PRDM14: A unique regulator for pluripotency and epigenetic reprogramming

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 289-298

  Nakaki, Fumio ^a,c   Saitou, Mitinori ^a,b,c,d  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Epigenetic reprogramming; Global DNA demethylation; Pluripotency; Pluripotent stem cells; PRDM14; Primordial germ cells

Indexed keywords

B LYMPHOCYTE INDUCED MATURATION PROTEIN 1; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; HISTONE METHYLTRANSFERASE; RETINOBLASTOMA BINDING PROTEIN; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN; PRDM14 PROTEIN, HUMAN; PRDM14 PROTEIN, MOUSE; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL FUNCTION; DEMETHYLATION; DNA METHYLATION; ECTODERM; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETIC REPROGRAMMING; EPIGENETICS; GENE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC REGULATION; HUMAN; INNER CELL MASS; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENCY; PRDM14 GENE; PRIMORDIAL GERM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; HUMANS; MICE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84901190070     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: 13624326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.04.003     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Evans M.J., Kaufman M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981, 292:154-156.
2. Martin G.R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981, 78:7634-7638.
3. Bradley A., et al. Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 1984, 309:255-256.
4. Thomson J.A., et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998, 282:1145-1147.
5. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126:663-676.
6. Takahashi K., et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131:861-872.
7. Murry C.E., Keller G. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell 2008, 132:661-680.
8. Nichols J., Smith A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 4:487-492.
9. Brons I.G., et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007, 448:191-195.
10. Tesar P.J., et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007, 448:196-199.
11. Rossant J. The impact of developmental biology on pluripotent stem cell research: successes and challenges. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:20-23.
12. Matsui Y., et al. Derivation of pluripotential embryonic stem cells from murine primordial germ cells in culture. Cell 1992, 70:841-847.
13. Saitou M., Yamaji M. Primordial germ cells in mice. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4:a008375.
14. Saitou M., et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse pre-implantation development and primordial germ cells. Development 2012, 139:15-31.
15. Ma Z., et al. Sequence-specific regulator Prdm14 safeguards mouse ESCs from entering extraembryonic endoderm fates. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:120-127.
16. Yamaji M., et al. PRDM14 ensures naive pluripotency through dual regulation of signaling and epigenetic pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12:368-382.
17. Grabole N., et al. Prdm14 promotes germline fate and naive pluripotency by repressing FGF signalling and DNA methylation. EMBO Rep. 2013, 14:629-637.
18. Tsuneyoshi N., et al. PRDM14 suppresses expression of differentiation marker genes in human embryonic stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 367:899-905.
19. Chia N.Y., et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals determinants of human embryonic stem cell identity. Nature 2010, 468:316-320.
20. Yamaji M., et al. Critical function of Prdm14 for the establishment of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:1016-1022.
21. Nakaki F., et al. Induction of mouse germ-cell fate by transcription factors in vitro. Nature 2013, 501:222-226.
22. Hohenauer T., Moore A.W. The Prdm family: expanding roles in stem cells and development. Development 2012, 139:2267-2282.
23. Jenuwein T., Allis C.D. Translating the histone code. Science 2001, 293:1074-1080.
24. Pinheiro I., et al. Prdm3 and Prdm16 are H3K9me1 methyltransferases required for mammalian heterochromatin integrity. Cell 2012, 150:948-960.
25. Margueron R., Reinberg D. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature 2011, 469:343-349.
26. Chan Y.S., et al. A PRC2-dependent repressive role of PRDM14 in human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming. Stem Cells 2013, 31:682-692.
27. Burton A., et al. Single-cell profiling of epigenetic modifiers identifies PRDM14 as an inducer of cell fate in the mammalian embryo. Cell Rep. 2013, 5:687-701.
28. Wu H., Zhang Y. Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 2014, 156:45-68.
29. Okashita N., et al. PRDM14 promotes active DNA demethylation through the Ten-eleven translocation (TET)-mediated base excision repair pathway in embryonic stem cells. Development 2014, 141:269-280.
30. Liu C., et al. Prdm14 acts upstream of islet2 transcription to regulate axon growth of primary motoneurons in zebrafish. Development 2012, 139:4591-4600.
31. Kurimoto K., et al. An improved single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:e42.
32. Yan L., et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:1131-1139.
33. Xue Z., et al. Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature 2013, 500:593-597.
34. Assou S., et al. A meta-analysis of human embryonic stem cells transcriptome integrated into a web-based expression atlas. Stem Cells 2007, 25:961-973.
35. Yabuta Y., et al. Gene expression dynamics during germline specification in mice identified by quantitative single-cell gene expression profiling. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 75:705-716.
36. Chambers I., et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 2007, 450:1230-1234.
37. Hayashi K., et al. Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 3:391-401.
38. Toyooka Y., et al. Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture. Development 2008, 135:909-918.
39. Young R.A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 2011, 144:940-954.
40. Kunath T., et al. FGF stimulation of the Erk1/2 signalling cascade triggers transition of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from self-renewal to lineage commitment. Development 2007, 134:2895-2902.
41. Niwa H., et al. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature 2009, 460:118-122.
42. Martello G., et al. Identification of the missing pluripotency mediator downstream of leukaemia inhibitory factor. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2561-2574.
43. Do D.V., et al. A genetic and developmental pathway from STAT3 to the OCT4-NANOG circuit is essential for maintenance of ICM lineages in vivo. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1378-1390.
44. Ye S., et al. Embryonic stem cell self-renewal pathways converge on the transcription factor Tfcp2l1. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2548-2560.
45. Martello G., et al. Esrrb is a pivotal target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 axis regulating embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11:491-504.
46. Ying Q.L., et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 2008, 453:519-523.
47. Marks H., et al. The transcriptional and epigenomic foundations of ground state pluripotency. Cell 2012, 149:590-604.
48. Leitch H.G., et al. Naive pluripotency is associated with global DNA hypomethylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:311-316.
49. Ficz G., et al. FGF signaling inhibition in ESCs drives rapid genome-wide demethylation to the epigenetic ground state of pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:351-359.
50. Habibi E., et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:360-369.
51. Borgel J., et al. Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:1093-1100.
52. Payer B., et al. Tsix RNA and the germline factor, PRDM14, link X reactivation and stem cell reprogramming. Mol. Cell 2013, 52:805-818.
53. Lister R., et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 2009, 462:315-322.
54. Boyer L.A., et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2005, 122:947-956.
55. Lu X., et al. SON connects the splicing-regulatory network with pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:1141-1152.
56. Kunarso G., et al. Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:631-634.
57. Gafni O., et al. Derivation of novel human ground state naive pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2013, 504:282-286.
58. Chan Y.S., et al. Induction of a human pluripotent state with distinct regulatory circuitry that resembles preimplantation epiblast. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:663-675.
59. Ware C.B., et al. Derivation of naive human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:4484-4489.
60. Ginsburg M., et al. Primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo during gastrulation. Development 1990, 110:521-528.
61. Saitou M., et al. A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice. Nature 2002, 418:293-300.
62. Ohinata Y., et al. Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature 2005, 436:207-213.
63. Ohinata Y., et al. A signaling principle for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Cell 2009, 137:571-584.
64. Aramaki S., et al. A mesodermal factor, T, specifies mouse germ cell fate by directly activating germline determinants. Dev. Cell 2013, 27:516-529.
65. Kurimoto K., et al. Complex genome-wide transcription dynamics orchestrated by Blimp1 for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1617-1635.
66. Hayashi K., et al. Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Cell 2011, 146:519-532.
67. Hayashi K., et al. Offspring from oocytes derived from in vitro primordial germ cell-like cells in mice. Science 2012, 338:971-975.
68. Seki Y., et al. Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev. Biol. 2005, 278:440-458.
69. Magnusdottir E., et al. A tripartite transcription factor network regulates primordial germ cell specification in mice. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:905-915.
70. Hackett J.A., et al. Synergistic mechanisms of DNA demethylation during transition to ground-state pluripotency. Stem Cell Rep. 2013, 1:518-531.
71. Smallwood S.A., et al. Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:811-814.
72. Smith Z.D., et al. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 2012, 484:339-344.
73. Okamoto I., et al. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 2004, 303:644-649.
74. Seisenberger S., et al. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol. Cell 2012, 48:849-862.
75. Tan S.S., et al. X-chromosome inactivation occurs at different times in different tissues of the post-implantation mouse embryo. Nat. Genet. 1993, 3:170-174.
76. Kobayashi H., et al. High-resolution DNA methylome analysis of primordial germ cells identifies gender-specific reprogramming in mice. Genome Res. 2013, 23:616-627.
77. Hackett J.A., et al. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 2013, 339:448-452.
78. Kagiwada S., et al. Replication-coupled passive DNA demethylation for the erasure of genome imprints in mice. EMBO J. 2013, 32:340-353.
79. Ohno R., et al. A replication-dependent passive mechanism modulates DNA demethylation in mouse primordial germ cells. Development 2013, 140:2892-2903.
80. Tachibana M., et al. G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:1779-1791.
81. Tachibana M., et al. Histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP form heteromeric complexes and are both crucial for methylation of euchromatin at H3-K9. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:815-826.
82. Seki Y., et al. Cellular dynamics associated with the genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming in migrating primordial germ cells in mice. Development 2007, 134:2627-2638.
83. Liang G., et al. Cooperativity between DNA methyltransferases in the maintenance methylation of repetitive elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:480-491.
84. Chen T., et al. Establishment and maintenance of genomic methylation patterns in mouse embryonic stem cells by Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:5594-5605.
85. Gillich A., et al. Epiblast stem cell-based system reveals reprogramming synergy of germline factors. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 10:425-439.
86. McWilliam H., et al. Analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:W597-W600.
87. Smith Z.D., Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14:204-220.
88. Wossidlo M., et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:241.
89. Gu T.P., et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 2011, 477:606-610.
90. Yamaguchi S., et al. Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature 2012, 492:443-447.
91. Yamaguchi S., et al. Role of Tet1 in erasure of genomic imprinting. Nature 2013, 504:460-464.
92. Carofino B.L., et al. A mouse model for inducible overexpression of Prdm14 results in rapid-onset and highly penetrant T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Dis. Model Mech. 2013, 6:1494-1506.
93. Dettman E.J., Justice M.J. The zinc finger SET domain gene Prdm14 is overexpressed in lymphoblastic lymphomas with retroviral insertions at Evi32. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3823.
94. Dettman E.J., et al. Prdm14 initiates lymphoblastic leukemia after expanding a population of cells resembling common lymphoid progenitors. Oncogene 2011, 30:2859-2873.
95. Hu M., et al. Distinct epigenetic changes in the stromal cells of breast cancers. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:899-905.
96. Moelans C.B., et al. Molecular profiling of invasive breast cancer by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification-based copy number analysis of tumor suppressor and oncogenes. Mod. Pathol. 2010, 23:1029-1039.
97. Nishikawa N., et al. Gene amplification and overexpression of PRDM14 in breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2007, 67:9649-9657.
98. Ruark E., et al. Identification of nine new susceptibility loci for testicular cancer, including variants near DAZL and PRDM14. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:686-689.
99. Steenbergen R.D., et al. Methylation-specific digital karyotyping of HPV16E6E7-expressing human keratinocytes identifies novel methylation events in cervical carcinogenesis. J. Pathol. 2013, 231:53-62.
100. Zhang T., et al. High expression of PRDM14 correlates with cell differentiation and is a novel prognostic marker in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Med. Oncol. 2013, 30:605.
101. Bedi D., et al. Delivery of siRNA into breast cancer cells via phage fusion protein-targeted liposomes. Nanomedicine 2011, 7:315-323.