A chemostat array enables the spatio-temporal analysis of the yeast proteome

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 39, 2013, Pages 15842-15847

  Dénervaud, Nicolas ^a   Becker, Johannes ^a   Delgado Gonzalo, Ricard ^a   Damay, Pascal ^b   Rajkumar, Arun S ^a   Unser, Michael ^a   Shore, David ^b   Naef, Felix ^a   Maerkl, Sebastian J ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cell arrays; DNA damage response; High content imaging; Microfluidics; Yeast proteomics

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; PROTEOME; RIBONUCLEOTIDE REDUCTASE; RNR4 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CANDIDA ALBICANS; CELL GROWTH; CELL SIZE; CELL STRESS; CHEMOSTAT; DNA DAMAGE; GENE DELETION; GENE DISRUPTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INDUCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEOMICS; RNA PROCESSING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION; YEAST; YEAST CELL;

CELL ARRAYS; DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE; HIGH-CONTENT IMAGING; MICROFLUIDICS; YEAST PROTEOMICS;

GENE DELETION; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MICROFLUIDICS; PHENOTYPE; PROTEOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84884640242     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308265110     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Giepmans BN, Adams SR, Ellisman MH, Tsien RY (2006) The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science 312(5771):217-224.
2. Cohen AA, et al. (2008) Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science 322(5907):1511-1516.
3. Neumann B, et al. (2010) Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes. Nature 464(7289):721-727.
4. Newman JR, et al. (2006) Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441(7095):840-846.
5. Huh WK, et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425(6959):686-691.
6. Tkach JMJ, et al. (2012) Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 14(9):966-976.
7. Breker M, Gymrek M, Schuldiner M (2013) A novel single-cell screening platform reveals proteome plasticity during yeast stress responses. J Cell Biol 200(6):839-850.
8. Narayanaswamy R, et al. (2009) Widespread reorganization of metabolic enzymes into reversible assemblies upon nutrient starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(25): 10147-10152.
9. Taylor RJ, et al. (2009) Dynamic analysis of MAPK signaling using a high-throughput microfluidic single-cell imaging platform. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(10):3758-3763.
10. Bennett MR, Hasty J (2009) Microfluidic devices for measuring gene network dynamics in single cells. Nat Rev Genet 10(9):628-638.
11. Bennett MR, et al. (2008) Metabolic gene regulation in a dynamically changing environment. Nature 454(7208):1119-1122.
12. Prindle AA, et al. (2012) A sensing array of radically coupled genetic 'biopixels' Nature 481 7379 39-39.
13. Bar-Even A, et al. (2006) Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat Genet 38(6):636-643.
14. Taniguchi Y, et al. (2010) Quantifying E. Coli proteome and transcriptome with singlemolecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329(5991):533-538.
15. Ghaemmaghami S, et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425(6959):737-741.
16. Picotti P, Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Domon B, Aebersold R (2009) Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell 138(4):795-806.
17. Lee MV, et al. (2011) A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 7:514.
18. Gasch AP, et al. (2001) Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol Biol Cell 12(10):2987-3003.
19. Sheth U, Parker R (2003) Decapping and decay of messenger RNA occur in cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science 300(5620):805-808.
20. Parker R, Sheth U (2007) P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol Cell 25(5):635-646.
21. Parker RR (2012) RNA degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisae. Genetics 191(3): 671-702.
22. Bergkessel M, Reese JC (2004) An essential role for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DEAD-box helicase DHH1 in G1/S DNA-damage checkpoint recovery. Genetics 167(1): 21-33.
23. Jung J-HJ, Kim JJ (2011) Accumulation of P-bodies in Candida albicans under different stress and filamentous growth conditions. Fungal Genet Biol 48(12):1116-1123.
24. Gaillard H, Aguilera A (2008) A novel class of mRNA-containing cytoplasmic granules are produced in response to UV-irradiation. Mol Biol Cell 19(11):4980-4992.
25. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH (1988) The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241(4863):317-322.
26. Spicakova T, McCann K, Brown JM (2008) A role for Lsmlp in response to ultravioletradiation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat Res 170(4):411-421.
27. Sommerhalter MM, et al. (2004) Structures of the yeast ribonucleotide reductase Rnr2 and Rnr4 homodimers. Biochemistry 43(24):7736-7742.
28. Yao R, et al. (2003) Subcellular localization of yeast ribonucleotide reductase regulated by the DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(11):6628-6633.
29. Chabes A, Stillman B (2007) Constitutively high dNTP concentration inhibits cell cycle progression and the DNA damage checkpoint in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(4):1183-1188.
30. Lee YD, Elledge SJ (2006) Control of ribonucleotide reductase localization through an anchoring mechanism involving Wtm1. Genes Dev 20:334-344.
31. Tang HMV, Siu KL, Wong CM, Jin DY (2009) Loss of yeast peroxiredoxin Tsa1p induces genome instability through activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and elevation of dNTP levels. PLoS Genet 5(10):e1000697.
32. Zaidi IW, et al. (2008) Rtt101 and Mms1 in budding yeast form a CUL4(DDB1)-like ubiquitin ligase that promotes replication through damaged DNA. EMBO Rep 9(10): 1034-1040.
33. Fujii K, Kitabatake M, Sakata T, Miyata A, Ohno M (2009) A role for ubiquitin in the clearance of nonfunctional rRNAs. Genes Dev 23(8):963-974.