Modulation of the yeast protein interactome in response to DNA damage

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 100, Issue , 2014, Pages 25-36

  Rochette, Samuel ^a   Gagnon Arsenault, Isabelle ^a   Diss, Guillaume ^a   Landry, Christian R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

DNA damage; MMS; P bodies; Protein interaction network; Protein fragment complementation assay; Yeast

Indexed keywords

DNA; EXOCYST; EXOCYST 84; FUNGAL PROTEIN; LAS17 PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; NOP7 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE; FUNGAL RNA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; METHOTREXATE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE PROTEIN FRAGMENT COMPLEMENTATION ASSAY; DNA DAMAGE; ESSENTIAL GENE; EXO84 GENE; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE FUNCTION; LAS17 GENE; NONHUMAN; NOP7 GENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN INTERACTOME; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RNA STABILITY; RNA TRANSLATION; UBIQUITINATION; YEAST; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EUKARYOTA;

DNA DAMAGE; METHOTREXATE; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TETRAHYDROFOLATE DEHYDROGENASE;

EID: 84897034514     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Scott J.D., Pawson T. Cell signaling in space and time: where proteins come together and when they're apart. Science 2009, 326:1220-1224.
2. Diss G., Filteau M., Freschi L., Leducq J.B., Rochette S., Torres-Quiroz F., et al. Integrative avenues for exploring the dynamics and evolution of protein interaction networks. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2013, 24:775-783.
3. Ideker T., Krogan N.J. Differential network biology. Mol Syst Biol 2012, 8:565.
4. Matsumoto A., Comatas K.E., Liu L., Stamler J.S. Screening for nitric oxide-dependent protein-protein interactions. Science 2003, 301:657-661.
5. Dreze M., Charloteaux B., Milstein S., Vidalain P.O., Yildirim M.A., Zhong Q., et al. 'Edgetic' perturbation of a C. elegans BCL2 ortholog. Nat Methods 2009, 6:843-849.
6. Bisson N., James D.A., Ivosev G., Tate S.A., Bonner R., Taylor L., et al. Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry reveals the dynamics of signaling through the GRB2 adaptor. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29:653-658.
7. Tarassov K., Messier V., Landry C.R., Radinovic S., Serna Molina M.M., Shames I., et al. An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 2008, 320:1465-1470.
8. Michnick S.W., Ear P.H., Landry C., Malleshaiah M.K., Messier V. A toolkit of protein-fragment complementation assays for studying and dissecting large-scale and dynamic protein-protein interactions in living cells. Methods Enzymol 2010, 470:335-368.
9. Gagnon-Arsenault I., Marois Blanchet F.C., Rochette S., Diss G., Dube A.K., Landry C.R. Transcriptional divergence plays a role in the rewiring of protein interaction networks after gene duplication. J Proteome 2013, 81:112-125.
10. Diss G., Dube A.K., Boutin J., Gagnon-Arsenault I., Landry C.R. A systematic approach for the genetic dissection of protein complexes in living cells. Cell reports. 2013, 3:2155-2167.
11. Freschi L., Torres-Quiroz F., Dube A.K., Landry C.R. qPCA: a scalable assay to measure the perturbation of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Mol Biosyst 2013, 9:36-43.
12. Schlecht U., Miranda M., Suresh S., Davis R.W., St Onge R.P. Multiplex assay for condition-dependent changes in protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:9213-9218.
13. Jackson S.P., Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009, 461:1071-1078.
14. Lord C.J., Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature 2012, 481:287-294.
15. Botstein D., Fink G.R. Yeast: an experimental organism for 21st Century biology. Genetics 2011, 189:695-704.
16. Dolinski K., Botstein D. Orthology and functional conservation in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 2007, 41:465-507.
17. Hartwell L.H. Nobel lecture. Yeast and cancer. Biosci Rep 2002, 22:373-394.
18. Ward T.A., Dudasova Z., Sarkar S., Bhide M.R., Vlasakova D., Chovanec M., et al. Components of a Fanconi-like pathway control Pso2-independent DNA interstrand crosslink repair in yeast. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002884.
19. Martini E., Borde V., Legendre M., Audic S., Regnault B., Soubigou G., et al. Genome-wide analysis of heteroduplex DNA in mismatch repair-deficient yeast cells reveals novel properties of meiotic recombination pathways. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1002305.
20. Tkach J.M., Yimit A., Lee A.Y., Riffle M., Costanzo M., Jaschob D., et al. Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:966-976.
21. Jelinsky S.A., Samson L.D. Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:1486-1491.
22. Smolka M.B., Albuquerque C.P., Chen S.H., Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:10364-10369.
23. Beli P., Lukashchuk N., Wagner S.A., Weinert B.T., Olsen J.V., Baskcomb L., et al. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 2012, 46:212-225.
24. Bandyopadhyay S., Mehta M., Kuo D., Sung M.K., Chuang R., Jaehnig E.J., et al. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 2010, 330:1385-1389.
25. Guenole A., Srivas R., Vreeken K., Wang Z.Z., Wang S., Krogan N.J., et al. Dissection of DNA damage responses using multiconditional genetic interaction maps. Mol Cell 2013, 49:346-358.
26. Stark C., Breitkreutz B.J., Reguly T., Boucher L., Breitkreutz A., Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:D535-D539.
27. Yachie N., Saito R., Sugiyama N., Tomita M., Ishihama Y. Integrative features of the yeast phosphoproteome and protein-protein interaction map. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1001064.
28. Amoutzias G.D., He Y., Lilley K.S., Van de Peer Y., Oliver S.G. Evaluation and properties of the budding yeast phosphoproteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11. [M111 009555].
29. Leducq J.B., Charron G., Diss G., Gagnon-Arsenault I., Dube A.K., Landry C.R. Evidence for the robustness of protein complexes to inter-species hybridization. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1003161.
30. Benaglia T., Chauveau D., Hunter D.R., Young D. Mixtools: an R package for analyzing finite mixture models. J Stat Softw 2009, 32:1-29.
31. R Development Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2011, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
32. Cherry J.M., Hong E.L., Amundsen C., Balakrishnan R., Binkley G., Chan E.T., et al. Saccharomyces genome database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D700-D705.
33. Li Z., Vizeacoumar F.J., Bahr S., Li J., Warringer J., Vizeacoumar F.S., et al. Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29:361-367.
34. Huh W.K., Falvo J.V., Gerke L.C., Carroll A.S., Howson R.W., Weissman J.S., et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 2003, 425:686-691.
35. Basrai M.A., Velculescu V.E., Kinzler K.W., Hieter P. NORF5/HUG1 is a component of the MEC1-mediated checkpoint response to DNA damage and replication arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol 1999, 19:7041-7049.
36. Chang M., Bellaoui M., Boone C., Brown G.W. A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:16934-16939.
37. Kuriyan J., Eisenberg D. The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 2007, 450:983-990.
38. Kannouche P.L., Wing J., Lehmann A.R. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2004, 14:491-500.
39. Lee C.W., Ferreon J.C., Ferreon A.C., Arai M., Wright P.E. Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:19290-19295.
40. Parker R., Sheth U. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol Cell 2007, 25:635-646.
41. Raska I., Koberna K., Malinsky J., Fidlerova H., Masata M. The nucleolus and transcription of ribosomal genes. Biol Cell 2004, 96:579-594.
42. Tharun S. Roles of eukaryotic Lsm proteins in the regulation of mRNA function. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2009, 272:149-189.
43. Tharun S., He W., Mayes A.E., Lennertz P., Beggs J.D., Parker R. Yeast Sm-like proteins function in mRNA decapping and decay. Nature 2000, 404:515-518.
44. Bouveret E., Rigaut G., Shevchenko A., Wilm M., Seraphin B. A Sm-like protein complex that participates in mRNA degradation. EMBO J 2000, 19:1661-1671.
45. Salgado-Garrido J., Bragado-Nilsson E., Kandels-Lewis S., Seraphin B. Sm and Sm-like proteins assemble in two related complexes of deep evolutionary origin. EMBO J 1999, 18:3451-3462.
46. Chen J., Rappsilber J., Chiang Y.C., Russell P., Mann M., Denis C.L. Purification and characterization of the 1.0 MDa CCR4-NOT complex identifies two novel components of the complex. J Mol Biol 2001, 314:683-694.
47. Pike B.L., Yongkiettrakul S., Tsai M.D., Heierhorst J. Mdt1, a novel Rad53 FHA1 domain-interacting protein, modulates DNA damage tolerance and G(2)/M cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2004, 24:2779-2788.
48. Chuang R.Y., Weaver P.L., Liu Z., Chang T.H. Requirement of the DEAD-Box protein ded1p for messenger RNA translation. Science 1997, 275:1468-1471.
49. Kraft C., Deplazes A., Sohrmann M., Peter M. Mature ribosomes are selectively degraded upon starvation by an autophagy pathway requiring the Ubp3p/Bre5p ubiquitin protease. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:602-610.
50. Wang H., Gari E., Verges E., Gallego C., Aldea M. Recruitment of Cdc28 by Whi3 restricts nuclear accumulation of the G1 cyclin-Cdk complex to late G1. EMBO J 2004, 23:180-190.
51. Gari E., Volpe T., Wang H., Gallego C., Futcher B., Aldea M. Whi3 binds the mRNA of the G1 cyclin CLN3 to modulate cell fate in budding yeast. Genes Dev 2001, 15:2803-2808.
52. Ratner J.N., Balasubramanian B., Corden J., Warren S.L., Bregman D.B. Ultraviolet radiation-induced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II. Implications for transcription-coupled DNA repair. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:5184-5189.
53. Luo Z., Zheng J., Lu Y., Bregman D.B. Ultraviolet radiation alters the phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II large subunit and accelerates its proteasome-dependent degradation. Mutat Res 2001, 486:259-274.
54. Woudstra E.C., Gilbert C., Fellows J., Jansen L., Brouwer J., Erdjument-Bromage H., et al. A Rad26-Def1 complex coordinates repair and RNA pol II proteolysis in response to DNA damage. Nature 2002, 415:929-933.
55. Ramachandran S., Tran D.D., Klebba-Faerber S., Kardinal C., Whetton A.D., Tamura T. An ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase mediated response to DNA damage down-regulates the mRNA-binding potential of THOC5. RNA 2011, 17:1957-1966.
56. Sha Z., Peth A., Goldberg A.L. Keeping proteasomes under control-a role for phosphorylation in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:18573-18574.
57. Finley D., Ulrich H.D., Sommer T., Kaiser P. The ubiquitin-proteasome system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2012, 192:319-360.
58. Krogan N.J., Lam M.H., Fillingham J., Keogh M.C., Gebbia M., Li J., et al. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 2004, 16:1027-1034.
59. Russell S.J., Reed S.H., Huang W., Friedberg E.C., Johnston S.A. The 19S regulatory complex of the proteasome functions independently of proteolysis in nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell 1999, 3:687-695.
60. Ben-Aroya S., Agmon N., Yuen K., Kwok T., McManus K., Kupiec M., et al. Proteasome nuclear activity affects chromosome stability by controlling the turnover of Mms22, a protein important for DNA repair. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000852.
61. Hoege C., Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Pyrowolakis G., Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 2002, 419:135-141.
62. Eddins M.J., Carlile C.M., Gomez K.M., Pickart C.M., Wolberger C. Mms2-Ubc13 covalently bound to ubiquitin reveals the structural basis of linkage-specific polyubiquitin chain formation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006, 13:915-920.
63. Ulrich H.D., Jentsch S. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J 2000, 19:3388-3397.
64. Madania A., Dumoulin P., Grava S., Kitamoto H., Scharer-Brodbeck C., Soulard A., et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of human Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein Las17p interacts with the Arp2/3 complex. Mol Biol Cell 1999, 10:3521-3538.
65. Aizer A., Brody Y., Ler L.W., Sonenberg N., Singer R.H., Shav-Tal Y. The dynamics of mammalian P body transport, assembly, and disassembly in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 2008, 19:4154-4166.
66. Andrin C., McDonald D., Attwood K.M., Rodrigue A., Ghosh S., Mirzayans R., et al. A requirement for polymerized actin in DNA double-strand break repair. Nucleus 2012, 3:384-395.