Bioadhesive polymers: Novel tool for drug delivery

Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine and Biotechnology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 274-283

  Kumar, Krishan ^a   Dhawan, Neha ^a   Sharma, Harshita ^a   Vaidya, Shubha ^a   Vaidya, Bhuvaneshwar ^a  

^a ISF COLLEGE OF PHARMACY   (India)

Author keywords

Alginate; Bioadhesion; Chitosan; Drug delivery; Polymers

Indexed keywords

ALGINATE; CHITOSAN; DRUG DELIVERY;

BIO-ADHESION; BIOADHESIVE POLYMERS; DELIVERY SYSTEMS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; INTERFACIAL FORCES; INTERFACIAL PHENOMENA; RESIDENCE TIME; THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY;

POLYMERS;

ALGINIC ACID; BIOADHESIVE POLYMER; CARBOMER; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CHITOSAN; COLLOIDAL GOLD; DRUG CARRIER; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; GELATIN; GUAR GUM; GUM TRAGACANTH; HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE; HYDROXYPROPYLCELLULOSE; HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYLCELLULOSE; KARAYA GUM; LECTIN; MACROGOL; METHACRYLIC ACID; METHYLCELLULOSE; N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE; PECTIN; PLANT GUM; POLYCARBOPHIL; POLYELECTROLYTE; POLYMER; POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; POVIDONE; SIALIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CROSS LINKING; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG RELEASE; GAMMA SCINTIGRAPHY; HYDROGEL; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHILICITY; INTESTINE EPITHELIUM; MUCOADHESION; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REVIEW; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SUSTAINED DRUG RELEASE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOPICAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; VISCOSITY; ADHESION; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; MUCOSA;

ADHESIVENESS; DRUG CARRIERS; HUMANS; MUCOUS MEMBRANE; POLYMERS;

EID: 84904295681     PISSN: 21691401     EISSN: 2169141X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/21691401.2013.815194     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Andrews GP , Laverty TP , Jones DS . 2009 . Mucoadhesive polymeric platform for controlled drug delivery . Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 71 : 505-518
2. Arya RKK , Juyal V , Singh R . 2010a . Development and evaluation of gastroresistant microspheres of pantoprazole . Int J Pharmacy Pharma Sci. 2: 112-116
3. Arya RKK , Singh R, Juyal V . 2010b . Mucoadhesive microspheres of famotidine: Preparation characterization and in vitro evaluation. Int J Eng Sci Tech. 2: 1575-1580
4. Asane GS , Nirmal SA , Rasal KB , Naik AA , Mahadik MS , Rao YM . 2008. Polymers for mucoadhesive drug delivery system: A current status. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 34: 1246-1266
5. Bagheri KS , Taghizadeh SM, Mirzadeh H . 2009. An investigation on the short-term biodegradability of chitosan with various molecular weights and degrees of deacetylation . Carbohyd Polym. 78 : 773-778
6. Barry BW , Meyer MC . 1979. Th e rheological properties of carbopol gels I . Continuous shear and creep properties of carbopol gels. Int J Pharm. 2: 1-25
7. Bazigha K , Abdul RS . 2010 . In vitro evaluation of miconazole mucoadhesive buccal fi lms . Int J Appl Pharm. 2: 23-26
8. Bhalodia R , Biswajit B , Garala K , Bhavik J , Mehta K . 2010 . Buccoadhesive drug delivery systems . Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 1: 1-32
9. Bhanja S , Ellaiah P , Kumar S , Sahu PK , Tiwari SP , Panigrahi BB , Das D. 2010 . Formulation and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of Timolol maleate . Int J Pharm Biomed. 1: 129-134
10. Bilensoy E , Sen M , Dogan AL , Calis S . 2007 . Th ermosensitive mucoadhesive gel formulation loaded with 5-Fu: Cyclodextrin complex for HPV-induced cervical cancer . J Inclusion Phenom Macrocyclic Chem. 57 : 363-370
11. Boddupalli BM , Mohammed ZNK , Nath RA , Banji D . 2010 . Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: An overview . J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 1 : 381-387
12. Bogataj M, Mrhar A , Korosec L . 1999. Infl uence of physicochemical and biological parameters on drug release from microspheres adhered on vesical and intestinal mucosa . Int J Pharm. 177: 211-220
13. Capra RH , Baruzzi AM , Quinzani LM . 2007 . Rheological, dielectric and diff usion analysis of mucin/carbopol matrices used in amperometric biosensors . Sensor Actuat B: Chem. 124 : 466-476
14. Carreno-Gomez B , Woodley JF , Florence AT . 1999 . Studies on the uptake of tomato lectin nanoparticles in everted gut sacs . Int J Pharm. 183: 7-11
15. Chattopadhyay P , Verma N . 2012. Preparation of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of metoprolol succinate: In vitro and in vivo drug release and bioadhesion. Trop J Pharma Res. 11: 9-17
16. Chen H, Langer , R . 1998. Oral particulate delivery: Status and future trends . Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 34: 339-350
17. Chenite A , Chaput C , Wang D , Combes C , Buschmann MD , Hoemann CD , et al . 2000 . Novel injectable neutral solutions of chitosan form biodegradable gels in situ, Biomaterials. 21 : 2155-2161
18. Chowdary CPR , Rao YS . 2004 . Mucoadhesive microspheres for controlled drug delivery. Biol Pharm Bull. 27: 1717-1724
19. Chowdary KPR, Srinivas L . 2000. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems: A review of current status . Ind Drug. 37 : 400-406
20. Choy YB , Park JH , McCarey BE , Edelhauser HF , Prausnitz MR . 2008. Mucoadhesive microdiscs engineered for ophthalmic drug delivery: Effect of particle geometry and formulation on preocular residence time . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 49: 4808-4815
21. Davies NM, Farr SJ , Hadgraft J , Kellaway IW . 1992. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery . II. Polymer-coated vesicles. Pharm Res. 9: 1137-1144
22. Dholakia M, Th akkar V , Patel N , Gandhi T . 2012. Development and characterisation of thermo reversible mucoadhesive moxifl oxacin hydrochloride in situ ophthalmic gel . J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 4 : 42-45
23. Dubolazov AV , Nurkeeva ZS , Mun GA , Khutoryanskiy VV . 2006. Design of mucoadhesive polymeric fi lms based on blends of poly(acrylic acid) and (hydroxypropyl)cellulose . Biomacromolecules. 7 : 1637-1643
24. Elliot JH , Ganz AJ . 1974 . Some rheological properties of sodium carboxymethylcellulose solutions and gels . Rheologica Acta. 13 : 670-674
25. Eouani C , Piccerelle P , Prinderre P , Bourret E , Joachim J . 2011 . In-vitro comparative study of buccal mucoadhesive performance of diff erent polymeric fi lms . Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 52: 45-55
26. Fini A , Bergamante V , Ceschel GC . 2011. Mucoadhesive gels designed for the controlled release of chlorhexidine in the oral cavity. Pharmaceutics. 3: 665-679
27. Good RJ . 1992. Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: A critical review. J Adhes Sci Technol. 6 : 1269-1302
28. Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SH . 1988. Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: Structure-property relationships. Crit Rev Th er Drug Carrier Syst. 5: 21-67
29. Haltner EJH, Lehr CM . 1997. Lectins and bacterial invasion factors for controlling endo and transcytosis of bioadhesive drug carrier system . Euro J Pharm Biopharm. 44: 3-13
30. Horstedt P , Danielsson A , Nyhlin H, Stenling R, Suhr O . 1989. Adhesion of bacteria to the human small-intestinal mucosa . A scanning electron microscopic study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 24 : 877-885
31. Hui HW, Robinson JR . 1985. Ocular delivery of progesterone using a bioadhesive polymer . Int J Pharm. 26: 203-213
32. Imam ME , Hornof M , Alenta V , Reznicek G , Schnürch AB . 2003. Evidence for the interpenetration of mucoadhesive polymers into the mucous gel layer . STP Pharma Sci. 13: 171-176
33. Jasti B , Li X , Cleary G . 2003 . Recent Advances in mucoadhesive drug delivery systems . Pharm Tech. 1: 194-197
34. Kesavan K , Nath G , Pandit JK . 2010. Sodium alginate based mucoadhesive system for gatifl oxacin and its in vitro antibacterial activity. Sci Pharm. 78: 941-957
35. Khairnar AJP , Baviskar D , Jain D . 2009. Developmement of mucoadhesive buccal patch containing aceclofenac: In vitro evaluations . Int J Pharm Tech. 1: 978-981
36. Koland M, Charyulu RN , Prabhu P . 2010. Mucoadhesive fi lms of losartan potassium for buccal delivery design and characterization . Ind J Pharm Educ Res. 44: 315-323
37. Kumar RS , Prabhakar B . 2010 . Bioadhesive polymeric platforms for transmucosal drug delivery systems . Trop J Pharm Res. 9: 91-104
38. Lee JW , Park JH, Robinson JR . 2000. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: The next generation. J Pharm Sci. 89: 850-866
39. Lehr CM, Bouwstra JA , Schacht EH, Junginger HE . 1992. In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers . Int J Pharm. 78: 43-48
40. Lehr CM , Johanna AB , Tukker JJ , Junginge HE . 1990 . Intestinal transit of bioadhesive microspheres in an in situ loop in the rat-A comparative study with copolymers and blends based on poly (acrylic acid). J Control Rel. 13: 51-62
41. Lele BS , Hoff man AS . 2000. Mucoadhesive drug carriers based on complexes of poly(acrylic acid) and PEGylated drugs having hydrolysable PEG-Anhydride-drug linkages . J Control Release. 69 : 237-248
42. Ludwig A . 2005. Th e use of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Del Rev. 57: 1595-1639
43. Majithiya RJ , Ghosh PK , Umrethia ML , Murthy RSR . 2006. Th ermoreversible- mucoadhesive gel for nasal delivery of sumatriptan . AAPS PharmSciTech. 7: 67
44. Mamatha Y , Rao BP , Ramesh K , Rajarajan S , Beny B, Reddy YV . 2012. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets containing pantoprazole . J Pharm Sci. 2: 69-80
45. Meseguer G , Gurny R, Buri P . 2004. In vivo evaluation of dosage forms: Application of gamma scintigraphy to non-enteral routes of administration. J Drug Rel. 2: 269-288
46. Motwani SK , Chopra S , Talegaonkar S , Kohli K , Ahmad FJ , Khar RK. 2008 . Chitosan-sodium alginate nanoparticles as submicroscopic reservoirs for ocular delivery: Formulation, optimisation and in vitro characterisation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 68: 513-525
47. Muthukumaran M , Dhachinamoorthi D , Chandra Sekhar KB , Sriram N . 2011 . A review on polymers used in mucoadhesive drug delivery system . Int J Pharm & Ind Res. 1: 122-127
48. Nayak AK , Hasnain MS , Beg S , Alam MI . 2010. Mucoadhesive beads of gliclazide: Design, development, and evaluation . ScienceAsia. 36 : 319-325
49. Palanisamy M, Khanam J , Kumar NA , Rani C . 2009. Chitosan microspheres encapsulated with metoprolol succinate: Formulation and in - vitro evaluation. Res J Pharm Tech. 2: 349-352
50. Park K . 1989 . A new approach to study mucoadhesion colloidal gold staining . Int J Pharm. 53: 209-217
51. Patel JK , Chavda JR . 2009. Formulation and evaluation of stomachspecific amoxicillin-loaded carbopol-934P mucoadhesive microspheres for anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy . J Microencapsul. 2 : 6365-76
52. Patel A , Patel K , Patel J . 2012. Design, development and in vitro evaluation of sertaconazole mucoadhesive vaginal tablet . Der Pharmacia Lettre. 4: 418-427
53. Patel DM, Patel MJ , Patel AN , Patel CN . 2011. Formulation and evaluation of mixed matrix gastro-retentive drug delivery for famotidine. Int J Pharm Investig. 1: 247-254
54. Peggs K , Mackinnon S . 2003. Imatinib mesylate- the new gold standard for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia . N Engl J Med. 348 : 1048-1050
55. Portero A , Osorio DT , Alonso MJ , Lopez CR . 2007. Development of chitosan sponges for buccal administration of insulin . Carbohyd Polym. 68 : 617-625
56. Pranshu T , Madhav NVS . 2011 . Recent advances in oral mucoadhesive drug delivery systems: A review . Int J Pharma Res Dev. 3 : 151-162
57. Pund S , Joshi A , Vasu K , Nivsarkar M, Shishoo C . 2011. Gastroretentive delivery of rifampicin: In vitro mucoadhesion and in vivo gamma scintigraphy . Int J Pharm. 411: 106-112
58. Puratchikody A , Prasanth VV , Mathew ST , Kumar AB . 2011 . Buccal drug delivery: Past, present and future - A review . Int J Drug Deliv. 3 : 171-184
59. Rajaonarivony M, Vauthier C , Couarraze G , Puisieux F , Couvreur P. 1993 . Development of a new drug carrier made from alginate. J Pharm Sci. 82: 912-917
60. Riva R, Ragelle H, des Rieux A , Duhem N , J iie C , Pr it V . 2011. Chitosan and chitosan derivatives in drug delivery and tissue engineering . In: Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Muzzarelli RAA , Eds. Chitosan for Biomaterials II . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
61. Sachan N , Bhattacharya K . 2009. A basics and theapeutic potentional of oral mucoadhesive microparticulate drug delivery systems . Int J Pharm Clin Res. 1: 10-14
62. Sankar GD , Goyal D , Sharma R, Mehta N , Kumari P , Kunwar SP . 2011. Formulation and evaluation of Mucoadhesive tablets of Famotidine. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 12: 1-3
63. Schnich BA . 2005. Th iomers: A new generation of mucoadhesive polymers . Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57: 1569-1582
64. Semalty M , Semalty A , Kumar G . 2008 . Formulation and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal fi lms of glipizide . Ind J Pharm Sci. 70 : 43-48
65. Senthil V , Gopalakrishnan S , Sureshkumar R , Jawahar N , Ganesh GNK , Nagasamyvenkatesh D . 2010 . Mucoadhesive slowrelease tablets of theophylline: Design and evaluation . Asian J Pharm. 4 : 64-68
66. Shahi SR, Tribhuwan SD , Tadwee IK , Gupta SK , Zadbuke NS , Shivanikar SS . 2011. Formulation of atenolol mucoadhesive microspheres for nasal delivery by spray drying technique: In vitro/ex vivo Evaluation. Der Pharmacia Sinica. 2: 54-63
67. Shaikh R, Th akur RR, Garland MJ , Woolfson AD , Donnelly RF . 2011. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems . J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 3 : 89-100
68. Shojaei AH, Xiaoling L . 1997. Mechanism of buccal mucoadhesion of novel copolymers of acrylic acid and polyethylene glycol monomethylether monometh-Acrylate . J Control Release. 47 : 151-161
69. Sigurdsson HH, Loftsson T , Lehr CM . 2006. Assessment of mucoadhesion by a resonant mirror biosensor . Int J Pharm. 325: 75-81
70. Sikavitsas V , Nitsche JM , Mountziaris TJ . 2002 . Transport and kinetic processes underlying biomolecular interactions in the biacore optical biosensor . Biotechnol Prog. 18 : 885-897
71. Silva DJ , Olver JM . (2005). Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) lubricant facilitates insertion of porous spherical orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 21: 301-302
72. Smart JD . 2005. Th e basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57: 1556-1568
73. Singh SK , Chidrawar VR, Ushir YV , Vadalia KR, Heth NR, Singh S. 2010 . Pharmaceutical characterization of amoxicillin trihydrate as mucoadhesive microspheres in management of H . Pylori. Int J PharmTech Res. 2: 348-358
74. Song Y , Wang Y , Th akur R , Meidan VM , Michniak B . 2004 . Mucosal drug delivery: Membranes, methodologies, and applications . Crit Rev Th er Drug Carrier Syst. 21: 195-256
75. Strumia MC . 2007 . Rheological, dielectric and diff usion analysis of mucin/carbopol matrices used in amperometric biosensors . Sensor Actuat B: Chem. 124 : 466-476
76. Sudhakar Y , Kuotsu K , Bandyopadhyay AK . 2006. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery - A Promising option for orally less effi cient drugs. J Control Release. 114: 15-40
77. Takeuchi H, Th ongborisute J , Matsui Y , Sugihara H, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y . 2005 . Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesion drug delivery systems . Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57: 1583-1594
78. Tan YT , Peh KK , Hanbali AO . 2000 . Effect of Carbopol and polyvinylpyrrolidone on the mechanical, rheological, and release properties of bioadhesive polyethylene glycol gels . AAPS Pharm- SciTech. 1 : 69-78
79. Ugwoke MI, Agu RU , Verbeke N , Kinget R . 2005. Nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery: Background, applications, trends and future perspectives . Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57: 1640-1665
80. Uttarwar S . 2012. Formulation and development of in situ gelling system for nasal administration for an antiemetic drug ondansetron hydrochloride by using Pluronics 127P and Pluronics 68 . Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci. 3: 1103-1118
81. Varshosaz J , Karimzadeh S . 2007 . Development of cross linked chitosan fi lms for oral mucosal delivery of lidocaine . Res Pharm Sci. 2 : 43-52
82. Varum FJO , Veiga F , Sousa JS , Basit AW . 2011. Mucoadhesive platforms for targeted delivery to the colon. Int J Pharm. 420: 11-19
83. Vinod KR, Reddy R, Sandhya S , Banji D , Reddy V . 2012. Critical review on mucoadhesive drug delivery systems . Hygeia J D Med. 4: 7-28
84. Wagh VD , Imandar B , Samanta MK . 2008 . Polymers used in ocular dosage form and drug delivery systems . Asian J Pharm. 2: 12-17
85. Warren SJ , Kellaway IW . 1998 . Th e synthesis and in vitro characterization of the mucoadhesion and swelling of Poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels . Pharm Dev Tech. 3: 199-208
86. Wee S , Gombotz WR . 1998. Protein release from alginate matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 31: 267-285
87. Woodley J . 2001 . Bioadhesion: New possibilities for drug administration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 40: 77-84
88. Yedurkar P , Dhiman MK , Petkar K , Sawant K . 2012. Mucoadhesive bilayer buccal tablet of carvedilol-loaded chitosan microspheres: In vitro, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigations. J Microencapsul. 29: 126-137.