Different subunits belonging to the same protein complex often exhibit discordant expression levels and evolutionary properties

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 113-120

  Matalon, Or ^a   Horovitz, Amnon ^a   Levy, Emmanuel D ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETERO OLIGOMERIC PROTEIN COMPLEX; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEASOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN AGGREGATE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT;

EXOSOME; GENE DELETION; GENE INTERACTION; GENOME; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; REVIEW; STOICHIOMETRY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; CHEMISTRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN AGGREGATES; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84903554316     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.06.001     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Noll M. DNA folding in the nucleosome. J Mol Biol 1977, 116:49-71.
2. White C.L., Suto R.K., Luger K. Structure of the yeast nucleosome core particle reveals fundamental changes in internucleosome interactions. EMBO J 2001, 20:5207-5218.
3. Imasaki T., Calero G., Cai G., Tsai K.L., Yamada K., Cardelli F., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Berger I., Kornberg G.L., et al. Architecture of the Mediator head module. Nature 2011, 475:240-243.
4. Bushnell D.A., Cramer P., Kornberg R.D. Structural basis of transcription: α-amanitin-RNA polymerase II cocrystal at 2.8Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:1218-1222.
5. Gnatt A.L., Cramer P., Fu J., Bushnell D.A., Kornberg R.D. Structural basis of transcription: an RNA polymerase II elongation complex at 3.3Å resolution. Science 2001, 292:1876-1882.
6. Berget S.M., Moore C., Sharp P.A. Spliced segments at the 5' terminus of adenovirus 2 late mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977, 74:3171-3175.
7. Will C.L., Lührmann R. Spliceosome structure and function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2011, 3. a003707.
8. Leung A.K., Nagai K., Li J. Structure of the spliceosomal U4 snRNP core domain and its implication for snRNP biogenesis. Nature 2011, 473:536-539.
9. Mitchell P., Petfalski E., Shevchenko A., Mann M., Tollervey D. The exosome: a conserved eukaryotic RNA processing complex containing multiple 3'→5' exoribonucleases. Cell 1997, 91:457-466.
10. Liu Q., Greimann J.C., Lima C.D. Reconstitution, activities, and structure of the eukaryotic RNA exosome. Cell 2006, 127:1223-1237.
11. Clemons W.M., May J.L., Wimberly B.T., McCutcheon J.P., Capel M.S., Ramakrishnan V. Structure of a bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit at 5.5Å resolution. Nature 1999, 400:833-840.
12. Harms J., Schluenzen F., Zarivach R., Bashan A., Gat S., Agmon I., Bartels H., Franceschi F., Yonath A. High resolution structure of the large ribosomal subunit from a mesophilic eubacterium. Cell 2001, 107:679-688.
13. Ben-Shem A., Garreau de Loubresse N., Melnikov S., Jenner L., Yusupova G., Yusupov M. The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3.0Å resolution. Science 2011, 334:1524-1529.
14. Kalisman N., Schröder G.F., Levitt M. The crystal structures of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT reveal its functional partitioning. Structure 2013, 21:540-549.
15. Beck F., Unverdorben P., Bohn S., Schweitzer A., Pfeifer G., Sakata E., Nickell S., Plitzko J.M., Villa E., Baumeister W., et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:14870-14875.
16. Alber F., Dokudovskaya S., Veenhoff L.M., Zhang W., Kipper J., Devos D., Suprapto A., Karni-Schmidt O., Williams R., Chait B.T., et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007, 450:695-701.
17. Bui K.H., von Appen A., Diguilio A.L., Ori A., Sparks L., Mackmull M.T., Bock T., Hagen W., Andrés-Pons A., Glavy J.S., et al. Integrated structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex scaffold. Cell 2013, 155:1233-1243.
18. Becker T., Bhushan S., Jarasch A., Armache J.P., Funes S., Jossinet F., Gumbart J., Mielke T., Berninghausen O., Schulten K., et al. Structure of monomeric yeast and mammalian Sec61 complexes interacting with the translating ribosome. Science 2009, 326:1369-1373.
19. Levchenko A., Bruck J., Sternberg P.W. Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:5818-5823.
20. Leake M.C., Chandler J.H., Wadhams G.H., Bai F., Berry R.M., Armitage J.P. Stoichiometry and turnover in single, functioning membrane protein complexes. Nature 2006, 443:355-358.
21. Maier T., Schmidt A., Guell M., Kühner S., Gavin A.C., Aebersold R., Serrano L. Quantification of mRNA and protein and integration with protein turnover in a bacterium. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:511.
22. Finka A., Goloubinoff P. Proteomic data from human cell cultures refine mechanisms of chaperone-mediated protein homeostasis. Cell Stress Chaperones 2013, 18:591-605.
23. Havugimana P.C., Hart G.T., Nepusz T., Yang H., Turinsky A.L., Li Z., Wang P.I., Boutz D.R., Fong V., Phanse S., et al. A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell 2012, 150:1068-1081.
24. Kaida D., Berg M.G., Younis I., Kasim M., Singh L.N., Wan L., Dreyfuss G. U1 snRNP protects pre-mRNAs from premature cleavage and polyadenylation. Nature 2010, 468:664-668.
25. Wahl M.C., Will C.L., Lührmann R. The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell 2009, 136:701-718.
26. Nooren I.M., Thornton J.M. Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J 2003, 22:3486-3492.
27. Jansen R., Greenbaum D., Gerstein M. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res 2002, 12:37-46.
28. Simonis N., Gonze D., Orsi C., van Helden J., Wodak S.J. Modularity of the transcriptional response of protein complexes in yeast. J Mol Biol 2006, 363:589-610.
29. Simonis N., van Helden J., Cohen G.N., Wodak S.J. Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes in yeast. Genome Biol 2004, 5:R33.
30. Liu C.T., Yuan S., Li K.C. Patterns of co-expression for protein complexes by size in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:526-532.
31. Mathur S., Vyas S., Kapoor S., Tyagi A.K. The Mediator complex in plants: structure, phylogeny, and expression profiling of representative genes in a dicot (Arabidopsis) and a monocot (rice) during reproduction and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol 2011, 157:1609-1627.
32. Gavin A.C., Aloy P., Grandi P., Krause R., Boesche M., Marzioch M., Rau C., Jensen L.J., Bastuck S., Dümpelfeld B., et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 2006, 440:631-636.
33. Lee J.W., Zemojtel T., Shakhnovich E. Systems-level evidence of transcriptional co-regulation of yeast protein complexes. J Comput Biol 2009, 16:331-339.
34. Tan K., Shlomi T., Feizi H., Ideker T., Sharan R. Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes within and across species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:1283-1288.
35. Mewes H.W., Frishman D., Mayer K.F., Münsterkotter M., Noubibou O., Pagel P., Rattei T., Oesterheld M., Ruepp A., Stümpflen V. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:D169-D172.
36. Kensche P.R., van Noort V., Dutilh B.E., Huynen M.A. Practical and theoretical advances in predicting the function of a protein by its phylogenetic distribution. J R Soc Interface 2008, 5:151-170.
37. Pellegrini M. Using phylogenetic profiles to predict functional relationships. Bacterial molecular networks 2012, vol. 804:167-177.
38. Pellegrini M., Marcotte E.M., Thompson M.J., Eisenberg D., Yeates T.O. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:4285-4288.
39. Fokkens L., Snel B. Cohesive versus flexible evolution of functional modules in eukaryotes. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000276.
40. Pereira-Leal J.B., Teichmann S.A. Novel specificities emerge by stepwise duplication of functional modules. Genome Res 2005, 15:552-559.
41. Seidl M.F., Schultz J. Evolutionary flexibility of protein complexes. BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9:155.
42. Costanzo M., Baryshnikova A., Myers C.L., Andrews B., Boone C. Charting the genetic interaction map of a cell. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2011, 22:66-74.
43. Costanzo M., Baryshnikova A., Bellay J., Kim Y., Spear E.D., Sevier C.S., Ding H., Koh J.L., Toufighi K., Mostafavi S., et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010, 327:425-431.
44. Baryshnikova A., Costanzo M., Kim Y., Ding H., Koh J., Toufighi K., Youn J.Y., Ou J., San Luis B.J., Bandyopadhyay S., et al. Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat Methods 2010, 7:1017-1024.
45. Mitra K., Carvunis A.R., Ramesh S.K., Ideker T. Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks. Nat Rev Genet 2013, 14:719-732.
46. Collins S.R., Miller K.M., Maas N.L., Roguev A., Fillingham J., Chu C.S., Schuldiner M., Gebbia M., Recht J., Shales M., et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 2007, 446:806-810.
47. Braberg H., Jin H., Moehle E.A., Chan Y.A., Wang S., Shales M., Benschop J.J., Morris J.H., Qiu C., Hu F., et al. From structure to systems: high-resolution, quantitative genetic analysis of RNA polymerase II. Cell 2013, 154:775-788.
48. Schneider A., Seidl M.F., Snel B. Shared protein complex subunits contribute to explaining disrupted co-occurrence. PLOS Comput Biol 2013, 9:e1003124.
49. Jeffery C.J. Moonlighting proteins-an update. Mol Biosyst 2009, 5:345-350.
50. Butler G.S., Overall C.M. Proteomic identification of multitasking proteins in unexpected locations complicates drug targeting. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009, 8:935-948.
51. Huberts D.H., van der Klei I.J. Moonlighting proteins: an intriguing mode of multitasking. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010, 1803:520-525.
52. Hernández S., Ferragut G., Amela I., Perez-Pons J., Piñol J., Mozo-Villarias A., Cedano J., Querol E. MultitaskProtDB: a database of multitasking proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:D517-D520.
53. Wang G., Xia Y., Cui J., Gu Z., Song Y., Chen Y.Q., Chen H., Zhang H., Chen W. The roles of moonlighting proteins in bacteria. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2013, 16:15-22.
54. Kuriyan J., Eisenberg D. The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 2007, 450:983-990.
55. Levy E.D., Kowarzyk J., Michnick S.W. High-resolution mapping of protein concentration reveals principles of proteome architecture and adaptation. Cell Rep 2014, 7:1333-1340.
56. Brix K., Summa W., Lottspeich F., Herzog V. Extracellularly occurring histone H1 mediates the binding of thyroglobulin to the cell surface of mouse macrophages. J Clin Invest 1998, 102:283-293.
57. Das R., Burke T., Plow E.F. Histone H2B as a functionally important plasminogen receptor on macrophages. Blood 2007, 110:3763-3772.
58. Das R., Pluskota E., Plow E.F. Plasminogen and its receptors as regulators of cardiovascular inflammatory responses. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2010, 20:120-124.
59. Laggerbauer B., Liu S., Makarov E., Vornlocher H.P., Makarova O., Ingelfinger D., Achsel T., Lührmann R. The human U5 snRNP 52K protein (CD2BP2) interacts with U5-102K (hPrp6), a U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP bridging protein, but dissociates upon tri-snRNP formation. RNA 2005, 11:598-608.
60. Nielsen T.K., Liu S., Lührmann R., Ficner R. Structural basis for the bifunctionality of the U5 snRNP 52K protein (CD2BP2). J Mol Biol 2007, 369:902-908.
61. Dopie J., Skarp K.P., Rajakylä E.K., Tanhuanpää K., Vartiainen M.K. Active maintenance of nuclear actin by importin 9 supports transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:E544-E552.
62. Farrants A.K. Chromatin remodelling and actin organisation. FEBS Lett 2008, 582:2041-2050.
63. Hofmann W.A., Stojiljkovic L., Fuchsova B., Vargas G.M., Mavrommatis E., Philimonenko V., Kysela K., Goodrich J.A., Lessard J.L., Hope T.J., et al. Actin is part of pre-initiation complexes and is necessary for transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat Cell Biol 2004, 6:1094-1101.
64. Halbach F., Reichelt P., Rode M., Conti E. The yeast Ski complex: crystal structure and RNA channeling to the exosome complex. Cell 2013, 154:814-826.
65. Arora C., Kee K., Maleki S., Keeney S. Antiviral protein Ski8 is a direct partner of Spo11 in meiotic DNA break formation, independent of its cytoplasmic role in RNA metabolism. Mol Cell 2004, 13:549-559.
66. Demartino G.N., Gillette T.G. Proteasomes: machines for all reasons. Cell 2007, 129:659-662.
67. Sun L., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. Physical association of the APIS complex and general transcription factors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002, 296:991-999.
68. Bhat K.P., Greer S.F. Proteolytic and non-proteolytic roles of ubiquitin and the ubiquitin proteasome system in transcriptional regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011, 1809:150-155.
69. Strambio-De-Castillia C., Niepel M., Rout M.P. The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:490-501.
70. Van de Vosse D.W., Wan Y., Lapetina D.L., Chen W.M., Chiang J.H., Aitchison J.D., Wozniak R.W. A role for the nucleoporin Nup170p in chromatin structure and gene silencing. Cell 2013, 152:969-983.
71. Henderson B., Fares M.A., Lund P.A. Chaperonin 60: a paradoxical, evolutionarily conserved protein family with multiple moonlighting functions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2013, 88:955-987.
72. Kabir M.A., Kaminska J., Segel G.B., Bethlendy G., Lin P., Della Seta F., Blegen C., Swiderek K.M., Zoładek T., Arndt K.T., et al. Physiological effects of unassembled chaperonin Cct subunits in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2005, 22:219-239.
73. Amit M., Weisberg S.J., Nadler-Holly M., McCormack E.A., Feldmesser E., Kaganovich D., Willison K.R., Horovitz A. Equivalent mutations in the eight subunits of the chaperonin CCT produce dramatically different cellular and gene expression phenotypes. J Mol Biol 2010, 401:532-543.
74. Wool I.G. Extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1996, 21:164-165.
75. Warner J.R., McIntosh K.B. How common are extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins?. Mol Cell 2009, 34:3-11.
76. Kabir M.A., Sherman F. Overexpressed ribosomal proteins suppress defective chaperonins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2008, 8:1236-1244.
77. Marsh J.A., Hernández H., Hall Z., Ahnert S.E., Perica T., Robinson C.V., Teichmann S.A. Protein complexes are under evolutionary selection to assemble via ordered pathways. Cell 2013, 153:461-470.
78. Cumberworth A., Lamour G., Babu M.M., Gsponer J. Promiscuity as a functional trait: intrinsically disordered regions as central players of interactomes. Biochem J 2013, 454:361-369.
79. Tóth-Petróczy A., Oldfield C.J., Simon I., Takagi Y., Dunker A.K., Uversky V.N., Fuxreiter M. Malleable machines in transcription regulation: the mediator complex. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e1000243.
80. Oberdorf R., Kortemme T. Complex topology rather than complex membership is a determinant of protein dosage sensitivity. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:253.
81. Gandhi S.J., Zenklusen D., Lionnet T., Singer R.H. Transcription of functionally related constitutive genes is not coordinated. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18:27-34.
82. Newman J.R., Ghaemmaghami S., Ihmels J., Breslow D.K., Noble M., DeRisi J.L., Weissman J.S. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 2006, 441:840-846.
83. de Lichtenberg U., Jensen L.J., Brunak S., Bork P. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 2005, 307:724-727.
84. Breker M., Gymrek M., Schuldiner M. A novel single-cell screening platform reveals proteome plasticity during yeast stress responses. J Cell Biol 2013, 200:839-850.
85. Rochette S., Gagnon-Arsenault I., Diss G., Landry C.R. Modulation of the yeast protein interactome in response to DNA damage. J Proteomics 2014, 100:25-36.
86. Denervaud N., Becker J., Delgado-Gonzalo R., Damay P., Rajkumar A.S., Unser M., Shore D., Naef F., Maerkl S.J. A chemostat array enables the spatio-temporal analysis of the yeast proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:15842-15847.
87. Tkach J.M., Yimit A., Lee A.Y., Riffle M., Costanzo M., Jaschob D., Hendry J.A., Ou J., Moffat J., Boone C., et al. Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:966-976.
88. Lehtinen S., Marsellach F.X., Codlin S., Schmidt A., Clement-Ziza M., Beyer A., Bahler J., Orengo C., Pancaldi V. Stress induces remodelling of yeast interaction and co-expression networks. Mol Biosyst 2013, 9:1697-1707.
89. Zhang X., Lam V.Q., Mou Y., Kimura T., Chung J., Chandrasekar S., Winkler J.R., Mayo S.L., Shan S.O. Direct visualization reveals dynamics of a transient intermediate during protein assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:6450-6455.
90. Koerber J.T., Thomsen N.D., Hannigan B.T., Degrado W.F., Wells J.A. Nature-inspired design of motif-specific antibody scaffolds. Nat Biotechnol 2013, 31:916-921.
91. Jain A., Liu R., Ramani B., Arauz E., Ishitsuka Y., Ragunathan K., Park J., Chen J., Xiang Y.K., Ha T. Probing cellular protein complexes using single-molecule pull-down. Nature 2011, 473:484-488.
92. Housden N.G., Hopper J.T., Lukoyanova N., Rodriguez-Larrea D., Wojdyla J.A., Klein A., Kaminska R., Bayley H., Saibil H.R., Robinson C.V., et al. Intrinsically disordered protein threads through the bacterial outer-membrane porin OmpF. Science 2013, 340:1570-1574.
93. Agrawal U., Reilly D.T., Schroeder C.M. Zooming in on biological processes with fluorescence nanoscopy. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2013, 24:646-653.
94. Freschi L., Torres-Quiroz F., Dube A.K., Landry C.R. qPCA: a scalable assay to measure the perturbation of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Mol Biosyst 2013, 9:36-43.
95. Reyes-Lamothe R., Sherratt D.J., Leake M.C. Stoichiometry and architecture of active DNA replication machinery in Escherichia coli. Science 2010, 328:498-501.
96. Handfield L.F., Chong Y.T., Simmons J., Andrews B.J., Moses A.M. Unsupervised clustering of subcellular protein expression patterns in high-throughput microscopy images reveals protein complexes and functional relationships between proteins. PLOS Comput Biol 2013, 9:e1003085.
97. Pereira-Leal J.B., Levy E.D., Kamp C., Teichmann S.A. Evolution of protein complexes by duplication of homomeric interactions. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R51.
98. Ispolatov I., Yuryev A., Mazo I., Maslov S. Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein-protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:3629-3635.
99. Levy E.D., Pereira-Leal J.B. Evolution and dynamics of protein interactions and networks. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008, 18:349-357.
100. Wang M., Weiss M., Simonovic M., Haertinger G., Schrimpf S.P., Hengartner M.O., von Mering C. PaxDb, a database of protein abundance averages across all three domains of life. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:492-500.
101. Milo R. What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values. Bioessays 2013, 35:1050-1055.
102. Levy E.D., De S., Teichmann S.A. Cellular crowding imposes global constraints on the chemistry and evolution of proteomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:20461-20466.
103. Yang J.R., Liao B.Y., Zhuang S.M., Zhang J. Protein misinteraction avoidance causes highly expressed proteins to evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:E831-E840.