Modelling of industrial biopharmaceutical multicomponent chromatography

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1304-1314

  Close, Edward J ^a   Salm, Jeffrey R ^b   Bracewell, Daniel G ^a   Sorensen, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatography modelling; Hydrophobic interaction chromatography; Process systems modelling; Purification process development; Quality by design; Therapeutic protein

Indexed keywords

DIMERS; FORECASTING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MONOMERS; PURIFICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REMOVAL;

HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; PROCESS SYSTEM; PURIFICATION PROCESS; QUALITY BY DESIGNS; THERAPEUTIC PROTEIN;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84901807495     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Borg N., Westerberg K., Andersson N., von Lieres E., Nilsson N. Effects of uncertainties in experimental conditions on the estimation of adsorption model parameters in preparative chromatography. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2013, 55:148-157.
2. Brooks C.A., Cramer S.M. Steric mass-action ion exchange: displacement profiles and induced salt gradients. AIChE J. 1992, 38:1969-1978.
3. Coffman J.L., Kramarczyk J.F., Kelley B.D. High-throughput screening of chromatographic seperations: 1. Method development and column modeling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100:605-618.
4. Degerman M., Jakobsson N., Nilsson B. Constrained optimization of a preperative ion-exchange step for antibody purification. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1113:92-100.
5. Degerman M., Jakobsson N., Nilsson B. Modeling and optimization of preperative reversed-phase liquid chromatography for insulin purification. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1162:41-49.
6. Degerman M., Westerberg K., Nilsson B. A model-based approach to determine the design space of preparative chromatography. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32:1195-1202.
7. Gerontas S., Asplund M., Hjorth R., Bracewell D.G. Integration of scale-down experimentation and general rate modelling to predict manufacturing scale chromatographic seperations. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:6917-6926.
8. Gétaz D., Stroehleina G., Butté A., Morbidelli Model-based design of peptide chromatographic purification processes. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1284:69-79.
9. Gétaz D., Butté A., Morbidelli M. Model-based design space determination of peptide chromatographicpurification processes. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1284:80-87.
10. Guiochon G., Goldshan-Shirazi S., Katti A.M. Fundamentals of Preparative and Non-linear Chromatography 1994, Academic Press, Boston.
11. Guiochon G. Review: preparative liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 965:129-161.
12. Jakobsson N., Degerman M., Nilsson B. Optimization and robustness analysis of a hydrophobic interaction chromatography step. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1063:99-109.
13. Jiang C., Flansburg L., Ghose S., Jorjorian P., Shukla A. Defining process design space for a hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) purification step: application of quality by design (QbD) principles. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107:985-997.
14. Karlson D., Jakobsson N., Axelsson A., Nilsson B. Model-based optimization of a preperative ion-exchange step for antibody purification. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1055:29-39.
15. Kaczmarski K., Antos D., Sajonz H., Sajonz P., Guiochon G. Comparitive modeling of breakthrough curves of bovine serum albumin in anion-exchange chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 925:1-17.
16. Kaczmarski K., Cavazzini A., Szabelski P., Zhou D., Liu X., Guiochon G. Application of the general rate model and the generalized Maxwell-Stefan equation to the study of the mass transfer kinetics of a pair of enantiomers. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 962:57-67.
17. Kelley B.D. Review: very large scale monoclonal antibody purification: the case for conventional unit operations. Biotechnol. Prog. 2007, 23:995-1008.
18. Kelley B.D. Industrialization of mAb production technology. mAbs 2009, 1:443-452.
19. Lightfoot E.N., Moscariello J.S. Bioseparations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 87:259-273.
20. McCue J.T., Engel P., Ng A., Macniven R., Thömmes J. Modeling of protein/aggregate purification and separation using hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 31:261-275.
21. McCue J.T., Cecchini D., Chu C., Liu W., Spann A. Application of a two-dimensional model for predicting the pressure-flow and compression properties during column packing scale-up. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1145:89-101.
22. Melter L., Butte A., Morbidelli M. Preperative weak cation-exchange chromatography of monoclonal antibody variants: 1. Single component adsorption. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1200:156-165.
23. Mollerup J.M., Hansen T.B., Kidal S., Sejergaard L., Hansen E., Staby A. Development, modelling, optimisation and scale-up of chromatographic purification of a therapeutic protein. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2007, 261:133-139.
24. Mollerup J.M. A review of the thermodynamics of protein association to ligands, protein adsorption, and adsorption isotherms. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2008, 31:864-874.
25. Mollerup J.M., Hansen T.B., Kidal S., Sejergaard L., Hansen E., Staby A. Use of quality by the design for the modelling of chromatographic seperations. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 2009, 32:1577-1597.
26. Muller-Spath T., Strolein G., Aumann L., Kornmann H., Valax P., Delegrange L., Charbaut E., Baer G., Lamproye A., Johnck M., Schulte M., Morbidelli M. Model simulation and experimental validation of a cation exchange IgG capture step in batch and continuous chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:5195-5204.
27. Nagrath D., Xia F., Cramer S.M. Characterization and modeling of nonlinear hydrophobic interaction chromatographic systems. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:1219-1226.
28. Nfor B.K., Ahamed T., van Dedem G.W.K., Verhaert P.D.E.M., van der Wielen L.A.M., Eppink M.H.M., van de Sandt E.J.A.X., Ottens M. Model-based rational methodology for protein purification process synthesis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 89:185-195.
29. Ng C.K.S., Osuna-Sanchez H., Valery E., Sørensen E., Bracewell D.G. Design of high productivity antibody capture by protein A chromatography using an integrated experimental and modeling approach. J. Chromatogr. B 2012, 899:116-126.
30. Osberghaus A., Drechsel K., Hansen S., Hepbildikler S.K., Nath S., Haindl M., vonLieres E., Hubbuch J. Model-integrated process development demonstrated on the optimization of a robotic cation exchange step. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 76:129-139.
31. Osberghaus A., Hepbildikler S., Nath S., Haindl M., von Lieres E., Hubbuch J. Optimizing a chromatographic three component separation: a comparison of mechanistic and empiric modeling approaches. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1237:86-95.
32. Persson P., Gustavsson P.E., Zacchi G., Nilsson B. Aspects of estimating dependencies in a detailed chromatography model based on frontal experiments. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:1812-1821.
33. Process Systems Enterprise gPROMS 2013, www.psenterprise.com/gproms.
34. Seidel-Morgenstern A. Review: experimental determination of single solute and competitive adsorption isotherms. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1037:255-272.
35. Shukla A.A., Hubbard B., Tressel T., Guhan S., Low D. Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies - application of platform approaches. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 848:28-39.
36. Susanto A., Wekenborg K., Hubbuch J., Schmidt-Traub H. Developing a chromatographic column model for bovine serum albumin on strong anion-exchange Source30Q using data from confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1137:63-75.
37. Steinmeyer D.E., McCormick E.L. The art of antibody process development. Drug Discov. Today 2008, 13:613-618.
38. Synder L.R., Kirkland J.J. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography 2008, Wiley, New York.
39. Teoh H., Turner M., Titchener-Hooker N., Sorensen E. Experimental verification and optimisation of a detailed dynamic high performance liquid chromatography column model. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2001, 25:893-903.
40. US Food and Drug Administration Guidance for industry; Q8 pharmaceutical development 2006.