesian estimator suggests strong, recurrent selective sweeps in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000198.
34. Jensen JD, Thornton KR, Aquadro CF. 2008. Inferring selection in partially sequenced regions. Mol Biol Evol. 25:438-446.
35. Kassen R, Bataillon T. 2006. Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria. Nat Genet. 38:484-488.
36. Keightley PD. 1998. Inference of genome-wide mutation rates and distributions of mutation effects for fitness traits: a simulation study. Genetics 150:1283-1293.
37. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2010. What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365:1187-1193.
38. Kibota TT, Lynch M. 1996. Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli. Nature 381:694-696.
39. Kimura M, Ohta T. 1974. On some principles governing molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 71:2848-2852.
40. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G. 2011. Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002056.
41. Lang GI, Botstein D, Desai MM. 2011. Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Genetics 188:647-661.
42. Lemonnier M, et al. 2008. The evolution of contact-dependent inhibition in non-growing populations of Escherichia coli. Proc Biol Sci. 275:3-10.
43. Lind PA, Berg OG, Andersson DI. 2010. Mutational robustness of ribosomal protein genes. Science 330:825-827.
44. MacLean RC, Buckling A. 2009. The distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000406.
45. Malaspinas AS, Malaspinas O, Evans SN, Slatkin M. 2012. Estimating allele age and selection coefficient from time-serial data. Genetics 192:599-607.
46. Martin G, Lenormand T. 2006. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models. Evolution 60:2413-2427.
47. Mathieson I, McVean G. 2013. Estimating selection coefficients in spatially structured populations from time series data of allele frequencies. Genetics 193:973-984.
48. Maynard-Smith J, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 23:23-35.
49. Mcdonald MJ, Cooper TF, Beaumont H J E, Rainey PB. 2011. The distribution of fitness effects of new beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biol Lett. 7:98-100.
50. Nielsen R. 2005. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet. 39:197-218.
51. Orozcoter Wengel P, et al. 2012. Adaptation of Drosophila to a novel laboratory environment reveals temporally heterogeneous trajectories of selected alleles. Mol Ecol. 21:4931-4941.
52. Orr HA. 2010. The population genetics of beneficial mutations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365:1195-1201.
53. Perfeito L, Fernandes L, Mota C, Gordo I. 2007. Adaptive mutations in bacteria: high rate and small effects. Science 317:813-815.
54. Rokyta DR, et al. 2008. Beneficial fitness effects are not exponential for two viruses. J Mol Evol. 67:368-376.
55. Rozen DE, De Visser J A G M, Gerrish PJ. 2002. Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations. Curr Biol. 12:1040-1045.
56. Sanjuán R, Moya A, Elena SF. 2004. The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101:8396-8401.
57. Sawyer SA, Parsch J, Zhang Z, Hartl DL. 2007. Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:6504-6510.
58. Schneider A, Charlesworth B, Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2011. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations. Genetics 189:1427-1437.
59. Schoustra SE, Bataillon T, Gifford DR, Kassen R. 2009. The properties of adaptive walks in evolving populations of fungus. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000250.
60. Sinha P, et al. 2011. On detecting selective sweeps using single genomes. Front Genet. 2:1-5.
61. Sousa A, Magalhães S, Gordo I. 2012. Cost of antibiotic resistance and the geometry of adaptation. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1417-1428.
62. Stevens KE, Sebert ME. 2011. Frequent beneficial mutations during singlecolony serial transfer of Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002232.
63. Thornton KR, Jensen JD, Becquet C, Andolfatto P. 2007. Progress and prospects in mapping recent selection in the genome. Heredity (Edinb) 98:340-348.
64. Trindade S, Perfeito L, Gordo I. 2010. Rate and effects of spontaneous mutations that affect fitness in mutator Escherichia coli. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365:1177-1186.
65. Woods RJ, et al. 2011. Second-order selection for evolvability in a large Escherichia coli population. Science 331:1433-1436.
66. Zhang W, et al. 2012. Estimation of the rate and effect of new beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Theor Popul Biol. 81:168-178.