Multiparametric analysis of screening data: Growing beyond the single dimension to infinity and beyond

Journal of Biomolecular Screening

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 628-639

  Abraham, Yann ^a   Zhang, Xian ^a   Parker, Christian N ^a  

^a NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cell based screening; High content screening; Machine learning; Multiparametric data analysis; Multiparametric visualization

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; RNA;

CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; IMAGING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLITE; METABOLOMICS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MULTIPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS; PARAMETERS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SCREENING; TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATASETS AS TOPIC; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; MACHINE LEARNING; PHENOTYPE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEINS; RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84902203637     PISSN: 10870571     EISSN: 1552454X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1087057114524987     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Tsiper, M. V.; Sturgis, J.; Avramova, L. V.; et al. Differential Mitochondrial Toxicity Screening and Multi-Parametric Data Analysis. PloS One 2012, 7 (10), e45226.
2. Basford, C.; Forraz, N.; McGuckin, C. Optimized Multiparametric Immunophenotyping of Umbilical Cord Blood Cells by Flow Cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5 (7), 1337-1346.
3. Kim, S. H.; Bang, S. H.; Park, S. A.; et al. Character Comparison of Abdomen-Derived and Eyelid-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cell Prolif. 2013, 46 (3), 291-299.
4. Bendall, S. C.; Simonds, E. F.; Qiu, P.; et al. Single-Cell Mass Cytometry of Differential Immune and Drug Responses Across a Human Hematopoietic Continuum. Science 2011, 332 (6030), 687-696.
5. Rauch, A.; Gossye, V.; Bracke, D.; et al. An Anti- Inflammatory Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator Preserves Osteoblast Differentiation. FASEB J. 2011, 25 (4), 1323-1332.
6. Braxton, S.; Bedilion, T. The Integration of Microarray Information in the Drug Development Process. Curr. Opin Biotech. 1998, 9 (6), 643-649.
7. Jimenez-Guri, E.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Cozzuto, L.; et al. Comparative Transcriptomics of Early Dipteran Development. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 123.
8. Scherer, A.; Dai, M.; Meng, F. Impact of Experimental Noise and Annotation Imprecision on Data Quality in MicroarrayExperiments. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 972, 155-176.
9. Peck, D.; Crawford, E. D.; Ross, K. N.; et al. A Method for High-Throughput gene Expression Signature Analysis. Genome Biol. 2006, 7 (7), R61.
10. Choi, N. W.; Kim, J.; Chapin, S. C.; et al. Multiplexed Detection of mRNA Using Porosity-Tuned Hydrogel Microparticles. Anal. Chm. 2012, 84 (21), 9370-9378.
11. Flagella, M.; Bui, S.; Zheng, Z.; et al. A Multiplex Branched DNA Assay for Parallel Quantitative gene Expression Profiling. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 352 (1), 50-60.
12. Metzger, D. C.; Luckenbach, J. A.; Dickey, J. T.; et al. Development of a Multiplex gene Expression Assay for Components of the Endocrine Growth Axis in Coho Salmon. Gen. Comp. Endocrin. 2013, 189, 134-140.
13. Nigsch, F.; Hutz, J.; Cornett, B.; et al. Determination of Minimal Transcriptional Signatures of Compounds for Target Prediction. EURASIP J. 2012, 2012 (1), 2.
14. Vogel, C.; Marcotte, E. M. Insights into the Regulation of Protein Abundance from Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses. Nature Rev. Genetics 2012, 13 (4), 227-232.
15. Van Riper, S. K.; de Jong, E. P.; Carlis, J. V.; et al. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: Basic Principles and Emerging Technologies and Directions. Adv. Exper. Med. Biol. 2013, 990, 1-35.
16. van Oostrum, J.; Calonder, C.; Rechsteiner, D.; et al. Tracing Pathway Activities with Kinase Inhibitors and Reverse Phase Protein Arrays. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2009, 3 (4), 412-422.
17. Carragher, N. O.; Brunton, V. G.; Frame, M. C. Combining Imaging and Pathway Profiling: An Alternative Approach to Cancer Drug Discovery. Drug Disc. Today 2012, 17 (5-6), 203-214.
18. Wunderlich, M. L.; Dodge, M. E.; Dhawan, R. K.; et al. Multiplexed Fluorometric Immunoassay Testing Methodology and Troubleshooting. J. Visual. Exper. 2011, 10.3791/3715 (58).
19. Edwards, B. S.; Kuckuck, F. W.; Prossnitz, E. R.; et al. HTPS Flow Cytometry: A Novel Platform for Automated High Throughput Drug Discovery and Characterization. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2001, 6 (2), 83-90.
20. Florian, A. E.; Lepensky, C. K.; Kwon, O.; et al. Flow Cytometry Enables a High-Throughput Homogeneous Fluorescent Antibody-Binding Assay for Cytotoxic T Cell Lytic Granule Exocytosis. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2013, 18 (4), 420-429.
21. Gregori, G.; Patsekin, V.; Rajwa, B.; et al. Hyperspectral Cytometry at the Single-Cell Level Using a 32-Channel Photodetector. Cytometry Pt. A 2012, 81 (1), 35-44.
22. Bodenmiller, B.; Zunder, E. R.; Finck, R.; et al. Multiplexed Mass Cytometry Profiling of Cellular States Perturbed by Small-Molecule Regulators. Nature Biotech. 2012, 30 (9), 858-867.
23. Zhang, A.; Sun, H.; Wang, X. Saliva Metabolomics Opens Door to Biomarker Discovery, Disease Diagnosis, and Treatment. App. Biochem. Biotech. 2012, 168 (6), 1718-1727.
24. Zhang, A. H.; Sun, H.; Han, Y.; et al. Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Based Comprehensive Metabolomics Combined with Pattern Recognition and Network Analysis Methods for Characterization of Metabolites and Metabolic Pathways from Biological Data Sets. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85 (15), 7606-7612.
25. Poroyko, V.; Morowitz, M.; Bell, T.; et al. Diet Creates Metabolic Niches in the "Inmature Gut" That Shape Microbial Communities. Nutr. Hosp. 2011, 26 (6), 1283-1295.
26. Perlman, Z. E.; Slack, M. D.; Feng, Y.; et al. Multidimensional Drug Profiling by Automated Microscopy. Science 2004, 306 (5699), 1194-1198.
27. Feng, Y.; Mitchison, T. J.; Bender, A.; et al. Multi-Parameter Phenotypic Profiling: Using Cellular Effects to Characterize Small-Molecule Compounds. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8 (7), 567-578.
28. Snijder, B.; Sacher, R.; Ramo, P.; et al. Single-Cell Analysis of Population Context Advances RNAi Screening at Multiple Levels. Molec. Sys. Biol. 2012, 8, 579.
29. Magness, S. T.; Puthoff, B. J.; Crissey, M. A.; et al. A Multi-Center Study to Standardize Reporting and Analyses of Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorted Murine Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Physiol. 2013, 10.1152/ajpgi.00481.2012.
30. Hahne, F.; LeMeur, N.; Brinkman, R. R.; et al. flowCore: A Bioconductor Package for High Throughput Flow Cytometry. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10.
31. Lo, K.; Hahne, F.; Brinkman, R. R.; et al. flowClust: A Bioconductor Package for Automated Gating of Flow Cytometry Data. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10, 145.
32. Ibig-Rehm, Y.; Gotte, M.; Gabriel, D.; et al. High-Content Screening to Distinguish between Attachment and Post- Attachment Steps of Human Cytomegalovirus Entry into Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells. Antiviral Res. 2011, 89 (3), 246-256.
33. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning; Springer: New York, 2008.
34. Fuchs, F.; Pau, G.; Kranz, D.; et al. Clustering Phenotype Populations by Genome-Wide RNAi and Multiparametric Imaging. Molec. Sys. Biol. 2010, 6, 370.
35. Linderman, M. D.; Bjornson, Z.; Simonds, E. F.; et al. CytoSPADE: High-Performance Analysis and Visualization of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28 (18), 2400-2401.
36. Saeys, Y.; Inza, I.; Larranaga, P. A Review of Feature Selection Techniques in Bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2007, 23 (19), 2507-2517. (Pubitemid 350048351)
37. Tarca, A. L.; Carey, V. J.; Chen, X. W.; et al. Machine Learning and Its Applications to Biology. Plos Comput. Biol. 2007, 3 (6), 953-963.
38. Tanaka, M.; Bateman, R.; Rauh, D.; et al. An Unbiased Cell Morphology-Based Screen for New, Biologically Active Small Molecules. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3 (5), e128.
39. Young, D. W.; Bender, A.; Hoyt, J.; et al. Integrating High- Content Screening and Ligand-Target Prediction to Identify Mechanism of Action. Nature Chem. Biol. 2008, 4 (1), 59-68.
40. Loo, L. H.; Wu, L. F.; Altschuler, S. J. Image-Based Multivariate Profiling of Drug Responses from Single Cells. Nature Meth. 2007, 4 (5), 445-453. (Pubitemid 46901279)
41. Durr, O.; Duval, F.; Nichols, A.; et al. Robust Hit Identification by Quality Assurance and Multivariate Data Analysis of a High-Content, Cell-Based Assay. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2007, 12 (8), 1042-1049.
42. Caie, P. D.; Walls, R. E.; Ingleston-Orme, A.; et al. High- Content Phenotypic Profiling of Drug Response Signatures across Distinct Cancer Cells. Molec. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9 (6), 1913-1926.
43. Glory, E.; Murphy, R. F. Automated Subcellular Location Determination and High-Throughput Microscopy. Devel. Cell 2007, 12 (1), 7-16.
44. Hutz, J. E.; Nelson, T.; Wu, H.; et al. The Multidimensional Perturbation Value: A Single Metric to Measure Similarity and Activity of Treatments in High-Throughput Multidimensional Screens. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2013, 18 (4), 367-377.
45. Adams, C. L.; Kutsyy, V.; Coleman, D. A.; et al. Compound Classification Using Image-Based Cellular Phenotypes. Meth. Enzym. 2006, 414, 440-468.
46. Petrone, P. M.; Simms, B.; Nigsch, F.; et al. Rethinking Molecular Similarity: Comparing Compounds on the Basis of Biological Activity. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7 (8), 1399-1409.
47. Reshef, D. N.; Reshef, Y. A.; Finucane, H. K.; et al. DetectingNovel Associations in Large Data Sets. Science 2011, 334 (6062), 1518-1524.
48. Szekely, G. J.; Rizzo, M. L.; Bakirov, N. K. Measuring and Testing Dependence by Correlation of Distances. Ann. Stat. 2007, 35 (6), 2769-2794.
49. Reisen, F.; Zhang, X.; Gabriel, D.; et al. Benchmarking of Multivariate Similarity Measures for High-content screening Fingerprints in Phenotypic Drug Discovery. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2013, 18 (10), 1284-1297.
50. Neumann, B.; Walter, T.; Heriche, J. K.; et al. Phenotypic Profiling of the Human Genome by Time-Lapse Microscopy Reveals Cell Division genes. Nature 2010, 464 (7289), 721-727.
51. Fix, E.; Hodges, J. L. Discriminatory Analysis. Nonparametric Discrimination: Consistency Properties. Intl. Stat. Rev.1989, 57 (3), 238-247.
52. Kummel, A.; Gubler, H.; Gehin, P.; et al. Integration of Multiple Readouts into the Z' Factor for Assay Quality Assessment. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2010, 15 (1), 95-101.
53. Wang, J.; Zhou, X.; Bradley, P. L.; et al. Cellular Phenotype Recognition for High-Content RNA Interference Genome- Wide Screening. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2008, 13 (1), 29-39.
54. Horvath, P.; Wild, T.; Kutay, U.; et al. Machine Learning Improves the Precision and Robustness of High-Content Screens: Using Nonlinear Multiparametric Methods to Analyze Screening Results. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2011, 16 (9), 1059-1067.
55. Statnikov, A.; Wang, L.; Aliferis, C. F. A Comprehensive Comparison of Random Forests and Support Vector Machines for Microarray-Based Cancer Classification. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9, 319.
56. Du, J.; Rozowsky, J. S.; Korbel, J. O.; et al. A Supervised Hidden Markov Model Framework for Efficiently Segmenting Tiling Array Data in Transcriptional and chIP- chip Experiments: Systematically Incorporating Validated Biological Knowledge. Bioinformatics 2006, 22 (24), 3016-3024.
57. Jensen, L. J.; Bateman, A. The Rise and Fall of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques. Bioinformatics 2011, 27 (24), 3331-3332.
58. Wilkins, M. F.; Hardy, S. A.; Boddy, L.; et al. Comparison of Five Clustering Algorithms to Classify Phytoplankton from Flow Cytometry Data. Cytometry 2001, 44 (3), 210-217.
59. Kummel, A.; Selzer, P.; Siebert, D.; et al. Differentiation and Visualization of Diverse Cellular Phenotypic Responses in Primary High-Content Screening. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2012, 17 (6), 843-849.
60. Nugent, R.; Meila, M. An Overview of Clustering Applied to Molecular Biology. Methods Molec. Biol. 2010, 620, 369-404.
61. Bezdek, J. C.; Pal, N. R. Some New Indexes of Cluster Validity. IEEE T. Syst. Man. Cy. B 1998, 28 (3), 301-315.
62. Ljosa, V.; Caie, P. D.; Ter Horst, R.; et al. Comparison of Methods for Image-Based Profiling of Cellular Morphological Responses to Small-Molecule Treatment. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2013, 10.1177/1087057113503553.
63. de Oliveira, M. C. F.; Levkowitz, H. From Visual Data Exploration to Visual Data Mining: A Survey. IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr. 2003, 9 (3), 378-394.
64. Keim, D. A.; Kriegel, H. P. Visualization Techniques for Mining Large Databases: A Comparison. IEEE T. Knowl. Data En. 1996, 8 (6), 923-938.
65. Pearson, K. On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space. Philosophical Magazine 1901, 2 (11), 559-572.
66. Hinton, G. E.; Roweis, S. T. Stochastic Neighbor Embedding. Adv. Neur. Info. Proc. Sys. 2002, 833-840.
67. Amir el, A. D.; Davis, K. L.; Tadmor, M. D.; et al. viSNE Enables Visualization of High Dimensional Single-Cell Data and Reveals Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Leukemia. Nature Biotech. 2013, 31 (6), 545-552.
68. Chernoff, H. Use of Faces to Represent Points in K-Dimensional Space Graphically. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1973, 68 (342), 361-368.
69. Pickett, R. M.; Grinstein, G. Iconographic Displays for Visualizing Multidimensional Data. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Sys. Man Cyber. 1988, 1, 514-519.
70. Gehlenborg, N.; Brazma, A. Visualization of Large Microarray Experiments with Space Maps. BMC Bioinformatics 2009,10, O7.
71. Anders, S. Visualization of Genomic Data with the Hilbert Curve. Bioinformatics 2009, 25 (10), 1231-1235.
72. Duncan, J. Selective Attention and the Organization of Visual Information. J. Exper. Psych. Gen. 1984, 113 (4), 501-517.
73. Cleveland, W. S.; Mcgill, R. Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1984, 79 (387), 531-554.
74. Hoffman, P.; Grinstein, G.; Pinkey, D. Dimensional Anchors: A Graphic Primitive for Multidimensional Multivariate Information Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 1999 Workshop on New Paradigms in Information Visualization and Manipulation in Conjunction with the Eighth ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Kansas City, MO, Nov 2-6, 1999; Ebert, D. S., Shaw, C. D. Eds.; ACM: New York, 1999; pp 9-16.
75. Di Caro, L.; Frias-Martinez, V.; Frias-Martinez, E. Analyzing the Role of Dimension Arrangement for Data Visualization in Radviz. In Proceedings of the 14th Pacific- Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Hyderabad, India, June 21-24, 2010; Zaki, M. J., Zu, J. X., Ravindran, B., Eds.; Springer: New York, 2010; pp 125-132.
76. McCarthy, J. F.; Marx, K. A.; Hoffman, P. E.; et al. Applications of Machine Learning and High-Dimensional Visualization in Cancer Detection, Diagnosis, and Management. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2004, 1020, 239-262.
77. Sharko, J.; Grinstein, G.; Marx, K. A. Vectorized Radviz and Its Application to Multiple Cluster Datasets. IEEE T. Vis.Comput. Gr. 2008, 14 (6), 1444-1451.
78. Zhang, J. H.; Chung, T. D. Y.; Oldenburg, K. R. A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. J. Biomolec. Screen. 1999, 4 (2), 67-73.
79. Shun, T. Y.; Lazo, J. S.; Sharlow, E. R.; et al. Identifying Actives from HTS Data Sets: Practical Approaches for theSelection of an Appropriate HTS Data-Processing Method and Quality Control Review. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2011, 16 (1), 1-14.
80. Iversen, P. W.; Eastwood, B. J.; Sittampalam, G. S.; et al. A Comparison of Assay Performance Measures in Screening Assays: Signal Window, Z' Factor, and Assay Variability Ratio. J. Biomolec. Screen. 2006, 11 (3), 247-252.
81. Sittampalam, G. S.; Iversen, P. W.; Boadt, J. A.; et al. Design of Signal Windows in High Throughput Screening Assays for Drug Discovery. J. Biomolec. Screen. 1997, 2 (3), 159-169.
82. Mazur, S.; Kozak, K. Z' Factor including siRNA Design Quality Parameter in RNAi Screening Experiments. RNA Biol. 2012, 9 (5), 624-632.
83. Kozak, K.; Csucs, G. Kernelized Z' Factor in Multiparametric Screening Technology. RNA BIol. 2010, 7 (5), 615-620.
84. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Eisen, M. B.; et al. "gene Shaving" as a Method for Identifying Distinct Sets of genes with Similar Expression Patterns. Genome Biol. 2000, 1 (2), RESEARCH0003.
85. Schreyer, S. K.; Parker, C. N.; Maggiora, G. M. Data Shaving: A Focused Screening Approach. J. Chem. Info. Comp. Sci. 2004, 44 (2), 470-479.
86. Chen, R.; Mias, G. I.; Li-Pook-Than, J.; et al. Personal Omics Profiling Reveals Dynamic Molecular and Medical Phenotypes. Cell 2012, 148 (6), 1293-1307.