Resilience of biochemical activity in protein domains in the face of structural divergence

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 92-103

  Zhang, Dapeng ^a   Iyer, Lakshminarayan M ^a   Burroughs, A Maxwell ^a   Aravind, L ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BETA SHEET; BIOCHEMISTRY; DIMERIZATION; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; MACROMOLECULE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84902526453     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.05.008     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. McGhee G.R. Convergent Evolution: Limited Forms Most Beautiful 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Benton M.J. Vertebrate Palaeontology 2009, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
3. Bork P., Sander C., Valencia A. Convergent evolution of similar enzymatic function on different protein folds: the hexokinase, ribokinase, and galactokinase families of sugar kinases. Protein Sci 1993, 2:31-40.
4. Graumann P., Marahiel M.A. A case of convergent evolution of nucleic acid binding modules. Bioessays 1996, 18:309-315.
5. Perona J.J., Hadd A. Structural diversity and protein engineering of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Biochemistry 2012, 51:8705-8729.
6. Majorek K.A., Dunin-Horkawicz S., Steczkiewicz K., Muszewska A., Nowotny M., Ginalski K., Bujnicki J.M. The RNase H-like superfamily: new members, comparative structural analysis and evolutionary classification. Nucleic Acids Res 2014.
7. Andreeva A., Howorth D., Chothia C., Kulesha E., Murzin A.G. SCOP2 prototype: a new approach to protein structure mining. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:D310-D314.
8. Cuff A.L., Sillitoe I., Lewis T., Clegg A.B., Rentzsch R., Furnham N., Pellegrini-Calace M., Jones D., Thornton J., Orengo C.A. Extending CATH: increasing coverage of the protein structure universe and linking structure with function. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D420-D426.
9. Dietmann S., Holm L. Identification of homology in protein structure classification. Nat Struct Biol 2001, 8:953-957.
10. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:3389-3402.
11. Eddy S.R. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform 2009, 23:205-211.
12. Soding J., Biegert A., Lupas A.N. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:W244-W248.
13. Todd A.E., Orengo C.A., Thornton J.M. Plasticity of enzyme active sites. Trends Biochem Sci 2002, 27:419-426.
14. Stark A., Sunyaev S., Russell R.B. A model for statistical significance of local similarities in structure. J Mol Biol 2003, 326:1307-1316.
15. Lupas A.N., Ponting C.P., Russell R.B. On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world?. J Struct Biol 2001, 134:191-203.
16. Kozbial P.Z., Mushegian A.R. Natural history of S-adenosylmethionine-binding proteins. BMC Struct Biol 2005, 5:19.
17. Gerlt J.A., Babbitt P.C., Jacobson M.P., Almo S.C. Divergent evolution in enolase superfamily: strategies for assigning functions. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:29-34.
18. Gerlt J.A., Babbitt P.C. Enzyme (re)design: lessons from natural evolution and computation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2009, 13:10-18.
19. Anantharaman V., Aravind L. Diversification of catalytic activities and ligand interactions in the protein fold shared by the sugar isomerases, eIF2B, DeoR transcription factors, acyl-CoA transferases and methenyltetrahydrofolate synthetase. J Mol Biol 2006, 356:823-842.
20. Murzin A.G. How far divergent evolution goes in proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998, 8:380-387.
21. Anantharaman V., Aravind L., Koonin E.V. Emergence of diverse biochemical activities in evolutionarily conserved structural scaffolds of proteins. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2003, 7:12-20.
22. Torrance J.W., Bartlett G.J., Porter C.T., Thornton J.M. Using a library of structural templates to recognise catalytic sites and explore their evolution in homologous families. J Mol Biol 2005, 347:565-581.
23. Stoddard B.L. Homing endonuclease structure and function. Q Rev Biophys 2005, 38:49-95.
24. Zhang D., Iyer L.M., Aravind L. A novel immunity system for bacterial nucleic acid degrading toxins and its recruitment in various eukaryotic and DNA viral systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:4532-4552.
25. Sokolowska M., Czapinska H., Bochtler M. Crystal structure of the beta beta alpha-Me type II restriction endonuclease Hpy99I with target DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:3799-3810.
26. Jinek M., Jiang F., Taylor D.W., Sternberg S.H., Kaya E., Ma E., Anders C., Hauer M., Zhou K., Lin S., et al. Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science 2014, 343:1247997.
27. Eastberg J.H., Eklund J., Monnat R., Stoddard B.L. Mutability of an HNH nuclease imidazole general base and exchange of a deprotonation mechanism. Biochemistry 2007, 46:7215-7225.
28. Meenan N.A., Sharma A., Fleishman S.J., Macdonald C.J., Morel B., Boetzel R., Moore G.R., Baker D., Kleanthous C. The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:10080-10085.
29. Love K.R., Catic A., Schlieker C., Ploegh H.L. Mechanisms, biology and inhibitors of deubiquitinating enzymes. Nat Chem Biol 2007, 3:697-705.
30. Iyer L.M., Koonin E.V., Aravind L. Novel predicted peptidases with a potential role in the ubiquitin signaling pathway. Cell Cycle 2004, 3:1440-1450.
31. Kitadokoro K., Kamitani S., Miyazawa M., Hanajima-Ozawa M., Fukui A., Miyake M., Horiguchi Y. Crystal structures reveal a thiol protease-like catalytic triad in the C-terminal region of Pasteurella multocida toxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:5139-5144.
32. Satoo K., Noda N.N., Kumeta H., Fujioka Y., Mizushima N., Ohsumi Y., Inagaki F. The structure of Atg4B-LC3 complex reveals the mechanism of LC3 processing and delipidation during autophagy. EMBO J 2009, 28:1341-1350.
33. Xu Q., Chiu H.J., Farr C.L., Jaroszewski L., Knuth M.W., Miller M.D., Lesley S.A., Godzik A., Elsliger M.A., Deacon A.M., et al. Structures of a bifunctional cell wall hydrolase CwlT containing a novel bacterial lysozyme and an NlpC/P60 DL-endopeptidase. J Mol Biol 2014, 426:169-184.
34. Grishin N.V. Phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase: a link between protein kinase and glutathione synthase folds. J Mol Biol 1999, 291:239-247.
35. Brown A.M., Hoopes S.L., White R.H., Sarisky C.A. Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme. Biol Direct 2011, 6:63.
36. Levdikov V.M., Barynin V.V., Grebenko A.I., Melik-Adamyan W.R., Lamzin V.S., Wilson K.S. The structure of SAICAR synthase: an enzyme in the de novo pathway of purine nucleotide biosynthesis. Structure 1998, 6:363-376.
37. Shi K., Houston D.R., Berghuis A.M. Crystal structures of antibiotic-bound complexes of aminoglycoside 2″-phosphotransferase IVa highlight the diversity in substrate binding modes among aminoglycoside kinases. Biochemistry 2011, 50:6237-6244.
38. Stogios P.J., Shakya T., Evdokimova E., Savchenko A., Wright G.D. Structure and function of APH(4)-Ia, a hygromycin B resistance enzyme. J Biol Chem 2011, 286:1966-1975.
39. Widmann B., Wandrey F., Badertscher L., Wyler E., Pfannstiel J., Zemp I., Kutay U. The kinase activity of human Rio1 is required for final steps of cytoplasmic maturation of 40S subunits. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:22-35.
40. LaRonde-LeBlanc N., Wlodawer A. Crystal structure of A. fulgidus Rio2 defines a new family of serine protein kinases. Structure 2004, 12:1585-1594.
41. Williams R., Berndt A., Miller S., Hon W.C., Zhang X. Form and flexibility in phosphoinositide 3-kinases. Biochem Soc Trans 2009, 37:615-626.
42. Taylor S.S., Kornev A.P. Protein kinases: evolution of dynamic regulatory proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2011, 36:65-77.
43. Iyer L.M., Zhang D., Rogozin I.B., Aravind L. Evolution of the deaminase fold and multiple origins of eukaryotic editing and mutagenic nucleic acid deaminases from bacterial toxin systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:9473-9497.
44. Conticello S.G. The AID/APOBEC family of nucleic acid mutators. Genome Biol 2008, 9:229.
45. Prochnow C., Bransteitter R., Klein M.G., Goodman M.F., Chen X.S. The APOBEC-2 crystal structure and functional implications for the deaminase AID. Nature 2007, 445:447-451.
46. Newman M., Murray-Rust J., Lally J., Rudolf J., Fadden A., Knowles P.P., White M.F., McDonald N.Q. Structure of an XPF endonuclease with and without DNA suggests a model for substrate recognition. EMBO J 2005, 24:895-905.
47. Aravind L., Makarova K.S., Koonin E.V. Holliday junction resolvases and related nucleases: identification of new families, phyletic distribution and evolutionary trajectories. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:3417-3432.
48. Shen B.W., Xu D., Chan S.H., Zheng Y., Zhu Z., Xu S.Y., Stoddard B.L. Characterization and crystal structure of the type IIG restriction endonuclease RM.BpuSI. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:8223-8236.
49. Khorasanizadeh S. Recognition of methylated histones: new twists and variations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011, 21:744-749.
50. Sanchez R., Zhou M.M. The PHD finger: a versatile epigenome reader. Trends Biochem Sci 2011, 36:364-372.
51. He F., Umehara T., Saito K., Harada T., Watanabe S., Yabuki T., Kigawa T., Takahashi M., Kuwasako K., Tsuda K., et al. Structural insight into the zinc finger CW domain as a histone modification reader. Structure 2010, 18:1127-1139.
52. Kim D., Blus B.J., Chandra V., Huang P., Rastinejad F., Khorasanizadeh S. Corecognition of DNA and a methylated histone tail by the MSL3 chromodomain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010, 17:1027-1029.
53. Iyer L.M., Makarova K.S., Koonin E.V., Aravind L. Comparative genomics of the FtsK-HerA superfamily of pumping ATPases: implications for the origins of chromosome segregation, cell division and viral capsid packaging. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:5260-5279.
54. Taylor G.K., Heiter D.F., Pietrokovski S., Stoddard B.L. Activity, specificity and structure of I-Bth0305I: a representative of a new homing endonuclease family. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:9705-9719.
55. Dynan W., Fox K., Stoddard B. Editorial: NAR surveys the past, present and future of restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:1-2.
56. Kinch L.N., Ginalski K., Rychlewski L., Grishin N.V. Identification of novel restriction endonuclease-like fold families among hypothetical proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:3598-3605.
57. Zhang D., de Souza R.F., Anantharaman V., Iyer L.M., Aravind L. Polymorphic toxin systems: comprehensive characterization of trafficking modes, processing, mechanisms of action, immunity and ecology using comparative genomics. Biol Direct 2012, 7:18.
58. Ng C.L., Lang K., Meenan N.A., Sharma A., Kelley A.C., Kleanthous C., Ramakrishnan V. Structural basis for 16S ribosomal RNA cleavage by the cytotoxic domain of colicin E3. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010, 17:1241-1246.
59. Miallau L., Jain P., Arbing M.A., Cascio D., Phan T., Ahn C.J., Chan S., Chernishof I., Maxson M., Chiang J., et al. Comparative proteomics identifies the cell-associated lethality of M. tuberculosis RelBE-like toxin-antitoxin complexes. Structure 2013, 21:627-637.
60. Boggild A., Sofos N., Andersen K.R., Feddersen A., Easter A.D., Passmore L.A., Brodersen D.E. The crystal structure of the intact E. coli RelBE toxin-antitoxin complex provides the structural basis for conditional cooperativity. Structure 2012, 20:1641-1648.
61. Renzi F., Caffarelli E., Laneve P., Bozzoni I., Brunori M., Vallone B. The structure of the endoribonuclease XendoU: from small nucleolar RNA processing to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:12365-12370.
62. Yang W. Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism. Q Rev Biophys 2011, 44:1-93.
63. Anantharaman V., Makarova K.S., Burroughs A.M., Koonin E.V., Aravind L. Comprehensive analysis of the HEPN superfamily: identification of novel roles in intra-genomic conflicts, defense, pathogenesis and RNA processing. Biol Direct 2013, 8:15.
64. Klaiman D., Steinfels-Kohn E., Krutkina E., Davidov E., Kaufmann G. The wobble nucleotide-excising anticodon nuclease RloC is governed by the zinc-hook and DNA-dependent ATPase of its Rad50-like region. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:8568-8578.
65. Meineke B., Shuman S. Determinants of the cytotoxicity of PrrC anticodon nuclease and its amelioration by tRNA repair. RNA 2012, 18:145-154.
66. Niewoehner O., Jinek M., Doudna J.A. Evolution of CRISPR RNA recognition and processing by Cas6 endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:1341-1353.
67. Reeks J., Naismith J.H., White M.F. CRISPR interference: a structural perspective. Biochem J 2013, 453:155-166.
68. Makarova K.S., Aravind L., Wolf Y.I., Koonin E.V. Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct 2011, 6:38.
69. Peisajovich S.G., Rockah L., Tawfik D.S. Evolution of new protein topologies through multistep gene rearrangements. Nat Genet 2006, 38:168-174.
70. Polekhina G., Board P.G., Gali R.R., Rossjohn J., Parker M.W. Molecular basis of glutathione synthetase deficiency and a rare gene permutation event. EMBO J 1999, 18:3204-3213.
71. Iyer L.M., Abhiman S., Maxwell Burroughs A., Aravind L. Amidoligases with ATP-grasp, glutamine synthetase-like and acetyltransferase-like domains: synthesis of novel metabolites and peptide modifications of proteins. Mol Biosyst 2009, 5:1636-1660.
72. Grishin N.V. KH domain: one motif, two folds. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29:638-643.
73. Tu C., Zhou X., Tropea J.E., Austin B.P., Waugh D.S., Court D.L., Ji X. Structure of ERA in complex with the 3' end of 16S rRNA: implications for ribosome biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:14843-14848.
74. Balaji S., Aravind L. The RAGNYA fold: a novel fold with multiple topological variants found in functionally diverse nucleic acid, nucleotide and peptide-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:5658-5671.
75. Nandakumar J., Shuman S., Lima C.D. RNA ligase structures reveal the basis for RNA specificity and conformational changes that drive ligation forward. Cell 2006, 127:71-84.
76. Burroughs A.M., Aravind L. A highly conserved family of domains related to the DNA-glycosylase fold helps predict multiple novel pathways for RNA modifications. RNA Biol 2014, 11.
77. Petrey D., Fischer M., Honig B. Structural relationships among proteins with different global topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:17377-17382.
78. Makarova K.S., Anantharaman V., Grishin N.V., Koonin E.V., Aravind L. CARF and WYL domains: ligand-binding regulators of prokaryotic defense systems. Front Genet 2014, 5:102.
79. Kim Y.K., Kim Y.G., Oh B.H. Crystal structure and nucleic acid-binding activity of the CRISPR-associated protein Csx1 of Pyrococcus furiosus. Proteins 2013, 81:261-270.
80. Lintner N.G., Frankel K.A., Tsutakawa S.E., Alsbury D.L., Copie V., Young M.J., Tainer J.A., Lawrence C.M. The structure of the CRISPR-associated protein Csa3 provides insight into the regulation of the CRISPR/Cas system. J Mol Biol 2011, 405:939-955.
81. Das D., Finn R.D., Abdubek P., Astakhova T., Axelrod H.L., Bakolitsa C., Cai X., Carlton D., Chen C., Chiu H.J., et al. The crystal structure of a bacterial Sufu-like protein defines a novel group of bacterial proteins that are similar to the N-terminal domain of human Sufu. Protein Sci 2010, 19:2131-2140.
82. Beck C.M., Morse R.P., Cunningham D.A., Iniguez A., Low D.A., Goulding C.W., Hayes C.S. CdiA from enterobacter cloacae delivers a toxic ribosomal RNase into target bacteria. Structure 2014, 22:707-718.
83. Hayes F., Van Melderen L. Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2011, 46:386-408.
84. Leplae R., Geeraerts D., Hallez R., Guglielmini J., Dreze P., Van Melderen L. Diversity of bacterial type II toxin-antitoxin systems: a comprehensive search and functional analysis of novel families. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:5513-5525.
85. McCurley N., Hirano M., Das S., Cooper M.D. Immune related genes underpin the evolution of adaptive immunity in jawless vertebrates. Curr Genomics 2012, 13:86-94.
86. Wang F., Ekiert D.C., Ahmad I., Yu W., Zhang Y., Bazirgan O., Torkamani A., Raudsepp T., Mwangi W., Criscitiello M.F., et al. Reshaping antibody diversity. Cell 2013, 153:1379-1393.
87. Aravind L., Anantharaman V., Zhang D., de Souza R.F., Iyer L.M. Gene flow and biological conflict systems in the origin and evolution of eukaryotes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2012, 2:89.
88. Hashimoto H., Pais J.E., Zhang X., Saleh L., Fu Z.Q., Dai N., Correa I.R., Zheng Y., Cheng X. Structure of a Naegleria Tet-like dioxygenase in complex with 5-methylcytosine DNA. Nature 2014, 506:391-395.
89. Hu L., Li Z., Cheng J., Rao Q., Gong W., Liu M., Shi Y.G., Zhu J., Wang P., Xu Y. Crystal structure of TET2-DNA complex: insight into TET-mediated 5mC oxidation. Cell 2013, 155:1545-1555.
90. Honig B. Protein structure space is much more than the sum of its folds. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007, 14:458.